(READ) New Zealand whistleblower arrested for exposing data linking Covid vax to death


The trend continues of whistleblowers who expose great wrongdoing being punished, while those responsible for the alleged misdeeds remain unpunished.

The following information is from Silent Partner.

On Nov. 8, 2023, a whistleblower sent leaked confidential vaccination and death data from New Zealand’s public health agency Te Whatu Ora to journalist and philanthropist Steve Kirsch. The data revealed that Covid-19 shots appeared to be strongly associated with a sharp rise in excess mortality in New Zealand. 

After authenticating the data and redacting all personally identifiable information, Kirsch announced in his Substack newsletter that he would reveal his analysis of the vaccine and death data at an upcoming lecture in the Kirsch Auditorium at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where Kirsch obtained his Bachelor of Science and Master of Engineering degrees.   

On November 29, 2023, the whistleblower went public with the data on the social media platform X in an hour-long video interview with the New Zealand attorney and leader of the New Zealand Loyal Party, Liz Gunn.  

At Kirsch’s MIT presentation the following evening, November 30, 2023, Kirsch shared his extensive analysis of the anonymized vaccination/death data, including that the Covid shots are highly correlated with death, especially in the elderly.

Following the lecture, Kirsch published the de-identified data in his Substack newsletter

On Sunday, December 3, 2023, Barry Young, the now-identified New Zealand whistleblower, was arrested and charged with allegedly “accessing a computer system for ‘dishonest purposes,’” as detailed in this Newshub article

Mr. Young appeared in the Wellington District Court twice on Sunday, December 3, 2023, receiving a standing ovation from a packed public gallery at his first procedural appearance. While the judge denied his application for immediate release on bail, Barry was granted release for the following day, December 4, 2023.  

Mr. Kirsch says, “Barry single-handedly has saved millions of lives because he proved you can leak data without affecting privacy, and that the data can show that the vaccine killed 10 million worldwide.” 

Based on Kirsch’s numerous conversations with Barry he says, “The charges against Barry are without merit. He clearly leaked the documents to expose a crime (negligent manslaughter) perpetrated by the NZ Ministry of Health and to save lives.” 

Link to the data and Steve Kirsch’s presentation at MIT here, which was also presented to the British Parliament on Dec. 4.

Visit The Sharyl Attkisson Store today

Shop Now

Unique gifts for independent thinkers

Proceeds benefit independent journalism


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

14 thoughts on “(READ) New Zealand whistleblower arrested for exposing data linking Covid vax to death”

  1. The link to Kirsch’s MIT presentation is interesting. I watched the presentation, which is approx. the first hour and 40-something minutes of the link, and then watched the first person in the question-answer session that followed the presentation.

    I’ll withhold comments about the presentation, for now — although a number of things caught my attention, both good and bad — and simply recommend that everyone watch as much of that presentation as they can.

      1. Actually, if you watch the 2+ hour link in the article to Kirsch’s MIT presentation, you’ll see that when the floor was thrown open to take questions (somewhere after the one-hour, 40-minute mark), someone ventured to argue about 10% of Kirsch’s points (I think the fraction was) while stating that he agreed with 90% of what Kirsch had said, but Kirsch wasn’t particularly receptive to the debate. Watch his body language and the way he tries to get the microphone back.

        So apparently Kirsch can have the mic for more than an hour and 40 minutes, but when some guy that sat through the entire presentation attempted to rebut a small percentage of what Kirsch had said, Kirsch didn’t want to let him have time to make his point.

        I agree with a lot of what Kirsch said, but I also think that if he’s gonna challenge people to challenge him — and offer a million dollars reward to anyone who can refute his arguments — that he needs to PUBLISH his rules of debate, because surely one of the debaters cannot also be a judge and time-keeper for the same debate that he’s participating in.

        I also think Kirsch’s presentation could have done without the commercials for Robert Kennedy Jr. campaign and the audience applause. I understand that this occurred in Massachusettes, but the political plug tarnished the science.

      2. Actually, if you watch the 2+ hour link in the article to Kirsch’s MIT presentation, you’ll see that when the floor was thrown open to take questions (somewhere after the one-hour, 40-minute mark), someone ventured to argue about 10% of Kirsch’s points (I think the fraction was) while stating that he agreed with 90% of what Kirsch had said, but Kirsch wasn’t particularly receptive to the debate. Watch his body language and the way he tries to get the microphone back.

        So apparently Kirsch can have the mic for more than an hour and 40 minutes, but when some guy that sat through the entire presentation attempted to rebut a small percentage of what Kirsch had said, Kirsch didn’t want to let him have time to make his point.

        I agree with a lot of what Kirsch said, but I also think that if he’s gonna challenge people to challenge him — and offer a million dollars reward to anyone who can refute his arguments — that he needs to PUBLISH his rules of debate, because surely one of the debaters cannot also be a judge and time-keeper for the same debate that he’s participating in.

        I also think Kirsch’s presentation could have done without the commercials for Robert Kennedy Jr. campaign and the audience applause. I understand that this occurred in Massachusettes, but the political plug tarnished the science.

  2. The link to Kirsch’s MIT presentation is interesting. I watched the presentation, which is approx. the first hour and 40-something minutes of the link, and then watched the first person in the question-answer session that followed the presentation.

    I’ll withhold comments about the presentation, for now — although a number of things caught my attention, both good and bad — and simply recommend that everyone watch as much of that presentation as they can.

  3. The link to Kirsch’s MIT presentation appears to have gone dead. Is it possible that he’s getting takers for his million-dollar challenge?

  4. The link to Kirsch’s MIT presentation appears to have gone dead. Is it possible that he’s getting takers for his million-dollar challenge?

  5. I just posted a comment pointing out that the link to Kirsch’s MIT presentation appears to have gone dead, and now that comment failed to post.
    What’s going on?

  6. I just posted a comment pointing out that the link to Kirsch’s MIT presentation appears to have gone dead, and now that comment failed to post.
    What’s going on?

Scroll to Top