The head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has announced a three or four day hearing to consider the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett will begin October 12.
Read the announcement below:
WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) this evening announced that the hearing to consider the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to serve as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States will begin October 12, 2020.
The hearing will last three to four days, using the format the committee has followed for recent Supreme Court nominees. Opening statements by Judiciary Committee members and the nominee will occur on Monday, October 12. The questioning of Judge Barrett will begin on Tuesday, October 13. Testimony by those who know Judge Barrett the best and legal experts is expected to follow.
Members of the media seeking to cover the hearing should contact their respective Senate Press Galleries. Chairman Graham’s statement about Judge Barrett can be found here.
Background
Judge Barrett was nominated by President Trump and confirmed with a bipartisan vote to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 2017.
Judge Barrett has a sterling academic and legal background, having clerked for Judge Laurence Silberman on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals and Justice Antonin Scalia on the U.S. Supreme Court, later becoming a distinguished professor at Notre Dame Law School where she taught from 2002 to 2017. Her 2017 confirmation was supported by every member of her Supreme Court clerk class, including the clerks of Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, O’Connor, Souter and others.
Judge Barrett is a native of South Bend, Indiana, and a mother of seven children.
The President did his job. Now it's up to the Senate. Nothing about Roe vs Wade will change until Congress applies Constitutional Rights to the unborn. If it is overturned, abortion will still be legal in every state where anti-abortion laws have been struck down by the Supreme Court or where it's been legal for decades.
Thank you Sharyl,
Judge Barrett will be a wellcomed adition to the supreme court. All of America should be proud of her and what she will bring to our country, especially at times when her talents adn patriotism is needed.
October 12 seems to be too far out. That's cutting it too close for confirmation before Nov. 3. The Dems always have dirty tricks up their sleeves.
Exactly. Let get it done ASAP!
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/judge-amy-comey-barrett-recently-approved-democrat-covid-19-lockdown-policies/
Barrett is a Trojan horse
https://thecommonsenseshow.com/conspiracy-tragedy-united-states/how-can-there-be-justice-trump-supreme-court-when-they-tolerated-murder-one-their-own-protect
-RB
I agree. They should start by Oct 1. Although the rational might be that hearings later in Oct and a confirmation by Nov 1 gives Blacks Love Murder less time to blow the country up. But I'm guessing.
Why two weeks? They should be started this Monday, tomorrow, and concluded by this coming Friday.
WHY is the Senate having hearings?? To allow the demonKKKrats to attempt to destroy another fine candidate with unproven smears??
Come on, McTurtle - if you have the votes, THEN VOTE!! Do NOT put Barrett through this demonKKKrat-driven charade!
Why do we have to wait two weeks? That is the middle of October just two weeks before election. Are the R's again the Stupid Party? Trying to throw the vote to after the Election?
Sharyl,
Re: CORRUPT Big Medicine—far beyond corrupt courts
(( Marxian pubic ed. teaches : no right or wrong—no wonder . . . ! ))
Recall that Harvard U. had been caught switching the main cause of heart disease from SUGAR to saturated fats—and MSM stifled the report.
Recall that mortuaries were caught harvesting tissue and bones from corpses, to be sold. Who was buying the products? Big Medicine’s research departments and its tissue-grafting clinics! 1,000 bodies cut up for sale can reap about $6,000,000 in today’s market (( Babycided tissues reap more; my term, used to strike REALITY into the minds of “abortionist” women and men ))—and MSM continues to stifle reporting about it, to this day.
—Makes one want track care of loved one’s body from hospital to grave.
-RB
P.S.
Left-journalism hid from the public
this eye-opening news :
Missouri voter roles had been hacked,
so it hired a firm to track down the
source.
The firm traced the hack to that “3rd”
Agency (( see post referencing that )),
which explains this MAJOR HACK
being blamed on RUSSIA, RUSSIA,
RUSSIA—by leftists (( by Neocons )).
Why ? :
—Illuminism seeks war!, to advance
sacrifice to . . .
