This story was first published in June of 2021.
Sharyl Attkisson investigates Covid-19 origins
- Numerous scientific insiders are signing onto the “lab origin” theory for Covid-19 and a link to controversial research funded by your tax dollars.
- High profile health figures who have worked to “debunk” lab origin questions are linked to funding and vaccine research partnerships with China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
- The U.S.- Chinese research involved genetically engineering bat coronavirus to make it infect human airway cells in mice, in order to invent vaccines and other therapeutics.
- U.S. taxpayer money supported the controversial vaccine research with Chinese scientists through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Some support came from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Timeline of Covid Origins by Empower Oversight here.
Click box below to watch. (Transcript and additional information follow the video.)
Transcript with additional info below. Clean transcript without additional info is here.
When the former head of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Dr. Robert Redfield, recently said Covid-19 likely leaked from a Chinese research lab, news headlines called it “shocking.”
Dr. Robert Redfield on CNN: “I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory— you know, escaped.”
That was followed by a flurry of media reports ridiculing the notion; insisting that Covid-19 probably jumped from bats to people through an unexplained, natural route. But there’s new information that hasn’t been widely reported. A sizable segment of the research community has formed the same opinion as Dr. Redfield: that Covid-19 leaked from experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.
Jamie Metzl, World Health Organization International Advisory Committee on Human Genome Editing: “There are scientists all around the world who have told me that they believe the most likely origin of COVID-19, of the pandemic, is an accidental lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
Jamie Metzl is a member of the World Health Organization International Advisory Committee on Human Genome Editing.
Additional info: About Jamie Metzl: Metzl served as Deputy Staff Director of the Foreign Relations Committee under then-Sen. Joe Biden (2001-2003); on the National Security Council (1997-99); and at the State Department (1999-01) under President Bill Clinton.
Sharyl (to Metzl): “What have you been told, and what have you found about scientists who feel like they can’t step forward?”
Metzl: “Many of these people are afraid to step forward. They’ve called it career suicide, because there are so many contentious issues, because the stakes are so high. Because the Chinese government, in collaboration, or conjunction, or maybe not even association, but with some very high-level and prominent scientists have put forward this story that I think is wrong.”
Two scientists with knowledge of the matter told me the U.S. government conducted genome sequencing almost immediately in the pandemic. Among other things, they say Covid-19 shows clear hallmarks of man’s intervention.
French virologist Luc Montagnier, a Nobel Prize recipient, arrived at the same conclusion a year ago. He says Covid-19’s genetics reveal “manipulation.” “Someone added sequences,” he said. “It’s the work of professionals, of molecular biologists…a very meticulous work.”
Additional info: Analysis saying Covid-19 is lab-derived: Dr. Stephen Quay, M.D., PhD., CEO of Atossa Therapeutics conducted a Bayesian analysis that he says concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that Covid-19 is lab-derived.
Genetic analysis alone isn’t 100% conclusive, because results must be compared to viruses from the Wuhan lab. And sources confirm: “We never got the sample from China.”
But scientists who spoke with me say genome sequencing, coupled with what’s known about research conducted by a U.S.-Chinese partnership, leaves them with little doubt that Covid-19 is a product of experiments.
The scientists I talked to don’t want to be quoted by name for fear of repercussions in today’s politically-charged environment. They’re highly critical that a U.S. research collaboration was allowed with China— a communist nation that has an active bioweapons program and, is arguably, our biggest world competitor and foe.
Scientists from the U.S. and the Wuhan lab joined up on experiments that involved making bat coronavirus more infectious, to try to invent a vaccine.
It’s called “gain of function” research, and it’s controversial because it could create a lethal virus that escapes and causes a pandemic. So risky, the U.S. temporarily halted such studies in 2014.
But an exception was made. The “gain of function” research underway by the U.S. and Wuhan scientists was “reviewed and approved for continued study by [the National Institutes of Health]” or “NIH.”
NIH didn’t only approve the research, it paid for it with six grants of tax dollars, including from the “National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,” led by Dr. Anthony Fauci. See grant numbers in image below:
More taxpayer money from Fauci’s institute and the U.S. Agency for International Development was funneled to the coronavirus research with China through EcoHealth Alliance, a New York based nonprofit led by Peter Daszak, a zoologist who specializes in viruses transmitted from animals to people.
Additional info: EcoHealth Alliance: EcoHealth Alliance describes its mission as: “Protecting global health by preventing the outbreak of emerging diseases.” According to tax records, the nonprofit brought in $18.5 million in 2018, almost entirely from U.S. government agencies. Its biggest single, reported expense was about $5.43 million in grants to foreign governments. About 1/3 of that total, $6.3 million, was spent on salaries and other employee-related costs.
