• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Store
  • ION Awards
  • Podcasts
  • Full Measure
    • Full Measure Cover Stories
  • Donate
  • Bestseller "Slanted"

Sharyl Attkisson

Untouchable Subjects. Fearless, Nonpartisan Reporting.

  • US
  • World
  • Business
  • Health
    • Vaccine, Medical links
    • Omicron Lab Origin
    • Covid-19 Origins
    • Covid-19 Natural Immunity
    • Covid-19 Vaccine Concerns Summary
    • Covid-19 Vaccine: 80 Common Adverse Events
  • The Censored
  • Special Investigations
    • Attkisson v. DOJ
    • Media Mistakes, Biden Era
    • Media Mistakes on Trump
    • Other investigations
      • Benghazi
      • "Collusion v. Trump" TL
      • Election 2020
      • Fake News
      • Fast & Furious
      • Obamacare
      • Obama Surveillance TL
      • Other investigations
      • Ukraine 'Sabotage' of Trump TL

READ: Penn. senator seeks to reject state's certification of election results

Dated: November 27, 2020 by Sharyl Attkisson 18 Comments

      

The following is an announcement from Pennsylvania state senator Doug Mastriano regarding the 2020 election results for the state.

Mastriano Measure Seeks Election Accountability

Posted on Nov 27, 2020

HARRISBURG โ€“ State Senator Doug Mastriano (R-33) proposed a legislative measure today that seeks accountability associated with the 2020 general election.

The resolution, introduced in conjunction with counterparts in the House of Representatives, disapproves and rejects the Secretary of Commonwealthโ€™s premature certification of the results of the November 3 vote pertaining to presidential electors.

The legislative resolution directs State Department Secretary Kathy Boockvar to withdraw and vacate the certification of the presidential election.

Earlier this week, the Senate Majority Policy Committee hosted a public hearing in Gettysburg โ€“ hosted by Mastriano โ€“ and testimony revealed numerous electoral irregularities in Pennsylvania.

โ€œPennsylvanians want transparency and accountability with our electoral process โ€“ it is the hallmark of our American system to ensure that we the people select our government leaders, including the President of the United States,โ€ said Mastriano. โ€œAs state legislators, we take our responsibility to guard and guarantee our constituentsโ€™ right to free and fair elections. I fought to defend this right for three decadesโ€ฆnothing is more sacred in our democracy.โ€

Mastriano is partnering with Senators Michele Brooks (R-50), Dave Arnold (R-48) and Mario Scavello (R-40).

The resolution declares that the selection of presidential electors is in dispute.

Earlier on Friday, members of the House delegation announced their intent to introduce mirror legislation.

Mastriano noted numerous discrepancies that occurred November 3,  such as failure to meet the requirement that all mail-in ballots are received by 8 p.m.; โ€œsatellite locationsโ€ being used outside of parameters set by state law; failure to meet requirements specifying that election officials must authenticate signatures of in-person voters; and โ€“ among other issues โ€“ failure to follow the law for the tabulation of defective absentee and mailed ballots.

Testimony from Wednesdayโ€™s hearing is available atย policy.pasenategop.com.

Support the fight against government overreach in Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions.
Thanks to the thousands who have already supported!

      

About Sharyl Attkisson

Emmy-Award Winning Investigative Journalist, New York Times Best Selling Author, Host of Sinclair's Full Measure

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Melanie says

    November 27, 2020 at 11:00 pm

    Thank you for all you do to keep the truth alive. Iโ€™m so disgusted with the mainstream media and the left!

    Reply
  2. Patrck Kelly says

    November 27, 2020 at 11:05 pm

    Blessings to you! Your work is far greater than an article, it is one of the few remaining beacons of true journalism. I appreciate you!
    - Patrick Kelly

    Reply
  3. James Akins says

    November 27, 2020 at 11:12 pm

    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/aupxhpt9r56cqel/AAD5sHXdaxLLkl1nVyTyUWcWa?dl=0

    Please look into this file. This is the biggest cover-up in human history. This is indisputable proof, just ask any Quantum Physicist.. This will affect the future of all 7 billion people on earth. There is only 2 more months on this election results, but this will go well into the next year.

    https://rumble.com/vau1w7-albert-einstein-was-100-wrong-the-human-mind-does-concieve-of-the-four-dime.html

    https://rumble.com/vatzid-the-story-of-our-life-based-on-a-true-life.-the-human-mind-concieves-the-fo.html

    https://rumble.com/vatz5b-albert-einstein-and-nikola-tesla-deserve-nobel-prizes-for-four-dimensions.html

    Reply
  4. Albert says

    November 27, 2020 at 11:18 pm

    Any fraud in any vote must be overturned period I do not want a fraudulent
    Elected official anywhere in my government this bull shit of finding out years later we were screwed has to stop or do away with government altogether this is crap we want what we asked for or nothing period

    Reply
  5. Anthony Sakal says

    November 27, 2020 at 11:36 pm

    Legislators and not courts, governors, secretaries of state or even SCOTUS judges have any say, let alone the final say, over how a state conducts the way its legal residents vote. That is Constitutional Law 101. The legislators can condemn the certification and that is where it gets dicy because the Congress will look at certified votes, submitted to them, that the legislature feels is not associated with the existing law. Congress will have to make a decision. The law was never amended to allow certain last minute provisions which the court and not the legislators treated as law. The legislators have plenary power and the courts have no power. Their job is to remind everyone that they can to nothing. There is also an equal protection consideration since mail in ballot voters were given consideration on identification and arrival deadlines not afforded those which voted in person. On this challenge the SCOTUS can intercede.

