CDC Scientist: ‘We scheduled meeting to destroy vaccine-autism study documents’


This article was first published July 29, 2015

A current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) senior scientist has made an unprecedented admission: he and his colleagues–he says– committed scientific misconduct to cover up a meaningful link between vaccines and autism in black boys.

Just as startling, the CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, says the study co-authors “scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room, and reviewed and went through all the hardcopy documents that we had thought we should discard, and put them into a huge garbage can.”

“The…co-authors…brought a big garbage can into the meeting room… [and put the documents]…into a huge garbage can.” –CDC Senior Scientist Dr. William Thompson

Despite this whistleblower testimony, which Dr. Thompson provided to Rep. Bill Posey, R-Florida, there is little chance of a meaningful hearing or investigation.

In an untainted news environment, the allegations would make headlines in most legitimate publications and would trigger federal inquiries. However, the interests of the powerful pharmaceutical industry reach deeply into Congress and the news media through lobbyists, propaganda and advertising dollars.

“The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism.” –CDC Senior Scientist Dr. William Thompson

That’s why Congressman Posey resorted to simply reading some of Dr. Thompson’s statement today on the House floor…including the part in which Dr. Thompson says he retained the evidence that had been thrown in the garbage can, in the unlikely event that a neutral investigative or scientific body would like to see it today.

“[B]ecause I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] and DOJ [Department of Justice] requests, I kept hardcopies of all documents in my office, and I retain all associated computer files,” Posey quotes Dr. Thompson as reporting.

The CDC and Thompson’s co-author Dr. Frank DeStefano, CDC Director of Immunization Safety, have defended the controversial study as originally published. Dr. DeStefano explains why here in detail.

One final note: Rep. Posey unequivocally states that he is pro-vaccine. However, the propaganda campaign typically falsely portrays anyone who addresses vaccine safety issues as “anti-vaccine.”

Listen to Rep. Posey’s statement by pasting the link below into your browser and going to 1:02:24

https://www.c-span.org/video/?327309-1/us-house-morning-hour&live

CDC responds to allegations it omitted vaccine-autism study link AUDIO

CDC: Possibility that vaccines rarely trigger autism

Rep. Posey’s entire statement about Dr. Thompson:

“I rise today on matters of scientific integrity and research. To begin with, I am absolutely, resolutely, pro-vaccine. Advancements in medical immunization have saved countless and greatly benefitted public health. That being said, it’s troubling to me that in a recent Senate hearing on childhood vaccinations, it was never mentioned that our government has paid out over $3 billion through a vaccine injury compensation program for children who have been injured by vaccinations.

“Regardless of the subject matter, parents making decisions about their children’s health deserve to have the best information available to them. They should be able to count on federal agencies to tell them the truth. For these reasons, I bring the following matter to the House floor.

“In August 2014, Dr. William Thompson, a senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, worked with a whistleblower attorney to provide my office with documents related to a 2004 CDC study that examined the possibility of a relationship between [the] mumps, measles, rubella vaccine and autism. In a statement released in August, 2014, Dr. Thompson stated, ‘I regret that my co-authors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics.’

“Mr. Speaker, I respectfully request the following excepts from the statement written by Dr. Thompson be entered into the record.

“Now quoting Dr. Thompson.

“‘My primary job duties while working in the immunization safety branch from 2000 to 2006, were to later co-lead three major vaccine safety studies. The MADDSP, MMR autism cases control study was being carried out in response to the Wakefield-Lancet study that suggested an association between the MMR vaccine and an autism-like health outcome. There were several major concerns among scientists and consumer advocates outside the CDC in the fall of 2000, regarding the execution of the Verstraeten Study. One of the important goals that was determined up front, in the spring of 2001, before any of these studies started, was to have all three protocols vetted outside the CDC prior to the start of the analyses so consumer advocates could not claim that we were presenting analyses that suited our own goals and biases. We hypothesized that if we found statistically significant effects at either 18 or 36 month thresholds, we would conclude that vaccinating children early with MMR vaccine could lead to autism-like characteristics or features. We all met and finalized the study protocol and analysis plan. The goal was to not deviate from the analysis plan to avoid the debacle that occurred with the Verstraeten thimerosal study published in Pediatrics in 2003.

‘At the Sept 5th meeting we discussed in detail how to code race for both the sample and the birth certificate sample. At the bottom of table 7, it also shows that for the non-birth certificate sample, the adjusted race effect statistical significance was huge.

