Freedom from information control: now more important than ever

It’s never been more difficult yet more important to share factual information, scientific studies and viewpoints that are off the narrative of powerful interests. That’s why I’m doubling down on my longstanding efforts to bring such material into the public domain in a way that’s widely accessible. 

As I share this information and views, my goal is to push for an open and free press in line with the promise of America. It doesn’t mean I necessarily agree (or disagree) with a particular shared view or piece of information; I simply see the free dissemination of it as crucial to ensuring powerful political and corporate interests do not successfully control every facet of our lives.

Toward this end, please visit, take part in the unscientific polls there, and join me on Parler. 

Also read my books, the New York Times bestsellers “Stonewalled” and “The Smear”; and preorder my newest book “Slanted: How the news media taught us to love censorship and hate journalism.”

And finally, watch my Sunday TV program “Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson” where we cover news the old fashioned way, airing diverse viewpoints and refusing to censors information that is off-narrative.

You can binge watch my Full Measure cover stories now to see what you’ve been missing by visiting this page:

Visit The Sharyl Attkisson Store today

Shop Now

Unique gifts for independent thinkers

Proceeds benefit independent journalism

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 thoughts on “Freedom from information control: now more important than ever”

  1. Sharyl :

    Copy my report about V I O L E N C E
    in L E F T I S M to paper, then nix it :


    Hey, Lefty!

    Name Right-Wing Mass Murderers

    of the

    20th Century

    – You Stand in the Camp of the Most
    Evil Men in History –

    Most politically left-wing Jews and Gentiles agree with John Kenneth Galbraith’s view of America’s conservatives:

    “The modern conservative
    is engaged in one of
    man’s oldest exercises in
    moral philosophy: that is
    the search for a superior
    moral justification for

    Galbraith was left-wing – i.e., emotion-driven, which means “irrational” – in his evaluations of and advice about America’s political, social, cultural, racial, and financial matters.

    In the tradition of the emotion-driven leftist mind, Galbraith was what reason-driven conservatives name-call, “do-gooder.”

    If you sit down with pen and paper and make a list of the most famous do-gooders of the Twentieth Century, you’ll discover they were all mass murderers, wishing to “crack a few eggs to make an omelet”; that is, they were UTOPIAN-MINDED men on the Left, hell-bent on creating Heaven on Earth through violence and mass murder—in the names of FAIRNESS and EQUALITY.

    And, yes, they were men opposed to Man’s selfishness, hoping to more equally distribute the means for living a comfortable life to everyone—to create a fairer, more equalitarian, near-classless national and/or global society (Note: National socialists conflict with universal socialists, as the former are unwilling to give up their nation-state borders for the open-borders global society that universalists seek to impose).

    Those mass murderers were socialist and/or communist in their politics and engineering schemes; a distinction separated only by the degree of applied totalitarianism, with socialism being less controlling of individuals’ personal affairs than communism—the former being, for most leftists, but a stage towards achieving the latter’s degree of control.

    Can you name them—those left-wing mass murderers?

    Of course, you, like most people, believe Hitler was a right-wing tyrant, rather than the left-wing socialist he and his Nazi Party actually represented. Many political analysts have documented that fact, but their evidence cannot penetrate leftists’ false propaganda about him—about his left-wing, national-socialist movement. And so, to this day, most people mistakenly tag America’s conservatives and conservatism as “Nazis” and “Nazism.”

    [[ Note: Leftists cannot abide being badly tainted by the gas-chamber killings associated with one of their own left-wing comrades, so they deceitfully call Hitler’s Leftism “right-wing”. ]]

    Hitler was a leftist. Can you name the rest in Leftism who committed mass murder during the Twentieth Century?

    Lenin, Stalin, Chairman Mao and Pol Pot were left-wing “do-gooders,” who managed to “break a few eggs” on their march towards a FAIRER world, numbering over 100-million deaths through warring, starvation, torture and firing squads:

    If you see a left-wing
    do-gooder coming
    down the road, fear him!

    The so-called “selfishness” among rightists has done far more to spread wealth – and to effect good civilization – than leftists’ do-gooder social engineering could ever hope to achieve. And, yet, Leftism marches into the 21st Century holding the exact same emotion-driven, do-gooder schemes responsible for such brutal savagery throughout the 20th.

    Now, name those “SELFISH” conservatives who had committed mass murder.

