Update: CDC has reconfigured its page and added back the "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" claim. See the page here.
- CDC Removed headline: "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism"
- That after a lawsuit challenged the scientific basis for such a claim
After a court challenge questioning the scientific support behind the claim that "vaccines do not cause autism," the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has removed that headline from its website.
The blockbuster change was made quietly last August, and went largely unnoticed, with no public announcement.
The CDC Vaccine-Autism page goes on to state in many different ways that parents should not be concerned about vaccines and autism, and "there is no link," while at the same time acknowledging a link cannot be ruled out.
In a Question and Answer post, CDC says "more research is needed" on the question as to whether vaccines can trigger autism in children with "mitochondrial disorders." Scientists say many people have mitochondrial disorders but do not know it.
More research is needed to determine if there are rare cases where underlying mitochondrial disorders are triggered by anything related to vaccines.CDC
According to CDC, mitochondria are like tiny power houses of almost all cells in the body, turning sugar and oxygen into energy needed to function.
Read CDC vaccine safety information here.
CDC Immunization Safety Official Acknowledged Possible Vaccine-Autism Link
In an interview with me in 2014, CDC's head of immunization safety, Dr. Frank DeStefano, acknowledged it's possible that vaccines rarely trigger autism in some children, and said "somebody" should do research to identify why that might be. However, there is no easily-found record of CDC encouraging or funding any such research.
Listen to Dr. DeStefano's interview here, and read a transcript.
CDC and The Department of Justice Secretly Settled and Paid a Landmark Vaccine-Autism Claim
In 2008, CDC secretly settled and paid a landmark vaccine-autism claim, acknowledging that vaccines triggered autism in a child named Hannah Poling, while publicly telling parents and the rest of the public there was no link. Poling's father is a pediatric neurologist. In paying the claim, CDC demanded the case be sealed. But the news leaked out.
Hannah developed autism quickly after a doctor's visit where she received five shots-- - nine doses of vaccines. She quickly came down with a fever, seizures and severe health problems.
Read more about Poling's story at the link:
The Government's Own Expert At The Time says Vaccines Can Cause Autism, After All
We only learned recently that the government's own one-time lead expert in defending vaccine-autism claims in court, the world renowned pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, changed his expert opinion based on new science and concluded vaccines can-- and do -- cause autism, after all, in "exceptional" cases.
In a sworn affidavit, Dr. Zimmerman says that when he informed the government (through Department of Justice attorneys who defend vaccine companies in court) that vaccines can cause autism, the government fired him as an expert witness and misrepresented his opinion in court to use against cases alleging vaccine-autism injuries.
Dr. Zimmerman had treated Hannah Poling, the daughter of his colleague Dr. Jon Poling, and said the science he learned in that case was part of how he came to understand that vaccines can cause autism.
Read Dr. Zimmerman's affidavit here.
CDC Senior Scientist Gave a Sworn Statement saying He and His Colleagues Committed Scientific Fraud to Coverup Vaccine-Autism Link
In 2014, a senior CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, blew the whistle and said he and his colleagues covered up a vaccine-autism association, particularly among African-American boys, identified in a study published in Pediatrics.
Thompson testified in a sworn statement that he was present when his CDC colleagues and coauthors met and literally threw some of the data into a trash can. He says he saved original copies and put them in a safe, believing they had committed a crime by destroying the material. Others at CDC deny it.
At the bottom of Table 7 it also shows that for the non-birth certificate sample, the adjusted race effect statistical significance was huge. All the authors and I met and decided sometime between August and September ’02 not to report any race effects for the paper. Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper.From sworn statement by CDC's Dr. William Thompson
After the controversy, CDC insiders say the agency quickly sought reanalyses to try to counter Dr. Thompson.
At the same time, propagandists who write on point with the vaccine industry, such as Seth Mnookin, Dr. Gorski of Scienceblogs.com ("Respectful Insolence"), and authors at Snopes, Vox, Wikipedia and even The Washington Post attacked and controversialized Dr. Thompson, implying the well-regarded CDC scientist was actually an anti-vaccine nut.
