About The Author
Sharyl Attkisson
Emmy-Award Winning Investigative Journalist, New York Times Bestselling Author, Host of Sinclair's Full Measure
Related Posts
(POLL) Gov. Kristi Noem is top guess for who will be Trump’s running mate
By
Sharyl Attkisson
/ March 28, 2024
Given a list of choices, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem is the top guess as to who Donald Trump will choose as his running mate. That’s according to our latest…
(POLL) 60% now agree with Trump: media are ‘enemy of the people’
By
Sharyl Attkisson
/ March 27, 2024
After major news organizations distorted former President Donald Trump’s comments about a “bloodbath” for the auto industry, a majority of voters now agree with Trump that the news media are…
The Criminal Prosecution System in the USA is severely damaged. The Legal System, as it is referred to is in a state of chaos. See cases involving KIRK BLOODSWORTH and CRAIG COLEY. A problem with the FACIAL RECOGNITION technology is that its use is justified by the potential visit from a “criminal” who wanders into its sphere. What if the alleged criminal didn’t commit the crime in the first place? What if the technology identifies someone who has already been victimized by a failed legal system and is then re-victimized by a technology that bases its very existence on its ability to warn or identify potential dangerous persons? When is it justifiable to use one mistake to commit another? Do two wrongs equal one right? Enormous amounts of information about USA citizens is collected every minute by a government that is out of control. When is enough enough?
AS IT IS SAID (IF YOU BUILD IT THEY WILL COME) AND ALSO TURE (IF THEY HAVE IT THEY WILL ABUSE IT) THIS IS THE CASE WITH ALL OF THE TOOLS THE SYSTEM USE. IF THERE WAS REEL ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEM IN THE SYSTEM .WE THE PUBLIC WOULD HAVE MORE TRUST IN THE SYSTEM AND THEM THAT WORK FOR IT . BUT AS WE HAVE SEEN THESE LAST FEW YEARS IT IS TO BROKEN TO FIX, CANT GO ON AS IT IS . SO WHAT IT THE ANSWER ????
I agree with George. Yes there will be lot of negative response but to breed the best out of every new change, one should understand the change well. Face/image recognition has made it a efficient one in case of security and surveillance under various industries.
Most of the requirements for us from our clients has been to incorporate face recognition in their surveillance system, especially some governing bodies. These solutions are not a treat to the common people but are to those who are already marked by the law. https://www.zerone-consulting.com/Case-Study/Face-Recognition-Supports-Crime-Prevention.html
But surveillance is not the only solution we can think of. Event planners can understand the response of the event, by detecting the emotions of their visitors which is actually an add-on to the face recognition technology. Thus emotion identity, entry pass-less program management etc. are few other solutions which are also not that dangerous to your privacy of the people.
It helps to control gangs apparently. But I wonder if it then turns law enforcement into gangs.