Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Biden vaccine mandate cases

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments today in two cases involving controversial Covid-19 vaccine mandates.

Two federal policies are at issue: a vaccine-or-test mandate for workers at large employers (with more than 100 employees), and a vaccine mandate for health care workers at facilities that receive federal funding.

The federal government is able to wield its power to threaten hospitals and other facilities that treat Medicare and Medicaid patients to bend to its directives and mandates. In this case, if the facilities don’t require their employees to get vaccinated, the facilities risk losing millions of dollars in federal taxpayer funds.

Thousands of health care workers have lost their jobs after refusing Covid-19 vaccination due to health reasons, religious objections, belief in free choice and informed consent, or because of worries about the safety, effectiveness and necessity of the vaccines.

In a brief filed by Republican members of Congress, they say the following:

“Congressional members have an interest in the powers they delegate to agencies not being abused—the legislative authority vested in the federal government belongs to Congress, not the Executive branch. In this case, the promulgation by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration of a sweeping, nationwide vaccine mandate on businesses intrudes into an area of legislative concern far beyond the authority of the agency. And it does so with a mandate enacted through OSHA’s seldom-used ‘emergency temporary standard’ provision that allows for bypass of notice and comment rule-making under certain circumstances.”

46 Republican Senators and 139 members of the House of Representatives

As more Americans have gotten vaccinated, a record number have gotten Covid-19.

Still, supporters of the vaccine industry say the vaccines are highly-effective.

The Lemonade Mermaid Store

Unique gifts for Land or Sea Mermaids, Mer-pets and Little Mermaids!

Left: Pastel Beach Necklace $16


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

14 thoughts on “Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Biden vaccine mandate cases”

  1. I am a nurse practitioner who did not take the injections. Was put on paid leave, had my exemption for religious reasons denied. They lawyers who are presenting these arguments need to take a package insert from the Pfizer, Moderna & J&J injections and present them. They are empty, no info at all. No one is able to provide informed consent without knowing the trial info, side effects and possible injuries related to taking. The medical profession has gone political, throwing research out with the trash. I pray the Supreme Court remembers their oath, the constitution and the rights of the US citizens or we are all doomed. If they rule that mandates for an unresearched Injection is right, they the government will take away all of our rights and will be be another communist nation.

    1. The “Supreme” Kangaroo Court is owned by the same monsters that own the US Dictators, Drumpf included. He seems to be shown very favorably on this site, which I don’t understand. All the despotic tyrannical implementations being drafted and enforced all began with him. He gave us lockdowns, masks, Operation Warp Speed (MAGA Jab kill shots), etc. Isn’t it interesting that he gave the title of a covert exercise (Operation) to the manufacturing of a dangerous toxin posing as a vaccine? Creepy Joe Biden is a puppet the same as Drumpf. They serve their masters, not us!

      1. Duke–I dare say a Shakespearean quote comes to mind (look in the mirror Mr Nukem)…”Methinks the lady doth protest too much.” It’s time to get over the orange-man-bad syndrome and focus on what must be done, Now. I’d suggest identifying the constitutional sheriffs in your district for starters. Introduce yourself and participate. That’s how this nation operates when it’s working properly!

      2. As much as I disagree with Trump, he did not “give us” lockdowns or masks. Those mandates were either state or local government.

        Please don’t post misinformation.

  2. I have been reading Robert Kennedy Jrs book The Real Anthony Fauci and it is so unbearably depressing. I believe we really are doomed. He has more power than any one person should ever have. And I believe it isn’t going to change. There is way too much money in all this. Fauci himself owns patents in the pharma industry and so does his buddy Bill Gates, specifically in the vaccine industry. I’m probably going to be put on some sort of list for this, but I’m genuinely angry and overwhelmingly downhearted at all I’ve learned. I really hope that the Supreme Court will do the right thing and not the thing that’s tied to profit. Sherry Miller is right about there being no informed consent and that’s because they don’t want us to know how truly dangerous these vaccines really are. I honestly believe the theory that they are trying to destroy the control groups. That’s why everyone “needs” to be vaccinated. So that when all the side effects that we are already seeing start to come on in worse droves and you won’t be able to say that it was because of the vaccine because there will be no control group to point at and say “see these people who didn’t get the vaccine didn’t get these side effects”. We are being lied to constantly and I’m tired of it. I’m tired of almost everywhere I look on the internet people spew hate as though it is a virtue. Just because you are vaccine hesitant for whatever reason you have doesn’t make you a science denier or anti-vaxxer. It should not be a “tar and feather” event to question the motives of your government. It actually used to be considered patriotic. Ok, I think I’ve gone on long enough, but I just wanted to get this off my chest because it is a disturbing time we are living in and I believe it’s only going to get worse.