EcoHealth Alliances’ Top 5 contributors in 2018
- $11.5 million: from U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
- $2.5 million: from U.S. Dept. of Defense
- $601,474: from U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- $783,412: from U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS)
- $900,000: from Johnson and Johnson
Additional info: Johnson and Johnson: Vaccine maker Johnson and Johnson did not reply to multiple requests for information on its contribution to EcoHealth Alliance.
Also working on the research, Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina. His work centered on genetically manipulating coronavirus in part to allow for “rapid and rational development…[of]…vaccines and therapeutics.”
Additional info: Vaccine tests: Baric’s 2015 NIH-funded Gain of Function study with the lead virologist from China’s WIV involved infecting mice with genetically modified bat coronavirus and testing a “live-attenuated virus vaccination” on them: “For vaccination, young and aged mice were vaccinated by footpad injection…then boosted with the same regimen 22 d later and challenged 21 d thereafter…All experiments were conducted contrasting two experimental groups (either two viruses, or vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts).”
Together, they teamed up with the renowned Chinese virologist nicknamed “bat woman,” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Shi Zhingli. They engineered genetic hybrids of bat coronaviruses, successfully getting them to infect human airway cells grafted in mice.
Additional info: China-U.S. research genetically-maniuplated bat coronavirus to make it infect human airway cells: “…plasmids containing wild-type, chimeric SARS-CoV and SHC014-CoV genome fragments were amplified, excised, ligated and purified. In vitro transcription reactions were then preformed to synthesize full-length genomic RNA, which was transfected into Vero E6 cells …Synthetic construction of chimeric mutant and full-length SHC014-CoV was approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Biosafety Committee and the Dual Use Research of Concern committee.”
Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance: “You can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily…”
Daszak talked about the collaboration in this interview [Virology Today] just before the Covid-19 outbreak. He said the team’s research was designed to stop coronavirus from crossing into people, and to help develop a vaccine for the resulting illness: SARS.
Daszak: “The logical progression for vaccines is, if you’re going to develop a vaccine for SARS, people are going to use Pandemic SARS, but let’s try to insert some of these related…and get a better vaccine.”
Additional info: From Peter Daszak Virology Today interview: In the interview published online on Dec. 9, 2019, EcoHealth Alliance’s Daszak discussed testing of modified coronaviruses on human cells and humanized mice in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). EcoHealth Alliance, which receives most of its funding from U.S. federal agencies, has provided funds for bat coronavirus research with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Phase 1 of a study Daszak coordinated with Shi Zhengli at WIV to catalog bat coronaviruses in China is reported to have taken place from 2014 to 2019.
As far back as 2015, numerous independent scientists objected to the “gain of function” research with China. In a published paper, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris (Simon Wain-Hobson) noted the research had produced an engineered novel coronavirus that “grows remarkably well” in human cells and “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory.” A biodefense expert (Richard Ebright, Molecular biologist, Rutgers University) added: “The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk.”
Additional info: Coronavirus used as “vaccine vector”: Scientists have long conducted research into the “potential of coronaviruses as vectors for vaccine development” noting that, “[s]everal features make these viruses attractive as vaccine and therapeutic vectors.” Some research has involved “recombinant” coronaviruses altered in a lab, “bringing together genetic material from multiple sources.” Scientists have also noted “unique safety issues associated with virus-vectored vaccines,” warning that such vaccines could mix with wild strains of coronavirus and “theoretically generate a more pathogenic strain.”
Additional info: How viral vector vaccines work: “Viral vector vaccines use live viruses to carry DNA into human cells. The DNA contained in the virus encodes antigens that, once expressed in the infected human cells, elicit an immune response.”
In 2018, the year before China’s outbreak, U.S. State Department science diplomats visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology. They said the research conducted on bat coronaviruses was critically important. But they were so concerned about safety issues at the lab, they dispatched sensitive cables to Washington D.C. warning that the work posed a possible risk of a new SARS-like pandemic. Josh Rogin at the Washington Post later obtained and published the cables.