‘All the authors and I met and decided sometime between August and September 2002, not to report any race effects from the paper. Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects. The co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room, and reviewed and went through all the hardcopy documents that we had thought we should discard, and put them into a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hardcopies of all documents in my office, and I retain all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper.’

“Mr. Speaker, I believe it is our duty to insure that the documents that Dr. Thompson are not ignored. Therefore I will provide them to members of Congress and the House Committees upon request. Considering the nature of the whistleblower’s documents as well as the involvement of the CDC, a hearing and a thorough investigation is warranted.

“So I ask, Mr. Speaker, I beg, I implore my colleagues on the appropriations committees to please, please take such action.”

Read CDC Vaccine Safety Info here

Read other vaccine news reports here

Order “Slanted: How the News Media Taught Us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism” by Sharyl Attkisson today at Harper Collins, Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Books a Million, IndieBound, Bookshop!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

73 thoughts on “CDC Scientist: ‘We scheduled meeting to destroy vaccine-autism study documents’”

  1. Who is worse? The scientists that took it upon themselves to hide evidence? Or a lazy and apathetic Congress that has been so thoroughly bribed by the pharmaceutical companies, that they won’t even act anymore? Vaccine manufacturers admit that vaccines are neither tested nor approved, according to their own package inserts. But nobody bothers to read them. There are 100s of billions of dollars at stake that are being fought for and protected by armies tens of thousands of lobbyists. And they’re doing an excellent job. Some specialize in working with the media and making it all seem like it’s just what we all need. This is not a conspiracy. It is a well-coordinated, multi-faceted attack on freedom, being carried out by an army of well-dressed executives covering Congress at the state & federal level, covering the media and purposefully creating animosity between the rest of us with a contrived campaign of Pro vs Anti – in order to keep our attention off the vaccine manufacturers on riveted on each other… As a CEO, I’ve seen well-coordinated attacks before. When they’re done right, the are multi-faceted and it seems like the news is coming from everywhere on some topic or product. This isn’t about vaccines causing autism – they do. This isn’t about whether or not they’re effective – they’re not. It’s about money. Lots of it. More than you can imagine.

  2. Would you please do a report on the attacks by the CDC and Big Pharma on sunlight? I just read a report out of San Diego that claims over 336,000 people die in the US from lack of sunlight.

    Thank You for all you do!

  3. I understand the reason children under 12 months or so do not generally have measles vaccination is because they are likely to have passive immunity from their mothers, i.e. maternally derived antibodies.

    The CDC MMWR report I quoted earlier notes: “Twelve of the unvaccinated patients were infants too young to be vaccinated.”(1)

    So it seems likely that these 12 patients were vulnerable in the tricky period when maternally derived antibodies wane, before vaccination around 12-15 months.

    It appears to me there is much uncertainty about the duration of maternally derived antibodies, and optimum timing for vaccination. This is likely to vary between individuals and depend upon factors such as whether the mother was vaccinated or unvaccinated, and breast-feeding. (I don’t claim to have any expertise in this area, but I’m interested to learn more about the effect and duration of maternally derived antibodies, for both humans and animals.)

    See for example Waaijenborg et al: “…Infants typically receive the first dose of vaccine around the first year of age. Maternally derived antibodies provide the primary protection for infants prior to this first vaccine dose. The initial concentration of maternal antibodies in a newborn is highly correlated with the antibody concentration in the mother. Subsequently, there is waning of the maternal antibody levels in the infant, leaving the child susceptible to infections. Optimal timing of the first dose of vaccine can contribute to keeping this period as short as possible. This is important because, among European infants aged <1 year, measles risk and severity are greater than the risk and severity among those aged ≥ 1 year. The optimal timing of the first MMR vaccine dose depends on 2 main factors. First, the infant’s immune system should be sufficiently mature to respond to the vaccine antigens. Second, levels of maternal antibodies must be low enough to ensure that they do not neutralize the live, attenuated strains in the vaccine. Insight in the kinetics and determinants of maternal antibody concentrations is therefore very important.”(2)

    In the CDC MMWR measles outbreak report it’s also interesting to note that: “Patients range in age from 6 weeks to 70 years…” It would be useful to have more information on the cases at the extremes of the age range, e.g. why wasn’t a 6 week old baby protected by passive immunity, and why did a 70 year old (whom one might presume would be immune) succumb to measles, and how badly were these individuals affected?

