The outrageous story of how reputable scientists who were off the government narrative were slandered, censored, and smeared — even though many of them proved to be far more correct than public health experts in their predictions, and more on target in terms of their advice. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya is a medical doctor and professor at the Stanford School of Medicine, and has a PhD in economics.
Listen Below:
Order my new book: “Follow the $cience: How Big Pharma Misleads, Obscures, and Prevails.”
Subscribe to my two podcasts: “The Sharyl Attkisson Podcast” and “Full Measure After Hours.” Leave a review, subscribe and share with your friends! Support independent journalism by visiting the Sharyl Attkisson store.
Visit SharylAttkisson.com, www.FullMeasure.news and Sharyl’s Substack for original reporting.
Do your own research. Make up your own mind. Think for yourself.
It is great that he is the proposed head of the NIH! With him and Bobby Kennedy involved the mess NIH, CDC HHS, etc., made of things will get some real light. And maybe the revolving door from gov’t health agencies to big pharma will be brought to an end!
Dr. Battacharya was instrumental in my decision to skip the jab. While I was in the age range, over 65, of those most susceptible to the Wuhan Flu, I was in fairly good health. After 60 days to stop the spread I decided the lockdowns were not in my best interest and likely not in the best interest of the nation/world. I spend the summer or 2020 traveling around the USA in my RV visiting friends and relatives. I did up my zinc, d2 and other supplements. If I came in contact with the virus, I never caught the effects. In my opinion based on my experience, Dr. Battacharya was 99,99% correct, only erroring in that all us seasoned citizens should take the jab, this one never did and never will!
About 30 years ago I was appointed head of an attorneys committee in the U.S. Coutt of Claims to represent several hundred claims under the Vaccine Compensation Act that the original Salk Inactivated Poliomyelitis Vaccine caused polio in IPV recipients and or their contacts. CDC dogma teaches that Salk IPV cannot cause polio.
The Committee gained access to internal records of the Salk’s Francis Field Trial – a Field Trial CDC touts as the Gold Standard of Field Trials. The only CDC recognized reactions to Salk’s IPV arose in the Cutter Incident shortly after licensure of the IPV. Lilly and Parke Davis were the only producers of the Francis Field Trial vaccines. Most of the polio cases in the Cutter Incident arose in family contacts of IPV recipients. The IPV injected into vaccine recipients was not inactivated and spread like a paralytic flu to people in close personal contacts with vaccine recipients in the Cutter Incident. Polio irises from the vaccine can paralyze contacts of vaccine recipients while leaving the recipient unharmed.
After review of the internal records it became evident that the Francis Field Trial and Cutter Incident had almost identical reaction rates. After the Field Trial Salk epidemiology eliminated direct injected IPV cases that began within 7 days of IPV injection as being caused by wild polio…then their classroom contacts who had been injected with a placebo acquired paralytic polio at twice the rate of vaccine recipients which allowed Salk’s Crew to fabricate an absolutely fraudulent conclusion that Salk’s IPV could not cause paralytic polio.
We did not realize at the time that the Cutter Vaccine had actually been made by Lilly which explains the Court’s reaction to the committee’s conclusion that The Cutter Incident and the Francis Field Trial had identical adverse reaction rates.
The government reacted violently to our heresy. One of the Committee got indicted and spent a year in Federal prison,. another was disbarred from the Claims Court…I just did not get paid.
Polio, which had historically been defined as Ascending, Assymetric, Flaccid Paralysis disappeared with current Salk IPV….when CDC renamed it Acute, Flaccid Myelitis or AFM.
I was up to date on my shots and vaccines until Covid, I was ahead on my Pneumonia shots because of my susceptibility.
When Covid came along, things did not proceed as they are supposed to and I became suspicious and did not get involved so to speak.
Old people die, that is why this age group was “vulnerable”. That is why young people “were not at risk”.
A virus does not know the difference. Either it is deadly or it is not. The covid injection was a terrible risk to inflict on anyone. I differ materially with his operating “conclusions”.