The following is an excerpt from Just The News.
Food and Drug Administration researchers have found that the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine is linked to higher instances of adverse effects in people ages 65 and older, but still says the benefits of getting shot "outweigh" the potential risks of being infected by the virus.
Using data up to Jan. 15, 2022, the study of more than 25 million people published by Science Direct earlier this month found that 0.06% of people over the age of 65 who receive the Pfizer Covid vaccine develop a pulmonary embolism, or a clot, typically of blood, in the lungs.
The researchers also noted an increased chance of people over 65 experiencing blood clots, platelet disorders and heart attacks after receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
The FDA "strongly believes the potential benefits of Covid-19 vaccination outweigh the potential risks of Covid-19 infection," the researchers wrote:
"Per FDA communication of these findings, FDA is currently not taking any regulatory actions based on these signal detection activities because these signals are still under investigation and require more robust study."
Link to article here.
The Lemonade Mermaid Store
Unique gifts for Land or Sea Mermaids, Mer-pets and Little Mermaids!
Left: Our signature Blue Fins Earrings
What are the “potential benefits” that the Pushers are so sure about and what paperwork might they be referring to in their potential benefit studies?
The benefits are "less severe" outcomes and fewer deaths.. That is the metric.
Drew Skonberg says
The comparison is never compared to early treatment protocols. Why? Obviously using data their rationale is destroyed.
I think there was a recent study by Jaqueline C. Stone that showed 34 patents with poor oxygen levels had an average 62% improvement in oxygen within 24 hours of taking an Ivermectin, doxycycline, and zinc treatment.
Tom Martin says
Knowing these potential problems, not being forthcoming about them yet REQUIRING the shots?