Over 9,000 Americans tested positive for Covid-19 after vaccination; 132 dead

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) calls them “breakthrough” Covid-19 cases. They are people who test positive for Covid-19 more than two weeks after being fully vaccinated for it.

As of April 16, there are 9,245 confirmed breakthrough cases reported in the U.S. so far, according to an Epoch Times report.

Nine percent (9%) of those people were hospitalized and 132 died, reports Epoch Times.

Some of the hospitalized breakthrough cases were reportedly asymptomatic for Covid-19, meaning they had no symptoms for Covid-19 but their infections were detected when they were hospitalized for another illness.

Twenty of the deaths were reported as asymptomatic or not related to Covid-19.

The actual number of infections after vaccination are believed to be far higher than what’s known, because scientists have established that only a fraction of events that occur are actually reported. Reporting from state health departments is voluntary. But the data is considered helpful in identifying patterns and looking for commonalities or signals among breakthrough cases.

The CDC still says vaccines are effective, noting that the known breakthrough cases represent a small number of the total number of people who have been vaccinated.

Over 133,000 adverse events associated with the Covid-19 vaccine have now been reported to the voluntary Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), according to the Epoch Times report.

VAERS reports 3,607 post-vaccine deaths, 2,527 life-threatening cases, 1,600 cases of permanent disability and nearly 8,500 cases where patients required hospitalization following their Covid-19-vaccine.

VAERS has not detected patterns in cause of death that would indicate a safety problem with COVID-19 vaccines.

Centers for Disease Control (CDC)

Click on the link below to read more:

Epoch Times: at least 9,245 Americans positive for Covid-19 post-vaccination

Support the fight against government overreach in Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions.
Thanks to the thousands who have already supported!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

17 thoughts on “Over 9,000 Americans tested positive for Covid-19 after vaccination; 132 dead”

  1. Sharyl it would be nice to know a breakdown of what vaccines the 9000 individuals were given.
    My guess is that the government won’t want to divulge the information for fear that this might play into peoples decision to get vaccinated. Seems to me this is the information we should be getting. In this day of databases and electronic reporting it should be readily available.

  2. Please watch Dr. Jane Ruby’s interview of Dr. David Martin. You know that every honest and courageous medical doctor and scientist is banned and censored nowadays, the level of tyranny is pathetic… and very dangerous.
    I add a few links about the issue of vaccine shedding; of course Fake News Main Stream says it doesn’t exist.
    “This is a new low, from the delusional wing of the anti-vaxx cult,” said Zubin Damania, MD, a.k.a. ZDoggMD, in a video he recently posted to bust vaccine shedding myths.”
    That’s a lot of insults in a short sentence, with zero proof, as usual.

    Vaccine shedding myths? Every person with 2 functioning brain cells and an Internet connection can find detailed scientific evidence in less than a few minutes. There are hundreds of examples, just a few quotes and links here:
    “Live rotavirus vaccines have been developed for the protection of children from severe wildtype rotavirus infections. Transmission of vaccine virus strains from vaccinated children to unvaccinated contacts harbours the potential for herd immunity, but also the risk of vaccine-derived disease in immunocompromised contacts. A review of rotavirus vaccine prelicensure studies shows that viral shedding and transmission were higher with the old tetravalent rhesus rotavirus vaccine than with the current human attenuated monovalent rotavirus vaccine and the pentavalent bovine-human reassortant vaccine. Immunocompromised contacts should be advised to avoid contact with stool from the immunised child if possible, particularly after the first vaccine dose for at least 14 days.”
    November 2008 The Lancet Infectious Diseases 8(10):642-9

