Why is the Department of Justice still fighting so hard in Attkisson computer intrusion case?

Sharyl Attkisson (shown here prior to testimony to Congress about her case) with attorney Tab Turner (left) and computer forensics analyst Don Allison (right)

Under ordinary circumstances, the Department of Justice would investigate and prosecute a case against those responsible for an unlawful intrusion into a national journalist’s computers and work.

So why is the Department of Justice is fighting so hard against the Attkisson computer intrusion case — instead of providing justice?

See a video update below.

Read more about the Attkisson computer intrusion case, including a summary of the forensic evidence here.

Visit The Sharyl Attkisson Store today

Shop Now

Unique gifts for independent thinkers

Proceeds benefit independent journalism

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 thoughts on “Why is the Department of Justice still fighting so hard in Attkisson computer intrusion case?”

  1. A victim fighting Enormous Extreme Injustice , Malicious , cruel ,Hate , Racist
    Revenge Prosecution Crimes ? USDOJ Prosecutors presented enormous false fraudulent evidence? Fake crimes charges? Big fraud on Jury ? in extreme violations to my constitutional rights, also civil rights ? Also DOJ Prosecutors Misconduct, atrocious Federal US Judge Misconduct aiding in Prosecutors crimes against US citizens? Actions of treason against US constitution ? Against America ? It’s citizens?
    Dangerous motives of Destroying lives of citizens, also families with children are devastated ?.. due the Criminal coup of law enforcement agencies? , Extreme Misconduct Judges ?. .
    Currently case is pending @ Circuit Appeals Court noted the Enormous false fraudulent evidence, approved stay out orders. Thank Goodness.
    Extreme Injustice happened ! ..

  2. No matter if some one searches for his vital thing, thus he/she needs to be available that
    in detail, so that thing is maintained over here.

  3. Charlie Hawkins

    The answer to that question is easy they are the intruders they should be prosecuted they need it but they are slow walking everything. They really arent looking forward to prison i guess.

  4. “Outside contractors” includes MI5, MI6 and GCHQ.
    Clinton, the Bushes and Obama outsourced more than the US economy – they outsourced illegal spying to the British, who then laundered it and routed it back to the FBI and thence to the CIA, DIA and White House. Via GCHQ, the spooks were able to rinse the spying through 5 Eyes,

  5. Just wondering whether you have been in touch with Barr? His mandate is to discover how far back illegal spying against political targets have been going on. I wouldn’t rely on your blog or your TV show to get your message across. Your case is precisely what he is after. He has access to your FBI file. Contact his office.

  6. I saw no accountability within the Obama administration for spying on James Rosen. As with all criminal activity by the Obama administration, the truth is slow walked, and when it eventually surfaces, the response will always be: “Nothing to see here, move along”. A tactic perfected by Hillary Clinton throughout her entire public life.

Scroll to Top