(POLL) Most still want Senate to pass SAVE Act


The following is from Rasmussen Reports.


Most voters continue to support the SAVE Act, legislation that would require proof of US citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections, according to a new Rasmussen Reports survey.

Sixty-three percent (63%) of likely US voters say they support the SAVE Act, including 45% who strongly support the legislation. Thirty-one percent (31%) say they oppose the bill.

The SAVE Act passed the House of Representatives last year but remains stalled in the Senate. Eighty-four percent (84%) say only US citizens should be allowed to vote in US elections, while just 10% disagree.

The poll also found that 52% say they believe it is likely non-citizens are illegally registered to vote in their state, including 31% who say it is very likely. Thirty-eight percent (38%) say they think that is unlikely.

Views differ sharply by party. Eighty-four percent (84%) of Republicans support the SAVE Act, compared to 42% of Democrats and 64% of unaffiliated voters.

The survey of 1,060 likely US voters was conducted May 10-12, 2026. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

To view survey question wording, click here.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 thought on “(POLL) Most still want Senate to pass SAVE Act”

  1. Lisa,
    Sharyl
    —and Full Measure Team :

    Re : The Ugly REALITY of Human Life on Planet Earth

    Forwarded Message

    Helena,

    Re : Crux of the matter of growing
    inter-racial conflicts in this once-mostly-
    White West ( pre-Sixties America : 90%
    White-European and British at that time )

    Aristotle warned us :

    —“Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyranny.”

    —On race-mixing :
    “Another cause of revolution is difference of races which do not at once acquire a common spirit; for a state is not the growth of a day, any more than it grows out of a multitude brought together by accident. Hence the reception of strangers in colonies, either at the time of their foundation or afterwards, has generally produced revolution.”

    —On bad democracy :
    “[T]he last form of democracy . . . [in which] all share alike . . . [and] the leaders have been in the habit of including as many as they can, and making citizens not only of those who are legitimate, but even of the illegitimate . . . This is the way in which demagogues proceed. Whereas the right thing would be to make no more additions when the numbers of the commonality exceeds that of the notables and of the middle class,—beyond this not to go . . . [these] measures taken by tyrants appear all of them to be democratic. Such a government will have many supporters, for most persons would rather live in a disorderly than in a sober manner.”

    —On how to install bad democracy :
    ”Fresh tribes and brotherhoods should be established; the private rites of families should be restricted and converted into public ones; in short, every contrivance should be adopted which will mingle the citizens with one another and get rid of old connections.”

    —Feminism’s Hidden Purpose, by Mackinnon :
    Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism.” – Catharine A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State ( First Harvard University Press, 1989 ), p.10

    Firstly, genetic makeup in us drives/effects/produces our personality traits ( our likes and dislikes )—and any gene-pool of people expresses cultural peculiarities resulting from THEIR heritable gene’s. Somewhere along the White West’s evolution, America morphed away from our Founding Fathers’/Framers’ original gene-based proclivities, through inter-breeding with non-White people. ( see the Minnesota-Twins-Separated-at-Birth studies, supporting that hypothesis ). And for 7 decades, public school teachers/administrators have blamed “skin-color racism,” not heritable genes, for African and Latino kids’ ongoing violence and academic failures, as compared with WHITE and ASIAN students ( stark contrast ! ).

    An underlying tenet of Marxism is mongrelization of the races—and because men of color ( most all of them ) chase after White women for marriage and family, the inevitable outcome is genocidal for Whitey. Notice how the Marxian Ad Council pushes race-mongrel-looking faces in TV advertisements. And they particularly like “black” females having a White-European morphology—longer ears and a narrower ( less Negroid ) nose, and with showing greater beauty by displaying a less distorted, shaped face.

    The Founders understood that, and had imposed “anti-miscegenation” laws – now removed – to prevent down-breeding of their race. White women having children with black or Latino men is dysgenic for whites—but eugenic for blacks and Latinos. In black communities, “SHADISM” is established and discussed among Africans, as their bias toward favoring lighter-skin offspring, by having noticed mixed-race ( white + black ) children are smarter/cleverer, and do much better in school.

    6,000-years-old warning from Hindu religion :

    “In times of unrighteousness and disorder, women become corrupted; from the corruption of women comes the mixing of races; and from this comes all evil.”
    -Bhagavad Gita.

    Moronic conservatives, such as Dana Loesch ( and Rush Limbaugh before her ), argue FOR “assimilation”—meaning – necessarily – down-breeding with the invading natives : Forced Equalitarianism/Mongrelism Underpin Communism !!! The U.N.’s purpose !!!, as each race/nationality vies for dominance among WHITES.

    And do not forget the FREE-SEX movement within COMMUNISM ( t-h-e fundamental reason for men advancing collectivism ), purposed to give unattractive men sexual access to pretty women
    ( a harsh/ugly/immoral aspect to our sex-based human interactions ?—beauty drives both men and women ).

    Reminds me of Linda Chaves who had, in the early 1980s, recommended – in order to solve growing conflicts between WHITES and LATINOS – : “Marry one another.”—That MORON !

    -Rick

Scroll to Top