They say a motivated prosecutor can “indict a ham sandwich.” But when it’s the Dept. of Justice and FBI judging their own– it seems like it’s not so easy.
About The Author
Sharyl Attkisson
Emmy-Award Winning Investigative Journalist, New York Times Bestselling Author, Host of Sinclair's Full Measure
Related Posts
(WATCH) Vaccine safety advocate on history of vaccine risks and failures
By
Sharyl Attkisson
/ March 19, 2024
Drawing from her experience as a mother of a vaccine-injured child and her decades-long involvement in vaccine risk awareness and informed consent advocacy, Barbara Loe Fisher offers her insights into…
(WATCH) The Vote
By
Sharyl Attkisson
/ March 18, 2024
Right now, there’s an effort under way to transform the way Americans conduct elections. And as we move forward deep into the 2024 campaign, you’re going to be hearing a…
Not easy or arrogant? You decide.
Another bipartisan aka interadministration(s) protective ineptitude / corruption. But, damn, we’re gonna throw the book at Assange and Snowden and Manning and and and …for exposing the corruption.
The American Republic is in jeopardy when its top law enforcement officers believe they are above the law.
The leaks were always going to be their (FBI’s) undoing. There are clear crimes by the FBI with serious enough consequences. It’s amazing the results that have been achieved from a single and almost inconsequential leak about the reopening of the Clinton Foundation investigation. They pinned the leak on Page who used her texts to protect herself. Now the leak is pinned on McCabe who has already exposed himself by lying about it earlier. I actually believe McCabe is not lying about Comey authorizing the leak. The only question is whether or not he can prove it. Just like with Page, the attempt to prove that Comey authorized the leak will involve revealing a whole lot more evidence of the entire scheme. It’s a beautiful thing to watch them turn on themselves. It is slow and methodical but very effective.