• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Store
  • ION Awards
  • Podcasts
  • Full Measure
    • Full Measure Cover Stories
  • Donate
  • Bestseller "Slanted"

Sharyl Attkisson

Untouchable Subjects. Fearless, Nonpartisan Reporting.

  • US
  • World
  • Business
  • Health
    • Vaccine, Medical links
    • Omicron Lab Origin
    • Covid-19 Origins
    • Covid-19 Natural Immunity
    • Covid-19 Vaccine Concerns Summary
    • Covid-19 Vaccine: 80 Common Adverse Events
  • The Censored
  • Special Investigations
    • Attkisson v. DOJ
    • Media Mistakes, Biden Era
    • Media Mistakes on Trump
    • Other investigations
      • Benghazi
      • "Collusion v. Trump" TL
      • Election 2020
      • Fake News
      • Fast & Furious
      • Obamacare
      • Obama Surveillance TL
      • Other investigations
      • Ukraine 'Sabotage' of Trump TL

(VIDEO) Big Tech Censorship Part 2: Follow the Money

Dated: January 10, 2021 by Sharyl Attkisson 21 Comments

      

Watch at the link below. Transcript follows.

http://fullmeasure.news/news/follow-the-money/big-tech-censorship-part-2

It is no accident that so much Big Tech fact checking and labels appeared in the lead-up to the 2020 election. Millions poured into the efforts behind the scenes. We continue our report on Big Tech censorship by Following the Money.

Whistleblower Zach Vorhies says his bosses at Google were devastated by President Trumpโ€™s unexpected victory. Then-CEO of Googleโ€™s parent company Eric Schmidt was a major donor and volunteer for Hillary Clinton.

Beyond political activism, Big Tech also stepped up control over public information. When coronavirus hit, Google directed searches to the World Health Organization, the very group criticized for โ€œlet[ing] China take charge" and praising the communist nation where the pandemic reportedly started. Then came the mask disaster. Taking cues from public health guidance last March, many declared face masks "are NOT effective.โ€ And Facebook banned ads โ€œselling medical face masks.โ€

But if public health experts are now correct in their turnabout on masks, it was Facebook and fact checks that spread misinformation and cost lives.

Cindy Cohn heads up the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which supports free speech and open access to information.

Sharyl: Do you worry that information available to the public that was once fairly unfettered online is becoming increasingly controlled or even manipulated by those who are able to, whether it's the tech companies or other third parties?

Cindy Cohn: I think we're making, we're seeing visibly what used to happen kind of invisibly. I mean, most people knew that when you picked up your local paper, what you saw was what whoever owned your local paper wanted you to see. Now we've got these sophisticated algorithms that are deciding what people see as well as the platforms themselves. And I think it is making some people uneasy.

By one count, fact check groups more than quadrupled in number over five years from 44 to 195. Itโ€™s a multi-million dollars industry that stands to benefits certain interests depending on how the fact checks shake down.

Today, Facebook and Google are major funders of news organizations and fact check efforts spending hundreds of millions of dollars.

Republican Lindsey Graham questioned Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg about who exactly determines their truth.

Sen. Graham (November 2020): When it comes to fact-checking, would you give us a list of people you use to fact-check?

Mark Zuckerberg (November 2020): Yes, we work with a number of independent organizations that are accredited by the Poynter Institute, and they include Reuters, the Associated Press, Aegence France Presse United States, USA Today, factcheck.org, Science Feedback, PolitiFact, Check Your Fact, Leadstories and the Dispatch in the United States.

But no matter how well meaning, critics say Facebookโ€™s list of trusted sources is rife with conflicts of interest. For example, Poynter Instituteโ€™s PolitiFact has received millions of dollars from groups that support โ€œre-imagining capitalism,โ€ counting illegal immigrants in the U.S. census, and changing presidential elections from the electoral voting system to a popular vote.

One group, Democracy Fund, gave PolitiFact $900,000 and is also a major funder of anti-Trump political efforts. $1.3 million for Poynterโ€™s International Fact-Checking Network came from the left-leaning George Soros โ€œOpen Society Foundations" and the Omidyar Network.

Like other groups, Poynter insists its fact checking is independent and donors have no influence.

Another of Facebookโ€™s trusted sources, Science Feedback, was used to discredit a documentary examining alleged coronavirus links to a lab in Wuhan, China. Turns out Science Feedback relied on a US scientist who worked at the Wuhan lab. Science Feedback also takes positions siding with climate change advocates and the vaccine industry.