Read more reporting on Vaccine Safety and other Medical Issues here.
Dr. Thompson and the controversy, along with secretly recorded audiotapes, are the subject of the documentary "VAXXED."
VAXXED has largely been censored from the Internet, and controversialized by propaganda groups such as Media Matters, which is aligned with the interests of the vaccine industry, and smears scientists and journalists who are off the narrative.
VAXXED was also widely attacked by authors and publications on point with the vaccine industry, such as Michael Hiltzik of the LA Times, and Deadline.com.
Though Dr. Thompson, one of the study's authors, admitted or claimed he and his colleagues had committed scientific fraud, the journal Pediatrics declined to retract the questioned study, or even note the fraud what one of the authors was claiming.
A Pediatrics spokesman told me, when I asked, that since Dr. Thompson's CDC co-authors had denied committing scientific fraud, there was no need to retract the article.
The journal said it did not contact or interview Dr. Thompson about his claims.
A CDC post about the controversy acknowledges the study's findings that found an association between vaccines and autism, without addressing Dr. Thompson's data and claims. But the official CDC position theorizes that the apparent association was just coincidental.
The findings revealed that vaccination between 24 and 36 months was slightly more common among children with autism, and that association was strongest among children 3-5 years of age. The authors reported this finding was most likely a result of immunization requirements for preschool special education program attendance in children with autism.CDC on 2004 study controversy in which a co-author admitted fraud
Read more on the study from CDC and the controversy at the link below:
CDC Blocks Dr. Thompson's testimony
Read the correction of a story regarding government vaccine expert and vaccine inventor Dr. Paul Offit, who made false claims about a CBS report exposing industry ties to Every Child By Two and other groups.
Read the CBS story Dr. Offit made false claims about. Watch the video here.
Read the account below of "Informed Consent Action Network" (ICAN) regarding its lawsuit to stop CDC from claiming "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism."
ICAN, through its attorneys led by Aaron Siri, has been relentless in its legal demands and actions to compel the CDC to remove its blanket claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from its website.
We are excited to report that the CDC has finally capitulated to those demands! It has removed this claim from its website! CDC’s Autism-Vaccine Page
Old Version vs. New Version
The more than three-year journey for how ICAN, and its legal team, achieved this result is a story of determined persistence. Here are the highlights.
ICAN’s Opening Salvo (Oct. 12, 2017 – Dec. 31, 2018) The journey began with a letter sent to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) on October 12, 2017. That letter explained why the CDC cannot scientifically claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” on its website. ICAN then ended with the following demand: “Please confirm that HHS shall forthwith remove the claim that ‘Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism’ from the CDC website, or alternatively, please identify the specific studies on which HHS bases its blanket claim that no vaccines cause autism?”To put HHS and the CDC (an agency within HHS) on their heels, mere days after sending this letter, ICAN also sent a FOIA request on November 1, 2017, demanding: All reports, scientific studies, and any other documents the CDC relied upon to support the assertion “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” located on its website at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html.
The CDC quickly called ICAN’s counsel, Aaron Siri, regarding this request. After some negotiations, the CDC formally responded on November 7, 2017, stating that “A search of our records failed to reveal any documents beyond the records hyperlinked in the specific web site” to support the claim that vaccines do not cause autism. The CDC had thus revealed a truth, one that HHS could not run from in its response to ICAN’s letter. On January 18, 2018, HHS responded to ICAN’s October 12th letter. In thatletter, HHS provided a list of studies it said supported the conclusion on its website that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.” All of the studies cited related either to a single vaccine, MMR, or to a single vaccine ingredient, thimerosal. None of these studies support the claim that vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Given that HHS failed to support its claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism,” ICAN responded by letter dated December 31, 2018 wherein ICAN asserted that “HHS cannot scientifically claim that ‘Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism’” and “must therefore remove this claim from the CDC website until it can produce the studies to support the claim.”
