(POLL) Hunter Biden’s IRS problems are serious scandal


Accusations that President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, got “preferential treatment” from the IRS amount to a serious scandal, according to a majority of voters. But few say they expect the president to be impeached over it.

That’s according to Rasmussen Reports.

The survey finds that 40% of likely US voters say they believe that the investigation of Hunter Biden is likely to lead Congress to impeach President Biden. That includes 18% who say it’s “very likely.”

Fifty-five percent (55%) say they don’t think Congress is likely to impeach the president over the Hunter Biden scandals, including 29% who say it’s “not at all likely.” 

An IRS official has stepped forward as a whistleblower, saying that an investigation of Hunter Biden has been hindered by “preferential treatment and politics.”

Sixty-nine percent (69%) of voters say they believe this accusation is a serious scandal, including 48% who say it is “very serious.”

Twenty-eight percent (28%) say they think “preferential treatment” in the Hunter Biden IRS investigation is not a serious scandal, including 13% who say it’s “not at all serious.”

To see survey question wording, click here.

The Lemonade Mermaid Store

Unique gifts for Land or Sea Mermaids, Mer-pets and Little Mermaids!

Left: Our signature Fish Scales design tote bag in Citrus

SHOP NOW


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 thoughts on “(POLL) Hunter Biden’s IRS problems are serious scandal”

  1. “Fifty-five percent (55%) say they don’t think Congress is likely to impeach the president over the Hunter Biden scandals …”

    I suspect most of those people don’t understand that “impeachment” happens in the House, and conviction happens in the Senate. It seems likely to me that Joetard WILL be impeached in the republican-controlled House, but he will not be convicted in the democrat-controlled Senate — and when I say “democrat-controlled” I’m not just referring to the majority of senators being democrats, but also to the majority of “republicans” in the Senate being RINOS.

    So even without hearing the yet-to-be-disclosed testimony of the IRS whistleblower — which seems like it might be devastating — my money is on Joetard being impeached in the House and aquitted in the Senate.

    1. Exactly, excellent analysis.
      The Republicans just have
      to have enough guys in the House to follow through…

      1. Not necessarily futile. The House impeached Trump twice and it will go down in history as such. Impeachment tarnishes the legacy even if the impeachment is bogus; as I believe both impeachments of Trump were.
        In the case of Biden we may actually get some facts regarding his treason even if the left will never convict.

    2. I would agree except McCarthy, who will have the power to take the impeachment over to the Senate, has stated he would not use impeachment as a political tool.
      While I believe Biden has committed criminal acts, possibly treasonous ones, McCarthy may believe otherwise. Plus there may not be enough votes to impeach as the republicans barely hold a majority and it only takes several to vote against it. The republicans do not have the solidarity the democrats do, even when they are correct!

  2. Sharyl and Full Measure Team,

    Forwarded Message :

    Find below list here :
    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/epstein-calendar-reveals-shadow-nobility-running-the-world/#comments

    JungianINTP
    May 2, 2023 at 9:38 am

    Alexandra (( not necessarily
    to post, but for your files )),

    Re : Part and Parcel

    Posted at Citizen Free Press :

    iamsane
    Have any of these people apologized to the American people yet, for lying to us about Hunter’s, (really,really his) computer?

    Have any of them claimed that someone hacked their signature?

    Have any of them claimed they thought they were signing their grocery list?

    Have any of them claimed they lost a bet, and had to sign or else wear a MAGA hat for a week?

    Have any of them been to Epstein’s Island?

    So who were the disgraced and shamed intel analysts and officials? Here’s the list of people who shouldn’t have a job informing the public about anything or ever appear on cable news again:
    1.Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN
    2.Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit
    3.Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary
    4.John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC
    5.Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University
    6.Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank
    7.John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University
    8.Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University
    9.Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems
    10.Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico
    11.Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism
    12.Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director
    13.Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director
    14.John Moseman, former CIA chief of staf
    15.Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group
    16.Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC
    17.Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff
    18.Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel
    19.David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager
    20.Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis
    21.Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer
    22.Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer
    23.John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer
    24.David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer
    25.Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard
    26.David Buckley, former CIA inspector general
    27.Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute
    28.Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer
    29.James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office
    30.David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst
    31.Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer
    32.Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer
    33.Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst
    34.Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer
    35.Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer:
    36.Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer
    37.Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer
    38.Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC
    39.Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis
    40.Ron Marks, former CIA officer
    41.Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum
    42.Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico
    43.Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer
    44.Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director
    45.John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer
    46.Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs
    47.Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues
    48.Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director
    49.David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman
    50.Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair,

    -Rick

  3. Aside from the Hunter and Joe crime show, the IRS ought to be prosecuted as an unconstitutional non-governmental agency used to launder our tax dollars. The issue remains: ‘Taxation without Representation’ is an ugly blight on the intended Republic as conceived by America’s founders.

Scroll to Top