The following is a news analysis.
Twitter has once again taken an action that indicates its one-sided censorship practices are deployed on behalf of pharmaceutical and vaccine interests.
This time, according to Just the News CEO John Solomon, the social media company has suspended Solomon's Twitter account over a fact-based report on scientific information that some pharmaceutical and vaccine interests do not want reported.
If journalists can't accurately quote a peer-reviewed study in a respected medical journal written by a university that has been trusted by NIH and WHO without being censored, then the First Amendment has been thoroughly gutted by Big Tech censors who want to substitute their version of truth for honest coverage of disputes in science and public policy. There is nothing inaccurate or harmful in the story, which includes dissenting views and context from the CDC. I ask Twitter to review the article and the underlying information and lift its suspension immediately. Accusing a journalist falsely of 'spreading misleading and potentially harmful information' without a basis is defamatory and suspending the account without cause simply erodes Twitter's standing in the market of free ideas.John Solomon, Just The News
To learn about more censored people and topics, click the CENSORED tab at the top of this page.
In the recent past, Twitter, Facebook and other social media companies have been responsible for widespread dissemination of false information by CDC, government officials and others-- whether it's on Covid, vaccines or Trump-Russia collusion-- while censoring factual information and studies or views that are off the narrative of certain powerful interests.
One thing many consumers of information are starting to learn is that when information is censored by Big Tech, it is often something important they should pay attention to.
The following is an except from Solomon's account on the controversy.
Twitter on Thursday suspended the account of Just the News CEO and Editor John Solomon for tweeting a story about a peer-reviewed study on COVID vaccines published in a respected medical journal by a research university that has worked with the both National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization.
The platform claimed the story was "violating the policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19" even though the story quoted federal agencies' context for the issue raised by the story.
The offending @JohnSolomonReports post was a link to a Just the News story posted Thursday morning with the headline "Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine converts to DNA inside human liver cells, according to new study" and the url: https://t.co/q4PfQSa6TD.
The story is about a study by Swedish scientists that found when the Pfizer vaccine's mRNA enters human liver cells it triggers a number of reactions that yield a reverse transcription that turns the mRNA into spike DNA and notes the story was first reported by another news outlet.
The peer-reviewed study was published in the respected medical journal Current Issues in Molecular Biology. and was conducted by Lund University in Sweden, a medical research institute that has done contract work with NIH and often cited by the WHO. (Continued...)
Stephen Triesch says
Who needs to go to Russia for censorship? We've got plenty of it right here in the USA.
Bruce Williamson says
I just posted the study to FB to see what happens. I'll probably go to FB jail (again).
Bruce Williamson says
So far nothing from either FB or Twitter
Roger Grant says
We now know that the entire media is engaged in journalistic malpractice.
The broadcast channels were paid by the gov't for positive stories and, by contract, agreed to post nothing that ran counter to the official narrative.
I really couldn't get why the MSM had the coverage they did when the objective data indicated there was ample information withheld from the public.
Now we know: they were paid. With tax dollars.