    “Why It’s Important to Still Wear a Mask After Covid-19 Vaccination
    Vaccinated people should still wear masks around unvaccinated individuals to prevent transmission
    A medical worker loads a syringe with the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine to be administered at a vaccination
    By Claire Bugos SMITHSONIANMAG.COM February 18, 2021
    “A study published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in November shows that people who recover from natural Covid-19 infections develop antibodies to protect the mucosal regions in the respiratory tract, but there is no evidence yet that the same is true with vaccine-induced immunity. Deborah Lehman, a professor of clinical pediatrics at UCLA, says if a Covid-19 vaccine is able to prevent the virus from living in the mucosal passages, it may not be able to spread to other people.
    “Since scientists haven’t yet found evidence that the vaccines provide mucosal immunity, someone who is vaccinated and has no symptoms of illness may be carrying the live SARS-CoV-2 virus and spreading it to others when they cough, breath or sneeze.”
    “To test whether this population is spreading live virus, Corey says researchers need to collect samples from a large group of vaccinated people multiple times per week for evidence of viral shedding.”
    To be clear, vaccinated people can still catch a virus and transmit it to others. Tell me the definition of a vaccine again?
    “Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.1,2 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10”
    As usual, great article here:
    Other studies
    A Study to Evaluate the Shedding and Safety of Trivalent Influenza Virus Vaccine Live, Intranasal in Infants and Young Children
    Shedding of Vaccine Viruses with Increased Antigenic and Genetic Divergence after Vaccination of Newborns with Monovalent Type 1 Oral Poliovirus Vaccine
    Journal of Virology https://jvi.asm.org/content/83/17/8693
    “In a study of 200 children aged 6 through 59 months, shedding of at least one vaccine virus was detected in 79% of children overall, and was more common among younger children (89% of 6- through 23-month-olds as compared with 69% of 24- through 59-month-olds)”
    Mallory RM, Yi T, Ambrose CS. Shedding of Ann Arbor strain live attenuated influenza vaccine virus in children 6-59 months of age. Vaccine. 2011 Jun 10;29(26):4322-7.
    “At a diagnostic laboratory between 2016 and 2018, 46.7% of positive cases of rotavirus in infants were the result of vaccine-related viral shedding, according to a study published in Clinical Infectious Diseases.”

    Welcome to share when people say vaccine shedding is a myth of the delusional wing of the anti-vaxx cult :)

  3. The government is in an uproar over Peloton about a child dying on one of its machines. One! Now they want to inject this into children.
    I receive emails from Vaccine Impact News, as of today there have been 4,178 Americans dead following the Covid 19 jabs. CDC just released these numbers.
    This is genocide!

  4. This headline continues to blare without any context. If 100,000,000 Americans were inoculated and only a little more than 9000 had breakthrough cases, that’s .009%. The reported efficacy was about 92 – 95% for Moderna and Pfizer. J&J much lower. So if the figures were reported fairly and without hype, it’s far better than two jabs of the polio vaccine and one of the smallpox vax. But hey, these sorts of hysterical headlines are far more exciting, aren’t they?

    1. And then there’s this from 2015… https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599698/
      “Deaths following vaccination: What does the evidence show?”

      Final sentence in abstract: “However, making general assumptions and drawing conclusions about vaccinations causing deaths based on spontaneous reports to VAERS – some of which might be anecdotal or second-hand – or case reports in the media, is not a scientifically valid practice.”

      We could discover in time that the vax against CCP virus is dangerous, but for now, to make assumptions, it seems a bit premature to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the CCP vax.

      1. I completely agree that it is premature to draw conclusions about the safety or efficacy of these vaccines. That is the whole point. No one knows if these vaccines are safe. We need to be thoughtful about all of the information and data that is unfolding in real time.

        In the meantime it is important to note 2 things:

        1) The Vaccine Safety Experts from around the globe literally have no idea about the safety of vaccines individually or when given as part of the schedule. And they certainly do not know the safety of these medical injections. This video is long and some of it terribly boring, but there are parts of the discussions and comments will absolutely shock you especially if you thought that “they” knew vaccines were safe. https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2019/12/02/default-calendar/global-vaccine-safety-summit

        2) A study done for Department of HHS by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc looking at data from 2007-2010 concluded that less than 1% of Adverse Events are reported.

        “This research project was funded to improve the quality of vaccination programs by improving the quality of physician adverse vaccine event detection and reporting to the national Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)”

        “…, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”


    2. Well the CDC says as of April 15 the number vaccinated with two shots was 76,681,252, so yes, that’s a whopping .012%.

      However, it’s the Government that does this to themselves with their “If it saves one life…” mentality.

      The US population is very bad with percentages and numbers.

      While 571,297 deaths at last count were due to COVID, that’s of 32,031,068 reported cases. Tell people 571,000 are dead and they demand action. Tell them 1.78%, not so much.

      Tell them them 571,297 of 328.2 million (US population) (0.174%) have died and it wouldn’t even be mentioned in the press.

      Context is a tricky thing and is used for spin by all sides of an argument.

      Given the figures above, would most people say the lockdown was worth it to save 1.78% of the population? Perhaps not. Tell them that would be 5.84 million dead and they will scream in terror.

  5. I’ve been trying to keep a tally of all deaths reported in the news. I don’t see a pattern as to one vaccine over the other causing deaths. They seem to be equally spread out. What is telling though, is that the Media, GOV, even doctors, will call any death related to Covid a Covid death (for instance, someone tests positive for Covid but dies in a car accident) but rush to say that a death after receiving the vaccination “is not related” immediately after the person has died.
    AMEN to Diana that mentioned the uproar of the death of one child due to Peloton, yet majority of adults rushing to sacrifice their children due to the hive mind.

