Republicans are probing why the Pentagon has failed its fifth consecutive audit designed to prevent waste, fraud and abuse of taxpayer dollars.
In a letter sent to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Oversight and Accountability (GAO)Chairman James Comer (R-Kentucky) along with Subcommittee Chairman Pete Sessions (R-Texas) requested a staff-level briefing to acquire additional information on the Defense Dept.’s (DOD) failed audit, financial management practices generally, and what it is doing to implement outstanding recommendations for improvement.
In November 2022, DOD failed its fifth consecutive audit, unable to account for sixty-one percent of its $3.5 trillion in assets. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) also recently reported that DOD continues to fail to accurately account for hundreds of billions of dollars of government furnished property in the hands of contractors. DOD’s inability to adequately track assets risks our military readiness and represents a flagrant disregard for taxpayer funds, even as it receives nearly a trillion dollars annually.
Reps. James Comer (R-Kentucky) and Pete Sessions (R-Texas)
The Pentagon’s financial management and contractor management have consistently been included on the GAO’s list of areas at “High-Risk.”
In January 2023, GAO reported that DOD failed to accurately account for much government furnished property provided to contractors including weapons, equipment, technology, and other defense articles.
DOD last estimated in 2014 that contractors were in possession of $220 billion in government furnished property but GAO says that estimate is “significantly understated.”
GAO has also recommended several changes to DOD weapons systems acquisition, business systems modernization, and overall financial tracking.
DOD’s lax financial management and inability to adequately track weapons, equipment and other defense articles have raised serious concerns about DOD’s stewardship of taxpayer dollars, especially as DOD’s budget approaches thirteen figures. Failure to address these issues has limited DOD’s ability to produce auditable financial statements which would enable adequate oversight of DOD’s financial management practices.
Rep. James Comer (R-Kentucky) and Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas)
Read the letter to Secretary Austin here or below:
The Honorable Lloyd Austin Secretary
U.S. Department of Defense 1000 Defense Pentagon Washington, D.C. 20301
Dear Secretary Austin:
March 6, 2023
The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the Department of Defense’s (DOD) failure to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse. In November 2022, DOD failed its fifth consecutive audit, unable to account for sixty-one percent of its $3.5 trillion in assets.1 The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) also recently reported that DOD continues to fail to accurately account for hundreds of billions of dollars of government furnished property in the hands of contractors.2 DOD’s inability to adequately track assets risks our military readiness and represents a flagrant disregard for taxpayer funds, even as it receives nearly a trillion dollars annually.3 The Committee requests a staff-level briefing to acquire additional information on DOD’s failed audit, financial management practices generally, and what it is doing to implement outstanding recommendations for improvement.
Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, approximately half of the more than $14 trillion in DOD spending went to military contractors to provide maintenance, logistics, transportation, and other vital services.4 DOD’s financial management and contractor management have consistently been included in GAO’s High-Risk List.5 In January 2023, GAO reported that DOD failed to accurately account for government furnished property provided to contractors including weapons, equipment, technology, and other defense articles.6 DOD last estimated in 2014 that contractors were in possession of $220 billion in government furnished property but GAO says that estimate is “significantly understated.”7 DOD has delayed efforts to resolve this issue eight times since 2003.8 Failure to address these issues has limited DOD’s
1 Ellen Mitchell, Defense Department fails another audit, but makes progress, THE HILL (Nov. 17, 2022).
2 U.S. GOV’T ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE, GAO-23-105198, DOD FINANCIAL MGMT. GREATER ATTENTION AND ACCOUNTABILITY NEEDED OVER GOV’T FURNISHED PROPERTY, 1 (Jan. 17, 2023).
3 BRENDAN MCGARRY, CONG. RESEARCH SERV., IN11990, FY2023 NDAA: SUMMARY OF FUNDING AUTHORIZATIONS, 2 (Dec. 30, 2022).
4 Mary Ellen Cagnassola, Defense Contractors Benefited From Nearly Half of $14 Trillion Spent for Afghan War: Study, NEWSWEEK (Sept. 13, 2021).
