University of Pennsylvania president Liz Magill has resigned after giving controversial testimony before Congress this past week. In that hearing, Magill and other university leaders, including the heads of Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, refused to say that calls for genocide against Jews violates university policy. The university leaders appear to have been coached not to condemn such racist calls against Jews. Critics say the testimony appeared to be supportive of Islamic extremist terrorist ideology against Jews.
Magill announcement her resignation today in an email statement to certain recipients.
It has been my privilege to serve as President of this remarkable institution. It has been an honor to work with our faculty, students, staff, alumni, and community members to advance Penn’s vital missions.
University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill in her resignation announcement
According to The Daily Pennslvanian, “The University Board of Trustees held an emergency gathering Thursday in the wake of resignation calls from dozens of government officials and Penn community members. The pressure to resign follows the mounting scrutiny of Magill’s “context dependent” response to a question about whether calling for the genocide of Jewish people violates Penn’s code of conduct from Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) — who referenced calls for “Intifada revolution” among some protesters on campus as calls for genocide.”
Amid the uproar over the testimony, Magill attempted to dial back her statement in a video. However, it did little to quell the criticism.
Big donors to the University of Pennsylvania have been complaining about the school’s policies. After Magill’s testimony, major donor Ross Stevens announced he was withdrawing a $100 million grant to the school.
Sunday on “Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson,” the program follows the money and finds the Muslim nation of Qatar has become the biggest foreign donor of American universities that have become a breeding ground for anti-Israel sentiment. Qatar is where the leadership of the Islamic extremist terrorist group Hamas resides.
Despite the controversy, Magill will reportedly stay on at the University of Pennsylvania as a tenured faculty member at Penn Carey Law.
Visit The Sharyl Attkisson Store today
Unique gifts for independent thinkers
Proceeds benefit independent journalism
The Poison Ivy universities are supposed to have the finest law schools yet they don’t know the difference between protected speech covered by the first amendment and the use of the legal term “Fighting words” which is meant to provoke violence against a person or group which isn’t. Not to mention open themselves up to law suits.
The Poison Ivy universities are supposed to have the finest law schools yet they don’t know the difference between protected speech covered by the first amendment and the use of the legal term “Fighting words” which is meant to provoke violence against a person or group which isn’t. Not to mention open themselves up to law suits.
She was well coached and stuck to the talking points she was given Same with the other 2. The rot lies much much deeper.
Mic Lawler,
It’s complicated.
[[ Sharyl and Full Measure Team ]] :
“Anti-Zionism,“
“Anti-Zionism,”
“Anti-Zionism,”
“Anti- Zionism,”
is
the
correct
charge !,
because Palestinians are Semites, too
(( ask CBS talk-show host Margaret Brennan,
who blurted out that T R U T H two Sundays
ago )).
One Jewess steps out to tell
us the TRUTH, Ilana Mercer :
“ . . . speaking to the proportionality
imperative of Just War Theory,
obliterated: The casualties ratio in
this war is now more than 12 to 1.
About 17.7K murdered Palestinians
to 1.3K murdered Israelis. I wonder
at what ratio the Gazans will have
been deterred? 50 to 1? How about
100,000 dead in Gaza
versus 1300 dead in Israel?
That’ll teach ’em! “
Above paragraph – slightly edited –
found here :
https://www.ilanamercer.com/2023/12/gaza-vs-fallujah-barbaric-blitzkrieg-highlights-u-s-marines-superiority/
-Rick
I would say your comment supports a ‘half truth’. True the original definition of Semite refers to a group of people consisting of both Jews and Arabs but what does it mean to be anti-Zionist other than to be against the establishment of a nation/homeland for Jews?
Israel was carved out, in 1947, of an area where Jews once dominated the population of that area. That Jews populated that land is evident from historical records uncovered more than a century ago. Even if one does not adhere to the Bible being the word of God, it contains great historical references that Jews inhabited that land thousand of years before the disporia.
The land Britian and the UN designated for a Jewish state at the end of WWII was quite small when compared to the land controlled by Arabs. That Israel is willing to live with Palestinians not only in Gaza but the West Bank within a scaled down Israeli territory seems quite reasonable.
How much hatred and terrorism must the Jews accept to live in peace? Hamas is a terrorist organization bent on destroying Jews, much the same as the Nazi regime of Germany. Israel has every right to defend their land and after multiple wars are taking the fight to their enemy. Did not the US do exactly that after 9/11 and the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor?
Anti-Zionism is more atrocious a policy than anti-semitism is a linguistic phrase.
Jeff,
No, the tag – “SEMITE” – refers to
germ lines ( tribes ) speaking
certain language iterations in the
LEVANT, over several thousand
years.
Abraham, having committed
adultery with his slave, fathering
two different breeds, is why the
Middle East remains in flames
(( original meaning of ADULTERY
in the Ten Commandments )).
Study the ancient Vedas, which
warn against inter-racial breeding,
as it eventuates major wars.