    1. Rose–I’m no advocate for hopium addiction, however, as a military strategist has observed: “This is what winning looks like.” Consider that most of us (myself included) didn’t even know who Tony F was 2.5 years ago. Now we have identified his consortium and its sinister profiteering (and worse-no doubt) agenda. How many people realized that the technocratic deep swamp was using a medical context to invoke global tyranny prior to the pLandemic? While it looks dire (and compliance is the real enemy) the world is reacting at large and shunning the totalitarian decrees and lockdowns. We now know that all governments have been compromised and corrupted and thus? …we must get our head in the fight and do what we must do: non-compliance, attend the rallies, share the real intel and eschew all fake news sources. To borrow from a lyric from Neil Sedaka: They say that waking up is hard to do. Winning is a process, not a slam dunk!

  3. The most flimsy argument in court I think I have EVER heard. Full of so many holes that should not have been ignored. No one asked why vaccinated are not being tested? No one asked why physicians rights to give their patients medical exemptions has been revoked. Therefor making medical exemptions non existent. No one mentioned that religious exemptions have also been revoked. So who are these unvaccinated people that need protection from other unvaccinated people??? If you have a medical condition so you can’t get vaxed… DENIED!! If you have religious grounds… DENIED!!! NOT ONCE was this brought to their attention because they have one direction in this…. GET EVERYONE SHOT!!! The only protection we ALL need is from this medical tyranny against our own bodily autonomy. The safe drugs that we do have to fight this virus are being stopped at the border. Unlike the opioids and street drugs that they are getting through. What happened to The right to try law????

  4. Sharyl Attkisson–in light of a recent judge’s ruling that there is presently no FDA-approved vaccine available, how is the FDA’s approval not considered when considering the legalities of the ‘fake’ vaxx mandates? Does this mean that the FDA is no longer a player–which for some of us seems like a move forward due to the litany of corrupt charges the FDA has faced, the obvious being conflicts of interest–aka being funded by the drug co’s with loyalties to stakeholders.
    The comment made by the nurse in today’s comment section makes a valid point: There is no informed consent when the drug co’s aren’t providing the information re possible adverse reactions that may occur. This looks like fat-cat Pharma-lawyers raking in the dough while they play with human lives as if chump change.

  5. Why? Why are they wasting time, money, and energy listening to arguments over something they all know is illegal! The injections are unapproved and experimental. You cannot coerce anyone into medical experimentation. Full stop. It’s like a bunch of liars going into court to ask the court make everyone believe their lies. They should be laughed out of court, fined, and jailed.

  6. I agree with one point or the other made by all the posters on this topic.

    If SCOTUS honors the constitution and the rule of law, they will strike down the mandate, but I am afraid the ignorant comments made by Sotomayor and Kagan will carry the day.

    As it turns out the FAA has violated its own rules regarding experimental drugs and medical certification for a year now, and the result is 80% of the airline pilots have compromised immune systems. This will have to be addressed.

  7. I skipped the trump approval ar disapproval question. For the record, I do not approve of trump. I answered the Biden’s approval question because he is an office and I don’t approve of him either, but as soon as I answered negatively about Biden it was presumed that I approve of Trump and I was asked for a trump donation. THIS IS A SCAM ! I DISAPPROVE OF BOTH MEN AND I DISAPPROVE OF THIS ARTICLE!

Scroll to Top