Donald Trump is a major news figure but many media outlets and platforms have conspired to censor him and to censor certain information about him for political reasons. We will publish some of that difficult-to-find information here.
| - May 22, 2021 - |
| Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America |
| Where’s Durham—what ever happened to the Durham Report? |
Buy SLANTED anywhere today.
To support my independent reporting and fight government overreach in Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI, visit here: https://www.gofundme.com/sharyl-attkisson-4th-am-litigation
Gee, when I said the exact same thing just the other day, it never made national news. Indeed. Where is the Durham Report - where is a preliminary Durham Report. Do we get our money back?
Lack of accountability for public malfeasance - the operations of the deep state - has rotted out this country more than anything - the side that gets away with it and the side that never gets a sense of retribution for bad actions. Full rot. And now it shows in every day life and increasing violence.
It all started at the top. And in recent memory if has all given the Democrat deep state a free pass. I despair, but I am old. The full brunt of this rot falls on the next generations. Moral relativity has no fans any longer.
Well stated.
Agreed. They were threatened or paid off, or both.
Well said.
Ditto
i will be working closely with a non-profit organization in the immediate future dedicated to elevating the two lowest income brackets of the population up to solid middle-class annual income, eliminating poverty. please help to raise awareness about it. more details at tjeforpres.com thank you
I read that he destroyed all the information that he had gathered, I forget where, but lack of any action has me believing it.
In my opinion, Durham was appointed to do what Mueller could not do. When Mueller was unable to charge President Trump with any crimes, his task became to destroy evidence of illegal actions by those involved in the coup.
So Durham investigated people involved but that Mueller could not interview for one reason or another.
This would be highly unlikely. If true, Judicial Watch would have been all over this public document destruction. They are magicians when using the Freedom of Information Act. One of the first things they look for are obvious gaps in the mandated document deliveries - they are back in court in an instant if this is what they find.
So wholesale destruction of an entire documentary record, paid for by US tax dollars and automatically protected as public work product would be very, very hard to get away with.
Even Clinton had t cough up a few damning hair balls in her record when Judicial Watch had the courts intervene. And publicly explain why there were so many gaps in her records too.
Destruction unlikely - culpability based on malfeasance findings so far unsatisfactory - hiding and obstructing the process - well, that has been the story over the past few years has it not. Judicial Watch is your friend in court on this topic.
Sharyl is your friend in the press keeping these critical, but often orphaned, issues alive.
I read that he destroyed all the information that he had gathered, I forget where, but lack of any action has me believing it.
In my opinion, Durham was appointed to do what Mueller could not do. When Mueller was unable to charge President Trump with any crimes, his task became to destroy evidence of illegal actions by those involved in the coup.
So Durham investigated people involved but that Mueller could not interview for one reason or another.
I was unable to access Trump's comment.
It was short: "Where’s Durham—what ever happened to the Durham Report?"
I read Durham destroyed any information gathered during his investigation. I forget where I read this, but I doubt it got as far as a completed report,
I have a couple sites to check out, I am hoping one of them will give me the answer.
still nothing on his official website.
There is no statement listed here...
The memory hole. Used by the Ministry of Truth to destroy evidence of the government rewriting history. (1984)