Public health officials are paying close attention to blood disorders reported after Covid-19 vaccines. The chart below was presented at a recent meeting of CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
Not every illness or death reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is necessarily related to the vaccine.
So why are officials concerned about what seems to be relatively few blood-related events when compared to the total number of vaccines?
First, scientists have established that the adverse events that get reported to VAERS are only a small percentage of the illnesses that actually occur. The vast majority of averse events, they say, are not properly recognized or reported by physicians and patients. So each known case is taken to represent far more.
Second, the government's calculation of risk versus benefit for a medicine is complex and not simply a matter of "do more people die when taking the drug... or not?" Officials consider factors such as: How serious are the adverse events? How necessary is the medicine? Are there alternatives?
Here are the numbers of blood disorders or illnesses reported as of April 9:
- 180 out of 4.9 million people vaccinated: Janssen (Johnson & Johnson)
- 1,540 out of 57.4 million people vaccinated: Pfizer-BioNTech
- 1,298 out of 51 million people vaccinated: Moderna
Read the full chart below:
Sheila Haynes says
If I am reading this correctly, it does not make sense that the J&J vaccine would be singled out.
Sharyl Attkisson says
I think that proportionally, some of their incidences are more than the others. Still, the calculus is complex and hard to understand!
Mark Pinkstone says
In this summary it would seem that the disproportionate items for J&J/Janssen are in occurrences so infrequent that they could be pure statistical anomaly, or VAERS reporting variations. It could also be early reporting bias since the narrative concerning efficacy and safety has become more mainstream since then.
Tammy Porter says
Did you do all the shots given amount and each category of side effects to each vaccine?
Kathy Palmer says
Fauci and Gates both have interests in Moderna and Pfizer. That should answer your question. They want to get rid of competition. Also, these 2 are mRNA which in the long term will kill more people which is the goal of depopulation.
If Fauchi and Gates have an interest in Moderna and Pfizer, I for one would love to see the evidence of that.
Kim Brumfield says
I agree. Follow the $ who’s involved with moderna bill gates and were does Fauci fit J&J is the competition and it’s NOT an mRNA vax more people were choosing j&j
Don't Need the Attention says
Why are you not talking about the deaths? There have been more Vaxx related deaths in the first 3 months of 2021 than in the last 10 years combined. Report on the real story that a lot of people are dying from these experimental mRna gene therapy shots and no one is talking about it. Even more have died in Europe.
Charles weaver says
What’s the incidence of the same problems occurring in a similar number of unvaccinated individuals. Given only this data and no control data this is useless information.. For all I know the vaccines may reduce risk of these conditions
Sharyl Attkisson says
You may be right but we are all hoping CDC and public health officials examining this material and making the decisions have that information. Since they are typically very much aligned with the pharmaceutical industry, it should be taken seriously that they would pause or remove or not approve a medicine or vaccine. They only do such a thing, historically, when there is overwhelming cases for concern far beyond what the general public knows.
John J Totten says
You are certainly correct as usual about a lot known but not shared. Dr. Ryan Cole, a Medical Doctor in Idaho speaks about the Covid-19 corona Virus and about The mRNA vaccine which is not a vaccine but a gene modifier which is an experimental treatment. More importantly, the doctor talks about the great importance of vitamin D and how it has a big impact on the health of your immune system. He also talks about safe and effective ivermectin is for treating Covid-19 and new viral variants that would arise. The mRNA jabs killed all animals in the animal trials of the past, and animals share a majority of the same DNA as humans do. Common sense tells us shots that are bad for them are generally bad for us, medications that are good for them are good for us. Humans are animals too. It is true that the general public is not having this kind of information shared with us. He also mentions how masks do nothing to protect you from viruses and are useless for that purpose. There is a website under his name if you are interested. All that you do is appreciated and you must be running on empty at least part of the time. Thanks!
This data shows that the occurrences of these side-effects are EXTREMELY rare whether the shots reduce or increase them. I agree it is not complete, but is is very useful.
I wonder how this compares with other routine vaccinations (flu, etc.)? That would be an interesting comparison.
I can’t understand why these haven’t been pulled yet. When the swine flu vaccines had 50’deaths reported they pulled the vaccine. There are over 3000 deaths reported so far for these products.
Carla Mcgrath says
Why would anyone subject themselves to a death shot when the virus won't kill them but the vaccine will force disease you need tested for to know if you have it. This is control.
Ed Eichman says
There's always politics. CDC and FDA are political organizations with scientific wallpaper. One person dying because of the vaccine is a political nightmare, but if a thousand die because they couldn't get the vax, you can say COVID did it. Ultimately the life saving virtue of vaccines is hypothetical and doesn't have the same bite (in your career) as an undeniable 1 to 1 causality.
It's reckless to administer an unproven and experimental vaccine for an illness that most people are immune to and for which there are perfectly good treatments both inpatient and outpatient in the form of MATH+ and I-MASK+. See http://flccc.net
Nancy Van Pelt says
These blood disorders might not show up for years. Three years ago (Mar-Apr) I was hospitalized twice with ITP. I had not been sick with the flu/cold or had a high fever. In fact I had been very healthy. The Hem/Onc Dr. said he didn't know why, that sometimes it just happens. I went to a Chinese Med Dr. who is also a board certified Hem/Onc. He told me that it was a result of a vaccine that I had taken in the past. I haven't taken a vaccine for a couple of decades. The only flu vaccine that I ever took was the Swine flu and I'm sorry I did that because it gave me a bad case of bronchitis. I also took the Hep B shot back in the early 90's because I worked in a hospital and it was recommended. After a reaction to that I never took the second one. So, what I'm trying to say is this is not just an immediate reaction. You could have a delayed reaction. This could come back to haunt you years later and your Dr. will not consider this to be a vaccine injury.
For those of you who believe these unapproved vaccines are a good thing you go first. You be a part of this experimental trial but do not force them on those of us who choose not to be a part of this clinical trial. My body my choice remember? Let's see what happens with those in the trial in the next months and years.