Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued Pfizer, Inc., for unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness of the company’s Covid-19 vaccine and attempting to censor public discussion of the product.
In a complaint filed in a Lubbock County state court, Paxton said it was misleading for Pfizer to claim its vaccine was 95% effective because it offered a “relative risk reduction” for people to who took it.
Paxton said the claim was based on only two months of clinical trial data, and vaccine recipients’ “absolute risk reduction” showed that the vaccine was just 0.85% effective.
“Pfizer intentionally misrepresented the efficacy of its Covid-19 vaccine and censored persons who threatened to disseminate the truth in order to facilitate fast adoption of the product and expand its commercial opportunity,” the complaint said.
The lawsuit seeks to stop New York-based Pfizer from making alleged false claims and silencing “truthful speech” about its vaccine, and more than $10 million in fines for violating a Texas law protecting consumers from deceptive marketing.
“Pfizer did not tell the truth about their Covid-19 vaccines. We are pursuing justice for the people of Texas, many of whom were coerced by tyrannical vaccine mandates to take a defective product sold by lies.”
Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney General
In a statement, Pfizer said its representations about its vaccine have been “accurate and science-based,” and that it believed Paxton’s lawsuit had no merit.
To read the petition, click here.
The Lemonade Mermaid Store
Unique gifts for Land or Sea Mermaids, Mer-pets and Little Mermaids!
Left: Pastel Beach Necklace $16
It’s worse even than Paxton is suggesting in this lawsuit. According to MIT-trained data analyst Steve Kirsch, the fake “vaccines” KILLED 3.5 times MORE people than the virsus killed:
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/new-study-reveals-covid-mrna-jabs-killed-3-5x-more-americans-than-virus-itself/
It’s worse even than Paxton is suggesting in this lawsuit. According to MIT-trained data analyst Steve Kirsch, the fake “vaccines” KILLED 3.5 times MORE people than the virsus killed:
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/new-study-reveals-covid-mrna-jabs-killed-3-5x-more-americans-than-virus-itself/
Unfortunately, likely nothing will come of this, for one simple reason. Too many folks downstream of Pfizer were part of the scam, including POTUS. Yes, Pfizer lied, but powerful people supported it, despite HAVING to know better. Even a modest understanding of experimental design and statistics–all I have–is sufficient to see that the clinical trial data was insufficient to support the kind of statements Pfizer made. Here is an analysis by a couple docs, directly addressing the relative risk versus absolute risk question: https://pandata.org/understanding-relative-risk-reduction-and-absolute-risk-reduction-in-vaccine-trials/.
Unfortunately, likely nothing will come of this, for one simple reason. Too many folks downstream of Pfizer were part of the scam, including POTUS. Yes, Pfizer lied, but powerful people supported it, despite HAVING to know better. Even a modest understanding of experimental design and statistics–all I have–is sufficient to see that the clinical trial data was insufficient to support the kind of statements Pfizer made. Here is an analysis by a couple docs, directly addressing the relative risk versus absolute risk question: https://pandata.org/understanding-relative-risk-reduction-and-absolute-risk-reduction-in-vaccine-trials/.
Paxton said the claim was based on only two months of clinical trial data, and vaccine recipients’ “absolute risk reduction” showed that the vaccine was just 0.85% effective.
It states that the vaccine is only 0.85% effective?
Paxton said the claim was based on only two months of clinical trial data, and vaccine recipients’ “absolute risk reduction” showed that the vaccine was just 0.85% effective.
It states that the vaccine is only 0.85% effective?
So, claimed 95% and actually less than 1% (0.85 is less than 1)??
So, claimed 95% and actually less than 1% (0.85 is less than 1)??
This Article gave me a New thought direction in thoughts into preventing and pre-treating Genetic Brain diseases before they happen in new research thoughts ?? + CRISPR —-> 3 Point point -> Cas9 point mutations = New outcome research treatments ? “From the inner mind to the outer limits in New mass energy outcomes E=( Subgroups Pi, ) The projection of new life into cell’s and DNA outcomes… ( Testing on mice first ??? ) Weird new science giggling thoughts outcome !
This Article gave me a New thought direction in thoughts into preventing and pre-treating Genetic Brain diseases before they happen in new research thoughts ?? + CRISPR —-> 3 Point point -> Cas9 point mutations = New outcome research treatments ? “From the inner mind to the outer limits in New mass energy outcomes E=( Subgroups Pi, ) The projection of new life into cell’s and DNA outcomes… ( Testing on mice first ??? ) Weird new science giggling thoughts outcome !