To better understand Marxism/Socialism/Communism,
study my 1996 essay (( copy to paper, then nix it ))
-----
©1996
— MARXISM Drives America's Social and Trade Policies —
"The doctrine of modern Communism, which is often concealed under the
most seductive trappings, is in substance based on the principles of dialectical
and historical materialism previously advocated by Karl Marx . . . Communism is
particularly characterized by the rejection of any link that binds woman to the
family and the home, and her emancipation is proclaimed as a basic principle.
She is withdrawn from the family and the care of her children, to be thrust
instead into public life and collective production under the same conditions
as man. The care of home and children then devolves upon the collectivity
. . . [Communism] subverts the social order" (( discover which pope wrote that,
and when ))
—and American civilization rapidly declines,
accordingly (( read my essay, "Defining 'Civil Society'
Down by Defeating Reason with Emotion" )).
Political affiliation falls on a continuum from
extreme LEFTISM (( intrusive, doting maternalism )) to
extreme RIGHTISM (( detached, uncaring paternalism )),
where extreme leftism (s)mothers the citizenry with
character-destroying welfare while extreme rightism
champions independence and self-reliance to the point
of mercilessness (( study my essay, "Trucfemism" )).
Moderate maternalism equates with a nurturing
concern and intrusive attentiveness (( advocating
sharing and social interdependence )) while moderate
paternalism equates with instructive detachment and
inattention (( advocating private property and self-
reliance )). The extremes of either one are
destructive while both in moderation may contribute
much to keeping good civil society. Today, America
and all other Western democracies suffer from extreme
maternalism.
— A Hellishly Bad Idea —
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels suffered the
emotional pain of witnessing children slaving under
the yoke of 19th-century industrialization. They
turned their deep feelings into a hellishly bad idea,
which idea to date has caused the unnecessary deaths
of from 90 to 120 million people; and one may
attribute to it many more millions, if one counts
those who died at the hands of the socialist Nazis--
the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
It amazes what convoluted thinking leftists go
through in trying to dissociate Hitler from leftism—
dissociate liberal Democrats' Socialism from the
insane works of Hitler, as if socialists' maternalism
can't employ fascist tactics (( Lenin, Stalin, Mao Tse-
tung, Pol Pot )), and as if the sick feminism that
possessed Marx and Engels wasn't working in the
Nazis' opposition to capitalism (( the leftists
especially don't want you to know that the Nazis
opposed capitalism )), opposition to intellectual
freedom (( all Marxist tyrants were staunch book
burners )) and opposition to Communism, which brand
of socialism the Nazis rejected for only nationalistic
purposes.
It's said that all communists are socialist but
not all socialists are communist. Nonetheless,
Hitler's philosophy and his socialist movement were
a hybrid offspring of Marx/Engels' emotional
collaboration ( The Communist Manifesto ) and Germany's
right-wing pursuit of material independence and
restored national pride. The Nazis' genocidal
machinations were characteristically maternal and
socialistic - a means to the goal of making Germany
a workers' paradise - while the cross-border advances
sprang from angry rightists' extreme paternalism; a
drive to show the world who's boss after the
humiliating defeat in WW I.
The only difference between Hitler's brand of
socialism and, say, Marxian Ted Kennedy's is that Hitler's
planned utopia was for only the Master Race while
Kennedy's is for the world. One might say that the
Nazis were selfish socialists, or National
Socialists, and suffered a strange hermaphroditic
blend of maternalism and paternalism—maternalism
being the dominant mind for exterminating the Jews
because only a feminine mind is capable of such
emotional rage.
All the other great genocidal maniacs of this
century were Marxist sympathizers—maternalistic
killers: Lenin, Stalin, Mao Tse-tung, Pol Pot, and
more recently, communistic military leaders in
Serbia. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned—or
a maternal man angered.
Maternalism is the creature that infected the
mind of Marx and Engels. Maternalism is the same
creature driving today's liberal Democrats in America
—and which drove the Nazis to insanity. Maternalism
is the creature possessing all leftists who conceive
philosophies opposed to Man's innate drive to pursue
a happy life through individual ( moral ) liberty. I call the
mind of maternalism "emoting feminine mind." It is
the destroyer of civilizations.