What about the news organizations Facebook counts on to fact check? Collectively, theyโ€™ve made plenty of their own reporting errors. USA Today misreported on Melania Trump's immigration status and falsely quoted Trump as saying Turkey invading Syria was โ€œnot our problem.โ€. Aegence France Press claimed 100,000 migrant children were in detention under Trump. But the figure was from 2015 under Obama. AP said media trust had fallen under Trump, mistakenly quoting an old poll actually done under Obama. Incorrectly reported conservatives funded the anti-Trump dossier, it was the Clinton campaign and Democrats. And wrongly reported that Trumpโ€™s pick for CIA Director, Gina Haspel, had waterboarded and mocked a terrorist dozens of times. But she wasnโ€™t even there.

Vorhies says his tipping point came when Google CEO Sundar Pichai told Congress the company doesnโ€™t blacklist websites.

Sundar Pichai (December 2018): We donโ€™t manually intervene on any particular search result.

Zachary Vorhies: And that's when I saw that Sundar Pichai was lying to congress by saying that they don't use blacklists. And I was sitting there as a full-time employee saying, "They don't use blacklists?" And I went and typed in blacklist and literally came to a blacklist that was named โ€œblacklist."

Vorhies resigned from Google and blew the whistle. About the same time, another former insider, Mike Wacker, also exposed Googleโ€™s blacklists. Which prompted a command performance of Googleโ€™s CEO before Congress.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (July 2020): So help us understand the inconsistency. There is either a manual component or there is not a manual component. Which is it?

Pichai(July 2020): For creating those lists, that process can involve a manual

Rep. Gaetz (July 2020): Okay, great. Well, that is sort of the concern that I have. You said that one of the reasons you maintain this manual tool is to stop election interference. I believe it is, in fact, your company that is engaging in election interference.

Pichai (July 2020): Congressman, with respect, I strongly disagree with that characterization. We donโ€™t approach this work with any political viewpoint.

Vorhies: And they're telling congress right now that "No, we don't use political bias or we don't filter on political ideology.โ€ And that's just not true.

If Big Tech developed a heavy hand after Trumpโ€™s election, it became a sledgehammer the final weeks of the 2020 campaign. Twitter labeled and censored many of President Trumpโ€™s tweets. It censored a New York Post expose on Joe Bidenโ€™s son. And post-election, YouTube banned videos disputing Bidenโ€™s victory. Facebookโ€™s Zuckerberg, Googleโ€™s Pichai and Twitterโ€™s Jack Dorsey declined our interview requests.

In testimony to Congress, they vigorously defended their practices, saying theyโ€™ve responded to calls to stop dangerous misinformation and fake news.

Jack Dorsey (November 2020): More than a year ago, the public asked us to offer additional context to help make potential misleading information more apparent. We did exactly that. Applying labels to over 300,000 tweets from October 27 to November 11.

Mark Zuckerberg (November 2020): We will always be working hard to minimize the harm. In the same way that a city will not minimize all crime. You try to reduce it and have it be as little as possible.

Sharyl: What's wrong with a company trying to, as they might say, be responsible and make sure that irresponsible or unfounded information and conspiracies don't make their way to a place where the public can easily see them?

Vorhies: The problem is that they are a monopoly. And the thing is is that if they decide that they're going to put their finger on the public narrative, that's going to be meddling in the election.

Congress is threatening to punish Big Tech by stripping them of legal protection they have under a provision of a law called Section 230.

Sharyl: But then the government steps in and says, โ€œMaybe we will help.โ€ Doesn't that add, though, another layer of potential complication?

Cindy Cohn: Absolutely. I think one of the, just because you have a problem doesn't mean that every solution is the right one. And I think we could really jump from a fireplace into a fire if we then decided that we're going to let who was ever in charge of the government decide what we see.

Sharyl (on camera): Both parties say they want to do something about Big Techโ€” but donโ€™t agree on the problem. Some want less censorship; others are pressing Big Tech to be more aggressive in controlling what they see as damaging information.


      
[the_ad id="17661"]

About Sharyl Attkisson

Emmy-Award Winning Investigative Journalist, New York Times Best Selling Author, Host of Sinclair's Full Measure

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Leslie says

    January 10, 2021 at 12:15 pm

    I canโ€™t find the link to part 2.

