Shades of Grey: A disturbing follow up to our story on allegedly false sex charges

The accuser who claimed she was raped by liberal PR pro Trevor FitzGibbon (above) has now retracted her allegations. But where does FitzGibbon go to get his reputation back?

The accuser “retracts and withdraws” her statements against the man she accused: Trevor FitzGibbon.

When we reported our Full Measure cover story “Shades of Grey,” we explained the risk of how the #MeToo environment can be weaponized. Dishonest figures can accuse their enemies of sexual abuse and hope that “they will be believed,” as victims, with few questions asked.

In our story, we profiled the story of the liberal public relations agent Trevor FitzGibbon.

Visit The Sharyl Attkisson Store today

Shop Now

Unique gifts for independent thinkers

Proceeds benefit independent journalism

FitzGibbon claimed he was falsely accused of rape as part of a large smear campaign, possibly to controversialize him for his support of Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton, and also for his representation of entities some on the left targeted, such as WikiLeaks, Julian Assange and Bradley (later Chelsea) Manning.

Trevor FitzGibbon was smeared by sex allegations that were never prosecuted, just like his client, Julian Assange; and WikiLeaks associate Jacob Applebaum.

FitzGibbon, like Julian Assange, was hit with sex accusations yet never prosecuted. The accusations came after internal documents from a government contractor showed an organized campaign to target and controversialize Assange, WikiLeaks and those associated with the group.

FitzGibbon admitted sexual contact with Radack, but claimed it was a consensual affair. He turned over to police sexually explicit photos and text messages she allegedly sent to him. He also eventually sued Radack (who declined our interview request due to the pending litigation).

FitzGibbon alleged that he and Radack had a consensual relationship. He produced photos and text message to police and in court.

The charges against FitzGibbon, a relative unknown, were oddly picked up by international news outlets such as The New York Times, Huffington Post, The Guardian, The Washington Post and other liberal publications that are often “on narrative,” such as The Nation, Slate and Medium.

Fitzgibbon says that as a result of the publicity branding him as a criminal or predator, his reputation was destroyed and he lost his business and his career opportunities.

Now, an interesting development.

On Friday, Radack issued a retraction of “every allegation” she has ” ever made against Fitzgibbon.”

Watch the original Full Measure report at the link below:

Below is a transcript of our original Full Measure report:

From the fall of Hollywood’s Harvey Weinstein to the political demise of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, there’s no shortage of sexual abuse allegations against famous men. The MeToo movement has liberated women to talk about long-tolerated misconduct. But it’s also led to whispers about the grey area between improper harassment and criminal assault. And questions about whether it’s now easier for people to get smeared by unproven — or even false— allegations. Today’s cover story is: Shades of Grey.

FitzGibbon: If you’ve got two believable stories, you’ve got— you can take anybody down.

Trevor FitzGibbon claims it happened to him. His story begins in December 2015, when he ran his own progressive PR firm and got a fateful call from his company’s vice president.

FitzGibbon: He said, “You have a problem.” And I said, “What’s wrong?” He said, “Well, in the past 48 hours, H.R. has gotten six phone calls all accusing you of sexual harassment.” And my heart kind of fell.

Before that call, FitzGibbon had angered some fellow liberals for his support of Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton and for representing clients connected to WikiLeaks. He represented Bradley Manning— who passed classified materials to WikiLeaks. Edward Snowden— the government whistleblower WikiLeaks once helped. The journalist Snowden leaked to: Glenn Greenwald And he represented WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange. The WikiLeaks connection will come into play later. FitzGibbon says after the HR phone call, before he even knew who his accusers were, they had gone to the national press.

FitzGibbon: And it’s really interesting to see the Huffington Post because at first they say it was harassment. A few hours later it was assault. And then, that got spun into rape culture.

Inside of 2 weeks— FitzGibbon’s staff had turned on him, his company shut down. With help from feminist lawyer Gloria Allred, three women filed criminal complaints. One of them, attorney Jesselyn Radack, claimed FitzGibbon— “touched her breast” against her will, then days later, when she met up with him at a hotel, raped her.

FitzGibbon: It was 100 percent consensual.

Sharyl: You did have sexual relations with her?

FitzGibbon: Yes but that was 100 percent consensual.

Here’s where shades of grey color the picture. FitzGibbon admits to “inappropriate behavior” toward female employees, and to cheating on his wife with Radack, but nothing criminal. Evidence he gave prosecutors included friendly sexual text messages and photos allegedly sent by Radack before and after the alleged assaults.

FitzGibbon: Text messages, photos that she sent me after the first alleged assault took place. And then afterwards, being very happy.

After reviewing the text messages and conducting a lengthy investigation, prosecutors “declined to file criminal charges.”

Sharyl: So for a year you lived under the cloud of possible prosecution for rape?