ICAN’s Pincer Maneuver (Jan. 1, 2019 to June 18, 2019)
In order to keep the pressure on to force the CDC to be honest with the public, during the first six months of 2019, ICAN submitted numerous requests for communications among key personnel within the CDC relating to autism. Some of these requests sought emails going back decades. The key players within the CDC with regard to vaccines and autism now knew we were watching, and that we would have their unvarnished, internal emails related to autism.
ICAN Drops the Gauntlet (June 19, 2019 to Dec. 30, 2019)
Now that ICAN had gathered the proof in the form of evidence and admissions it needed to hold the CDC’s feet to the fire, on June 19, 2019, ICAN demanded that the CDC produce copies of the studies it relies upon to claim that all the vaccines given during the first six months of life “Do Not Cause Autism.” These vaccines include DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV. ICAN also demanded that the CDC produce studies to support that the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life “Do Not Cause Autism.” ICAN, of course, already had the CDC’s admissions on these points from its prior FOIA request in November 2017, the HHS letter exchange, and the CDC’s internal emails. The CDC had nowhere to hide and no way to dissemble. As expected, it responded to ICAN’s request with the same list of studies involving MMR or thimerosal. Not a single study supported that DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV do not cause autism.
ICAN Battles the CDC in Court (Dec. 31, 2019 to March 5, 2020)
ICAN then put the pressure directly on the CDC. Instead of walking away after the CDC effectively admitted it did not have the studies ICAN sought, ICAN sued the CDC in federal court. The suit focused on the CDC’s claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” on the basis that the CDC had not specifically listed the precise studies that it asserts support that claim. This lawsuit also quoted from the deposition of Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the godfather of vaccinology, who admitted under oath that he was “okay with telling the parent that DTaP/Tdap does not cause autism even though the science isn’t there yet to support that claim.” After a lot of wrangling between ICAN’s counsel Aaron Siri, and the Department of Justice, which was representing the CDC, the CDC finally capitulated and signed a stipulation that was entered as an order of the court on March 2, 2020in which the CDC identified 20 studies as the universe of support it relies upon to claim that DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV do not cause autism. Here is a summary of the vaccines these studies cover: · 1 relating to MMR (not a vaccine ICAN asked about);· 13 relating to thimerosal (not an ingredient in any vaccine ICAN asked about);· 4 relating to both MMR and thimerosal;· 1 relating to antigen (not a vaccine) exposure; and· 1 relating to MMR, thimerosal, and DTaP. Incredibly, the one study relating to DTaP on the CDC’s list was a recent review by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), paid for by the CDC, which conducted a comprehensive review looking specifically for studies relating to whether DTaP does or does not cause autism. The IOM concluded that it could not identify a single study to support that DTaP does not cause autism.
Instead, the only relevant study the IOM could identify found an association between DTaP and autism. In other words, the only study the CDC listed that actually looked at any of the vaccines given to babies during the first six months of life concluded that there are no studies to support that DTaP does not cause autism. Yet, the CDC chose that study as one of the few that supports its claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism”! This reality is truly incredible because, when it comes to autism, vaccines are the one suspected culprit that the CDC claims to have exhaustively investigated but, yet, the CDC could not provide a single study to support its conclusion that the vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism. The CDC regularly complains that those raising concerns about vaccine safety are unscientific and misinformed. It is therefore truly stunning that when we asked the CDC for studies to support its claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism,” the March 2, 2020 stipulation and order made it abundantly clear that it was the CDC’s own claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” that was unscientific.
ICAN’s Coup de Grâce (Mar. 6, 2020 to Aug. 26, 2020)
And now for the coup de grâce. ICAN’s demands at the end of 2019 and over which it took the CDC to court in early 2020 were for the studies the CDC “relied upon” to claim that Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism. ICAN now had a court ordered stipulation that specifically listed the twenty studies the CDC “relied upon” to support this claim – none of which supported that the vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism. To assure that the CDC understood ICAN was never, ever, ever, letting this issue go, on March 6, 2020 (days after concluding the federal lawsuit) ICAN submitted the following FOIA demand to the CDC: “All studies supporting the claim that DTaP does not cause autism” and days later requested “Studies created or retained by CDC to support the claim that DTaP does not cause autism.” The difference between this and ICAN’s prior requests is subtle but powerful. Instead of asking for the studies the CDC “relied upon” to support that DTaP does not cause autism (as it did previously), ICAN was now seeking the studies that in fact support that DTaP does not cause autism. In response to this request, the CDC could not list its MMR or thimerosal studies – its hands were tied. It understood there was nowhere left to hide its unsupported claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.” And it knew that ICAN would again take it to court, and this time the outcome could be even harsher.
