"Hillary Clinton is nuts. She’s also not far from the Democratic Party mainstream, which has been pushing the same line for years."Mike Taibbi, reporter, Rolling Stone
Former presidential nominee for Democrats, Hillary Clinton, ignited a lot of discussion when she recently stated that other prominent liberals are "Russian assets."
Who does Clinton say has gone over to the red side?
Presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard, a Democrat (who was identified by implication only); and Jill Stein (who ran as an independent candidate in 2016).
Both Gabbard and Stein quickly slammed Clinton's "conspiracy theory."
Clinton also continued pushing the idea that President Trump is a Russian, asset, too.
“[Jill Stein’s] also a Russian asset… Yeah, she’s a Russian asset — I mean, totally. They know they can’t win without a third-party candidate....I don’t know what Putin has on [Trump], whether it’s both personal and financial … I assume it is.”Hillary Clinton, 2016 (D) presidential nominee
Clinton's accusations prompted an article by Mike Taibbi in Rolling Stone who writes, "Hillary Clinton is nuts. She’s also not far from the Democratic Party mainstream, which has been pushing the same line for years."
The following is an excerpt of the article in Rolling Stone
Less than a week before Clinton’s outburst, the New York Times — once a symbol of stodgy, hyper-cautious reporting — ran a feature called, “What, Exactly, is Tulsi Gabbard Up To?” The piece speculated about the “suspicious activity” surrounding Gabbard’s campaign, using quotes from the neoconservative think-tank, the Alliance For Securing Democracy, to speculate about Gabbard’s Russian support.
(Read the rest of the article by clicking the link below)
Helen Corey says
HClinton may have given Tulsy Gabbard free publicity with her comment about Gabbard being Russian asset OR Clinton may have been trying to take spotlight off Shifty Schiff’s faux impeachment of President Trump. You never know what HClinton’s up to.
GEORGE EADY says
THIS IS THE HILLARY CLINTON HAND BOOK. GO OUT AND DO IT . AND THEN SAY THEY (RNC ) DID IT. HILLARY IS AN ASSET. FOR CHINA ,RUSSA,IRAN, AND ANY OTHERS THAT HACKED HER EMAILS .SHE DID THIS CRAP BECAUSE SHE LOST IN 2016 . YES THIS SORRY BITCH IS A SPY . MANY DIED FRON HER ACTIONS (EMAIL ) WE WONT KNOW THE NUMBER,S . AND FOR HER TO MAKE THE EMAIL THING TO BE ANY THING BUT A SALE OUT OF AMERICA . SHOWS HOW SORRY SHE IS . THIS IS ONE SPY THAT SHOULD GET LIKE IN PRISON . BUT HILLARY IS IN THE HEART OF DEEP STATE . THERE PLAN IS TO OVER THROW AMERICA , OPEN BORDERS . GETTING OUR GUNS . THAT IS TO EASY TO SEE . UNLESS THERE DUMB AS AROCK. TRUMP IS THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN STOP THEM. THEY CANT WIN THE OFFICE .AND YES TRUMP HAS MADE MANY MISSTACKES . BUT HE IS NOT A POLICICIANS . WITH 10 TO 50 YR OF TRAINING .HOPEING THE REEL DEMCORATES SEE THERE PARTY IS HIJACKED .AND VOTE FOR TRUMP TO SAVE AMERICA AS WE ALL KNOW HER
Bob Smith says
The Rolling Stone article is spot on.
This RUSSIA!RUSSIA!RUSSIA! narrative has not only gotten old, and a distraction, but borderline silly.
What they dont want to admit, what they cannot admit, is 1) Clinton is not likeable, 2) they ran a poor campaign.
NPR did a piece questioning how many times can the DNC re-introduce Clinton.
A PRI piece post election, a Democrat strategist stated people who voted for Obama in 2012, voted for Trump in 2016. They voted for change.
I think people made up their minds about 5minutes after it was decided who the Presidential candidates were (Clinton and Trump).
I dont use Facebook so I was never under the influence of Russian interference.
If anyone had a bigger influence in the election, it was MSM.