Today, most countries have officially determined that most kids don’t need COVID shots. But in the U.S., the CDC still recommends COVID vaccinations for babies and children six months and older.
The following is a transcript of a report from “Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson.”
Watch the video by clicking the link at the end of the page.
I found that American doctors are sometimes given a slanted picture of the safety and effectiveness of COVID vaccines in children.
Saul Faust: Welcome, everybody, to the final
In May 2023, the website Medscape, which has a left-leaning, pro-pharmaceutical industry tilt, posted materials for a class about COVID in children.
The course is a continuing medical education class offered to doctors to keep their licenses current. But the posted class materials don’t directly address one simple, important question:
What’s the risk to children from getting COVID compared to their risk from getting the vaccines?
The doctors’ class also doesn’t acknowledge important cases like that of Maddie de Garay, profiled last year on Full Measure. Maddie may have been the first child injured by COVID vaccines. At age 12, she entered Pfizer’s clinical trial at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital. Within hours of her second experimental vaccine dose on January 20, 2021, her health fell apart.
Stephanie de Garay: She said she felt like her heart was being ripped out. Chest pain. She had severe abdominal pain. She was hunched over when she walked through the door. Her toes and her fingers were white, and when you touched them, they were ice-cold.
Soon, Maddie couldn’t walk. By the time she was hospitalized for a third time, she was so sick she couldn’t feel her legs, had an abnormal heart rate, was suffering seizures, passing out, vomiting, unable to swallow or eat, and had to be fed through a tube. Maddie was eventually diagnosed with a paralyzing immune disorder known to be associated with COVID shots and flu shots, and other vaccines.
But before we check to see if Maddie’s case is reflected in the doctors’ continuing medical education course, it helps to know who’s presenting the class.
The three instructors are introduced by their distinguished professional titles without mention of their extensive vaccine and drug industry ties.
Not mentioned?
Instructor Dr. Barbara Rath is a consultant or advisor for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Roche.
Instructor Dr. George Kassianos advises or consults for Merck, Novavax, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, and Valneva.
And instructor Saul Faust has relationships with an A-to-V list of vaccine manufacturers: AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, Novavax, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Valneva.
Looking at the presentation, it claims that COVID vaccines are up to “100% effective” in kids. The generous definition of “efficacy” is questionable. The quoted figure only measured whether kids in the study had COVID one week after their second vaccine.
Dr. George Kassianos: The efficacy, again, seven days after the second dose, was 100%.
Furthermore, the fine print at the bottom of the slide claiming 100% effectiveness indicates that stat is from the study led by Dr. Robert Frenck—the one Maddie was injured in.
In his findings, Dr. Frenck reported, “there were no vaccine-related serious adverse events and few overall severe adverse events.”
And that’s exactly what doctors were led to believe in the continuing medical education class.
Dr. George Kassianos: The adverse effects were mild to moderate and generally in the form of injection site pain, headaches, and fatigue. But no vaccine-related serious adverse effects.
For the purposes of educating other doctors, Maddie de Garay simply doesn’t exist.
Sharyl Attkisson: In my new book, there’s more on conflicts of interest in the medical field that begin in medical school, and other reasons why we’re growing sicker even though we’re spending record amounts on health and insurance.
Watch video here.
NOW AVAILABLE: FOLLOW THE $CIENCE
Order Sharyl Attkisson’s New Bestseller!
Sharyl and Lisa—and Full Measure Team,
Also, most hyperactive children do
not need
PSYCHOACTIVE
A D H D
drugs—only restriction of sugar and
caffeinated foods/drinks :
https://www.sciencealert.com/high-doses-of-adhd-drug-can-cause-serious-side-effects-study-warns?utm_source=ScienceAlert+-+Daily+Email+Updates&utm_campaign=a13952d946-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fe5632fb09-a13952d946-366102109
-Rick
P.S.
Somewhere, deep in your reports, you’ll
find my post about a mother’s trick
on her two toddlers—firstly, giving them
a breakfast of bacon and eggs, which had
been non-eventful, regarding following
behavior; and, then, after about an hour,
she gave them each a bowl of surgery
cereal ( Sugar Pops ), after
which they’d become
screaming,
hyperactive,
running-here-and-there,
kids.
Again,
ADHD is just a contrived mental disease
caused by those two stimulants.
Sugar and caffeine
cause out-of-control kids
(( boys’ NATURAL hyperactivity notwithstanding )).
Drugs for it are very dangerous
—and profit-making means
for physicians’
cushy
life.
I just wanted to let Ms Atkisson know that I will purchase the book.
The reason I held up on the purchasing is that I wanted to confirm it is a good reference book, well worth-not only reading-but also keeping.
I reserved it from the local library and am reading the unbelievable reports on doctors not even writing their journal articles (and, I believe, all medical journal articles have to be peer approved).
Well first of all, many of the articles are generally written, not by the doctor who signs the article as the author, but by a representative of the pharmaceutical industry. The doctor who is supposedly the author (and is listed as the author) does nothing but sign off on the legitimacy of the lab tests and evidence tests shown in the article.
Moreover, the “peer”s approval” is not legitimate either. Either his peers don’t know whether the doctor wrote the article, or they do know about these practices by our medical journal community-but don’t care.
Not only that, but the doctor who ostensibly authored the article may actually be a consultant of the pharmaceutical company that actually ran and “medical journal” gave its seal of approval on the tests, and their legitimacy.
This is just a part of one chapter. If you want to see and review the shenanigans of our so-called expert community of doctors read and keep this book. Not only will it be a good reference book on pharmaceuticals but also it gives (I thought) tips on how any “expert” connected to lawyers, the IRS or the Federal Government will try to snooker you.
Anyway, I just want to thank you, Ms. Attkisson, for doing the research (which I’m not able to) and for your writing this book.
(Please don’t tell me that it was ghostwritten ;)