In my essay on Maternalism, I present this
telling formula: Maternalism = Emotionalism =
Irrationalism = Feminism = Marxism. The root of
every Marxist-based theory is Maternalism:
an emotionally irrational response
to adverse conditions, which require
rational analysis for remedying, but
which rational thinking the maternal
mind is incapable of exercising
because her emotions are too strong
and block sound reasoning [[ Both men
and women have a maternal mind (emot-
ing feminine mind) and a paternal one
(rational masculine mind); a conflic-
ted duality, but with one dominant
nature that's mostly gender-corres-
pondent: paternal men and maternal
women ]].
For a socialist, his/her strong emotions
concerning bad social conditions, such as seeing
child slaving over machinery in a factory, demand
immediate remedy to soothe the bad feelings (their
drive to feel strongly about anything notwithstand-
ing). Such a remedy might include destroying the
factory, or denying the child's family the meager
but lifesaving wage, or executing everyone but the
abused children.
Such knee-jerk responses have been repeated again
and again in less direct ways in our courts and
legislatures these past sixty years; the worst of
them being the 1964 Civil Rights Act (( it unconstitu-
tionally abridged the rights of the majority by
providing special rights for a racially incompatible
minority )), the 1965 Immigration Act (( invited diverse
races to overrun and dangerously divide the consti-
tutionally protected majority that opposed such
immigration )), and the Democrats' Great Society Pro-
grams (( confiscatory taxation of the productive major-
ity for nurturing and growing an unproductive poverty
class )), all of which have badly damaged America's
social infrastructure.
— Karl Marx and Free Trade —
Marxism is at the root of certain officials' push
towards installing the mechanism for achieving Global
Economic Socialism: INTERNATIONALISM, which success-
ful implementation requires that WHITE CIVIL SOCIETY
in America be subject to the FORCED INTEGRATION of
diverse races—using open borders, multiculturalism,
multilingualism, and FREE TRADE to diminish whites'
political and cultural strength; the State Depart-
ment's "Diversity Program," in which it searches
for UNDER-REPRESENTED MINORITIES from around the
world, to plant in white communities, is integral to
the effort (( State has announced plans on April 22
for bringing over 3000 more Laotians )).
Karl Marx valued free trade as a step towards
achieving the workers' paradise. In a speech given
to the Democratic Association in Brussels, in 1848,
Marx said:
"We are told that free trade would
create an international division
of labor, and thereby give to each
country the production which is
most in harmony with its natural
advantages [what liberal economists
today refer to as "comparative
advantage"] . . . [which] breaks up
old nationalities and pushes the
antagonism of the proletariat and
the bourgeoisie to the extreme point.
It is in this revolutionary sense
alone, gentlemen, that I vote in
favour of free trade."
Marx was correct in his assessment of free
trade. The proletariat (( industrial working class )) in
America is suffering great fear and seething with
anger at the loss of America's industrial base while
a significant part of the bourgeois class of white
collar workers is stunned by its unprecedented rout
from the workforce, to accommodate both the incoming
low-wage guest workers from Third World countries and
the outsourcing of jobs to India, China, Pakistan, and the
Philippines.
Bob Dole, Newt Gingrich, Dick Armey, Bill
Clinton, and their compatriot vulture capitalists in
multinational corporations have engineered the
beginning of the end of America's middle class with
passage of NAFTA, GATT and accedence to the WTO
governing body.
They're planning a North America Free Trade Zone
to complete the plan, which necessarily will force
America's standard of living to decline towards that
lowest common denominator within the trade zone--
Mexico. If you wish to see your children's future,
travel in Mexico (( or in "Hispanic" parts of L.A. ))--
but don't get in a car accident or altercation in
Mexico; you'll have a very hard time escaping the
low-culture corruption there.
Your tax dollars are being used to defeat you—
to support the invaders and destroy your nation for
Marxism.
Wake up, America!
-Rick