Additional info: About the State Dept. cables: According to sensitive U.S. diplomatic cables from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, China, published by the Washington Post last July, the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) took 11 years to build the highest level biosafety lab, level 4, to research “among the most virulent viruses that pose a high risk of aerosolized person to person transmission.” Construction was finished Jan. 31, 2015 and the lab was accredited by the Chinese in Feb. 2017. The cables, dated Jan. 19, 2018, the year before the Covid-19 outbreak, found, “The new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.” According to the cables, the Wuhan lab “has scientific collaborations” with the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston— supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is led by Dr. Fauci. Further, according to the cables, Fauci’s institute and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) had supported a five year study (2017) on bat coronaviruses with the Chinese scientists from the Wuhan lab and Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases: “Obviously, there are a number of theories…”
For his part, Fauci responded to Redfield’s opinion— that Covid-19 escaped from the Wuhan lab— without addressing his agency’s funding of research at issue.
Fauci: “So Dr. Redfield was mentioning that he was giving an opinion as to a possibility. But again there are other alternatives, others that most people hold by.”
Additional info: Fauci comments about Redfield: “The alternative explanation which most public health individuals go by, is that this virus was actually circulating in China, likely in Wuhan, for a month or more before they were clinically recognized at the end of December of 2019. If that were the case, the virus clearly could have adapted itself to a greater efficiency of transmissibility over that period of time, up to and at the time it was recognized.”
Fauci declined our interview request.
Additional info: Fauci documents: The federal government has failed to lawfully respond to multiple Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests I made regarding Fauci’s emails, which are public documents. The documents are required by law to be produced within 30 days. It’s been over a year.
So did Baric, the researcher at the University of North Carolina as did Daszak— the researcher who leads EcoHealth Alliance.
Additional info: About Ralph Baric’s vaccine-related work: Baric lists his specific areas of interest as: Coronavirus Reverse Genetics and vaccine development. “We have developed infectious cDNAs from two coronaviruses,” he writes on his bio page. “Specific applications include…rearranging the coronavirus gene… development of coronavirus replicon RNAs and coronavirus replicon particles for vaccine development… Most of the research in our laboratory has used coronaviruses as models to study the genetics of RNA virus transcription, replication, persistence, and cross species transmission. We have also been using alphavirus vaccine vectors to develop novel candidate vaccines against caliciviruses.”
On Twitter, Daszak called the idea that Covid-19 links to his research— “rabbit hole conspiracies.”
“The same gang of right wing media outlets are also posting fraudulent claims about my work,” Daszak tweeted. “Pure politics w/out a care for how this ultimately puts public health at risk.”
Despite Daszak’s research partnership with Wuhan lab scientists, the World Health Organization raised eyebrows by inviting him to help investigate the origins of Covid-19. That team recently issued a report saying it’s “extremely unlikely” the virus came from a lab.
Additional info: WHO findings: In February, a World Health Organization (WHO) team claimed: “The findings suggest that the laboratory incidents hypothesis is extremely unlikely to explain the introduction of the virus to the human population.”
Additional info: Risk of experiments: Daszak acknowledged in a 2015 presentation that experimenting on coronavirus with the “humanized” mice have the highest degree of risk.
Sharyl to Metzl: “Do you have any idea who was behind the effort in the United States to controversialize the mere asking of the question about whether it came from a lab early on?”
Metzl: “Absolutely. I have repeatedly called for Peter Daszak to be removed from the WHO Organized International Advisory Committee looking into the origins of the pandemic, and the reason why I have done so is Peter has a tremendous conflict of interest as someone through his organization, the EcoHealth Alliance, who is a significant funder of Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
Metzl says Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance were a driving force behind efforts to discredit questions about a lab origin of Covid-19 as “crackpot theories.”
Additional info: Attempts to discredit China lab link: Early in the pandemic, as reporters followed the Covid-19 trail, medical journals added “Editors’ notes” on the bat coronavirus studies involving China in an attempt to debunk any lab ties at the outset. The notes read: “March 30, 2020, We are aware that this article is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.”
They helped orchestrate a letter signed by prominent scientists labeling talk of lab origins as “conspiracy theories.” Their own ties to the Chinese lab in question were omitted.
Metzl: “This letter was considered at the time, very credible. There were a number of Nobel laureates who signed it. And only later did it come out through a Freedom of Information request that the entire process had been managed and manipulated, and it really took the better part of a year.”
As the question is debated, five scientists who spoke with me said the sensitive U.S. research with China should never have been allowed.
One source, a medical doctor, says it was “irresponsible” to “partner with China on how to make [coronavirus] more infectious.” Another, also a medical doctor and biodefense expert says, “Hell, no, it’s not a good idea…[China has] an active bioweapons program, a very good one…and you’re going to cooperate with them on gain of function research? Somebody’s IQ dropped sharply when that decision was made.”