The CDC Capitulates
On the heels of the foregoing, and dozens of related demands regarding autism that ICAN continued to press, in the dead of the night, and without any fanfare or announcement, on August 27, 2020, the CDC website removed the claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from its website! The CDC had finally capitulated to the truth! Compare for yourself the CDC’s autism-vaccine webpage on August 26, 2020versus August 27, 2020. You may be wondering why we waited until now to announce this amazing news. Well, ICAN and its legal team have been so busy fighting on dozens of vaccine related fronts (mandatory MMR vaccines, flu shot requirements, improper COVID vaccine trials, etc.) that we only realized the CDC’s vaccine-autism claim had been removed when we recently turned back to that front! Like a Mayan temple hidden in plain sight for hundreds of years, ICAN only recently discovered the CDC’s silent capitulation.
The most recent data from CDC shows that 1 in 36 children born this year in the United States will develop autism. This is a true epidemic. If the CDC had spent the same resources studying vaccines and autism as it did waging a media campaign against parents that claim vaccines caused their child’s autism, the world would be a better place for everyone. To their credit, parents with autistic children have never backed down. In the face of incessant brow beatings by public health authorities, studies have found between 40% and 70% of parents with an autistic child continue to blame vaccines for their child’s autism, typically pointing to vaccines given during the first six months of life. These parents know what they experienced, what their parental instincts tell them, and no amount of shaming can change that truth. With the removal of the claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism,” it is ICAN’s sincere hope that our public health authorities have turned or will soon be turning the corner on this issue. That they will fund independent scientists to conduct the desperately needed studies of autism and the cumulative impact of the vaccines given during the first six months of life. The cries of parents who know that vaccines caused their child’s autism should no longer be ignored. The science must be done. And ICAN will continue to fight to make sure that that it is done.
The CDC’s website does continue to claim that “Vaccine ingredients do not cause autism” and so ICAN’s fight continues! Our next step will be to force the CDC to admit whether or not they are also making this claim for aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines. And if so, to produce the studies to support this claim. (See ICAN’s white paper on aluminum adjuvants and autism here.) Of course, whether one or more ingredients, like water used in vaccines, does not cause autism is not really the issue. The question is whether the vaccine, the product itself as formulated, causes autism. And we now know that the CDC finally understands that it can no longer claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.”
I looked on CDC website. The statement is still there. No link between vaccines and autism.
Sharyl Attkisson says
Please read the article. As it says, after a lawsuit challenging the "science," it remove the headline discussed.
Lol I love how people don’t even read the article and then feel like they should comment.
It is there as November 13th, 2021. Huge, first liner.
Hello Sharyl, Cindy just said as of present the website still says the same but you claim after lawsuit the headline was removed.....What are you saying?......The claim was reposted again?.......
Sharyl Attkisson says
Please read the article. It explains what was removed, what it still says and implies. It does not "say the same." The headline was removed.
I would like to say thank you Sharyl for your great work discussing this topic and other topics most reporters would not cover. Thank you for your honest journalism. You are a great journalist.
Kathryn S. says
Hi Sharryl, I posted a link to your article and Twitter Immediately suspended my account citing your article as misinformation. I'm an attorney and I understand the significance of this important change by the CDC. I now expect Dorit and her Twitter army to try to knock out any references to your article. 1984
Gerald Brennan says
Autism has a genetic component. Vaccinosis (pathology developing after a vaccination) can be a strong mimic of autism but it is not autism. This is not important. The important thing is that vaccines do more harm than we are led to believe and general ignorance among the population on the topic is deplorable.
