(STUDY) Covid-vaccinated more likely to get Covid says Cleveland Clinic


  • “It is now well-known that SARS-CoV-2 infection provides more robust protection than vaccination.”

A new study from Cleveland Clinic finds that those who meet CDC’s definition of being “up to date” on Covid-19 vaccines are more likely to get Covid.

It also restates what many independent medical experts have been saying since the start of the Covid vaccination program: natural immunity is more effective than infection.

CDC and White House adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci downplayed or denied the power of natural immunity while pressing for adults and children to get multiple vaccinations. Scientists, journalists and advocates who distributed accurate information about natural immunity and vaccine side effects were frequently censored and smeared in the media and by social media companies, public health officials, political figures, and pharmaceutical industry interests.

CDC has not publicly responded to the suggestion that their Covid vaccination policy is making people more likely to become ill. Nor have CDC officials announced plans to reconsider their potentially harmful recommendations.

In April 2023 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated its guidance on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination to consider all individuals above the age of 6 to be “up-to-date” with COVID-19 vaccination only if they had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 bivalent vaccine [1]. By this definition, those who had not received a single dose of a COVID-19 bivalent vaccine would be considered not “up-to-date”. A recent study was unable to find the bivalent vaccine to be effective while the XBB variants were the dominant circulating strains [2]. Given this lack of effectiveness of the bivalent vaccine against the XBB variants, which are the predominant circulating strains at this time, it is reasonable to question whether individuals “up-to-date” with a vaccine of questionable effectiveness are protected against COVID-19 compared to those not “up-to-date”.

You can read the full study below.


Read more here:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1

Visit The Sharyl Attkisson Store today

Shop Now

Unique gifts for independent thinkers

Proceeds benefit independent journalism


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

15 thoughts on “(STUDY) Covid-vaccinated more likely to get Covid says Cleveland Clinic”

  1. “It also restates what many independent medical experts have been saying since the start of the Covid vaccination program: natural immunity is more effective than infection”

    Should that read, ‘natural immunity is more effective than vaccination.’ .?

  2. Mary Jo B. Burton

    Once I read the descriptions of the vaccinations, I decided I wouldn’t get them. They entered core functions in every cell in the body. I didn’t believe that the labs, in their haste to be first, did enough research to know or appreciate the extent of the effect of the shots. I decided, having had clients with mitochondrial disease, not to let the shots enter my body.

  3. In April 2021, the CDC put a “Pause” on the Johnson & Johnson Vaccine a couple weeks after it came out, most likely because 1 shot and done dominated the market for a couple weeks and killed sales on their preferred brand. Their lame excuse was that there were SIX reported cases of adverse reactions, including one death, so they needed to study it more. Apparently, they were actually trying to give it bad publicity, because their own data showed their lies. The VAERS system by that time showed that by the end of March, the J&J vaccine already had over 40 deaths and over 6,500 adverse reactions. This is compared to over 700 deaths and 39,000 adverse reactions reported for the Moderna vaccine and over 1,400 deaths and 42,000 for the Pfizer/Biontech vaccine. With so many reports of reports on Moderna and Pfizer, why did the Pause the J&J? The only thing that makes sense to me is following the money. The “Pause” was an negative advertisement, and they stopped the “Pause” after a week, probably because J&J would cry foul if they didn’t. In fairness, the CDC would say their own database is unverified, but with so many deaths and adverse events, wouldn’t it make sense for them to verify the data?

  4. There’s no doubt that mRNA “serums” have nothing to do with ANY form of “vaccine.” They are destructive to immune systems, and provide ZERO protection, prevention, or recovery from CV-19. The horrendous damage and death that these drugs have done, is criminal, and condoned by leftists.

  5. How interesting that all 3 articles today are COVID related with the first on reporting on a digital vaccine passport and the last reporting natural immunity beats the COVID jab.
    Makes one wonder how the corrupt WHO is going to reconcile that dichotomy!

  6. This has been found incorrect Sheryl. Need to do a quick search. Mutiple articles explain my comment. Peer review is involved.

    1. Nonsense. What’s preventing you from identifying any of the “Multiple articles” explaining your comment?

Scroll to Top