The following is a news analysis.
Study of AstraZeneca vaccine finds:
- 30% preterm births for vaccinated women vs. 0% for the control group
- No reported impact on short term fertility in women
Vaccine and industry advocates continue to produce information that they acknowledge is designed to increase Covid-19 vaccination rates rather than to simply report safety findings in an unbiased fashion.
One example is a study published in Lancet medical journal on “fertility rates and birth outcomes” after AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 vaccination. It is significant to note the study was done by Oxford scientists, and Oxford has partnered with Covid-19 vaccine maker AstraZeneca. (AstraZeneca is the subject of numerous safety concerns worldwide and is not currently given in the U.S.)
The study appears to be approached in a biased fashion with the description implying that its purpose was rooted in dispelling fears that Covid-19 could impact pregnant and fertility.
In fact, it is scientifically indisputable that there is only limited preliminary or short-term data on the subject; yet the study takes the position at the start that any fears are unfounded:
Fears of adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination on fertility have affected vaccine uptake in some communities. Despite the absence of supporting evidence for such a risk, low biological plausibility, and preliminary data supporting the safety of mRNA vaccines in pregnancy, this claim has become widespread, and it has been challenged by WHO. Vaccine hesitancy during pregnancy, or among women of childbearing age, could have substantial public health consequences because infection with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy is a risk factor for severe maternal illness and complications.
Lancet study
The Covid-19 vaccines have numerous documented adverse events so far, unrelated to fertility rates and birth outcomes, and women or pregnant women who get the vaccine put themselves at some risk. Scientists differ in their predictions and assessments as to how much risk that will ultimately turn out to be when more data is in and more time passes.
I just have very strong feelings of doom (for lack of a better word) this isn’t going to end well. Look how long it took to learn giving fake estrogen to menopausal women caused osteoporosis and heart disease the very ailments it was meant to prevent. (30 years)
WOW thanks will go look. Didn’t know.