(POLL) 48% Rate Kamala Harris ‘poor’ on border policy


President Joe Biden put Vice President Kamala Harris in charge of efforts to control migration at the southern border, and most voters say they don’t think she’s done a good job of it.

That’s according to Rasmussen Reports.

The survey found that 62% of likely voters say they consider the current situation with migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border to be a crisis.

Twenty-six percent (26%) say they don’t see it as a crisis, while 12% say they are not sure.

Harris was assigned by Biden in March 2021 “to lead our efforts,” working with Mexico and the so-called Northern Triangle countries  – Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras – in “stemming the migration to our southern border.” 

Thirty-one (31%) of voters say they rate Harris as doing a “good or excellent” job in dealing with migration, while 48% say they give her a “poor” rating on the issue. 

To see survey question wording, click here.

Visit The Sharyl Attkisson Store today

Shop Now

Unique gifts for independent thinkers

Proceeds benefit independent journalism


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 thoughts on “(POLL) 48% Rate Kamala Harris ‘poor’ on border policy”

  1. Todd Michael Wiseman

    Yes indeed well over 16,000,000 million illegal foreigners trying to taint the white majority in the u.s, it’s almost 2025, yet in the 1950s Germany was able to build their containment WALL that did the Job just fine until the Yankees stuck their nose in it and it was dismantled in the 80s, we must keep ALL these foreigners OUT, to keep a strong white majority and national identity always, so very critical, in Europe, the Nordic Scandinavian countries have had to learn this lesson the hard way last few yrs

    Todd
    Ohio univ Athens

  2. Todd Michel Wiseman,

    On The National Desk ( Fox TV ) this
    morning, this statistic was reported :

    In 2010, 9-million in the U.S. identified as multi-racial. In 2020, the number had risen to 33-million.

    Aristotle had warned against that phenomenon
    within a host culture—as it always results in
    bloody revolution.

    Here’s is part of the reason MONGREL-Building Marxists ( Socialists/Feminists ) have gotten this far, revealed below—as Marxian Senator Ted Kennedy had L I E D to White Americans in 1965 :

    Forwarded Message :

    Marxian Senator Edward M. Kennedy
    (D-MA), commenting on passage of his
    – his Communist Handlers’ –
    Immigration Act of 1965—His (broken)
    P R O M I S E now destroying the Framers’/
    Founders’ constitutional republic and
    White Civil Society ( see Great Britain
    today ) :

    “Out of deference to the critics, I want to comment on … what the bill
    will not do. First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants
    annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration
    remains substantially the same …
    Secondly,
    the
    ethnic
    mix
    of
    this
    country
    will not be upset … Contrary to the charges in some quarters, S.500 will
    not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or
    the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia.
    In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed
    measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.
    Thirdly, the bill will not permit the entry of subversive persons, criminals,
    illiterates, or those with contagious disease or serious mental illness. As I
    noted a moment ago, no immigrant visa will be issued to a person who is
    likely to become a public charge … the charges I have mentioned are
    highly emotional, irrational, and with little foundation in fact. They are out
    of line with the obligations of responsible citizenship. They breed hate of
    our heritage.” (Senate Part 1, Book 1, pp. 1-3)

    -Rick

  3. Rick,
    Wasn’t Kennedy speaking about legal immigration? In fact, didn’t Reagan want to extend citizenship to illegal’s while shutting down new entrees. Reagan just didn’t bother with the later part.
    I should remind y’all that back during the great migrations from Europe, folks didn’t want the Irish or the Italians to enter, but they did.

  4. Phil,

    Reagan began that deadly AMNESTY
    mistake !—and all else inimical to good
    civil society began with him (( he had
    been serving Vulture Capitalists’
    LUST for more and more warm bodies
    —read Jefferson’s warning about
    “MERCHANTS” lack of allegiance
    to anything but “the ground they
    stand on.”

    And we’re to believe Reagan had been
    duped by Democrats’ promise, that if
    he granted AMNESTY, they’d fix the
    illegal “wetbacks” streaming across
    the southern border. I’ve a shiny new
    UFO in my back yard to sell you, if you
    believe that; and, by the way, what
    about homosexual tours through his
    White House—read/study, “The
    Franklin Coverup.”

    Great Britain – via Illuminati/Rothschild –
    starved the Irish !—in order to drive them
    into the colonies (( England had had lots
    of food to ease starvation, but chose the
    HEARTLESS road, because England
    HATED both the Irish and the anti-KING
    Founders’/Framers’ “treason” )).

    As for Italians—ever heard of “Mob”/
    “Mobsters”/“OrganizedCrime” in large
    EASTERN cities, during the first half
    of the 20th-Century ?

    Fine citizens ?

    -Rick

  5. Of the alleged Thirty-one (31%) of voters who say they rate Harris as doing a “good or excellent” job in dealing with migration, I seriously doubt that any of them could identify anything Harris has actually DONE — unless they define “doing nothing” as a form of “doing something,” as if ignoring a problem is considered a form of dealing with a problem.

    It’s far more likely that the 31% are just providing a reflexive POLITICAL response supporting the democrat candidate.

Scroll to Top