The following is an excerpt of an article published in PublicIntegrity.org discussing low vaccination rates among long-term health care workers:
Nationwide, most of the elderly and vulnerable in long-term care facilities have taken the coronavirus vaccine, but many of the staff caring for them have refused it. The federal program responsible for bringing vaccines to the vast majority of nursing homes and similar settings inoculated roughly half of long-term-care workers in the nation, and in some states a much slimmer percentage, as of March 15, according to new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided to the Center for Public Integrity.
In seven states and the District of Columbia, the program vaccinated less than a third of staff members.
Now the federal program is winding down in the coming days, leaving states and facilities to figure out how to vaccinate the remainder of workers in settings where COVID-19 has already taken a heavy toll.
Though they represent a tiny fraction of the American population, long-term-care residents made up 34% of the nation’s COVID-19 deaths as of March 4, according to the Covid Tracking Project. Low vaccination rates among staff at these facilities mean that workers continue to have greater risk of contracting COVID-19 themselves or passing the virus to their patients, including residents who can’t be inoculated for medical reasons. Low staff uptake can also complicate nursing homes’ attempt to reopen their doors to visitors like Caldwell, who are striving for some sense of normalcy.
“Going into it, we knew it was going to be a problem,” said Ruth Link-Gelles, who led the team at CDC working on the federal initiative that’s now closing up shop, the Federal Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program.
She cited past years’ low vaccination rates among long-term-care workers for diseases such as the flu. “We were disappointed, but I don’t think anyone was shocked to see the low uptake. … There is a stubbornly large portion of the population that really doesn’t want to get vaccinated, and we have a lot of work to do generally and in this community in particular.”
Federal agencies and states have poured resources into a #GetVaccinated educational campaign, hosting listening sessions, live chats and virtual town halls for long-term-care staff to get their questions answered.
In spite of all these efforts, many workers are reluctant to take the shots because they don’t trust information about the vaccines’ safety or they don’t wish to be among the first to take them, experts said.
“There are many reasons to blame nursing homes and the federal government,” said David Grabowski, a professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School who studies long-term care. “We knew this coming in — that this was a group that was not very trusting of leadership and frankly not very trusting of the vaccine so it was going to take some work in terms of building that trust.”
Click on the link below to read the full article:
John J Totten says
I really don't blame them. We are not being given the info about bad effects on our bodies after the jab. Dr. Ryan Cole a medical doctor in Idaho says that the jabs are not a vaccine but a gene modifier which is an experimental treatment. More importantly, the doctor talks about the great importance of vitamin D and how it has a big impact on the health of our immune system. He also talks about the mRNA jabs that were used on animals in animal trials of the past and that the jabs killed all the animals. He says that common sense tells us that shots that are bad for animals are generally bad for us, medications that are good for them are good for us. Humans are animals too. Dr Ryan Cole has commented online and a simple search will find his comments.
gg pedestolae says
30% 0f ferrets died in one mRNA experiment after they were exposed to SARS-COV- in the wild a year later thought they did well against the virus at the time of the initial treatment. That's not "all the animals" but a significant number.
Mrs. Patriot says
If the vaccine doesn't stop the spread, as we have been told, then that's not a valid incentive to use to encourage people to get the shot, is it?
Todd McIntyre says
As a minimum, those LTC workers who refuse to get vaccinated should not be allowed to work with the elderly who require 24/7 care. These workers, who have Constitutional rights not to be vaccinated, should be transferred to work in areas where they only come in contact with those who remain mobile and are absent co-morbidities.
brian king says
you do know there is a critical shortage, nationally, in long term care staff. particularly at the CNA and nursing levels. in following your plan you will be denying care due to the lack of vaccinated replacement staff...
Just me says
This article leaves out the FACT that Natural immunity is BETTER than the EXPERIMENTAL vaccine. It also leaves out the FACT they saw the BS of false positive testing. Asymptomatic, and side effects of the vaccines up close and personal.
A J says
Your intelligence is really suspect! Glad you're not running what's left of our country. Sleepy Zhou is bad enough.
Julia Millan says
If the injections neither stop transferrence or infection, what difference does it make if the staff get it or not
The lack of common sense is more contagious than the virus. The jab is an experimental shot, under emergency use authorization. It CANNOT be forced on anyone. What happened to our HIPPA laws by the way? More brains have been washed, than hands over the last year. The insanity will not stop bless we stop it.
