Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard recently filed a lawsuit against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, claiming that Clinton defamed her by suggesting that she is a “Russian asset.”
Clinton did not specifically mention Gabbard’s name during the podcast last October, but she stated that the Republicans were grooming a Democratic presidential candidate for a third-party bid and that the candidate was a “favorite of the Russians.” Clinton went on to say, “..she’s a Russian asset. Yeah, she’a a Russian asset, I mean totally.”
The Epoch Times reports that Clinton’s office had not yet responded to its request for comment on the lawsuit, but when asked if Clinton was referring to Gabbard, a Clinton spokesperson told CNN, “If the nesting doll fits….”
Gabbard is reportedly seeking around $50 million in damages.
Click on the link below to read more at Epoch Times:
If the Army actually thought Tulsi was a Russian Asset, wouldn’t she, at a minimum, be in jail for life…if not executed….that’s not the type of casual accusation you just lob at someone. Especially from someone who’s had HRC’s security clearance and connections in the intelligence community.
Let’s assume it’s true, that she’s a Russian Asset. Aren’t there some sort of campaign laws that spell out that you cannot run for President if you’re a foreign agent? This last question is tongue in cheek but I find it appalling not so much that HRC made that accusation as much as many on the left are buying what HRC is selling.