    Reply
    • Leah S. says

      November 29, 2020 at 3:37 pm

      โ€œConstitutional Law 101โ€ โ€” You need to read the entire Article II. The US Constitution also gives the US Congress the power to decide the day (โ€œtimeโ€) on which electors are to be chosen. The US Congress has done so in 3 U.S. Code ยง 1, and the day this year was Nov.ย 3.

      If a state legislature wanted to change the manner in which electors are appointed, the US Constitution requires that they needed to have done this BEFORE Nov. 3rd, by changing their own state laws. If a state selected its electors on a day other than Nov.ย 3, it would violate federal law, and that slate could therefore not be counted.ย 

      Reply
  6. Chuck Whitney says

    November 28, 2020 at 12:00 am

    The State Senator was on with Steve Bannon this morning 11/27/20
    (War Room Pandemic #541) He said the power to seat Electors has by statute always been a function of the Congress but was voluntarily given to the Secretaryโ€™s Office in 1938.Their goal is to take it back by using the Resolution process since it doesnโ€™t need to go through the Governorโ€™s Office to get his signature, saving time which is going to be at a premium. While heโ€™s got sign-ons in both Senate and House, they still need to swear in the newly elected Senators and Reps. so theyโ€™ll have a full session.
    They still need to get warm bodies in the seats in order to call an Open Session of Congress, so while heโ€™s optimistic about the plan, he says he needs as many Pennsylvania residents as possible to get this information and to contact their State Legislators and push them to get back for this Important Resolution.

    Reply
  7. Jeffrey Anderson says

    November 28, 2020 at 1:35 am

    I love you tenacity and commitment to truth and fairness. I have turned several people over the past couple of years to hear your battles in these arenas crucial to the America we all cherish. May God be with you in this fight.

    Reply
  8. Lee Keel says

    November 28, 2020 at 3:21 am

    Happy to see people like you standing with our President. 72,000,000 plus Patriots know that there was a very concerted effort to steal this election. The mere idea of washing this over and then asking for unity is absurd. For an investigate reporter this is a gold mine for you, just be careful. The left are totally nuts. This treasonous effort runs very deep. I am actually fairly optimistic that President Trump will pull this off. He has some of the most brilliant legal minds in the country, they are motivated and our President gets done what he puts his mind to. I have actually come up with an idea that would be good for the country and get rid of Amazon, that's for later. O'Reilley was saying to Hannity that because SCOTUS was aware that if the cry baby dems didn't get their way there would be violence and possibly because of this would vote against the Trump team. With Thomas, Alito, Gorsch ?, ACB, etc. I would say we have a very good shot. Trump will not put up with anymore of the violence. SCOTUS just needs to do their job, easy peasy and do not defer. I likened what O'Reilley said, to say my neighbor being violent and coming over and hurting one of mine. Does O'Reilley really think for one second I would not go over to this home to dispense justice because my neighbor may be violent? I say lets get this done and get back on track.
    Keep the articles coming, knowledge is power
    Lee

    Reply
  9. Mary Jo says

    November 28, 2020 at 4:49 am

    I support your efforts to help save our country! Thank you !

    Reply
  10. Kat says

    November 28, 2020 at 5:37 am

    Way to go !!

    Reply
  11. Craig Gamble says

    November 28, 2020 at 6:19 am

    All states,should and are required by law to provide are transparent and free from voter fraud elections, Any state or government body or political party interfering with this process of free transparent an by the laws set forth should be held accountable to the act of treason. And should be punished as so.

    Reply
  12. Bud C says

    November 28, 2020 at 7:57 am

    Mastriano and team,
    Thank you for your courageous move to fight for the protection of our freedoms and bringing forth a honest vote from the lie machine or most commonly known as democrats . Keep up the good fight because we all know what went on .

    Reply
  13. Sherry says

    November 28, 2020 at 9:03 am

    God bless them for standing up for what is right! This is for we the people because tjis is a stolen election
    If lee allow this there will never be another election worth voting for . God help us in this matter!

    Reply
  14. Julia says

    November 28, 2020 at 10:46 am

    I think one of the most damning things in the hearing was about the vote spikes. I can understand there may be spikes when a bunch of mail in ballots are loaded. I cannot understand the HUGE disparity in votes for each candidate. It seems statistally impossible. I am just an average citizen, but I am employed in a math field. I think if this point was explained to the people in even more basic terms with more exact numbers and compared to the average rate of these mail ballot loads elsewhere, it could have a big impact. Statistical math can be hard for some to understand. This, to me, is a huge point to make clear, as it involves hundreds of thousands of votes.

    Reply
  15. Brenda Rorabaugh says

    November 28, 2020 at 10:54 am

    We recieved a mail in and we didnt ask for one. There shouldn't of been anything on the june ballet for the nov. Ballet. My husband and myself diont agree how this mail-in ballets were handled. We should of had to request it just like the june ballet. My question is why did we have to void the mail in in order to vote in person when all i should of done was fill in in and put it in the machine?

    Reply
  16. Ralph says

    November 28, 2020 at 11:53 am

    The ลฅruth must prevail.!

    Reply
  17. Larry says

    November 28, 2020 at 10:21 pm

    I hope the challengers in PA succeed, but, I wonโ€™t be surprised if the Dems get their way, if they end up in court.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Coming Soon

Click Here

The Sharyl Attkisson Store

Buy Great, Original Products & Support Independent Journalism

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

SUBSCRIBE TO SHARYL’S RUMBLE CHANNEL


Follow Sharyl Attkisson

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube



Footer

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Support
  • Contact

Sitemap

2ndary Pages

  • Full Measure Stations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Newsletter
  • Returns & Refunds Policy

SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

  • Attkisson v. DOJ/FBI
  • Benghazi
  • Election 2020
  • Fake News
  • Fast & Furious
  • Obamacare

Copyright © 2023 ยท Log in