NASA announces it's changing "insensitive, actively harmful" nicknames for cosmic objects.
"Eskimo Nebula"
NASA will no longer refer to planetary nebulaย NGC 2392,ย the glowing remains of a Sun-like star that is blowing off its outer layers at the end of its life,ย as the โEskimo Nebula.โ โEskimoโ is widely viewed as a colonial term with a racist history, imposed on the indigenous people of Arctic regions.
"Siamese Twins Galaxy"
NASA will also no longer use the term โSiamese Twins Galaxyโ to refer toย NGC 4567ย andย NGC 4568, a pair of spiral galaxies found in the Virgo Galaxy Cluster.
As the scientific community works to identify and address systemic discrimination and inequality in all aspects of the field, it has become clear that certain cosmic nicknames are not only insensitive, but can be actively harmful. NASA is examining its use of unofficial terminology for cosmic objects as part of its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.ย
NASA Announcement Sept. 5, 2020
These nicknames and terms may have historical or culture connotations that are objectionable or unwelcoming, and NASA is strongly committed to addressing them.
Stephen Shih, NASA associate administrator for Diversity and Equal Opportunity
Read NASA's announcement in full below:
NASA to Reexamine Nicknames for Cosmic Objects
Distant cosmic objects such as planets, galaxies, and nebulae are sometimes referred to by the scientific community with unofficial nicknames. As the scientific community works to identify and address systemic discrimination and inequality in all aspects of the field, it has become clear that certain cosmic nicknames are not only insensitive, but can be actively harmful. NASA is examining its use of unofficial terminology for cosmic objects as part of its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
As an initial step, NASA will no longer refer to planetary nebula NGC 2392, the glowing remains of a Sun-like star that is blowing off its outer layers at the end of its life, as the โEskimo Nebula.โ โEskimoโ is widely viewed as a colonial term with a racist history, imposed on the indigenous people of Arctic regions. Most official documents have moved away from its use. NASA will also no longer use the term โSiamese Twins Galaxyโ to refer to NGC 4567 and NGC 4568, a pair of spiral galaxies found in the Virgo Galaxy Cluster. Moving forward, NASA will use only the official, International Astronomical Union designations in cases where nicknames are inappropriate.
โI support our ongoing reevaluation of the names by which we refer to astronomical objects,โ said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator of NASAโs Science Mission Directorate. โOur goal is that all names are aligned with our values of diversity and inclusion, and weโll proactively work with the scientific community to help ensure that. Science is for everyone, and every facet of our work needs to reflect that value.โ
Nicknames are often more approachable and public-friendly than official names for cosmic objects, such as Barnard 33, whose nickname "the Horsehead Nebula" invokes its appearance. But often seemingly innocuous nicknames can be harmful and detract from the science.
The Agency will be working with diversity, inclusion, and equity experts in the astronomical and physical sciences to provide guidance and recommendations for other nicknames and terms for review.
"These nicknames and terms may have historical or culture connotations that are objectionable or unwelcoming, and NASA is strongly committed to addressing them," said Stephen Shih, associate administrator for Diversity and Equal Opportunity. "Science depends on diverse contributions, and benefits everyone, so this means we must make it inclusive.โย
Read more by clicking the link below:
Why not call the one Nebula โNancy Pelosi Nebula?โ Sheโs about as nebulous as they come. Plus it is a dying star, just like Nancy!
The whole nation seems to be bending to the will of the Marxist, BLM. America did not become the greatest nation in history by allowing a fringe group of lunatics set the narrative. It really upsets me when government agencies are forced to make changes to history to appease a group of rebellious citizens, who after one success will just move on toward the next conquest. They will never be appeased until they have cancelled all of our traditional institutions.
How do the Eskimos feel about this? Are there any Siamese twins to ask how they feel? I'm sure that's the least of their worries. I bet it never occurred to them to be offended, but go ahead cave to the bully thugs. Way to go NASA. That's the way to handle bullies. God help us all