Additional info: State Department Fact Sheet Jan. 15, 2021: On January 15, shortly before the end of Trump’s presidency, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued a Fact Sheet about the origins of Covid-19. It said “several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019 . . . with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses.” It also stated that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had not disclosed all of its related work, and collaborated on secret projects with China’s military. In public statements, Pompeo has said there’s “enormous evidence” supporting the idea that Covid-19 leaked from the Wuhan lab.
Shi, of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, has been firm in her denial of anything to do with Covid-19 calling the virus, “nature’s punishment on the human race.” “I swear on my own life that the virus has no connection with the laboratory,” Shi said in a statement. “To those people who believe in and are spreading the rumours perpetrated by third-rate media outlets… I would like to give this advice: Shut your dirty mouths!”
Additional info: Biden administration: The Biden administration has called on the Chinese government to be more transparent and asked WHO to complete a full and independent investigation.
Additional info: Petition: About 1,000 people have signed onto a petition created by independent scientists asking WHO and EcoHealth Alliance’s Peter Daszak to explain more about the 2019 research that was taking place during the time the pandemic broke out.
Additional info: Ongoing U.S. funding for China’s WIV and EcoHealth Alliance: With the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s (WIV) possible role in the Covid-19 outbreak an open question, the Trump Administration cancelled remaining funding for the EcoHealth Alliance research with WIV on April 27, 2020. After receiving political backlash for the cancelled funding, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) reinstated the grant, but made China receiving additional funds contingent upon WIV answering questions about the lab’s practices and the Covid-19 outbreak; and providing a virus sample. EcoHealth Alliance criticized the conditions saying it made the research “impossible.” On Aug. 27, 2020, it was announced that the National Institutes of Health had awarded an even larger grant of taxpayer money, $7.5 million, to EcoHealth Alliance. EcoHealth Alliance is now reportedly one of 11 institutions and research teams approved to receive part of an $82 million bundle of U.S. tax money to study viruses crossing from nature into people, and rapid response strategies.
Clean-Transcript:
When the former head of the Centers for Disease Control, Dr. Robert Redfield, recently said Covid-19 likely leaked from a Chinese research lab, news headlines called it “shocking.”
Dr. Robert Redfield on CNN: “I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory— you know, escaped.”
That was followed by a flurry of media reports ridiculing the notion; insisting that Covid-19 probably jumped from bats to people through an unexplained, natural route. But there’s new information that hasn’t been widely reported. A sizable segment of the research community has formed the same opinion as Dr. Redfield: that Covid-19 leaked from experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.
Jamie Metzl, World Health Organization International Advisory Committee on Human Genome Editing: “There are scientists all around the world who have told me that they believe the most likely origin of COVID-19, of the pandemic, is an accidental lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
Jamie Metzl is a member of the World Health Organization International Advisory Committee on Human Genome Editing.
Sharyl (to Metzl): “What have you been told, and what have you found about scientists who feel like they can’t step forward?”
Metzl: “Many of these people are afraid to step forward. They’ve called it career suicide, because there are so many contentious issues, because the stakes are so high. Because the Chinese government, in collaboration, or conjunction, or maybe not even association, but with some very high-level and prominent scientists have put forward this story that I think is wrong.”
Two scientists with knowledge of the matter told me the U.S. government conducted genome sequencing almost immediately in the pandemic. Among other things, they say Covid-19 shows clear hallmarks of man’s intervention.
French virologist Luc Montagnier, a Nobel Prize recipient, arrived at the same conclusion a year ago. He says Covid-19’s genetics reveal “manipulation.” “Someone added sequences,” he said. “It’s the work of professionals, of molecular biologists…a very meticulous work.”
Genetic analysis alone isn’t 100% conclusive, because results must be compared to viruses from the Wuhan lab. And sources confirm: “We never got the sample from China.”
But scientists who spoke with me say genome sequencing, coupled with what’s known about research conducted by a U.S.-Chinese partnership, leaves them with little doubt that Covid-19 is a product of experiments.
The scientists I talked to don’t want to be quoted by name for fear of repercussions in today’s politically-charged environment. They’re highly critical that a U.S. research collaboration was allowed with China— a communist nation that has an active bioweapons program and, is arguably, our biggest world competitor and foe.
Scientists from the U.S. and the Wuhan lab joined up on experiments that involved making bat coronavirus more infectious, to try to invent a vaccine.
It’s called “gain of function” research, and it’s controversial because it could create a lethal virus that escapes and causes a pandemic. So risky, the U.S. temporarily halted such studies in 2014.
But an exception was made. The “gain of function” research underway by the U.S. and Wuhan scientists was “reviewed and approved for continued study by [the National Institutes of Health.]” or “NIH.”
