Males banned from competing in female sports at public schools– in bill that won’t become law


The House of Representatives has passed a bill banning males from competing in female sports at public schools.

The vote is a symbolic gesture since, to become law, the bill would require passage in the Democrat-controlled Senate and have to be signed by President Biden. In general, Democrats support males competing on female sports teams.

The Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act is in response to boys and men increasingly competing in girl’s and women’s sports; including weightlifting, swimming, and track; often beating out the female athletes.

Some liberal feminist activists have joined with conservatives in saying that allowing the males to compete as if they are females is unfair and an affront to women. On the other side, transgender activists say it’s unfair not to let a man who says he feels like a woman (or vice versa) compete alongside and against the people he views as his peers.

Without acknowledging the bill stands little chance of going any further toward becoming law, House Republicans took a victory lap after the vote.

“This is a great day for America and a great day for girls and women and for fairness in sports,” House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.)

Read the bill below.


H. R. 734

[Report No. 118–35]

To amend the Education Amendments of 1972 to provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of such Act in athletics, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 1, 2023

Mr. Steube (for himself, Ms. Tenney, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Buck, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Gaetz, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. Griffith, Mr. LaMalfa, and Mr. Carl) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

April 10, 2023

Additional sponsors: Mr. Tiffany, Ms. Mace, Mr. Bost, Mr. Walberg, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Wenstrup, Mr. Pfluger, Mr. Davidson, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Good of Virginia, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. Feenstra, Mr. Banks, Mr. Dunn of Florida, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Guest, Mrs. González-Colón, Mr. DesJarlais, Mrs. Harshbarger, Mr. Santos, Mrs. Chavez-DeRemer, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Yakym, Mrs. Luna, Mr. Hudson, Mr. LaLota, Mr. Timmons, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Gimenez, Ms. Hageman, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Barr, Mr. Cline, Mr. Posey, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Fitzgerald, Mr. Carter of Texas, Mr. Gooden of Texas, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Ezell, Mr. Curtis, Mr. Rose, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Estes, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, Mr. Owens, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Comer, Mr. Waltz, Mr. Crawford, Mrs. Cammack, Mrs. Lesko, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Duncan, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. McCormick, Mr. Bean of Florida, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Green of Tennessee, Mr. Miller of Ohio, Mr. Ciscomani, Mr. Hunt, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Self, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Stauber, Mr. Arrington, Mr. Finstad, Mr. Fallon, Ms. De La Cruz, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Brecheen, Mr. Burlison, and Mr. Johnson of South Dakota

April 10, 2023

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 1, 2023]


A BILL

To amend the Education Amendments of 1972 to provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of such Act in athletics, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2023”.

SEC. 2.  AMENDMENT.

Section 901 of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(d) (1) It shall be a violation of subsection (a) for a recipient of Federal financial assistance who operates, sponsors, or facilitates athletic programs or activities to permit a person whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls.

“(2) For the purposes of this subsection, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.

“(3) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit a recipient from permitting males to train or practice with an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls so long as no female is deprived of a roster spot on a team or sport, opportunity to participate in a practice or competition, scholarship, admission to an educational institution, or any other benefit that accompanies participating in the athletic program or activity.”.


Union Calendar No. 22
118th CONGRESS
     1st SessionH. R. 734
[Report No. 118–35]
A BILL
To amend the Education Amendments of 1972 to provide that for purposes of determining compliance with title IX of such Act in athletics, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.
April 10, 2023
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 thoughts on “Males banned from competing in female sports at public schools– in bill that won’t become law”

  1. We’ve gone from decades of women saying there is no difference between the sexes. Women can do anything a man can do and be allowed to compete on mens teams, and force their way into male organizations, to women aren’t equal and need special protections and treatment.

    Of course if we then extend the current debate to equal pay and, using the science used here that men have 30% greater muscle mass and aerobic capacity, that men should be paid 30% more (at least in activities where strength and endurance matter, like sports).

    Never mind that this bill likely violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution.

    Be careful what you wish for, what you litigate for, you might get it.

    For the record, I don’t support males on female sports teams or female activities, but then I didn’t support females playing on male teams or forcing their way into the Boy Scouts or other male activities.

Scroll to Top