| - August 11, 2021 - |
| Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America |
| Good morning, America! While you were all sleeping, the Radical Democrats advanced a plan that will be known as the $3.5 trillion Communist Plan to Destroy America. This legislation is an assault on our Nation, on our communities, and on the American Dream. It destroys our Borders and the rule of law by granting dangerous amnesty that will flood America’s beautiful cities. It will overwhelm our schools, and make our Nation less safe. It raises taxes like we have never seen, while also making many things you buy everyday more expensive (gas, groceries, and much more). And don’t forget the crazy Green New Deal. America, you are being robbed in the dark of night. It’s time to wake up! |
Sharyl and Full Measure Team,
Nix this after copying to paper, for
future reference—as keeping it
here might cause tedium, to wade
through my analyses on Democrats’
mental illness and Republicans’
more rational/logical mind-set :
======
©2002
An Analysis of the Relationship
Between
Left/Right Politics
and
Nuclear-Family Dynamics
(( —excerpted from my mailing about
BUSH and CLINTON'S political
psychologies ((from my October 12,
2000, mailing :
"BAD MOTHER and BAD FATHER" )):
##############################
PART 3,
— Study Nuclear-Family Dynamics to Understand the Politics of LEFT vs. RIGHT —
My Premise :
REPUBLICANS are to father
what Democrats are to mother
in the nuclear family dynamic.
WHENEVER ANY LEFTIST decries rightists' social/political policies he/she is attacking an authoritarian FATHER-figure in the HOUSE and siding with an anything-goes MOTHER-figure, reliving his/her resentment at being told what to do within the family dynamic.
ALL OF LIBERALS' LIBERALISM in the last century - from FEMINISM to FORCED INTEGRATION to OPEN BORDERS to GAY RIGHTS - has been ((is)) a massive, hysterical rage against FATHER'S reason-driven authority in the HOUSE.
SUCH FEMINIST HYSTERIA reflects clinical insanity.
America, Great Britain and all other white Western democracies are in the grip of FEMINISM; a social/political condition of clinical insanity, being driven by left-wing EMOTIONALISM ((right-wing RATIONALISM restores sanity)).
IF YOU WISH to understand politics,
Left and Right, study nuclear-family
dynamics :
FOR PURPOSES of my
below explanations :
"FATHER" = Republicans
"MOTHER" = Democrats
"CHILDREN" = Citizenry
"HOUSE" = Position of Power and Control
"MORAL AUTHORITY" = A Nation's Underlying Legitimacy
TODAY'S REPUBLICAN PARTY reflects the character of a bad FATHER while the Democrats reflect the character of a bad MOTHER, and while the CHILDREN are to choose between those two bad parents on election day.
Bad-FATHER in George W. Bush and
company displays an unfaithful cad,
greedily pursuing profit-making for
his money-grubbing friends ((Bush
is no social conservative but an
economic one, concerned not with
family values or patriotism or white
Western civilization, but with
INTERNATIONALISTS' bottom-line
profit-taking)).
Bad-MOTHER in Bill Clinton and company
reflects an unfaithful tramp, who
resents FATHER'S seeming disinterest
in the welfare of the CHILDREN ((keep
in mind that physicality doesn't necessarily
reveal the psychological sex of an individual,
as Bill Clinton is female in that male body—
as are many liberal Democrat "men")).
But MOTHER has no noble character here. She is an enabling, underhanded tramp because her care and concern for the CHILDREN are a ruse—a means to seduce the CHILDREN and persuade them to help her kick FATHER out of the HOUSE. She enables the CHILDREN by appealing to weakness in them, by promising to give to them what they ought to acquire through self-reliance and hard work.
FATHER is a natural capitalist:
individualistic, aloof,
adventurous, independent,
freedom-loving, and
science-oriented ((always
seeking answers to life's
questions)).
