Fifty-six percent (56%) say they are not happy with the current presidential candidate field.
That’s according to the latest unscientific poll at SharylAttkisson.com.
Forty-four percent (44%) say they are satisfied with the current candidates.
The results highlight a divide among voters regarding the available choices for the upcoming election.
This divide reflects widespread concerns about whether these candidates truly represent their values and priorities.
Full results are below. Be sure to answer the newest poll at SharylAttkisson.com. Look for the black box on the right sidebar on your computer or scroll way down on your mobile device.
Are you happy with current presidential candidate field?
44% Yes
56% No
The Lemonade Mermaid Store
Unique gifts for Land or Sea Mermaids, Mer-pets and Little Mermaids!
Left: Pastel Beach Necklace $16
This poll is nonsensical…You will NEVER get a majority to agree on a presidential candidate. There is too large a variety of constituents, with a very diversified ideology.
There’s no perfect candidate for everyone and there will never be a consensus.
This poll indicates Nothing! Every person polled would like to see a better candidate from the ‘other’ party so it is surprising 100% are NOT satisfied.
Could this be one more way to divide the nation? Polling has become nothing more than anothe social media ruse.
Yes – no one will be completed satisfied, that’s true – but each year the quality of the choices are deteriorating. Harris who was not even close in primaries against Biden, was selected as VP based on “Biden racist/sexist criteria” and now since Dems recognize Biden unelectable (should have know 2 yrs ago); and Trump, well he is as unpresidential as you can get… really?
100% Happy with the choice. What could be easier. Donald Trump, a man who loves his country and wants to better that country or Kamala Harris, a DEI candidate inserted after an in your face coup who could careless about her country. Why wouldn’t I be thrilled with those options?
“Are you happy with current presidential candidate field?”
That question is EXTREMELY poorly-worded. To be happy with the candidate “field” means to be happy with ALL of the candidates running — technically including not just being happy with the republican candidate and the democrat candidate, but ALSO being happy with the libertarian candidate, the socialist candidate, the communist candidate, and any other candidate.
Whoever thought up the wording of the question doesn’t know or care much about linguistics.