Cannot be forced on anyone?
I've been told I get both shots before June 7, or kiss my job goodbye.
So is that force or not?
do a little research you can not be forced into experimental treatments.
Cheryl Barbour says
The government cannot "force" the so called vaccine, however; Biden is "working with" corporations and companies to punish, ostracize, and segregate those who refuse this experimental drug.
‘We Made a Big Mistake’ — COVID Vaccine Spike Protein Travels From Injection Site, Can Cause Organ Damage • Children's Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org) Do some research and ask yourself, Is Biden lying? Is Fauci lying? Harris is only good for giggling so disregard her. The answer is YES< YES....so why in the hell would I trust these people? They've lied since the beginning and it's looking more and more like Fauci is responsible though we all know nothing will happen since he is protected by corruption and the media will lie. With so many lies, how can Americans trust our so called leaders. My God people, they ignore (after making) the border crisis....why??? Ask yourselves why is Biden doing everything he can against and not for America???? Be honest. This is just another term for Obummer and by the time it is over we may well have lost so much of our liberties and freedoms that we may not recover. Welcome to Socialism/Communism folks. Pray like you never prayed before.
that's force but if you don't consent to it, it cannot be legally enforced. further info through research/internet. good luck!
That's great,..if they don't want you, then you are free to go somewhere better or go on a permanent vacation!
United States Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration Rules That Employers Who Mandate the Covid-Jab are Liable if Workers Suffer Injury or Death!!!
The following Questions and Answers are from the OSHA website
(When they say that it's recordable, it means that it has to be filed as a workplace injury and treated as such)
Q If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?
A If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.
Q I do not require my employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine. However, I do recommend that they receive the vaccine and may provide it to them or make arrangements for them to receive it offsite. If an employee has an adverse reaction to the vaccine, am I required to record it?
A No. Although adverse reactions to recommended COVID-19 vaccines may be recordable under 29 CFR 1904.4(a) if the reaction is: (1) work-related, (2) a new case, and (3) meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7, OSHA is exercising its enforcement discretion to only require the recording of adverse effects to required vaccines at this time. Therefore, you do not need to record adverse effects from COVID-19 vaccines that you recommend, but do not require.
Note that for this discretion to apply, the vaccine must be truly voluntary. For example, an employee’s choice to accept or reject the vaccine cannot affect their performance rating or professional advancement. An employee who chooses not to receive the vaccine cannot suffer any repercussions from this choice. If employees are not free to choose whether or not to receive the vaccine without fearing adverse action, then the vaccine is not merely “recommended” and employers should consult the above FAQ regarding COVID-19 vaccines that are a condition of employment.
This is definitely progress as it likely means that employers won't be so Jab happy if they're the ones who are responsible for a lifetime of medical bills and wrongful death lawsuits.
All Covid19 info coming from the WHO, the CDC, the government health officials and "the news" is pure propaganda and is being made up on the fly. The "vaccines" are not only ineffective, they are DANGEROUS, as many people of all ages have died directly from them. Anyone with half an eyeball, and a fraction of a brain cell can see right through this scamdemic! STOP GETTING TESTED!! Enough already...
Beverly Teboe says
For people who brag about being 'vaccinated' it takes all my self control not to ask them if they have their affairs in order. The propaganda word is 'vaccine' which conveys thoughts of immunity. These jabs do not give immunity, all they claim to do is to reduce the symptoms of COVID, when there are proven medicines on the market that do a better job of stopping CoVID in its tracks, i.e. HCQ, ivermection etc. People are still requiring masks and social distancing, so what really is the point except to make the vaccine manufacturers wealthy? Also people who have had COVID already have a natural immunity and probably shouldn't be vaccinated anyway. This has been a scam from the get go. Two weeks to flatten the curve.
I think there are very good reasons to avoid this vaccine.
Bill Gates says that population control can come through vaccines.
While it’s obvious that these current vaccines kill, I think of how many people will die because of HC shortages if they try to make jobs mandatory to have it.
We are living through insanity like we have never seen!
Kevin Wrynn, Ed. D. says
Read this to understand why these are faux vaccines. They have redefined the meaning. They don’t make you immune nor do they prevent you from passing it on like a real vaccine.