NIH didn’t only approve the research, it paid for it with six grants of tax dollars, including from the “National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,” led by Dr. Anthony Fauci.
More taxpayer money from Fauci’s institute and the U.S. Agency for International Development was funneled to the coronavirus research with China through EcoHealth Alliance, a New York based nonprofit led by Peter Daszak, a zoologist who specializes in viruses transmitted from animals to people.
Also working on the research, Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina. His work centered on genetically manipulating coronavirus in part to allow for “rapid and rational development…[of]…vaccines and therapeutics.”
Together, they teamed up with the renowned Chinese virologist nicknamed “bat woman,” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Shi Zhingli. They engineered genetic hybrids of bat coronaviruses, successfully getting them to infect human airway cells grafted in mice.
Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance: “You can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily…”
Daszak talked about the collaboration in this interview just before the Covid-19 outbreak. He said the team’s research was designed to stop coronavirus from crossing into people, and to help develop a vaccine for the resulting illness: SARS.
Peter Daszak: “The logical progression for vaccines is, if you’re going to develop a vaccine for SARS, people are going to use Pandemic SARS, but let’s try to insert some of these related, and get a better vaccine.”
As far back as 2015, numerous independent scientists objected to the “gain of function” research with China. In a published paper, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris (Simon Wain-Hobson) noted the research had produced an engineered novel coronavirus that “grows remarkably well” in human cells and “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory.” A biodefense expert (Richard Ebright, Molecular biologist, Rutgers University) added: “The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk.”
In 2018, the year before China’s outbreak, U.S. State Department science diplomats visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology. They said the research conducted on bat coronaviruses was critically important. But they were so concerned about safety issues at the lab, they dispatched sensitive cables to Washington D.C. warning that the work posed a possible risk of a new SARS-like pandemic. Josh Rogin at the Washington Post later obtained and published the cables.
Dr. Anthony Fauci: “Obviously, there are a number of theories…”
For his part, Fauci responded to Redfield’s opinion— that Covid-19 escaped from the Wuhan lab— without addressing his agency’s funding of research at issue.
Dr. Anthony Fauci: “So Dr. Redfield was mentioning that he was giving an opinion as to a possibility. But again there are other alternatives, others that most people hold by.”
Fauci declined our interview request. So did Baric, the researcher at the University of North Carolina as did Daszak— the researcher who leads EcoHealth Alliance. On Twitter, Daszak called the idea that Covid-19 links to his research— “rabbit hole conspiracies.”
“The same gang of right wing media outlets are also posting fraudulent claims about my work,” Daszak tweeted. “Pure politics w/out a care for how this ultimately puts public health at risk.”
Despite Daszak’s research partnership with Wuhan lab scientists, the World Health Organization raised eyebrows by inviting him to help investigate the origins of Covid-19. That team recently issued a report saying it’s “extremely unlikely” the virus came from a lab.
Sharyl to Metzl: “Do you have any idea who was behind the effort in the United States to controversialize the mere asking of the question about whether it came from a lab early on?”
Metzl: “Absolutely. I have repeatedly called for Peter Daszak to be removed from the WHO Organized International Advisory Committee looking into the origins of the pandemic, and the reason why I have done so is Peter has a tremendous conflict of interest as someone through his organization, the EcoHealth Alliance, who is a significant funder of Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
Metzl says Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance were a driving force behind efforts to discredit questions about a lab origin of Covid-19 as “crackpot theories.”
They helped orchestrate a letter signed by prominent scientists labeling talk of lab origins as “conspiracy theories.” Their own ties to the Chinese lab in question were omitted.
Metzl: “This letter was considered at the time, very credible. There were a number of Nobel laureates who signed it. And only later did it come out through a Freedom of Information request that the entire process had been managed and manipulated, and it really took the better part of a year.”
As the question is debated, five scientists who spoke with me said the sensitive U.S. research with China should never have been allowed.
One source, a medical doctor, says it was “irresponsible” to “partner with China on how to make [coronavirus] more infectious.” Another, also a medical doctor and biodefense expert says, “Hell, no, it’s not a good idea…[China has] an active bioweapons program, a very good one…and you’re going to cooperate with them on gain of function research? Somebody’s IQ dropped sharply when that decision was made.”
Shi, of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, has been firm in her denial of anything to do with Covid-19 calling the virus, “nature’s punishment on the human race.” “I swear on my own life that the virus has no connection with the laboratory,” Shi said in a statement. “To those people who believe in and are spreading the rumours perpetrated by third-rate media outlets… I would like to give this advice: Shut your dirty mouths!”
This story was first published on April 24, 2020.