FitzGibbon: Yes.

Sharyl: And what happened in that timeframe to you?

FitzGibbon: I couldn’t defend myself in the press. I was vilified in the national media and on social media and the accusers— and whatever political machine came after me— used it to poison the water to make it almost impossible for me to get work.

Sharyl: You lost your business.

FitzGibbon: I lost the business, lost my home.

Attorney Nicole Smith defends companies against sexual harassment claims and isn’t connected to FitzGibbon’s case. She says the current environment can breed confusion and even false allegations.

Smith: “Me too” movement is phenomenal, but it also is a catchphrase for conduct that really, is every scope of any kind of allegation from a slight that someone might feel that they had been disrespected to actual criminal conduct. So couching all of that conduct in one term is difficult then when you try and unravel individual claims.

Some victims’ advocates say accusers should automatically be believed. The recent conviction of entertainer Bill Cosby for allegations that were 14 years old seemed to make the case. But it’s not always cut and dry.

Sharyl: Are you finding that in this environment of “women should be believed” that there is a downside?

Smith: So often in these cases, I think what we’re faced with is it’s a “He Said, She Said” thing. There’s not a lot of witnesses, if any, ever present. So to say that you’re just always going to believe the woman really doesn’t get us anywhere.

It may also open the possibility that accusations can be weaponized to smear a target for hidden motives. FitzGibbon began to suspect he was the target of a smear right after it was announced he wouldn’t be charged yet he was attacked in a national press release.

FitzGibbon: And that press release was a letter signed by 72 national organizations pledging to never hire me or work with me again.

Sharyl: What did you think of when you saw that?

FitzGibbon: It was one of the first times that I realized that something else is at play.

He’d sold his house, was split from his wife and children, including infant twins and was too discredited to find work. FitzGibbon now thinks powerful people may have come after him because of his PR work for enemies of the mainstream Democratic party and the stateincluding WikiLeaks. In 2016, WikiLeaks published embarrassing insider emails of Hillary Clinton officials and the Democratic National Committee, and WikiLeaks was accused of working with Russia and being pro-Trump. There’s little doubt there are powerful efforts to smear WikiLeaks and its supporters. Government contractors circulated this dossier in 2010, a wide-ranging strategy to combat “The WikiLeaks Threat,” to “sabotage or discredit” WikiLeaks supporters using “social media exploitation” and “disinformation.”

FitzGibbon: It shows the photos and the names of the individuals that were supportive of WikiLeaks or worked with WikiLeaks

Sharyl: And the PR documents specifically discussed going after these people.

FitzGibbon: Ways to discredit to target to smear them.

Several targets were FitzGibbons’ clients. Two were discredited by sex claims alleged in the media but never prosecuted just like FitzGibbon. WikiLeaks’ Assange and a key associate Jacob Appelbaum. With Assange, two women told a journalist that consensual sex with him when he was in Sweden for a speech, turned into rape. A rape investigation hung over his head for seven years—before it was dropped last year. Anonymous accusers started a website to publicly accuse Appelbaum of groping and rape. He was forced out of his job, but also never charged. In the end, a smear campaign can often take advantage of the uncertainty surrounding a case of ‘he said she said.’ And that’s the problem. FitzGibbon asked a lawyers’ disciplinary body to punish Radack for alleged false allegations. They declined, saying the “question was close” but “The truth about what occurred in private is sometimes hard to prove.” Even if someone isn’t ultimately prosecuted, they may find they’re tainted just because this aura of inappropriateness or criminality lingers over them regardless of what the outcome is in the court of law.

Smith: And the costs that they incur, obviously representing themselves in that proceeding.

Sharyl: Did you do any of these things— any of these things that the women said you did?

Fitzgibbon: In regards to being flirtatious?

Sharyl: Anything that they said was inappropriate?

Fitzgibbon: You know, I’ll say this. I was accused of assault and I was accused of first degree assault which is rape. And I didn’t do any of that.

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson’s work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 thoughts on “Shades of Grey: A disturbing follow up to our story on allegedly false sex charges”

  1. Where do the Democrats end and the CIA/FBI/NSA begin? They are all part of the same dreadfully corrupt entity, and quite a few GOP actors are in the same club.

    There was a weird story about a Dating Agency which was set up to target Assange. It was an intricate fraud, which could only have been set up by an intel agency, and it apparently had ties to the Clinton campaign. The bait was $1m to Assange for an interview, which was not taken, and the smear was an allegation of child sex abuse involving a Canadian girl in the Bahamas (or was it Bermuda?), supposedly reported to the police and given a veneer of UN respectability.

    Upon investigation, the dating agency did not really exist, there was no police report, no Canadian child – but this was a serious plan with serious investment behind it. And after it failed, the media were all over it like a rash. Not.

    These people can do anything. They are above the law.

Scroll to Top