Plus they create the protein which could prove to create health problems for many over time.
Dick Lanier says
Here is an excerpt from the linked article: "The NWO (New World Order) controllers want to download some kind of Microsoft office system or software into your body and brain, and hook you up to the JEDI and/or Amazon-CIA cloud, so they can have direct access to your brain.
Then, they can roll out “vaccines” which are not vaccines to continually update you, just like computer software gets regular updates. Viruses, real or not, and vaccines, real or not, are just means to achieve this goal."
Who believes this nonsense? I wish that I could properly express how stupid this is. But I really shouldn't have to since it speaks for itself.
Bill Gates' microsoft is notorious for its viruses. just sayin'.
Terry Roberts says
84 year old dad in assisted living, beat C-19 in the summer. Got vaccine in Feb. Died 2 weeks later.
Sharyl Attkisson says
Please report online to VAERS so they can watch for possible associations. Most people and physicians do not properly report...
I'm so sorry for your loss. This is terrible.
No one knows what will happen to the people who are getting the experimental therapy injections.
Some in the medical field are reporting those in close contact with them are experiencing worse than normal periods, premature periods, and post menopause bleeding. Men are waking up with bruises all over their bodies.
Immunologists say coming in contact with a wild virus may cause the immune system to destroy itself.
If the experimental therapies don't stop us from getting or spreading the virus, there's no point in being a lab experiment.
Bill Gates really wants to reduce the population by 95%.
I will not get a vaccine for a virus that has a low rate of death in my age group. I think the death rate from the vaccine is higher than the virus death rate in my age group. The media is clearly lying about many things going on in our country, they are hiding the things that would cause them to lose viewers that support their party ( and there is absolutely favorable press leaning). The fact that ppl are being censored for anything that goes against the social media platforms and broadcast news narrative including reporting side effects and deaths related to the vaccine has caused people to say no. Additionally, if anything goes wrong there is no one accountable and who supports our lifestyle and families? No one ! These jabs are experimental and in the years to come who knows what will happen. Healthcare workers have the right to say no and companies who deny them a job will pay. Nonetheless, the ppl who believe all others should be vaccinated need to remember that we all have choices and stop playing the guilt card. It won’t work. I keep my opinion to myself on what think about those who took the jab. It’s very worrisome for me but I don’t try to stop ppl I love from their choice to get the jab. I may be wrong but I hear it’s Moderna first vaccine and Pfizer has a very long record of lawsuits. J&J not the best but at least their not trying to push more boosters. Ppl getting vaccine still test positive so what’s the point. I fed up with it all! Turn your tv off and enjoy life.
BigPharma has indemnity from being sued unfortunately.
Dick Lanier says
My frustration grew as I read these posts about the dangers of the vaccines. I struggle to understand what would make people believe the things that they post. So here’s a question to ponder: Which is more likely to be correct: (1) the vaccine information on their safety and efficacy being provided by the various national and international medical organizations, complete with (peer reviewed) data to back up their claims, or (2) the musings of people with little to no formal medical training and the occasional fringe doctor with nothing more than anecdotal tales to back up their claims of danger from the vaccines?
I know where I would put my money.
Normally, I wouldn’t care if someone wants to disregard medical advice from those who are trained to provide such advice. I figure live and let live. And it might be a good thing when that decision only affects one person. But COVID-19 is a public health hazard. Everyone’s actions affect everyone else. So it’s not OK to indulge your inner child, that little voice inside your head that tells you that somehow if you just read a lot on some subject on the internet, that will make you better equipped to handle pandemics than the experts. Sorry, but life doesn’t work that way.
If the story of “bad” vaccines is true, that requires that the many hundreds, if not thousands, of medical professionals and others involved in the making and distribution of the vaccine are either too incompetent to see straight or too corrupt to care. Those are the only choices that I see.
These people have dedicated their lives to helping people. And because of their work, we have a chance to get out of this mess. And their reward is to be accused of such treachery. Well, count me out on that.
Of course, there’s a risk with the vaccine. So I guess it’s OK if those of us are willing to take that risk to help protect ourselves and others as long as you don’t have to. That sounds fair. Because if no one was willing to get vaccinated, the medical experts (whose predictions have been pretty good so far) are telling us that a whole lot more people are going to die.
