(POLL) Majority say they are less likely to visit Cracker Barrel


A majority of respondents say they are now less likely to visit Cracker Barrel.

That’s according to the latest unscientific poll at SharylAttkisson.com.

Fifty-nine percent (59%) say they are less likely to visit the restaurant chain.

Thirty-two percent (32%) say there has been no change in whether they would visit.

Just nine percent (9%) say they are more likely to visit Cracker Barrel.

The results show a clear negative shift in consumer sentiment toward the popular restaurant, with most respondents saying they are now less inclined to stop in.

Full results are below. Be sure to answer the newest poll at SharylAttkisson.com. Look for the black box on the right sidebar on your computer or scroll way down on your mobile device.

Poll Question: As of today are you more likely or less likely to visit Cracker Barrel?

9% More
59% Less
32% No change

FOLLOW THE SCIENCE by Sharyl Attkisson on Audible

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 thoughts on “(POLL) Majority say they are less likely to visit Cracker Barrel”

  1. Business 101 tells us that unless you’re in the politicking business, if you want to cast the widest net for customers, keep clear of any political messaging. Any CEO committing to, and/or celebrating one political group is going to potentially turn away a high percentage of current and future customers. If I was on the board, even if I agreed with the CEO’s messaging, I’d still vote to fire them. If your business is eateries, to move it forward, you look for ways to increase foot traffic, not decrease. If you look in an HVAC engineering book, they have a table that shows what percentage of people are comfortable at different temperatures. That’s where your companies thermostat is usually set. If say, 72 degrees is comfortable for 65% of people, you cast the widest net to try and keep most of your employees comfortable. I’m not sure why these CEO’s aren’t fired immediately. They lack simple business common sense.

  2. [[ Not for Publication, Sharyl—but Your and Friends’ and Colleagues’ Consideration ]]

    Re : Heading Back Schools to be Educated in W O K E N E S S Studies

    =====
    ©1991

    Name of the Beast

    for

    Unchained Liberalism

    A vile beast strides unchallenged through the halls of academia and across the land, and throughout Western civilization.

    Clever deceivers promise that as leaves turn and bags are packed, parents will send hopeful young minds off to places charged with imparting knowledge of great, good things.

    But after months in college with that beast, embattled youths lack courage to speak openly of its workings within the classrooms, dorms, and minds of the administrators, professors, and counselors.

    Minds long inquisitive and bursting with youthful innocence meet the beast, while monitors who distrust parents and disparage moral values silence youthful mouths with intimidation and guile.

    Can you name the beast? The clues are all around you. The servants of the beast are sent forth in sheep’s clothing to prey on innocence and chant:

    “do your own thing,”
    “it’s just another lifestyle,”
    “don’t be a bigot,”
    “don’t discriminate,”
    “don’t be judgmental,”
    “live and let live,”
    “don’t be a prude,”
    “don’t knock it if you haven’t tried it,”
    “if it feels good, do it,”
    “they’re just like you and me,”
    “people everywhere are the same,”
    “who’s to say what’s right or wrong?”
    “it’s a victimless crime,”
    “it’s none of your business,”
    “down with dead, white European males and Western civilization,” “up with Asian-, Hispanic-, and Afro-centrism,” “more pluralism, diversity, and ethnic awareness,” “more privileges and payments for historic grievances,” . . . and more special rights for the self-deprived, self-enslaved, self-abused, self-infected, and self-glorified.

    Corruption of the good is the quest of the beast, and its keepers call it, “tolerance.”

    -Rick

  3. DS,

    -best to identify the sex, which hysterical behavior
    of that Board Chairman may be either male or
    female, physically—but in this case is female.

    Watch “The View” women hysterically pummel
    sound logic. Watch Democrat men hysterically
    pummel sound logic. Watch the ongoing death
    of the West—dying from lack of applying sound
    logic.

    The past informs the present to predict the
    future.

    Emotions rule !—read Matthew 15:19.

    -Rick

  4. No shift. The question was not “as an ardent customer of Crackerbarrel, after hearing about their switch back to their original ethos, are you more or less likely to continue to support the brand, now that you know the Board Chairman is a namby-pamby, wishy-washy, panty-waisted red diaper doper baby?

Scroll to Top