    References:

    1. Measles Outbreak – California, December 2014-February 2015. CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), February 20, 2015 / 64(06); 153-154:https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6406a5.htm?s_cid=mm6406a5_w
    2. Waaijenborg, Sandra et al. Waning of Maternal Antibodies Against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella in Communities With Contrasting Vaccination Coverage. Journal of Infectious Diseases Advance Access, published May 8 2013: https://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/04/29/infdis.jit143.long

  4. In regards to the highly publicised measles outbreak in California, the CDC reports:
    “Among the 110 California patients, 49 (45%) were unvaccinated; five (5%) had 1 dose of measles-containing vaccine, seven (6%) had 2 doses, one (1%) had 3 doses, 47 (43%) had unknown or undocumented vaccination status, and one (1%) had immunoglobulin G seropositivity documented, which indicates prior vaccination or measles infection at an undetermined time. Twelve of the unvaccinated patients were infants too young to be vaccinated. Among the 37 remaining vaccine-eligible patients, 28 (67%) were intentionally unvaccinated because of personal beliefs, and one was on an alternative plan for vaccination. Among the 28 intentionally unvaccinated patients, 18 were children (aged <18 years), and 10 were adults. Patients range in age from 6 weeks to 70 years; the median age is 22 years. Among the 84 patients with known hospitalization status, 17 (20%) were hospitalized.”(1)

    So 13 people vaccinated with a measles-containing vaccine came down with measles. (And there may have been more in the group of unknown or undocumented vaccination status.)
    It appears two doses of measles vaccine, or even three, does not guarantee immunity for all. It would be interesting to know more about the people who had multiple doses of measles vaccine, e.g. how old they are, exactly how old they were when they were vaccinated, and what brand of vaccine was used (presumably Merck M-M-R II if they were born in the US).

    I’d also be interested to know how the 10 unvaccinated adults fared, as I understand the effects of measles can be more serious in older individuals; and some details of the deleterious effects that resulted in at least 17 people being hospitalized.

    Could there be a problem with the measles vaccine, a la the mumps component of the Merck M-M-R II, which is currently the subject of lawsuits in the US, ie: “Lawsuits claiming Merck lied about mumps vaccine efficacy headed to trial” https://www.fiercevaccines.com/story/lawsuits-claiming-merck-lied-about-mumps-vaccine-efficacy-headed-trial/2014-09-09

    Reference:

    1. Measles Outbreak – California, December 2014-February 2015. CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), February 20, 2015 / 64(06); 153-154: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6406a5.htm?s_cid=mm6406a5_w

  5. Re the Antibody Titer Law (Holly’s Law) re measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination, referred to in my first comment.

    This law was passed in 2004 in response to the death of five year old Holly Marie Stavola who died of encephalopathy which she developed seven days after receiving her second dose of MMR vaccine. Holly’s family campaigned for this law, wishing they had known about the option of the antibody titre test before Holly’s arbitrary revaccination with the second dose of live MMR vaccine.

    On the HopeFromHolly website, Holly’s parent Robin Stavola says: “I served on the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as a parent of a vaccine injured child. We were compensated by the government for death. My family and I hope that Holly’s story will make a difference and help you realize that you must be aware of the benefits and risks of vaccinations for your child just as you make yourself aware of the benefits and risks of any medical procedure. We, unfortunately, were not educated in the area of vaccinations and because of this were not able to help the medical people help our daughter Holly. The reason we would like to tell Holly’s story is because we think other parents, as well as doctors, should know the truth and become educated about vaccinations.” https://hopefromholly.com/blog/our-purpose/

    The Antibody Titer Law brochure is available via this link: https://www.state.nj.us/health/cd/documents/antibody_titer_law.pdf

    I suggest it is unethical to withhold information on the option of antibody titre testing after MMR vaccination from parents and others individuals.

  6. These three Pennsylvania congressmen are on the Energy and Commerce subcommittee on Health.
    They are currently sitting on a proposed bill to mandate vaccines to the states.

    14 Doyle, Mike D 239 CHOB 202-225-2135 Energy and Commerce
    16 Pitts, Joseph R. R 420 CHOB 202-225-2411 Energy and Commerce
    18 Murphy, Tim R 2332 RHOB 202-225-2301 Energy and Commerce

    PLEASE CALL AND ASK THEM TO MAKE A FOIA REQUEST TO CONGRESSMAN POSEY FOR THE WHISTLEBLOWER DOCUMENTS, AND THEN MAKE THEM AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC. THE DOCUMENTS ARE IN AN UNREDACTED SEARCHABLE DATABASE.