And I won’t even indulge the conspiracy theorists that COVID-19 is somehow a “plandemic”. Holding such beliefs which maligns so many people’s character without any evidence is simply beneath contempt.
Some people (myself included) perceive the dangers of these vaccines as very legitimate due to all of facts that point to this pandemic as being rigged to trigger a new level of control over the general population. These vaccines were incredibly rushed through a controlled testing process that takes years to meet FDA approval before it even gets to human trial phases (and even then the bureaucrat's pockets get lined with tax payer dollars) yet it was somehow accomplished in less than a year.
From what I've read (and do not necessarily believe but have not taken the time to fully research) is that more people have died from the vaccine(s) than died in the last flu season before C19 locked everyone up in their own homes, destroyed small business, and unleashed a swath of emotional destruction upon families.
No entity - corporate, government or otherwise - has the power to violate my rights under the Fourth Amendment. Politicians and bureaucrat's from all of the alphabet agencies have tirelessly worked to circumvent every principle that is the foundation upon which this republic was built - that being the U.S. Constitution. If I want to get the vaccine then I will but it will not be done by force or threats (e.g. "Show me your vaccine papers" as I try to buy groceries for my family). Think of all the personal information one must divulge to even get the vaccine...a lot of it is information the government already has on file. Why do they want more? Why do they need more? Control.
This is not conspiracy. There is plenty of evidence and facts if one would just look for it (e.g. Fauci, a supposed expert in immunology, has not gotten one thing right the whole time he's been steering the C19 effort) but if they can't get their head out of the sand and take a look around at all the destruction going on - which this pandemic has played a huge role in aligning - then they're just another lemming blindly headed to a fate not of their choosing.
Dick Lanier says
Some people do indeed perceive the dangers of the vaccine. And I agree that there are likely some dangers. Just as there are dangers with almost all medications. The question is risk vs. reward. It seems to me that the risk of taking the vaccine is very small compared to a very great reward of a greatly reduced risk of getting the virus. As I said, normally I wouldn’t care if someone wanted to take some particular medication or not. And I don’t care now as long as those refusing to be vaccinated would be willing to isolate themselves so as not to spread the virus around. But that isn’t what’s happening.
What “facts” are there pointing to the pandemic “as being rigged to trigger a new level of control over the general population”?
Certainly the government can’t force you to take a vaccine. But private businesses (including grocery stores) certainly have the right to deny service to those who don’t. That is also a basic principle of our country.
Just for the record, according to the CDC, 34,200 people died from the flu during the 2018 – 2019 flu season. So I think that makes it almost impossible to believe that more people have died from the vaccines than from the flu.
When I got my vaccine, I had to enter my name, date of birth (age), address, and insurance information. I assume that the age information was required because at the time of my vaccination, age was one of the criteria for eligibility – had I been qualifying under a job-related criteria, I would have had to enter occupational information. That doesn’t seem like all that much personal information to me.
I dispute the claim that Fauci “has not gotten one thing right the whole time he's been steering the C19 effort”. He has gotten some things wrong certainly, but he’s gotten a lot more right. What are some of those many things (Please don’t use his statement that masks weren’t required. That statement reflected the medical community’s understanding at the time and has long since been corrected.)? But it’s kind of a moot point in that it isn’t just Fauci saying those things. So is almost the entire medical community wrong as well?
You say that this is not a conspiracy. OK, then, what would you call it when one group of people “rigs” things in order to be able to “trigger a new level of control over the general population”? Since they aren’t saying anything remotely like that in public, that sounds pretty much like a conspiracy to me.
Or are you claiming that the malevolent forces behind the virus are the conspiracy, but the medical community are simply unwitting allies? That seems like one interpretation of your “fate not of their choosing” comment.
There are legitimate questions about how the lockdown and other stay-at-home orders were implemented. Some almost certainly were not targeted correctly. And no one disputes the economic devastation that this had caused. We should review all of our actions so that we are better prepared for the next time. But we should also try to figure out what it is that makes so many people think that they know more than the medical professionals simply because they were being told something that they didn’t want to hear.
