The following is an excerpt from an article in Central City News.
Note: Many officials deny any improprieties in the 2020 election, or say it was not enough to make a difference.
New York Times Election Report Reveals 104,984 Stolen Votes in Ga, 347,768 in PA
While the mainstream media has crowned former Vice President Joe Biden as “President-elect,” the facts on the ground are quite different, at least in two swing states that have been called for Vice President Biden — Georgia and Pennsylvania.
In those two states, a careful analysis of the data shows that both states voted for President Trump and the election was stolen.
It was fraud by computer.
Since Dominion and Smartmatic have control of the voting machines, the software, and the reporting of the results, it should be up to the owners and officials of those two entities to explain how it was done. But it was done, as will be shown.
Unraveling this mystery begins with The New York Times. After polls closed on Election Day, The Times begin to report the results hour after hour. The coding for that data is still online, and we have down- loaded it in case it is taken down.
Thirty of those states and more than 2,000 counties have something in common. The citizens of those areas vote on voting machines pro- vided by Dominion Voting Systems with software from Smartmatic Vote Counting System.
The data from The Times shows the time, expressed as UTC, or Uni- versal time, which is Greenwich mean time in England.
It also shows the totals for Trump and Biden, Trump’s lead, and then new votes for Trump and Biden as each change in the results was up- loaded.
Read the full article at the link below:
https://centralcitynews.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Central-City-News-11-19-20-Small.pdf
If this election is allowed to stand we will have let traitors to our country into the WH again to finish what Obama started, and Obama will be the one running the show in the WH since Biden is just a puppet. We have allowed these criminals to murder 65 million unborn and now they will disarm the people and remove anyone who disagrees with their policies, democrats are the party of death and their brand of politics must die with their hate and their vision of America.
Sorry, forgot to add Part II of my analysis (as my daughter had to jump on my iPad for Zoom session).
When both Biden and Trump stayed at xx.x% as the new batch didn’t change that % by much (not at 0.1% rounding level), you will notice that the votes are allocated to each candidate based on their % of vote then and Trump gains a small amount of votes (if he is up by 0.2% due to 48.5 to 48.3 lead — he gets .2% more of the new votes). Thus as # of votes in that batch goes up (from 100 new votes to 200 new votes in next batch, lets day), so did his lead from 2 votes more to 4 votes more. Only when the % change does that 4,600 appear. (follow link above to the actual news paper pdf)
The negative votes for Trump occurred when he lost .1% (of 4,500,000 votes) due to rounding, he lost 4,500 votes it seems (but not actually).. if the number of new votes allocated to him wasn’t large enough to overcome the rounding of going from 48.5 (when it could have been 48.45) to 48.4 (when it could have been 45.44). You will need to add up the Trump votes to Biden votes to see he gained overall but at a 80/20 split Biden to Trump.
Now, someone will say, how does Biden get this 4,600 all in his favor and it never happens to Trump? Mail in ballots usually tended to go to Biden (thus taking the lead … slowly but surely). So in this case, Trump would never went up by .1% and Biden didn’t lose that .1% to see a drop during the mail in counting.
Now, if you watch the Phili data dump video from Edward Solomon (using actual votes from Phili system in real time), you will see what Sidney Powell maybe calling vote stealing (where Biden gets a minimum % of mail in votes no matter if Trump actually got more) — many references in Solomon analysis to the specific ratios like 3 to 1 … down to the actual votes no matter how many votes were recorded 4, 8, 12, 400, …. or ratios like 9 to 2. This could be going on elsewhere and is another reason Biden could always win in late voting. Let alone some video of poll watchers in Detroit recalling how 50 boxes showed up for at 4:03 am and were all counted by 5:15. If they were mail in ballots (arriving late), you cannot separate votes that fast from envelops … reason it takes all night to count ballots unless you are tabulating ballots like in Georgia that were on pristine paper – no envelop fold — with a perfect circle for Biden in stacks of 50 in a row.
There is plenty of evidence of fraud in this election. This is not it. Sorry
At first, I liked the analysis and was shocked it could be found from a Louisiana small paper. However, there is a simple explanation. NYT data (not really theirs, just what everyone uses by Edison Research I think) only provides total votes to that point and % of total going to Biden and Trump (not their actual vote total). Computer guys have used the running tally to calculate votes for Biden and Trump for each reporting period to then figure out new votes in total and back into new Trump and Biden votes.
