(WATCH) IRS Audit Trends

The Biden Administration’s Inflation Reduction Act includes $80 billion tax dollars for the IRS over the next 10 years, enough to hire 87,000 new agents at $100,000 a year. Some critics say America’s tax agents spend too much effort harassing the little guy while bypassing multi-millionaires. James McTigue heads up the tax policy at the General Accountability Office, a government investigative agency, which recently examined IRS audit trends.

The following is a transcript of a report from “Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson.” Watch the video by clicking the link at the end of the page.

James McTigue: In 2010, IRS audited basically nine people out of a thousand, and today, it has fallen to fewer than three in a thousand.

Sharyl: But the concern over not having enough people audited, potentially, must lie in the idea that money is being lost somehow?

McTigue: Studies have shown that taxpayers are more likely to comply and make payment if they think IRS may be checking up on them. And everyone is not really delighted to pay their taxes, but if I know you’re paying your taxes, that makes me feel a little bit better about me paying my taxes, or my neighbor, and vice versa. So, that’s why it’s critically important.

Sharyl: So in simple terms, what did you study, and what did you find?

McTigue: We looked at IRS audit rates over the last 10 years or so, broken up by income. And what we found is that, over that period, audit rates have declined across the board, both for our high-income taxpayers, as well as low-income taxpayers. They’ve declined a little bit greater for higher-income taxpayers than lower-income taxpayers, but still, audit rates are about a third of what they were back in 2010.

Sharyl: There has been some outside criticism that says the IRS treats high-income earners better in some instances than low-income earners. Did you find that that was the case? That there could be more money they would get through audits of the high-income earners, but they’re gravitating to more low-income earners?

McTigue: We didn’t see that specifically. You know, what we did see is that on average the additional tax collected from a high-income audit is about 50 times what it is for a lower-income audit. So in terms of bang for the buck, the audits of the highest income, highest-earning individuals, those with incomes in excess of $5 million annually, those do have a higher return on investment.

Sharyl: If, when the IRS audits someone making above $5 million a year, they’re more likely to get a lot more taxpayer money that hadn’t been properly paid, why don’t they spend more time auditing that population?

McTigue: Well, as our report did show, IRS does spend a lot of time auditing that population, and, in fact, audits that population at the highest rate, when broken up by income. The problem is that those tax returns tend to be very complex. It’s very labor intensive, requires a lot of audit hours, and also requires a fair amount of — not just a fair amount of expertise, but a very high level of expertise. And it takes time to train and develop the expertise that is needed to go after these higher-income — you know, really, well-financed in terms of their tax and accounting advice. So IRS, to some extent, has been outgunned.

Sharyl (on-camera): IRS staffing was over 100,000 in 2010. That had been cut back to about 75,000, but now, with the new money, the agency is well on its way past its previous mark.

Watch story here.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 thoughts on “(WATCH) IRS Audit Trends”

  1. Best way to address the complex audits of $million tax payers is to innovate: Hire a small number of highly competent tax preparers from the private sector and have them train IRS auditors and/or be expert resources for them.

    1. Actually, best way to address complex audits, is to make the tax rules much simpler. Flat tax is best way to do that, but Congress has always given tax breaks to themselves and their wealthy donors.

  2. Biden’s version of read my lips. Only people making $400,000 a year will see their taxes raised. Is that so. Who does he think mostly uses online sellers to sell their used items that he now has to harass sellers if they sell more then $600 a year and pay taxes on items that they already paid tax on?

  3. OK, the cudgel that is held over everyone’s head, and is sometimes used to smack them with, is the threat of having the legal system set on them! But, answer me this, if you can do so honestly. WHERE is our written guarantee that anyone ever GETS a fair trial in it? The legal system is NOT set up to dispense justice to anyone when they have been wronged, it is set up to get convictions on as many people as it can, regardless of their guilt or innocence! With those convictions comes lots of revenue for the courts (all of which are listed in Dun & Bradstreet as businesses, because that is what they are!) in the form of fines, penalties and imprisonment of men and women for the privately owned and run prison system!!
    Since no one can be guaranteed that they will actually GET a fair trial, that means that they are all a scam of some kind, right? Or at best a gamble, with a very slim chance of winning, because the sham trials are generally run to find the side with the deepest pockets guilty! WHERE is our obligation to gamble our time, life and property away? WHERE is our actual obligation to be made a victim of someone’s crimes?
    The USSC/SCOTUS proved to the world that it is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant when it reversed its decision of Roe v. Wade from 1973! If it wasn’t a wrong decision back then, it would be impossible to reverse it today! If they couldn’t get it right back in 1973, what does that say about any court decisions made now?? It says that the legal system cannot be trusted to make good decisions about ANYTHING, not even something so innocuous as a parking ticket!!

Scroll to Top