It is unconscionable that Dr. Fauci remains in charge of the covid pandemic in the United States. I question also whether he should remain employed by NIH.
I agree!
If all of the information continues to confirm what Sharyl has reported then he should not only be removed from his position but I think he should end up in prison.
It appears he has known all along where this virus came from and yet has continually lied to the American public.
I agree! Fauci needs to go. He is a bold face liar.
Did the CCP turn this thing loose to slow our economy down to get Trump out of office? Did they turn a more contagious strain loose on their new enemy India? Are they putting out more strains to sell more vaccines and PPEs. Why are not more Countries upset about germ warfare.
Not just the CCP
Because Xi along with other political and corporate leaders who embrace globalism are a part of WEF/YGL who have embedded in them a technocratic ideology of global governance through the great reset /build back better/new world order agenda by designing and implementing such a global crisis to through chaos cause the ignorant to submit to their totalitarian control.
Many should go after WEF/YGL along with its members of which this plandemic is the brainchild of to exploit the chaos to further their agenda.
https://sociable.co/government-and-policy/timeline-great-reset-agenda-event-201-pandemic-2020/
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/WEF/Young_Global_Leaders
https://www.glennbeck.com/contributor/revealing-joe-bidens-deep-ties-to-the-radical-great-reset-movement-and-its-globalist-leaders
There are a few other things that happened in Feb 2020… that suggest China knew they had a problem with the lab… https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1745270.shtml (read 4th paragraph knowing that the Chinese would never actually admit an problem) and then this https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8003713/China-appoints-military-bio-weapon-expert-secretive-virus-lab-Wuhan.html The same day Xi gives a speech about the need to tighten biosecurity he puts their top bioweapons expert in charge of the lab.
Excellent investigative work.
Sharyl,
Have you contacted or followed media on Dr .Li-Meng Yan of Hong Kong University. She has written several papers on SARS-Cov-2 pertaining to “gain of function” research. Additionally, she reports that the Chinese Military was actively involved in that research.
Facebook has blocked this articled two hours after I posted it.
Incredibly fascinating read!
Thank you Ms Atkinson.
You are one of few true reporters. Have you looked into the level 4 bio research lab the government has built in Manhattan, KS? They are going to be working with viruses that are harmful to animals and humans but have no cure. All this in the center of our agriculture. There goes our food supply. So a Wuhan lab in the middle of our country. This can lead to nothing good. Please look into this.
Sharyl, always informative to read you or watch full measure. You should have a bigger platform.
Excellent chronology Ms. Attkisson…and might I add I’m an admirer of your reporting.
Indeed many of the ‘Gain of Function’ Papers were published prior to ‘Event 201’ clearly identifying these studies authored by people now caught up in ‘smear campaigns’ or have simply ‘disappeared. Independent researchers have long ago concluded C-19 was engineered but have been censored or simply drowned out by Propagandists.
Deep inside the ICs of many Nations Bio-Defence experts ‘likely’ came to this very conclusion long ago and reported their findings to their ‘superiors’ only to be succinctly ‘dismissed’ after a cursory ‘thank you’. Those in the ‘trade’ generally recognize the ‘Tenor’ and ‘Body Language’ presented to the proferror of ‘bad news’ to know when their silence is required, as is often the case.
The big question before us now is whether its release was accidental or deliberate (with a few ‘outliers’ that don’t believe it exists at all).
I do find it curious, however, that the Chinese knowing of its effects, while restricting travel within their own country, did nothing to stop the exodus of its citizens sojourning to the ‘four-corners of the Earth’ during the largest annual holiday celebrated World-wide: The Chinese Lunar New Year. Holiday travelers make excellent disease ‘vectors’ in that regard.
Determining motives is much more complex as each ‘regime’ generally responds to crises as their Politics dictates.
‘Never let a crisis go to waste…’ I believe is a popular retort.
I believe that the NIH was involved with the Wuhan Lab as explained in this article. Further, I believe the Chinese Government weaponized the virus once they recognized the virus had accidentally escaped from the lab.
Biological warfare requires a vector to spread the virus. That vector was infected Chinese. They traveled from Wuhan around the world spreading the virus. The gestation period is 14 days. Wuhan was locked down for travel within China but, not for air travel outside of China. The rest is history.
A failure to hold China accountable is a grave mistake. They will attempt this type of an attack again. It is far cheaper than economic or physical warfare and they have a compliant target. The rest of the world of nations.
George Ross’ comment is spot on.
Is it possible that after having weaponized the virus and even manipulating it further, that the very virulent strain evident in India now could have been deliberately introduced by their “friends” across the border? So much we don’t know.