Long story short, as % is given as xx.x% of 4.5 million votes to that period, the estimate from this database of actual votes per candidate to actual can be off by +/- .049% due to rounding. Thus, as most votes were in, a small change of few thousand votes would change the % allocated per candidate by .1% up or down at most. This is where that 4,600 change comes from .1% of 4.6 million. Notice how the change increase slightly as vote total overall increases as well. You get 9,200 if Biden went up .1% and Trump went down .1% due to rounding each at 48.5% or so.
If you want to see fraud, someone got the Phili vote in real-time where it showed the actual votes by precinct by each batch (using specific ratios time after time) …. That is fraud.
A few comments:
1) The wording “New York Times Election Report Reveals 104,984 Stolen Votes in Ga, 347,768 in PA” is highly misleading at best. First of all, it implies that the revelation is coming from the NYT itself, not using an analysis of data provided by the NYT. Secondly, the conclusion is stated as a certainty when at best it represents something of a statistical anomaly.
Many entries in the table don’t make sense to me. I assumed that “New Trump” was the change in votes for Trump while “New Biden” was the change in votes for Biden (otherwise what are they?). But the numbers don’t bear that interpretation out. For example, the second and third rows (UTC 17:12 and UTC 19:42) show this:
UTC 17:12: Trump: 2387413 Biden: 2301979
UTC 19:42: Trump: 2391099 Biden: 2310125
So Trump’s total increased by 3686 while the table shows “New Trump” as -1783. Biden’s numbers increased by 8146 but the table shows a “New Biden” number of 2873. And the “Change” column sometimes is the actual change in Trump’s lead based on the vote totals and sometimes it is hundreds of votes off. There are many examples of this in this table. How were the “New Trump” numbers and “New Biden” numbers calculated?
I don’t know where the problem is (perhaps it’s my interpretation of the data), but the data doesn’t seem consistent. Has anyone looked into the analysis? For that matter, has anyone corroborated the story itself?
2) The Central City News piece is dated 11/19 which by coincidence just happens to be the same day that Georgia announced the results of its HAND RECOUNT of the ballots in which Biden’s victory was confirmed. If they indeed counted them by hand, then the voting machines weren’t involved. How do you square that with the claim that it was “fraud by computer”?
3) An audit was done on the voting machines which according to UPI “used forensic techniques and verification processes to confirm no tampering, cyberattacks or election hacking”. The results were summarized by Georgia SoS Raffensperger thusly: “We are glad but not surprised that the audit of the state’s voting machines was an unqualified success”.
4) What is striking to me is the willingness of so many people to accept that there was voting fraud despite the very large number of people from both sides that have stated otherwise. And the voting audits. And the voting recounts. And the lost court cases. Despite all this, all it takes is one person to put together a story about voter fraud and so many folks react with “well, that proves it”.
I used to think that rational people would take a total vote recount that didn’t change the results as a sign that things were on the up-and-up. And I guess I still do. It’s just my view of how many rational people there are that has changed.
I completely agree with you that the numbers in the table do not calculate correctly. I can’t figure out what formula is being used, but the New Vote totals and the change in lead totals sometimes calculate correctly and other times are way off.
Regarding your question about a hand count, there are affidavits saying there were boxes of Biden-only ballots being brought in unmarked boxes/bags through a back entry. So, a recount of actual ballots vs tabulated ballots would still match if they loaded 1000s of illegal ballots into the voting machines to accomplish the lead changes..
My point was the Dominion Voting Systems and SmartMatic Vote Counting System were specifically mentioned in this article implying (to me at least) that the authors believed them to be the source of the fraud. Especially since no other sources of possible fraud were mentioned. Sidney Powell explicitly claimed this in her press conference. But the hand recount would seem to exonerate them.
As far as the sworn affidavits regarding voting irregularities are concerned, apparently whatever was presented in court was not sufficient to persuade a judge that they had merit since all of the lawsuits have either been dismissed or dropped and the election has now been certified. So I think that I’ll go with that.
Sidney has revealed in today’s Stop the Steal rally in Georgia that Georgia did not do a full hand recount, and that in a very small precinct where they did do, it showed exactly such irregularities, with Biden being weighted at 1.52 vs Trump 0.48.
About a week earlier, Garland Favorito commented that the recount was conducted in a compromised way, in that it was the state telling the counties what their audit results were instead of the other way round. You could watch his comment here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJtoiOVehac&t
The tabulated data shown here were the condensed version, and therefore they appeared not adding up. Read the full article (link above) where it showed the data in full, and where the numbers did add up.
With 2020 election results ,
” If you torture your data long enough, they will tell you whatever you want to hear “”
has become very popular, .
Sharyl: Thank you for publishing this! It’s now beginning to make sense. The old expression is still accurate: “Figures don’t lie, but liars do figure.”