    Hmmm…—and, now, drop your left-wing positions, as you stand there in the camp of the MOST EVIL men in human history. [[ Note: There is much that’s wrong with how Western conservatives and conservatism have applied meritocratic capitalism, but mass murder isn’t one of their failings. Capitalism isn’t to blame for this financial crisis in the West, but CAPITALISM ENSLAVED to and INFECTED by leftists’ socialism/communism is. ]]



  2. P. S.


    This is my deeper analysis of M E N T A L
    ILLNESS in leftists’ socialism/communism :

    — from the collection of my 3000-plus thoughts on the root causes of the West’s steep moral/cultural/financial decline, “Paleoconservative Thoughts To Ponder”:

    2345) Communism is the goal of socialism, which is but a temporary pause in leftists’ forced march of humanity towards hell on earth, about which hell this scribbler has been giving warnings to anyone sympathetic to that cause – to that horrific insanity! – of socialism/communism, which ism’s bottom-line underpinnings are expertly retold by Long Visalo, a returnee to Pol Pot’s communistic Cambodia in 1973, and who gave this horrifying account of an indoctrination seminar for intellectuals at camp K-15, conducted by Khieu Samphan [“Pol Pot: Anatomy of a Nightmare,” by Philip Short, pp. 316-317]: “How do we make a communist revolution? The first thing you have to do is to destroy private property. But private property exists on both the material and the mental plane…To destroy material private property, the appropriate method was the evacuation of towns…But spiritual private property is more dangerous, it comprises everything that you think is ‘yours’, everything that you think exists in relation to yourself—your parents, your family, your wife. Everything of which you say, ‘It’s mine…’ is spiritual private property. Thinking in terms of ‘me’ and ‘my’ is forbidden…The knowledge you have in your head, your ideas, are mental private property, too. To become truly revolutionary, you must…wash your mind clean…So the first thing you must do to make yourself fit to participate in the communist revolution…is to wash your mind…If we can destroy all material and mental private property…people will be equal. The moment you allow private property, one person will have a little more, another a little less, and they are no longer equal. But if you have nothing – zero for him and zero for you – that is true equality…If you permit even the smallest part of private property [and private thinking!], you are no longer as one, and it isn’t communism”…[p. 325, employing George Orwell’s 1984]: “The whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought…In the end we will make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that will be needed will be expressed by exactly one word [no hint of what that one word is here], with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten…Every year fewer and fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller…In fact there will be not thought as we understand it now. Orthodoxy [communist orthodoxy] means NOT THINKING [my emphasis]…Orthodoxy is unconsciousness”; an INSANITY, dear reader, that’s lost on all leftists harboring any hope of goodness and truth being found in socialism/communism, and so extreme in its Utopian pursuit of equality that even to THINK of how beautiful a sunrise is or to smile at the missteps of a toddler at play or to feel even a hint of pleasure from a warming morning sun invites MENTAL INEQUALITY, which necessarily leads to material inequality, according to the leftist Utopians. How dare you to steal a mental pleasure that some comrade, somewhere, cannot equally share with you? There can be no private thoughts! And today’s socialism-/communism-/feminism-driven Left within Western democracies is incrementally leading us there, as today’s fairness-driven leftists are tomorrow’s equality-driven Pol Pots – those Marxian ARCHITECTS and their liberal-Christian and secular-humanist dupes! – who’ll eventually come to TORTURE and/or KILL any opponents of their perfect Marxian equality, and which fact about them ought to horrify any reason-driven person anticipating future results of the Marxists’ DIVERSITY MOVEMENT and requisite FORCED INTEGRATION, which their open-borders immigration policies now demand worldwide.



    Does history rhyme or repeat?

  3. DungianINTP says,

    History repeats, You are not the first nor will be the last lunatic to create a Word Salad.
    You need to be placed in a medically induced coma and then fitted for a straight jacket. The straight jacket is in case the nurse is late with your meds and you get loose and find a computer and embarrass yourself to the world again.

    1. Kevin,

      To attack the man, as you do here, is E M O T I O N A L L Y illogical.

      Study brain hemisphericity, for a better understanding (( from the political psychology this scribbler has developed and presented from 1987 forward )) :

      Study brain hemisphericity, and learn that we each are two people:

      Right-Hemisphere emotional ( leftist camp )


      Left-Hemisphere logical ( rightist camp ).

      Kevin, your extreme emotionalism (( your attack-language )) strongly suggests, that you are in the psychological camp of right-hemisphere-driven L E F T I S M—which is, generally, the primary source of liberal-/libertine-effected VIOLENCE seen on the streets and in many Hollywood movies.

      Keep in mind brain/body cross-lateralization:

      The LEFT hemisphere controls right side of body (politic),


      The RIGHT hemisphere controls the left side of the body (politic).

      Your emotional attacks — your RIGHT hemisphere, LEFT-WING politics — stem from parental influences or, possibly, genetic influences—or both?

      Well, this would take many pages of further explanation.

      Re-study my above posts, Kevin, and stop your childlike name-calling..


      1. P.S.

        Kevin :

        Jung was an INTP, which extremely unique brain-configuration drove him to leave his teacher, Freud, and develop his own field of psychology: Jungian Psychology.

        I’ve titled this INTP’s own new field of psychology :

        “Political Cross-Lateralization”—trade marked.


Scroll to Top