(POLL) Most say Covid-19 is a ‘bioweapon’

Ninety-eight percent (98%) say it’s pretty clear now that Covid is a bioweapon.

That’s according to the latest unscientific poll at SharylAttkisson.com.

The origins of Covid-19 has been a hotly contested debate since the pandemic began in 2019 in Wuhan, China where a lab was conducting US-funded ‘gain-of-function’ research on manipulated bat coronaviruses.

After the outbreak, US and Chinese public health officials went to great lengths to insist that the virus jumped from bats to people through a market close to the Level 4 biosafety lab Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

Over the last four years, most experts have said the lab is the likely source of Covid-19. Many scientists and government entities, including the FBI and the Energy Department agree that it is unlikely Covid originated from the bat market.

Full results are below. Be sure to answer the newest poll at SharylAttkisson.com. Look for the black box on the right sidebar on your computer or scroll way down on your mobile device.

It’s pretty clear now that Covid ____ a bioweapon.

98% Is

2% is not

Visit The Sharyl Attkisson Store today

Shop Now

Unique gifts for independent thinkers

Proceeds benefit independent journalism

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 thoughts on “(POLL) Most say Covid-19 is a ‘bioweapon’”

  1. SGT Todd Wiseman

    Yes indeed Sharyl,
    We are very proud to be the 18% who never took that evil vax, thus we are healthy & happy, no embalmer is taking giant rubber ten inch long clots out of our veins.
    Todd Wiseman
    Ohio univ Athens

  2. A critical problem with the bioweapon theory is the faulty diagnostics of Covid. You can’t even get to describing something as a bioweapon for covid if you cannot establish valid diagnostics for Covid. The early PCR testing at high cycles was horrendously inaccurate, and they relied on Chinese models on figuring out what they needed to look for. The mortality during and after the covid era is thought by many to be higher from the treatments, vaccines and medicines (died suddenlies) than covid itself. Birx herself was instrumental in having deaths misclassified as covid deaths. It was through her mechanizations, that, if someone had more serious health and immediate problems, those deaths would still be classified as Covid deaths.

    1. I would say there is not problem in declaring it to be a bio-weapon.
      What was the intent of creating the SARS-19 or SARS-2. Since the ChiComs did not want a 2d SARS leaving Wuhan, it was renamed COVID, courtesy of Fauci.
      Your introduction of faulty diagnostics indicates you are attempting to shift the blame from Wuhan, the ChiComs, Fauci, and more.

  3. Replying to Kevin. I do not even accept that covid-19 was isolated (using Koch postulates). The medical treatments would have been far better had the hospitals assumed they were not dealing with something that was completely novel. If a patient seems like they have pneumonia or the flu, treat them as such and do not fail to treat them. In many cases, a combination of either failing to treat, or using faulty treatments, resulted in excess casualties. As Celia Farber has continually pointed out, the whole Faucian response was replay of the catastrophic response to the AIDS crisis. Instead of the vaccine as the killer, it was AZT.

Scroll to Top