    Reply
    • Sharyl Attkisson says

      January 10, 2021 at 6:14 pm

      It's there now

      Reply
  2. Rick Bland says

    January 10, 2021 at 12:18 pm

    When I went to Apple Books, I noticed they include a grossly, dishonest and biased review by Publishers Weekly. I donโ€™t see such a hit job with any other books on their site. Maybe you should dig into and expose this group also.

    Keep up the good work. A free society needs people like you to expose corruption, bias, and dishonesty, regardless of political party or affiliation. Thanks for keeping journalism objective and honest.

    Reply
  3. Paul says

    January 10, 2021 at 12:25 pm

    Hi
    There is no link to watch.

    Reply
    • Sharyl Attkisson says

      January 10, 2021 at 6:13 pm

      Fixed now, sorry

      Reply
  4. Rory Tuggle says

    January 10, 2021 at 12:30 pm

    No video link โ€œbelowโ€.

    Reply
    • Sharyl Attkisson says

      January 10, 2021 at 6:13 pm

      Fixed now, sorry

      Reply
  5. Brad Pierce says

    January 10, 2021 at 12:38 pm

    Iโ€™d like to watch but I donโ€™t see a link! Thx

    Reply
    • Sharyl Attkisson says

      January 10, 2021 at 6:13 pm

      Fixed now, sorry.

      Reply
  6. Mark Edman says

    January 10, 2021 at 12:45 pm

    I may not be around to see it, but one day someone will carve Trump's face into a monument in a mountain. His greatest gift to us was tearing off the covers to unveil all of the corruption and corrupt characters who have been a cancer on the USA. MAGA will never go away, the the democrats do not have the support of America, which they are slowly waking up to.

    Reply
  7. R Peckar says

    January 10, 2021 at 1:24 pm

    I do not see a LINK BELOW?

    Reply
    • Sharyl Attkisson says

      January 10, 2021 at 6:12 pm

      It's fixed.

      Reply
  8. Kara M says

    January 10, 2021 at 2:45 pm

    There is no video link.

    Reply
    • Sharyl Attkisson says

      January 10, 2021 at 6:08 pm

      Should be fixed...

      Reply
  9. taxpayer says

    January 10, 2021 at 10:21 pm

    Sharyl, I appreciate the work you do, but it would be much more valuable if you included links, or at least source notes, to document the assertions you make. To take one example, "Poynter Instituteโ€™s PolitiFact has received millions of dollars from groups that support 're-imagining capitalism,' counting illegal immigrants in the U.S. census, and changing presidential elections..." You evidently have sources for this, and it'd be a bigger project than readers might care to undertake to identify which funders are doing these things as well as funding PolitiFact.

    Reply
  10. Perry J. Hayden Jr. says

    January 11, 2021 at 5:39 pm

    Sharyl, I watch your show "Full Measure" every week on ABC CH 30.1 KDNLDT in St. Louis, MO. They have your show scheduled to air at 9:30am to 10:00am and at 10:00pm to 10:30pm on Sundays. Although my online television guide listed that the shows on Jan. 10th would be โ€œBig Tech Censorship: Follow the Moneyโ€, they instead aired reruns of the show about โ€œRare Earth Elementsโ€. I found and watched the โ€œBig Tech Censorship: Follow the Moneyโ€ on the internet but wanted you to know that they didnโ€™t air the one that was supposed to air. I have to wonder why! Were they hiding it? Are you being censored?

    Reply
  11. Tom George says

    January 13, 2021 at 5:19 pm

    I use an Macintish (Apple) computer. The video will not play on Apple's browser (SAFARI). It also will not play on Google Chome (at least on my computer). It will p[lay, however on the Firefox browser. aybe you are being censored by Apple & Google.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Coming Soon

The Bad Shirts: High-Quality, Wearable Humor

The Sharyl Attkisson Store

Buy Great, Original Products & Support Independent Journalism

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

SUBSCRIBE TO SHARYL’S RUMBLE CHANNEL


Follow Sharyl Attkisson

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube



Footer

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Support
  • Contact

Sitemap

2ndary Pages

  • Full Measure Stations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Newsletter
  • Returns & Refunds Policy

SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

  • Attkisson v. DOJ/FBI
  • Benghazi
  • Election 2020
  • Fake News
  • Fast & Furious
  • Obamacare

Copyright © 2023 ยท Log in