  6. As I have posted before, one job of a journalist is to provide context, to explain how whatever that latest news is fits into the overall picture. Well, once again, SA has provided an article crammed full of data points without the slightest bit of context. The fact that there have been 9000+ breakthrough cases should come as no big surprise. It’s only surprising that the number isn’t higher. For with a 95% efficacy rate and a 100,000,000 population base, something on the order of 5,000,000 cases are to be expected. So, yes, it stands to reason that the actual number is “far higher” than what has been reported.
    And the idea of reaching any serious conclusions based on raw VAERS data seems borderline preposterous. We are told that there have been “3,607 post-vaccination deaths”. OK, how does that break down? What were the ages of those that died? What were the causes of death? There’s that context again.
    This reminds me of a previous newsletter article that claimed something like 16 people had died two weeks after receiving their shot, strongly implying that something bad was happening. Missing from that article was the point that all but three of those people were well into their 70’s. One poster calculated that, assuming a uniform distribution of the deaths and assuming that none of that population was going to live past 100 meant that more than 1,300 deaths should have been expected in any given two-week period just from the law of probability.
    Several of my family members had “adverse events” from the shot. They basically were laid up for a day. None of them reported it to VAERS, but they certainly could have. No one should get too worked up about the VAERS data until the medical people have looked at it. And thus far, they continue to say that the vaccines are safe. Here are a couple of points from the CDC website about using VAERS data:
    a) VAERS reports are submitted by anyone and sometimes lack details or contain errors.
    b) VAERS data alone cannot determine if the vaccine caused the reported adverse event.
    And while it is true that it might turn out that the COVID-19 vaccines have long-term bad side effects, it’s also possible that it will turn out that those who have recovered from COVID-19 will end up suffering negative long-term medical consequences.
    And nowhere in this article is an attempt made to quantify the number of deaths that should be expected if none of the 100.000.000 had been vaccinated. I can only imagine that the number would be a whole lot greater than 132 (For example, if half of that population got COVID-19 and the mortality rate was about .3%, that would mean 150,000 deaths. You can quibble with the specific numbers, but no matter how you slice it, it’s going to be a whole lot more than 132.). Why not point that out?
    I always ask myself what the purpose is when I see articles such as this. It sure seems like it is intended to cast doubt on the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. But that story is undercut if all of the relevant information is provided, if a more balanced article is published. So instead we get this.
    And just for the record, the CDC reported that between March and the end of last year, there were 522,368 excess deaths in the U.S. Not all of those died of COVID, of course, but they died of something. And even though a lot of those that died had underlying health conditions, the salient question is how many of them would be alive today if not for COVID-19. My guess is almost all of them.

    1. These numbers are important when mandates are on the line because true efficacy and side effects from the vaccines have not been fully vetted. The FDA Emergency Use Authorization shortcuts the process of determining medically serious side effects. Drugs that show high promise in initial trials are later never FDA approved because of adverse side effects discovered in broader trials. Even FDA cleared drugs- Vioxx, Meridia, Accutane to name but a few- which were cleared by the FDA were subsequently detected to have previously unrecognized medically serious side effects. Which is why we do not mandate them. The truth stands that the full clearance and risk factors normally required for any medication introduced in the United States has not been performed for these vaccines, so these numbers do indeed matter, especially in matters of mandates.

      I have three college – age children facing mandates. All three of my children have had Covid-19. I know their risk from a Covid infection because we’ve faced it. I do not know their risk from these vaccines especially since any studies on people who have already had Covid and then receive the vaccine are non-existent. My children have antibodies and T-cells from having had Covid but are being mandated a vaccine because -without studies- somehow it is known their natural immunity is not as good as vaccine immunity. So I’m watching these numbers and these mandates very closely- they matter very much to this mom.

      1. I didn’t think any organization could mandate a trial experimental drug. I think that is against the law. You have to ask these colleges “will you be responsible if my child has an adverse reaction.” These jabs are trial shots until 2023, I believe.
        Taking the jab since it’s in trial stages, you need informed consent. They cannot give you any long term information about these jabs.
        If you need help with this go to Robert Kennedy JR website. Children’s Health Defense. They will be able to give you answers. Look up DrShari Tenpenny, Dr Delores Cahill, Dr Mercola. They will tell you about these “ vaccines”., that are not vaccines but gene therapy. I wouldn’t dare let any of my kids be injected with this poison.