Kim Clark says
The US rate of 1 in 36 children now having autism is NO WAY genetic! Even geneticists say this is too high. Also highly coincidental that autism was not ever seen before vaccines. And pretty much every kid we know these days has some kind of health issue big or small. My kids only have had a few of their vaccines and after age 3, but I regret any I ever gave them.
Gerald Brennan says
Kim, I would love to blame vaccines. My respect for Big Pharma and those behind the worldwide vax movement is about the same as I have for schoolyard crack dealers. But the more I study it the more I see that vaccinosis and autism are not the same. I'm not married to the idea and I have no dog in this race. Nor do I dispute that the subject isn't settled. It isn't. But most researchers will agree that the case for a genetic connection is very strong.
But I and all my siblings who were heavily vaccinated have severe allergies and respiratory issues; the ones who were not vaxxed are free of this. I can't help but make this connection and much recent research bears me out.
Also, it's easy to believe that the subject is so political (and profitable) that the good studies that make the vax-aut connection are being repressed. I want to believe that. I just can't justify it.
I think autism has been around a long time but we've only recently pinned a name on it and gave it a set of parameters. And there is good evidence that the numbers are growing.
But I agree with you that so many kids are unhealthy! And I do blame the catastrophic fiddling about with their immune systems via vax for a big part of it.
Perhaps this will be of interest: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-real-reasons-autism-rates-are-up-in-the-u-s/.
I think vaccines are definitely at the very least a trigger. You have to look at other factors as well. After studying toxicology for 31 years I can say that few are looking at the synergistic and cumulative properties of the myriad of toxins we are constantly exposed to. Most throw up their hands and say we can't avoid everything! However as someone who has been exposed to massive amounts of poisons since birth for 68 years with terrible consequences directly traceable to those exposures and quantified by medical tests I can tell you that it is no surprise that we have the sickest children in developed countries. Seven vaccines STILL contain Hg, 22 contain aluminum, 24 formaldehyde. The other adjuvants are antibiotics,antifungals,viruses, industrial solvents, detergents, polysorbate 80, blood & tissues from monkeys,cows,pigs,dogs,guinea pigs,mice,chickens,army worms, moths, and since 1984: aborted fetal cells from 4 different lines. Autism exploded after the 1986 act giving Big Pharma no liability, the addition of dead babies to the brew and the increase from 5-7 vaccines to 67 vaccines. The variables include exposure to amalgam/mercury in utero/breast milk/dental fillings and fluoridated water,food,air . If you lived near a factory or industrial farms there are chemical ,pesticides ,fungicides,and herbicides sprayed from planes in air water & food. Lastly in 1986 the FDA let Big Pharma start adding fluoride to 34% of our pharmaceuticals to "enhance" them resulting in even more damage to brain [IQ], liver ,lungs, kidneys,thyroid,bones & teeth. Fluoride makes bones & teeth APPEAR DENSER on XRAYS; but in matter of fact the bone is built so quickly it is BRITTLE and more likely to crack causing brown teeth and more arthritis & hip fractures. 7000 elderly were studied in nursing homes on Prozac & Paxil [high dose Fluoride],they had 50% more hip fractures. Fluorine loves calcium; but will combine with anything locking it in including metals & acids, chemicals. So you have to do some detective work and DNA analysis helps as well; to find out as I did that even though I only received small pox, polio & tetanus vaccines as a child in the late 50s ; I was bombarded with lead arsenate from planes to kill the Gypsy moth on Cape Cod, then 17 years of DDT,houses were all sprayed with chlordane for termites, paint was all lead, and my mother poisoned me in utero and with breast milk because she was working for 3 dentists mixing amalgams with her bare hands in cheese cloth and also smoking cigarettes. I screamed for 6 weeks with colic till they put me on formula. By age five I had MEE's lines ; definitive of arsenic poisoning; but did not figure this out till 50 years later. My kids were vaccinated with everything in the 80s [all Hg back then] ,plus I nursed them with mouthful of amalgams, but living next to cotton fields was the worst for all of us. Had no idea that the govt would allow dangerous chemicals sprayed in residential subdivisions; but I was wrong. We have all suffered many many illnesses because of this especially CNS, depression & anxiety, allergies & pain. Big Pharma & Big Ag still get subsidized while we get sicker and this Covid shot [not a vaccine] will be the end of our health & freedoms.
