When the media purposefully controversializes issues, life-saving facts become harder to find. Hear how Facebook and other self-appointed censors are making certain facts and views hard to find.
As part of today's podcast, hear Democrats and Republicans discuss getting bullied out of investigating issues involving the safety of vaccines and other medicine.
Also, hear the former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine say that much information in medical journals today cannot be believed due to improper influence over studies and articles by pharmaceutical industry.
Watching full measure during the covid-19 social distancing Etc, I am curious as to what is on the mantle behind you when you are on camera during your reporting that I so enjoy? Are the Emmys? Your fireplace is lovely I'm so happy you turn it on to do your reporting that I see on Sunday
Yes Emmys! 🙂
For investigation into Red Cross fraud involving 9/11 donations...
The Bush administration's bait and switch on TARP...
Follow the Money on Congressional spending...
Undercover investigation into Republican fundraising and K Street lobbying...
Investigation into Fast and Furious...
It says “deactivated” and won’t allow us to donate
Thank you, it is working for me. Can you try: https://www.gofundme.com/f/sharyl-attkisson-4th-am-litigation
As you're no doubt aware, most of the silicon valley tyrants are actively deleting both posts and posters they do not like, especially when the information conveyed goes against the NWO agenda.
What do you think of this idea?
No one is born with an unalienable right to form a corporate entity; it must be applied for, and is only conditionally granted, that is, if the fictional person to be established can be claimed to be "in the public interest."
First, who makes that decision, and is it enforceable against corporate entities if their continued operation is deemed no LONGER "in the public interest"?
Second, all officeholders are required to take an oath of fealty to the US Constitution, which not only defines what powers they might lawfully exercise, but which they may NOT.
So how can it be that corporate entities are allowed to trample upon the Bill of Rights(specifically, the First) when our sworn public servants are NOT(in theory, at least)?
Finally, what do you think would be the effect upon this censorship should a corporate charter be yanked/terminated, and the entity forced to reorganize as either a partnership or a sole proprietorship if they wish to continue doing business in the United States?