While mRNA “vaccines” have been studied for years they never successfully made it through the clinical trials for a reason.; you might want to check out why. The FDA has authorized not approved any Covid 19 vaccines so they are experimental. When you check the VAERS site you realize that as of today there has been more reported deaths in regards to these experimental vaccines than all the other previous vaccines combined over the last 15 years. As a healthcare provider I am a pro-vaxer but as with any other medical treatment I look at risk versus benefit because over the decades I have seen the FDA recall numerous treatments. Problems do show up that we’re missed in clinical trials. Just today I read about the #of fully vaccinated people who still got Covid & died from it; a little over 1% of the “breakthrough” individuals. That statistic alone gives me pause because they vaccines are suppose to reduce the severity of the disease not prevent it. Currently there is not enough evidence to convince me that benefit outweighs the risk! Everyone needs to make their own decision but it needs to be an informed one, not a pressured or forced one!
In this world "Everyone's actions affect everyone else" is your argument. First it's patently false. My actions won't affect others in China, or in Oregon. They may, possibly will to a greater or lesser measure, affect other people near me. But then that is true of life in general, so using your logic, we MUST require everyone to comply with every edict issued by an authority, right?
A full physical before we step out of the house every day to ensure we're "fit" to be out in, and not potentially endanger, the public. A heart patient must have a doctors release every day to drive in case he or she might have a cardiac event and potentially endanger the public, YOU.
Even now medical experts differ on the effectiveness of some of the covid measures. It's just which measures, which experts, you choose to believe after, as you put it, indulging "your inner child, that little voice inside your head that tells you that somehow if you just read a lot on some subject on the internet, that will make you better equipped to handle pandemics than the experts. "
The "experts" DID lie to us. They DID say that masks weren't effective against transmission early on. They DIDN'T say, it's a new virus and we're not sure how effective masks are (or aren't). They DIDN'T say "due to the shortage of masks we need to limit their use to specific settings or people to protect those most at risk". Now in revisionist history they change the narrative.
While the current strain may be a "novel" corona virus, corona virus's aren't novel and science should know enough about them in general that they/we should know what is and isn't effective. Yet masks and such haven't been required for other strains.. Recently Michigan led the nation in infections, having higher daily infection rates than last summer when Whitmer locked the state down. Yet now she refuses to issue the same orders. She blames those evil Republicans for it, but the only real difference between last summer and now is the party who holds the White House.
We don't know the risk of the vaccine. "Experts say it's safe" those are the same experts who have said multiple medications are safe, medications that have been removed from use because it turns out they aren't safe. This after years of testing, not months. If the vaccine is so safe, why insulate manufacturers from liability then?
We don't need, nor require, you to get the vaccine , or as you put it "take that risk" (which in an interesting phrase since "everybody" claims the vaccine is safe) to protect me. I'm quite capable of deciding all that for myself and accepting the results of my decisions. I much prefer to put my welfare into my hands, not yours. You can weigh the risk/benefit and decide for yourself. Your body, your choice (or does that only apply to infanticide). You don't get to do that for me. No matter how much time you indulge your inner child and read on the internet.
Not being a medical expert, I can say with 100% accuracy that everyone alive today is going to die Whether it's from covid, or heart disease or cancer or a distracted driver, or other causes.
Dick Lanier says
I will admit to engaging in some degree of hyperbole with my comment that “everyone's actions affect everyone else” comment. I thought that it would clearly be seen as hyperbole but apparently not. So let me try to be clearer. My point was that this isn’t a decision that you are making about how you might treat a noncommunicable disease like cancer. You may or may not die (sooner) as a result of your decision in that case, but that decision doesn’t affect the health of others that you come in contact with. That, of course, is not the case for COVID-19. Your decision not to be vaccinated greatly increases the risk not only to you but also to others in your orbit (including health care professionals required to treat you in case you do get sick). For deciding not to get vaccinated means that you believe that it’s OK for everyone else to so refuse. And then we’d be back at square one (or maybe square 2 as there have been advancements in treatments).
But you, of course, are also engaging in hyperbole by comparing the idea that taking a vaccine which has been shown to be effective in combating a deadly communicable disease to requiring a full physical just to leave your house in the morning.
You have incorrectly conflated my “inner child” comment with the restrictions imposed to combat the spread. I made no connection to the other restrictions in my original post although my second post does agree that there are questions about the effectiveness of some of the lockdown measures. I thought that it was clear that I was only talking about refusing to take the vaccine based on your “inner child” voice. Getting vaccinated is heavily supported by the medical community (I would have said “universally supported” but I didn’t want to be accused of hyperbole again given that there might be a small number of medical professionals who disagree).
