The following is information from Children’s Health Defense.

A landmark COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study has been republished in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law. This follows its controversial withdrawal by two prior journals.

The study, led by Nicolas Hulscher, an epidemiologist at the McCullough Foundation. provides what he describes as “robust evidence” linking the vaccines to fatal outcomes. It claims these findings meet the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) criteria for a “Class I recall.”

A Class I recall is defined by the FDA as necessary when a product poses “a reasonable probability” of causing severe health consequences or death. The study calls for immediate regulatory action.

Hulscher hailed the republication as a “pivotal victory for transparency and accountability in science.” He described it as a blow to the “Academic Publishing Cartel” and their alleged efforts to suppress open debate.

“The forces of censorship and suppression within the biopharmaceutical complex have suffered a significant setback.” 

– Nicolas Hulscher, Epidemiologist,  McCullough Foundation

The research team includes prominent figures like Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus of epidemiology at Yale, and Dr. Peter McCullough, a noted critic of current vaccine policies. They have emphasized the need for transparency in vaccine safety data.

The study analyzed 44 papers documenting 325 autopsies and one necropsy. After screening out duplicates and incomplete data, researchers found that 73.9% of deaths were directly or significantly linked to COVID-19 vaccination. Most deaths occurred within a week of the last dose, with sudden cardiac death being the leading cause at 35%, followed by pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction. The findings align with known vaccine injury mechanisms and raise concerns about unexplained deaths in otherwise healthy, vaccinated individuals.

“This is a victory not just for science, but for the fundamental right to question authority and demand accountability.” 

– Nicolas Hulscher, Epidemiologist,  McCullough Foundation

The findings were originally submitted to Preprints with The Lancet and Forensic Science International. Both journals withdrew the study under what the authors claim were external pressures. Hulscher criticized the biopharmaceutical industry’s influence on academic publishing, arguing that it stifles open debate and suppresses research critical of vaccine policies.

The republication of the study has reignited debates over vaccine safety and the influence of powerful entities on scientific discourse. Advocates for transparency are calling for stronger accountability from pharmaceutical companies, regulators, and publishers, raising fundamental questions about scientific freedom and the integrity of regulatory systems.

For more details, read the full article here.