    Please note that Merck and Co. (who have a monopoly on the MMR vaccine) are located in Pennsylvania.

  7. Another point about this is the fact they paid 3 BILLION dollars out to the victims of these injections over the past 20 years. That works out to be $150,000,000.00 a year to claims that had gone through. A few weeks ago I was reading on the web site that contains the information to file a claim for damages, there is a strict rule they have and that if your child is damaged mentally from the vaccines you have to have (basically) proof of your child being normal before it was injected. By means of a doctors full examination in writing stating there isn’t anything wrong with the kid BEFORE the injections. Otherwise your SOL trying to get financial help from the one’s who caused the damage. They will say it’s GENETIC! hands down every time!

  8. I WONDER WHAT’S IN THE REST OF THE DOCUMENTS THAT DR. THOMPSON SENT CONGRESSMAN POSEY??????????????????

    I saved this original post. The link is dead:

    “#CDCWhistleblower Update: US Congressman Posey’s Office In Possession of Up To 100,000 CDC Whistleblower Documents
    Posted on September 8, 2014 by ChildHealthSafety
    By: Ben Swann Sep 8, 2014
    CDCwhistleblower
    Congressman Bill Posey’s office has confirmed exclusively to Benswann.com that a “very large number” of documents have been turned over by CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, who has admitted that the CDC suppressed information about the links between the MMR vaccine and autism in some cases.
    According to Congressman Posey’s spokesman, George Cecala, “I can confirm that we have received a very large number of documents and we are going through those documents now. There are a lot of them, so it will take some time.” Cecala could not say exactly how many documents are in possession of the Congressman’s staff though sources tell me that as many as 100,000 documents have been handed over.
    Read rest of article here:
    Update: Congressman’s Office In Possession of 100,000 CDC Whistleblower Documents? By: Ben Swann Sep 8, 2014”

  9. Thank you ! Thank you Sharyl !
    I’ve been waiting almost a year to hear something from Congressman Posey.
    PLEASE CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVE AND TELL THEM TO GET THE DOCUMENTS.
    FOLLOW UP AND KEEP THEIR FEET TO THE FIRE!
    Refer them to Sharyl’s article.
    If you live in California, call your Assemblyman, especially ones on the Health Committee. Tell them to ask their Congressman to get these documents from Posey.
    HOLD THEIR FEET TO THE FIRE!
    The citizens must show broad base support for a hearing regarding Dr. Thompson’s documents.

  10. You’re correct about the lack of media coverage. That’s why it’s important that every person who post on a comment board about vaccines has to post in their comment the statement made by Dr. Thompson on how the CDC scheduled a day to destroy evidence. Just like the media ignored the original statement of Thompson’s last year it still went viral and so will this. However, there is power in numbers to some degree and if everyone post this information than the word will get out. Social media is used for more than just chit chat and passing around pictures. Flip the switch and use it the same way big pharma and the government has been using it for years—as a weapon, but as a weapon of mass enlightenment of truth.

  11. There is a good (recent) article on Natural News (dot) com that discusses the connection between autism and vaccines, but also the connection between cancer and vaccines. The article is very unsettling.

  12. Why is it so difficult to consider that a drug may not be 100% safe for anyone, especially infants with developing autoimmune and neurological systems? There is no one size fits all date when benefits outweigh risks. To discard data that does not fit your social and political agenda because it is good for 99% of society is criminal to the other 1% and their families. If this is true, what else has CDC “socially engineered” through misleading data?

    1. Same as wearing masks is not safe for everyone. I don’t wear masks because of medical issues but I can’t convince owners of certain area stores and businesses. They say “It’s store policy.” I wonder if it were store policy for customers to go to the roof and jump off in order to be admitted to the stores? If they survived the jump they could shop there.

  13. Outrageous! Yet another example of govt agents conspiring to commit a Crime Against Humanity by making sure the “informed” part of “Informed Consent” can never happen.

    Informed Consent Petition: https://tinyurl.com/InformedConsentPetition

    Notice to All Govt Agents: there is no statute of limitations under the Nuremberg Code.