Thank you Sharyl. Very sobering. I am deeply concerned about the deep-6 of your FOIA request. Obviously, that’s not the only thing to be concerned about. It seems “novel” to me that pointing out conflicts of interest is tantamount to holding “crackpot theories.” To close, yes, the US working with China on this high-risk experimentation, does justify speculation about the IQ of those involved in making such decisions. The only other explanation I can think of would be some sort of Faustian bargain. Sometimes, redemption moves too far beyond the reach of regret and even remorse. But I actually feel secure in doubting that there is either regret, or remorse. Hubris and narcissism have made history through eons, and few of those with these traits exhibited anything a reasonable person would recognize as regret. Let alone remorse.
Most of this information was coming out last year on January 28 when Professor Charles Lieber was arrested by the FBI for lying when questioned about the Coronavirus. Sharyl, an Emmy winning journalist, did a good job verifying and putting everything together in this article.
It is also known that Jeffrey Epstein and a team of American scientists and Bill Gates were involved with Lieber and his Wuhan project. I do not trust the people funding and performing this research. President Trump tried to have a real investigation and was obstructed by Congress and the Deep State. The coverup has been blatant especially with Daszak investigating a project that he was also funding.
Thank you for posting this! I have been praying foe over a year now that the truth would come out about everything and everyone involved. People have died because of the lying that we’ve endured for years by the global elite people and organizations spinning their web to make money, get rich and depopulate the globe! The “leak” may have been accidental, but the research wasn’t accidental at all. Those responsible for such deadly “gain of function” research to create a “vaccine” need to be exposed.
May God allow all involved to be exposed and held to account so those who suffered may be vinidicated!
Thank you for posting this! (Typo correction!)
Amen, Lynn!
Thank You Sharyl for your work.
Sharyl, thank you for this eye opening report. What I have suspected is true about the origin of the virus. What is shocking is how deep and wide the conspiracy has been to fool the world that our government along with the Chinese developed a virus to make it have “enhanced functions” which to me is another term for bio weapon which could, without vaccine, wipe out the world. Now I wonder what other enhanced function viruses may have been cooked up in a government lab.
This Virus wasn’t leaked on accident, it was purposely released.
Shouldn’t we form protests for transparency on this important matter. Maybe make “visual factual charting” showing the factual relations between the key players….and organizations. How do we educate the public to understand these corrupt connections? It is right in front of our eyes but no one seems to care. The elephant in the living room is not wearing a mask Mr. Fauci. Or maybe they have heard immunity.
Of course we should. The US public is shellshocked, demoralized and depressed after 16+ months of lockdowns, mask mandates, coercive vaccinations, and a 24/7/365 propaganda campaign disseminating non stop panic porn. We must form community groups and resist this growing tyranny. To some extent it is
already happening.
Maybe we need to make a “visual factual chart” showing the factual relations between the key players….and organizations. How do we educate the public to understand these corrupt connections? It is right in front of our eyes but no one seems to care.
The elephant in the living room is not wearing a mask Mr. Fauci, or maybe he has Hurd immunity.
Awesome job Sharyl! ?
Nice work Ms. Attiksson. Your report confirms my research and previous reports I have published on this topic. Other interesting information includes the timing of Event 201, a simulation of a global coronavirus pandemic conducted by the WEF, the Gates Foundation, the CDC from the US & China, the media, UN, central banks and J&J in Oct 2019. Just before the actual outbreak occurred.
Event 201 took place the exact same day as the world military games opening ceremony was held in Wuhan China, where military’s from 110 nations were all at ground zero, just weeks before the world learned of covid. Strangely, nobody wants to talk about the games. There are reports of athletes getting sick after retuning home from the games. I could go on, but instead will just thank you for this report.
Spiro
I learned similar info without the detail, Thanks for adding, and yes, great transcript & additional info Ms Attiksson.
In my research, every single member of the Canadian team became sick during the games and arrived home in Canada to be quarantined. The CCP “worked” with Canada to keep the whole incident mum. I will leave it to your own searching to understand what “worked” means.
Covid is a bioweapon, jointly developed and funded by China and the US. It was intentionally released by the US during the Military Games in a False Flag / Blow Back operation. The US could point a finger at China. The response wasn’t incompetent, it was planned. Only 6% of the reported 500,000 US deaths were from Covid, the rest were from other causes and Covid was present. This means only 30,000 of the deaths were caused by Covid, half the yearly number of deaths from influenza in the US.
Thank you Sharyl for posting this article.
Sparkling clear
Thank you.