    2. You had a great piece going until you made the massive assumption regarding “excess” deaths and COVID, unless you really believe all the deaths in which COVID was reported as a cause were in fact due to COVID.

      So, “person that committed suicide because they got depressed in lockdown” – would they be alive were it not for COVID? Theoretically yes. Are they dead because of COVID? That’s a stretch.

      1. I assume that your comment was directed at my post about COVID-19 deaths, so please allow me to explain my position further. The main point that I was trying to make was to counteract the story (seen in this news letter almost any time a vaccine story is published) that the number of COVID-19 deaths has been (greatly) exaggerated. This is usually part of a more general narrative against mask wearing and other mitigations strategies (including vaccines) because the claimed lower death count is supposed to make it seem terribly unreasonable to take such drastic actions as have been taken when the threat is not that great. And it also furthers the conspiracy theory that the government is lying to us for some nefarious reason.
        The basis for my counterargument is simply the excess deaths (522,368) in 2020. Think about it this way. For many years, the death count has remained relatively steady (the increases for 2017, 2018, and 2019 were 2.5%, .9%, and .5%, respectively). Then a deadly pandemic is unleashed upon the country and the number of deaths jumps 17.6%. That doesn’t prove anything by itself, but it seems awfully suspicious to me. I looked up the top 11 causes of death in the U.S. in 2020, and it shows roughly that, outside of COVID-19, the number of deaths from the other 10 causes increased by about 70,000. That leaves more than 450,000 unaccounted for. What other choice is there for the cause of the majority of those missing deaths than COVID?
        There is also the related argument that most of the people that died from COVID-19 had other health conditions. While that is true, my argument is those health conditions likely existed in 2019 as well and the death count did not spike in that year (or the year before that). So it seems logical that a lot more of those people would have been alive, absent COVID-19.
        I am not claiming that “all the deaths in which COVID was reported as a cause were in fact due to COVID”. But I am claiming that there is no other known mechanism that could be responsible for the greatly increased death count. So I would say that, yes, COVID-19 is responsible for the great majority of the deaths attributed to it.
        BTW, the number of suicides actually went down last year.

        1. Hello,
          I just spent some time reading about suicide; it’s quite complicated and as usual it takes time to find reliable data, so here it is:
          “In 2019, a total of 47,511 deaths were attributable to suicide. From 2018 to 2019, the overall suicide rate declined significantly by 2.1%”
          A little hint, look for “Official final data”.
          Around two third of suicides are committed by while males by the way.
          For 2020, it appears that there was “no rise in suicide rates (Massachusetts, USA; Victoria, Australia; England) or a fall (Japan, Norway) in the early months of the pandemic.”
          Most info on suicide relies on early data, so it’s clearly not the final picture:
          However, in Japan for example, “The 20% decrease in Japan early in the pandemic seemed to reverse in August, when a 7.7% rise was reported”.
          I think this trend happened almost everywhere: “Increase in suicide following an initial decline during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan”
          Here is the data I have for 2020:
          48,344 Americans died by suicide.
          And now, my educated guess on what is going to happen: a very large increase at the end of 2020 and in 2021.
          Check this for example:
          “In Japan, more people died from suicide last month than from Covid in all of 2020. And women have been impacted most”
          https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/28/asia/japan-suicide-women-covid-dst-intl-hnk/index.html (November 30, 2020)
          Military Deaths by Suicide Jumped 25% at End of 2020
          Take care

  7. “Coronavirus: Conspiracy theorists falsely claim COVID-19 vaccine is infectious through ‘shedding'”
    I can’t stop laughing when I read this, until I eventually stop and begin to worry. The ignorance of MSM is abysmal, or perhaps they lie on purpose, I don’t have the answer to this existential question yet.
    Please have a look at this:
    “Self-Spreading Vaccines: Self spreading vaccines are genetically engineered to move through populations like communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection. The vision is that a small number of individuals in a target population could be vaccinated, and the vaccine strain would then circulate in the population much like a pathogenic virus, resulting in rapid, widespread immunity.”
    Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks (2018). Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
    And if you are still not convinced:
    “Transmissible Viral Vaccines” Trends in Microbiology
    Volume 26, Issue 1, January 2018, Pages 6-15
    “Technology for self-spreading vaccines now available”
    “We now have the technology to develop vaccines that spread themselves”
    When self-spreading vaccine technology was not a myth…
    “From self-spreading vaccines to 3D drugs: the tech that will stop a pandemic”
    2018 The Telegraph
    Conclusion: My body, Big Pharma’s choice
    Take care

Scroll to Top