5 U.S. GOV’T ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE, GAO-21-119SP, HIGH-RISK SERIES, 235 (Mar. 2021).
6 Supra n. 2.
7 Id.
8 Id. at 5.
The Honorable Lloyd Austin March 2, 2023
Page 2 of 2
ability to produce auditable financial statements which would enable adequate oversight of DOD’s financial management practices.9
GAO has also recommended several changes to DOD weapons systems acquisition, business systems modernization, and overall financial tracking.10 The Pentagon’s adherence to GAO’s recommendations will improve tracking of weapons and funds, including those sent to Ukraine. The DOD Comptroller and Chief Financial Officer, Michael McCord, stated, “[the war in Ukraine is] a really great example of why it matters to get this sort of thing right, of counting inventory, knowing where it is.”11 Since Russia invaded Ukraine nearly a year ago, Congress has authorized $67.1 billion in defense assistance to the Ukrainian people.12 As the U.S. continues to provide weapons, equipment, and other defense articles to Ukraine, it is imperative that DOD exercise better financial management of resources.
DOD’s lax financial management and inability to adequately track weapons, equipment and other defense articles have raised serious concerns about DOD’s stewardship of taxpayer dollars, especially as DOD’s budget approaches thirteen figures.13 The Committee requests a staff-level briefing on DOD’s failed audit, financial management practices generally, and what it is doing to implement outstanding recommendations for improvement. Please make arrangements to schedule the briefing with Committee staff on this matter as soon as possible, but no later than March 13, 2023.
To schedule the briefing or to ask any related follow-up questions, please contact Committee on Oversight and Accountability Majority Staff at (202) 225-5704. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the U.S. House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X. Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this inquiry.
Sincerely,
_____________________________
James Comer
Chairman
Committee on Oversight and Accountability
_____________________________
Pete Sessions
Chairman
Subcommittee on Government Operations and the Federal Workforce
cc: The Honorable Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member Committee on Oversight and Accountability
The Honorable Kweisi Mfume, Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Government Operations and the Federal Workforce
9 Idat2.
10 Supra n. 5.
11 Press Briefing, Dept. of Defense, Michael J. McCord, Under Sec’y of Defense (Comptroller), Holds a Press Briefing on the Results of DOD FY 2022 Dept. – Wide Financial Statement Audit (Nov. 15, 2022).
12 COMM. FOR A RESPONSIBLE FED. BUDGET, Congress Approved $113 Billion of Aid for Ukraine in 2022 (Jan. 5, 2023).
13 Supra n. 3.
Stunning! Thank you for this, depressing as it may be. Seems like it should be headline news… somewhere.
A failed audit should result in immediate agency appropriation cuts. Congress has zero spine, though, so why would any deep-state group, aka government agency, care about a silly audit?
“Probe” is governmentspeak for “committee” which is govenrmentspeak for “more money for each member of the committee since each member of a committee gets additional pay, staff and expense moneys.
Nothing will ever come of any “probe” by a government committee other than the taxpayer’s butt getting more sore.
that’s no reason to not conduct one.
Yeah, right. When are they going to probe their spraying of heavy metals in the skies? Alzheimer’s is at an all time high, folks! It is destroying the soil to where food is very hard to grow. Nothing can be called organic after what they have done over the last seven decades. Water is now filled with heavy metals. Our bodies are full of them. Let’s do real probes!
Right! And, has the FED even been audited as of yet? Taxation without Representation is clear evidence that the US doesn’t have a sovereign government. We are ruled via Corporate Oligarchy–and these private interests will continue to take the US citizens to the cleaners until We the People take a stand and create a Tax Revolt–stop paying for the crimes of a few despotic tyrants, People! We are complicit in maintaining a criminal org as long as we continue to allow these duplicitous actions. President Eisenhower warned us 60 years ago in his exit speech! “Beware the M.I.C.!”
After the Pentagon try’s to cast blame else ware, I would start a detailed audit any area that does not cooperate should have all spending frozen except areas actually involved in defense. I bet you will find contractors that have ex military they will be the people who know the details. Billions are being waisted that does nothing for defense. Start with Ukraine, you will find kickbacks.. Except for pay everything needs to be audited. It is a mountain but it can be handled and you will be surprised how cooperative someone can be when looking at military prison. General Mi Li has explaining to do!