You do have a valid point that Fauci changed the narrative around mask wearing early on. He never said initially that part of his concern was the availability of masks. Although, as far as I know, his original statement that masks were not necessary reflected the medical community’s thinking at the time, he wasn’t completely forthright about the whole situation. So you can consider that a lie if you’d like, but at least it was corrected shortly thereafter. And you haven’t provided any other examples for the past year. Now consider that Trump told Woodward in late January that COVID-19 was much worse than “even your strenuous flus” and then proceeded to tell the American public literally the opposite. And he never changed his tune. I submit that the degree of “lying” in these two instances is not remotely the same. So if lying is your criterion for anger, you can be miffed at Fauci, but you should be steamed at Trump.
You correctly point out that we have had viruses before and never required masks. But with the exception of the 1918 flu pandemic, none of those killed anything like the number that have been killed by COVID-19. And if you see pictures from that era, you can see that a lot of people are wearing masks. In a way, you are making my point for me. Since the medical community hadn’t recommended masks for previous (smaller) outbreaks, and they are now, doesn’t it stand to reason that this outbreak is a lot worse and requires more drastic measures?
And we have certainly for many years required proof of vaccination in order to attend public school. When I was a kid, I don’t think that any exceptions were allowed to that rule. And few, if any, pitched a fit then. Nor did they claim to know more than the medical establishment. So I believe that your historical perspective needs some adjustment.
I can’t speak to the situation in Michigan. Perhaps Whitmer doesn’t like the idea of begin kidnapped and possibly murdered.
Certainly the medical community has made mistakes in the past. And it’s always possible that they are wrong now. But we are faced with a deadly virus right now that isn’t going to go away until most people get vaccinated (clearly Trump was wrong when he said that it would go away in the heat). So sometime in the future we may find that there are long-term negative side effects from the vaccine. But the same could be said of those who have had COVID-19 and have “recovered”. Who knows what their medical life will be like many years from now.
I believe that I have addressed all your points.
But, in the end, it all boils down to your belief that you are perfectly capable of making the vaccine decision for yourself even though you have no medical training. What would you base that decision on?
I really like paragraphs.
Happened a lot but hidden by age, co- morbidities and a drug used in ICU’s. They are murdering the weak and old.
Jack Knife says
This can't come as a surprise. The government has done NOTHING to build trust in the vaccine because they can't. The facts don't exist.
Everything I've seen is simply a marketing campaign. "Take the vaccine", "Please, take the vaccine", "You won't be able to fly if not vaccinated". I, for one, require facts. And the facts that I've seen aren't very good.
To me, these vaccines are like iPhone 1. Who wants that thing. I'll wait for iPhone 12 (maybe). Watch as new, better tested, lower side affect vaccines appear in the future. I'm not willing to gamble with my life and I don't blame long-term healthcare workers for feeling the same way.
The System Has Collapsed - Therefore Get Rid of the 'Useless Eaters'.
Three (3) Economic Collapses in Two (2) Decades - National Debt 28 Trillion
2000 - Dot Com Tech Bubble Collapse.
2008 - Bankster Mortgage Bubble Collapse. (29 Trillion Bailout - Ron Paul Audit)
2020 - Everything Bubble Collapse. (4+ Trillion Bailout - No Audits)
The Corona Virus Plandemic – The Whole World Believed ‘The Lie’.
11Therefore God will send them a Powerful Delusion so that they Believe the Lie,
12in order that judgment may come upon all who have disbelieved the truth and delighted in wickedness. 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12
They that live godly in Christ Jesus shall doubtless suffer persecution.
Globalist Banker Predicted Scamdemic & Genocide of The Useless
I had covid in January, lost my smell and taste.
I work in a nursing home. I've seen Dr.s saying not to get the jab.
Well read the Georgia Guidestones. This is a bio weapon they want to thin the useless eaters.
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
Unite humanity with a living new language.
Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
I would feel 100% better about COVID vaccines if:
1- they receive standard FDA approval and the emergency usage flag is dropped.
2- manufacturer and government indemnities are also dropped.
I don't see how one can be trusting of these vaccines with such significant CYAs in place. These advocators have zero skin in the game should the concerns about long term effects materialize.