Investigate the origin of used-
to-be-top-secret NSA(OI)—
Never
Secure
America
Only
Israel,
to explain how a 30-billion-
dollar-per-year SECURITY
Agency could have been
fooled by 12 uneducated
Arabs on 9/11 ?
-Rick
P.S.
Philosopher Socrates said, in his time,
circa 470 BC—about societal decline :
Children have bad manners, contempt for authority;
they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in
place of exercise. They no longer rise when elders
enter the room, they contradict their parents and
tyrannise their teachers. Children are now tyrants.”
P.P.S.
Jeff, read my post in here,
regarding how Palestine
had been captured by a
“rich” tribe :
https://sharylattkisson.com/2023/11/watch-georgia-politics-2/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Sharyl+Attkisson+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=Daily+Newsletter
P.P.S.
Jeff, read my post in here,
regarding how Palestine
had been captured by a
“rich” tribe :
https://sharylattkisson.com/2023/11/watch-georgia-politics-2/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Sharyl+Attkisson+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=Daily+Newsletter
Jeff,
No, the tag – “SEMITE” – refers to
germ lines ( tribes ) speaking
certain language iterations in the
LEVANT, over several thousand
years.
Abraham, having committed
adultery with his slave, fathering
two different breeds, is why the
Middle East remains in flames
(( original meaning of ADULTERY
in the Ten Commandments )).
Study the ancient Vedas, which
warn against inter-racial breeding,
as it eventuates major wars.
Investigate the origin of used-
to-be-top-secret NSA(OI)—
Never
Secure
America
Only
Israel,
to explain how a 30-billion-
dollar-per-year SECURITY
Agency could have been
fooled by 12 uneducated
Arabs on 9/11 ?
-Rick
P.S.
Philosopher Socrates said, in his time,
circa 470 BC—about societal decline :
Children have bad manners, contempt for authority;
they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in
place of exercise. They no longer rise when elders
enter the room, they contradict their parents and
tyrannise their teachers. Children are now tyrants.”
I would say your comment supports a ‘half truth’. True the original definition of Semite refers to a group of people consisting of both Jews and Arabs but what does it mean to be anti-Zionist other than to be against the establishment of a nation/homeland for Jews?
Israel was carved out, in 1947, of an area where Jews once dominated the population of that area. That Jews populated that land is evident from historical records uncovered more than a century ago. Even if one does not adhere to the Bible being the word of God, it contains great historical references that Jews inhabited that land thousand of years before the disporia.
The land Britian and the UN designated for a Jewish state at the end of WWII was quite small when compared to the land controlled by Arabs. That Israel is willing to live with Palestinians not only in Gaza but the West Bank within a scaled down Israeli territory seems quite reasonable.
How much hatred and terrorism must the Jews accept to live in peace? Hamas is a terrorist organization bent on destroying Jews, much the same as the Nazi regime of Germany. Israel has every right to defend their land and after multiple wars are taking the fight to their enemy. Did not the US do exactly that after 9/11 and the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor?
Anti-Zionism is more atrocious a policy than anti-semitism is a linguistic phrase.
Mic Lawler,
It’s complicated.
[[ Sharyl and Full Measure Team ]] :
“Anti-Zionism,“
“Anti-Zionism,”
“Anti-Zionism,”
“Anti- Zionism,”
is
the
correct
charge !,
because Palestinians are Semites, too
(( ask CBS talk-show host Margaret Brennan,
who blurted out that T R U T H two Sundays
ago )).
One Jewess steps out to tell
us the TRUTH, Ilana Mercer :
“ . . . speaking to the proportionality
imperative of Just War Theory,
obliterated: The casualties ratio in
this war is now more than 12 to 1.
About 17.7K murdered Palestinians
to 1.3K murdered Israelis. I wonder
at what ratio the Gazans will have
been deterred? 50 to 1? How about
100,000 dead in Gaza
versus 1300 dead in Israel?
That’ll teach ’em! “
Above paragraph – slightly edited –
found here :
https://www.ilanamercer.com/2023/12/gaza-vs-fallujah-barbaric-blitzkrieg-highlights-u-s-marines-superiority/
-Rick
She was well coached and stuck to the talking points she was given Same with the other 2. The rot lies much much deeper.
Not to mention we have another cautious word smith on the U.S. Supreme Court who can’t answer the question, ” What’s the definition of a woman?”
Not to mention we have another cautious word smith on the U.S. Supreme Court who can’t answer the question, ” What’s the definition of a woman?”
If someone switched up the word antisemitism with black, would the answers still have been the same?
If someone switched up the word antisemitism with black, would the answers still have been the same?
Conservatives are snowflakes when it suits them. No censorship for thee but for me when I need to avoid criticism. Demanding a ceasefire is not antisemitic.
Conservatives are snowflakes when it suits them. No censorship for thee but for me when I need to avoid criticism. Demanding a ceasefire is not antisemitic.