(POLL) Jewish people more threatened than Muslims in US


Sixty-seven percent (67%) say Jews are more threatened in the US than Muslims.

That’s according to the latest unscientific poll of 682 people at SharylAttkisson.com.

Twenty-two percent (22%) say neither Jews nor Muslims are more threatened in the U.S.

Full results are below. Be sure to answer the newest poll at SharylAttkisson.com. Look for the black box on the right sidebar on your computer or scroll way down on your mobile device.

In US, ________ are more threatened.

67% Jews

6% Muslims

2% Both

22% Neither

2% I don’t know

Visit The Sharyl Attkisson Store today

Shop Now

Unique gifts for independent thinkers

Proceeds benefit independent journalism


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 thoughts on “(POLL) Jewish people more threatened than Muslims in US”

  1. I think it’s not a matter of opinion. Though Jews represent 2.5% of the population, the FBI stats show they are more than 60% of the victims of hate crimes. Just look at the campuses!

    1. Ruth Fazio,

      There exist “love” crimes, Ruth.

      Hate-crime laws are unconstitutional
      —to any reason-trained mind, regard-
      ing the Bill of Rights, which 1st amend-
      ment therein, they negate (( I’ve a long
      essay—explaining why hate-crime
      punishments are designed to effect
      THOUGHT Control on the masses,
      thanks to two Jews who had written
      that legislation ) :

      =====
      ©1999
      Liberals’ ‘Love’ Connection

      – – –

      What Connects Forced Integration
      to
      Human Slaughterhouses?

      – ‘Love’ Groups Cause the Hate They Decry –

      “The evil mind that f o r c e d the integration of a minority race of black Africans into white civil society through forced busing, affirmative-racism quotas and “fair housing” regulations – but after promising that the 1964 Civil Rights Act would never be used to apply quotas or to discriminate against whites, and after promising that the Immigration Act of 1965 would never be used to alter America’s racial mix – is the same mind that brought human slaughterhouses (‘pro-choice’ baby-killing clinics) to every city; and, now, tries to mainstream adult/child sex (pedophilia) through the auspices of the American Psychological Association, which used its power in the Seventies to convert homosexuality to ‘normalcy.’”

      – snip –

      -Rick

      1. Sharyl and Full Measure Team,

        Do you recall this 2020 post,
        about your lawsuit ? :

        #######

        — S E T T L E D LAW : Marbary v. Madison —

        [[ slightly edited from original post ]]

        JungianINTP says
        JULY 6, 2020 AT 9:14 AM

        Sharyl :

        At which point — in your battle
        with the Agency — are you going
        to suffer Torba’s Visa-credit-shun-
        ning punishment ? :

        https://news.gab.com/2020/06/26/social-credit-score-is-in-america-visa-blacklisted-my-business-and-my-family-for-building-gab/

        You are in violation of the Patriot
        Act by even having the audacity
        to challenge the Agency’s spy
        tactics—as applied against you.

        Of course, this is SETTLED LAW :

        No “law” passed by Congress
        not in accord with the Constitution
        has lawful authority.

        The Patriot Act (( and subsidiary
        unconstitutional regulations )) is a
        smokescreen of illegality—but the
        public is too dumbed-down (( to
        include compliant attorneys and
        judges )) to know that.

        Do your attorneys know that, Sharyl?

        Only the amendment process can
        lawfully effect such draconian
        mandates, as set out in NEOCONS’
        9/11-effected A U T H O R I T A R I –
        I A N I S M.

        Change our rule-or-law Constitution
        — to impose draconian rules —by
        states’ A M E N D M E N T process.

        Do you know which Supreme Court
        case established the above FACT ? :

        MARBARY vs. MADISON .

        Note : This is FALSE opinion about
        that decision : that some government actions are exempt from that ruling !

        Really?—then why may VOTERS
        turn out rulers who had imposed,
        say, the Patriot Act (( a/k/a citizens’
        power in self-determination )), then
        defang the draconian rulers’ rules ?

        -Rick

        #######

      2. Sharyl and Full Measure Team,

        Do you recall this 2020 post,
        about your lawsuit ? :

        #######

        — S E T T L E D LAW : Marbary v. Madison —

        [[ slightly edited from original post ]]

        JungianINTP says
        JULY 6, 2020 AT 9:14 AM

        Sharyl :

        At which point — in your battle
        with the Agency — are you going
        to suffer Torba’s Visa-credit-shun-
        ning punishment ? :

        https://news.gab.com/2020/06/26/social-credit-score-is-in-america-visa-blacklisted-my-business-and-my-family-for-building-gab/

        You are in violation of the Patriot
        Act by even having the audacity
        to challenge the Agency’s spy
        tactics—as applied against you.

        Of course, this is SETTLED LAW :

        No “law” passed by Congress
        not in accord with the Constitution
        has lawful authority.

        The Patriot Act (( and subsidiary
        unconstitutional regulations )) is a
        smokescreen of illegality—but the
        public is too dumbed-down (( to
        include compliant attorneys and
        judges )) to know that.

        Do your attorneys know that, Sharyl?

        Only the amendment process can
        lawfully effect such draconian
        mandates, as set out in NEOCONS’
        9/11-effected A U T H O R I T A R I –
        I A N I S M.

        Change our rule-or-law Constitution
        — to impose draconian rules —by
        states’ A M E N D M E N T process.

        Do you know which Supreme Court
        case established the above FACT ? :

        MARBARY vs. MADISON .

        Note : This is FALSE opinion about
        that decision : that some government actions are exempt from that ruling !

        Really?—then why may VOTERS
        turn out rulers who had imposed,
        say, the Patriot Act (( a/k/a citizens’
        power in self-determination )), then
        defang the draconian rulers’ rules ?

        -Rick

        #######

    2. Ruth Fazio,

      There exist “love” crimes, Ruth.

      Hate-crime laws are unconstitutional
      —to any reason-trained mind, regard-
      ing the Bill of Rights, which 1st amend-
      ment therein, they negate (( I’ve a long
      essay—explaining why hate-crime
      punishments are designed to effect
      THOUGHT Control on the masses,
      thanks to two Jews who had written
      that legislation ) :

      =====
      ©1999
      Liberals’ ‘Love’ Connection

      – – –

      What Connects Forced Integration
      to
      Human Slaughterhouses?

      – ‘Love’ Groups Cause the Hate They Decry –

      “The evil mind that f o r c e d the integration of a minority race of black Africans into white civil society through forced busing, affirmative-racism quotas and “fair housing” regulations – but after promising that the 1964 Civil Rights Act would never be used to apply quotas or to discriminate against whites, and after promising that the Immigration Act of 1965 would never be used to alter America’s racial mix – is the same mind that brought human slaughterhouses (‘pro-choice’ baby-killing clinics) to every city; and, now, tries to mainstream adult/child sex (pedophilia) through the auspices of the American Psychological Association, which used its power in the Seventies to convert homosexuality to ‘normalcy.’”

      – snip –

      -Rick

  2. I think it’s not a matter of opinion. Though Jews represent 2.5% of the population, the FBI stats show they are more than 60% of the victims of hate crimes. Just look at the campuses!

Scroll to Top