    What you can do: https://drrimatruthreports.com/advancevaccinedirective/

    And this two hour discussion: “We Must Unite to Defeat Vaccine mandates” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=995Bag3UsSw

    1. Ralph, are you not a shark. Sue under the Fraud provision of the US Constitution, our government has lied. Fraud, screw the harm done protected by former employees of these same drug companies.
      Ralph, organic sulfur a crystal food can prevent the need of supporting any drug company being that organic sulfur has replaced all of the advertised drugs of pHarma. Bankruptcy can be more effective than legislation by our representatives also bribed by pHarma.
      The Cellular Matrix Study believes all of the vaccine damaged children can come back giving their moms their life back.
      Ralph you are correct there is no statue of limitations regarding the Nuremberg Code which called for hanging all of the chemists, even all of the post world war two chemists, hang them all.
      2016 is the year all vaccinations cease, never effective never safe.
      Vaccinating anyone could make you ineffective and never safe, we will find you.
      Vaccinatiors are pedophiles, look it up, and remind you pediatrician who pays the bill.

      Got Sulfur?

    1. Patricia boggess

      if the vaccines are hurting children’s please stop them let us know don’t hide too many are being hurt

  14. Sharyl ~ Thank you for your consistent reports regarding vaccines/immunizations and related information/links. I have a strong belief that the truth will win out as more and more kids/families become directly impacted by the growing epidemic of vaccine injury/early chronic illness onset/autism. With the parents/families of kids searching for answers & positive outcome treatments outside mainstream medicine continuing to share their successes using biomedical/natural/ individual needs body based treatment plans to heal their kids’ vaccine injuries more opportunities arise to “connect the dots” of causation(s). I am sincerely grateful for professionals, such as yourself and physicians/scientists and parents who listen & question on behalf of the well being of all kids. As a grandmom to a vaccine injured autistic 11 year old boy my hope is to uncover the facts and keep other children safe & healthy. Best Regards to you :)

    1. we grandmothers that are paying attention must be courageous to speak up to our children who are now having children and let them know they must get educated before inoculation of their children. Another great current book is ” How to stop the Autism Epidemic”.

      1. Believe me, I have had these talks with my children who think I just crazy, Plus my daughter in law is a nurse so she thinks that she has all the inside information. just saying, because the soon will or may have grandchildren too.
        just saying.

        1. I can relate. My daughter is a nurse and hopefully a parent someday. She’s all in on vaccinations and thinks I’m crazy too. I warned her not to get the covid vax and she got it anyway. I’m so afraid for her and my future grandchildren. My niece has 4 kids, two of them vaccinated and the two youngest are not. The two oldest have severe autism. It’s so sad.

          1. Terry, I am a semi retired nurse with lots of time to research this. I was sick to learn my daughter in law received the vaccine (she works with special needs children and felt it necessary, ) but so far my 2 children have not, although my daughter says if I keep sending her info, she might. Typical kid, huh. I feel for you and hope that maybe some of what we read is hype (not) or that future vaccines will be the cause of the major problems. What a sad world we live in.

      2. I am an aware grandmother who is not welcome to discuss this subject with her children and neices who are all parents who vaccinate their children .
        It is very difficult .

        1. Many people are in the same situation. With the help and ignorance of the media, and with assistance from CDC and other public health officials, pharmaceutical industry interests have effectively made it where simply discussing vaccine safety studies and issues — even if you are a peer reviewed, published researcher, is controversial and falsely labelled “anti-vaccine.”

          1. Recently found this thanks to a link posted at Conservative Treehouse.

            I.C.A.N. – Informed Consent Action Network . org

            Extensive vaccine whistleblowing, case studies , documentation and petitions to United Nations on known problems.
            Thanks for your actual journalism.

      1. andrew in your movie vaxxed , I believe you and others did a very credible job of exposing the cdc for the cover-up of tanted facts. I would like to see a full investigation into the financial links and ties between cdc employees and vaxine manufactures. Iwould prefer to further see the cdc taken out of the conflict of intrest business, and have them disbanded for the harm they have clearly caused.

      2. Hello Dr. Wakefield,
        I did research day and night back in 2001 on the MMR and other vaccines. I believed you then, and thankfully protected my five sons from the potential harm that the CDC has offered mothers and families. I know that they (everyone, the medical community etc.) have dragged your name through the mud, but to me- you’re a hero! I am so very grateful to you for your courage and your sacrifice! I hope that history will vindicate you and you will be know as the brave man that you are, a fine scientist, an honorable doctor and someone I consider a friend!

      3. Good to see this. I wish you were still practicing. My niece and nephew live in the area of the last address I could find for you. My sister,their grandmother and I saw your video.. You and your wife are awesome. Blessings!

Scroll to Top