You are one of the last true journalists remaining. Thank you for discussing this topic. We can never stop pushing for the truth around the biggest lie ever told. Thank you!
Twitter immediately suspended my account after I posted the link from this article there without any personal comment. Scary times. The stated basis is that this is misinformation about Covid-19.
It’s still here
Susanne Guzzetti says
You need to read Judy Mikovits books!
Karen Seibold says
About time that your hard work shows some light- now if the Gov would come clean with hacking into you computer!
Currently the CDC Vaccine-Autism page states:
"There is no link between vaccines and autism." and "Vaccine ingredients do not cause autism."
There has been no change in the CDC's position has there? If so, please state simply and accurately how it was changed. Otherwise your headline is simply "click bait".
Sharyl Attkisson says
It's all specified in detail in the article. Please try reading again. Pay special attention to the article republished at the bottom of the page explaining more.
Dragon night says
Why doenst your site have links to post on gab or mewe ? Do you only support Big Left tech ?
Sharyl Attkisson says
My tech folks cannot find the buttons for that. I operate this site at a cost and cannot really pay for full scale support/help, unfortunately. Also Google has de-monetized this site as of today, as it does periodically, to punish for the off-narrative articles I publish so they make it difficult!
May be links are broken, but when I click on August 26 I can't see a headline saying 'Vaccines do not cause autism'. In fact top part looks exactly the same for me as one on August 27. I am giving a benefit of the doubt and kindly ask to check and fix links. It's imperative that links are the correct ones otherwise the whole point of the article is lost.
Sharyl Attkisson says
Scroll down to see old and new versions of pages and further details if you find it confusing.
Jean McCormick says
I was wondering whether you are continuing to investigate. I saw a doctor speaking about aluminum deposited in the brain from vaccines in Alzheimers patient. Previously I heard there was a similarity with autism and Alzheimers. Aluminum was never mentioned on the cdc website. Was that intentional??
Sharyl, you and a handful (small, to be sure) of other reporters like you are truly a beam of light in these times. Thank you for what you do, the courage you display and the keen eye you maintain on everything around us, because without you doing that, we would not be able to get to know many crucial changes and circumstances. I cannot stress enough how grateful I am for the work you do. Thank you! Please never stop! We truly truly need people like you!
Thank you for writing this article. It's incredibly obvious that the MSM censors this topic. Keep up the great work!
I have an autistic son. I used to agree that vaccines don't cause autism but I changed my mind after reading Handley's "How to End the Autism Epidemic" (2018). Handley blames autism on the aluminum in (some) infant vaccines, including the Heptatis B vaccine, which is given to newborns in the US since the mid-1990s. It turns out that Aluminum can cause "dysfunctional mitochondria" because ATP (our cellular energy source) preferably bonds with Aluminum over Magnesium.
There's also an Aluminum-Alzheimer's connection. Chris Exley has a new book about that ("Imagine you're an Aluminum Atom").
UPDATE: after the CDC couldn’t handle the bad PR they put the statement back up! Check out Sharyl’s link above and you’ll see it is there again. ICAN is taking them back to court. What a move by the CDC!
Seth M says
From what I am understanding, the CDC did not change their position nor did they remove the text.
They simply moved (not removed) but moved the wording "Vaccines do not cause autism." from the headline down to the next paragraph.
Is this correct ? and if so does this really change anything whatsoever with the CDC advertising false information ? no it doesn't
They put it back up to provide support for their soon to be released requirement that all school age kids need the 2021 vax.
Matt R says
It is childish to make such a claim. The ingredients are not the only element to consider. The other component aspect is the body's reaction to the ingredients. Read that again. Consider the fact that every body is unique and that vaccines are administered in combinations of different ingredients.