(Not that it was a surprise)
Vaping pneumonia started in August 2019. Nobody tests covid on those cases. E- cigarette users are worldwide, but only American users had respiratory outbreak. Why?
Good point! I am now thinking vaping would be the other good way to spread the virus or get a vaccine!?
June/July 2019 Maryland , Fort Detrick Level 4 BioLab leak ,hundreds of residents in vicinity fell sick with respiratory disease. Why? CDC closed it in August 2019.
Truth…..I saw on a post in CHD . A woman and her husband were living near by…got a weird upper respiratory ‘flu’. Dec 2019. We know it was here at least in August.
So seldom I see Fort Detrick mentioned, when in fact it was the epicenter of gain of function development world wide and source of many local and wider outbreaks. Plague of Corruption, provide its most intimate information by someone who for years was on inside and Fauci’s decades of criminal activities that went on there for decades. Fauci hold patents and makes big money from public investments. America doesn’t really have much of a medical system as a Cure for anything is the last product they even want to come up with. A MD/JD medical doctor friend warned me long ago, “There’s more politics in MEDICINE than in Politics.
And how many cases have been reported worldwide re flu/virus infections within proximity of biolabs? [perhaps these go unreported]
because virus was already here I had it first week of Jan 2020
I know it was already here because my daughter had covid symptoms in February 2020! Tested negative for flu A & flu B ans streptococcus ! Dry cough that sounded like croup! Nasal congestion with no mucus or real reason to feel congested. Inability to taste food. Finally, antibiotic alone wasn’t working. Finally did an albuterol sulfate nebulizer treatment at home and was 80% better the next day!! Another 2 daily treatments and she was cured!
Months later, a dr. In Texas was interviewed ans revealed he was using the same treatment to treat covid because he couldn’t get HCQ!
(Her meds were slightly expired because she hadn’t used it in years and it still worked!)
I’ll try albuterol. Nebulizers are inexpensive to purchase. H2O2 diluted down from 3% was recommended by my doctor. I breathed it in for 2 or 3 minutes a few times per day.
The simple oxygen release kills virus on contact in mouth and nose where multiplication first occurs, It’s instant protection of killing gives your lungs an immediate break from the illness. So, in a few minutes it probably changes any outcomes of a “test” dramatically too.
The drug the Texas doctor was using was budesonide, not albuterol.
George Webb was reporting on this very early on.
Webb has been at the forefront and he needs to be acknowledged more often. In a world where a legit Free Press is represented by TV Media–Webb would be a trusted News Anchor. Perhaps we will live to see this day come.
perfectly stated
If Sharyl and Jennifer Zeng teamed up to report this on Sunday morning, it would be fabulous. Jennifer had the full story all along and is also very credible. A perfect pair for this story- my 2 favorite reporters.
The lab in Wuhan China is also owned by the world’s health organization As I understand it.. The CDC had a patent on this virus back in 2003 as well as a pattent the testing and vaccine…as of now there has not been 1 sars 2 genome mapped…this is sars 1 and there is nothing novel about it…I’ll find the reading if anyone wants email me
Dear Sharyl, I’m writing from Italy, where we had a very regime creation following all of the MSM lies on the false pandemic that created a situation that incompetent governments were very culprit of many many crimes.
In italy and all of EU nations are in a very criminal situation of dictature and everyday we are experimenting what Ukraine nazism is doing from 2014 and before. Political parties of opposition we had in past are now non existent, political elections born from precedent crisis are a demential example of another way to have regime change and a very new dictature, almost all EU nations maken sanctions to Russia obtaining a very enormous economical crisis (while Russia is flourishing from all aspects), poor people in one year decuplicated, and almost all we have very concern of our future. Many problems came from last Usa president (a parkinsonian which is for sure manipulated) and american diktats on a war lost before the start bring us in a real situation of war and whenever Russia decide to bombing us we are with no defences at all, and……. WE DO NOT WANT A WAR for american interests.
All the continue american provocations obtained 3/4 of the world pratically isolated western nations and Dollar is falling rapidly. And you can see France finally going to finish that demential situation, soon many other european nations will follow fench example, I hope also italy (but italian people are a very sheep people which in last 3 years demonstrated to are not ready to change things also if in front of immense number of crimes of the governments). All of that is the signal of the very fall of capitalist, neoliberist, colonialist behavior of western failed system. African nations are throwing out French, american, english assets from their nations and Russia and China are takung all the positions that were of west, Middle East also seeing double standards on Israelian and american behavior are going to make a sole thing to send home the western axis of evil. Thinking of all of the situations described, Sharyl, what do you think?
Please, all of you must excuse me for little english.