• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Store
  • ION Awards
  • Podcasts
  • Full Measure
    • Full Measure Cover Stories
  • Donate
  • Bestseller "Slanted"

Sharyl Attkisson

Untouchable Subjects. Fearless, Nonpartisan Reporting.

  • US
  • World
  • Business
  • Health
    • Vaccine, Medical links
    • Omicron Lab Origin
    • Covid-19 Origins
    • Covid-19 Natural Immunity
    • Covid-19 Vaccine Concerns Summary
    • Covid-19 Vaccine: 80 Common Adverse Events
  • The Censored
  • Special Investigations
    • Attkisson v. DOJ
    • Media Mistakes, Biden Era
    • Media Mistakes on Trump
    • Other investigations
      • Benghazi
      • "Collusion v. Trump" TL
      • Election 2020
      • Fake News
      • Fast & Furious
      • Obamacare
      • Obama Surveillance TL
      • Other investigations
      • Ukraine 'Sabotage' of Trump TL

(READ) Supreme Court declines to review Carter Page defamation suit against DNC

Dated: January 10, 2022 by Sharyl Attkisson 7 Comments

      

Below is an excerpt from Just the News.

The Supreme Court on Monday declined review of a defamation case brought by one-time Trump campaign adviser Carter Page against the Democratic National Committee and others with ties to the debunked Steele dossier.

The suit, Page v. Democratic National Committee, alleges that while working as an adviser on the Trump 2016 presidential campaign, a DNC subsidiary company, the law firm of Perkins Coie, and two two Perkins partners – Michael Sussman and Marc Elias – of disseminating false information about the adviser. 

The suit had previously been dismissed on procedural grounds, and not further revived by a number of lower courts. 

Read full article here


      
[the_ad id="17661"]

About Sharyl Attkisson

Emmy-Award Winning Investigative Journalist, New York Times Best Selling Author, Host of Sinclair's Full Measure

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Stephen Triesch says

    January 10, 2022 at 5:02 pm

    "dismissed on procedural grounds"

    What does that mean? They didn't want an open airing of the facts, so they found some bogus way to scuttle it?

    Reply
  2. metaphorsbwithu says

    January 10, 2022 at 5:49 pm

    The process is the punishment.

    It's a two-tiered justice system.

    Like the old saying goes, "You can't fight City Hall".

    Reply
    • Stephen Triesch says

      January 10, 2022 at 7:37 pm

      Roberts is so concerned about avoiding the appearance of political bias that he ends up being political, always somehow favoring the left, and prioritizing hos concerns about "perceptions" over following the law. Above all, he is a defender of the Establishment, a man who wants to be well thought of by the right kind of people.

      Reply
      • Arthur says

        January 10, 2022 at 9:28 pm

        Damn right there Stephen.

        Reply
  3. Mark Tebor says

    January 10, 2022 at 7:25 pm

    disappointing even for this Banana Republic

    Reply
  4. Thomas Joseph Hussman says

    January 11, 2022 at 10:23 am

    Durham must complete his task before civil suits begin. The timing was off, and Carter's lawyers should have known that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Coming Soon

The Bad Shirts: High-Quality, Wearable Humor

The Sharyl Attkisson Store

Buy Great, Original Products & Support Independent Journalism

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

SUBSCRIBE TO SHARYL’S RUMBLE CHANNEL


Follow Sharyl Attkisson

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube



Footer

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Support
  • Contact

Sitemap

2ndary Pages

  • Full Measure Stations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Newsletter
  • Returns & Refunds Policy

SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

  • Attkisson v. DOJ/FBI
  • Benghazi
  • Election 2020
  • Fake News
  • Fast & Furious
  • Obamacare

Copyright © 2023 · Log in