MOTHER is a natural Marxist:
collectivistic, engaged,
non-adventurous, dependent,
controlling and domestic-
oriented ((always more
concerned with funding
the poor than with funding
pain-relieving science and
advancing poverty-ending
capitalism))
Note: Pundits mistakenly call feds "paternalistic," even though their controlling regulations and intrusive government are MATERNALISTIC. It has been a near-futile effort on this scribbler's part to try and correct them over the years ((Buckley, Will, Limbaugh, Schlaffly, Tyrrell, Pruden, Charen, et. al.)).
GOOD-FATHER would have his CHILDREN
be self-confident, self-reliant and
rational.
GOOD-MOTHER would have her CHILDREN be
self-confident, self-reliant and rational.
FATHER'S nature inclines him toward
self-confidence, self-reliance and
rational-mindedness, all of which
underpin leadership in the HOUSE.
MOTHER'S nature inclines her to
rebellion against FATHER'S
leadership, as her nature invites
emotional and material dependence
in her CHILDREN.
UNFORTUNATELY FOR AMERICA, either bad-MOTHER or bad-FATHER leadership has ruled from the time that that bad-MOTHER-infected Abraham Lincoln had trashed FATHER'S Constitution and began a legacy of appealing to emotion to win any consent of the CHILDREN.
=======
=======
THE ABOVE PRESENTATION IS a psychological profile of FATHER-/MOTHER-driven politics, which has its origins in the psychological interplay between FATHER and MOTHER and CHILDREN within any two-parent, heterosexual-oriented household.
CONCLUSION:
Only violence may restrain bad-MOTHER - or what this scribbler terms: “Marxism/Socialism/Feminism” - because she is mostly incapable of sound thinking—she's unable to THINK through to the FALSE conclusions of her FALSE premises, then reject them for SOUND LOGIC (( recall that feminist Gloria Steinem told ABC's John Stossel on national television: "Logic doesn't matter!" )).
Bad-FATHER IS A FAR WORSE CONDITION for society because he invites chaos, because his fall from REASON and LIGHT - his failure to lead his HOUSE through morality and justice - invites civilization's decline and fall, invites bad-MOTHER to take the HOUSE and corrupt the CHILDREN.
A good FATHER may lead while a bad MOTHER works to undermine him by turning the CHILDREN against him.
A good FATHER'S underlying power to control a bad MOTHER and keep her evil seductions in check is found in his keeping MORAL AUTHORITY.
A good MOTHER supports and embraces a good FATHER'S MORAL AUTHORITY, and never challenges it in front of the CHILDREN.
After good-FATHER ((social conservatives in the Republican Party)) had failed to pursue the felonious and treasonous bad-MOTHER in Bill Clinton and remove him from office ((because feministic "soccer moms" had overwhelmingly supported bad-MOTHER, and because bad-FATHER in economic conservatives wanted their votes)) America suffered a death-blow to its national psyche—had lost its MORAL AUTHORITY in the eyes of its citizens and the world; ergo, America had lost its underlying legitimacy to exist.
America - white Western civilization in North America - is finished—but for some merciful act of God.
-Rick
#####################################
For an in-depth analysis of the
psychology underlying Left/Right
political/cultural conflicts, read my
essay, “The Donahue Syndrome”:
/R
Good analysis, Rick! Translation might be: Democrats: emotional. Republicans: logical.
I enjoyed your analysis, Rick! I too have been making efforts to observe human psychology on the archetypal level with regard to the political dysfunction in our midst. You have truly hit a mother lode IMO. I think we must authentically address all the elements of our 'ego-selves' in order to become free of harmful and toxic ingrained behavior. One other dynamic I might explore in developing your premise has to do with the "shadow selves", and in my lexicon this addresses "sub personalities" as a causative factor in terms of all relationship function/dysfunction. I bring to your attention: "Embracing Our Selves" by Hal and Sidra Stone. I believe you will enjoy this book in case you haven't already read and digested it. Thank you for sharing the Bad Father/Bad Mother premise. If only we had real News sources that would explore this sort of thing...maybe more folks might rise to the occasion and think more deeply about the causes of societal dysfunction.