• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Full Measure
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • "Slanted" Preorder here

Sharyl Attkisson

Untouchable Subjects. Fearless, Nonpartisan Reporting.

  • US
  • World
  • Business
  • Health
    • Vaccine, Medical links
  • Special Investigations
    • Attkisson v. DOJ
    • Benghazi
    • "Collusion v. Trump" TL
    • Fake News
    • Fast and Furious
    • Media Mistakes on Trump
    • Obama Surveillance TL
    • Obamacare

Sharyl Attkisson

VIDEO: What an attack on free press looks like in Hong Kong

Arson attack recorded on surveillance video at Epoch Times offices in Hong Kong

Epoch Times, which has offices in Hong Kong, has published this surveillance video showing thugs entering their offices and literally burning their printing presses.

According to a tweet by Epoch Times, involvement by the Chinese Communist Party is suspected.

"Staff managed to put out the fire, but only after effecting significant damage. #CCP involvement suspected, given @hk_epochtimes truthful and transparent coverage of the #HongKongProstests."

Epoch Times tweet, Nov. 19

Watch the video by clicking the arrow below.

Attack on press in Hong Kong. Amazing and terrible! @EpochTimes https://t.co/Uw4tOEX8mC

— Sharyl Attkisson🕵️‍♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) November 19, 2019

Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI

READ: Congress asks ABC for answers about allegedly blocking Epstein story

ABC

In a letter issued November 17, Republican leaders in the House of Representatives ask ABC News to explain its alleged obstruction of a news story about convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

The allegation of obstruction was made by ABC anchor Amy Robach in an apparently candid discussion that was recorded and leaked for publication.

Read the letter below:

Support the fight against government overreach in Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions.
Thanks to the thousands who have already supported!

IG report really is coming soon: hearing announced

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) Photograph by: Frank Plitt via Wikimedia Commons

The following is an announcement form the office of Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). It says there will be a December 11 hearing on the Inspector General's report into alleged government surveillance abuses.

Chairman Graham Announces Hearing on DOJ Inspector General’s Report on FISA Abuse Investigation

DOJ Inspector General Horowitz to Testify Publicly on Dec. 11

WASHINGTON – Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) today announced that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz will testify before the Committee on Wednesday, December 11, 2019.

The Inspector General will discuss the findings of his investigation into DOJ and FBI’s conduct during the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant process as it relates to the 2016 presidential election.

“I appreciate all the hard work by Mr. Horowitz and his team regarding the Carter Page FISA warrant application and the counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign.

“Mr. Horowitz will be appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on December 11, where he will deliver a detailed report of what he found regarding his investigation, along with recommendations as to how to make our judicial and investigative systems better.

“I look forward to hearing from him. He is a good man that has served our nation well.”

Read more by clicking the link below:

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/chairman-graham-announces-hearing-on-doj-inspector-generals-report-on-fisa-abuse-investigation

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

READ: The memo from President Trump's physician

Below is the letter released today from President Trump's physician regarding an unannounced trip the President made to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center this week.

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Silent bombshell in last week's impeachment testimony: State Dept. witnesses are the ones who conducted "shadow diplomacy"

Ambassador William Taylor

The following is a news analysis.

There has been an understandable (and predictable) effort by President Trump's opponents within the State Department and beyond to controversialize his foreign policy practices.

Among the supposed controversies is Trump's use of his personal adviser and attorney Rudy Giuliani, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Special Envoy Kurt Volker, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, and Director of Office of Management and Budget Mick Mulvaney to implement Ukrainian diplomacy.

Trump critics and some in the media have incorrectly termed that as "shadow diplomacy."

Impeachment witness Ambassador William Taylor took great pains to repeatedly called this an "irregular channel," implying there was something sinister and wrong-- maybe even impeachable-- about the arrangement.

In fact, the resisting diplomats are the ones who are conducting shadow diplomacy when they are acting contrary to the president's wishes. Under the U.S. Constitution, the president directs all foreign policy; not the other way around.

Along those lines, there was something of a silent bombshell that nobody flagged in last week's impeachment testimony from Ambassador Taylor.

Taylor testified that he understood it was President Trump's desire to lock in a commitment from Ukraine to launch a corruption investigation by having the president, Vlodymyr Zelensky, say so on CNN. But Taylor further testified that he did not want the CNN interview to happen, and "sought assurances from Zelensky that he would not do so."

Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI

Under what authority did Taylor resist the President's foreign policy-- presumably behind his back?

Taylor and others also testified they assumed President Trump was seeking a campaign 2020 quid pro quo from Ukraine, and that they resisted that, too. We now know that Trump never mentioned the 2020 campaign-- at least there's no testimony or documentation so far that he did. He discussed investigating corruption tied to the 2016 election.

And we also know that quids pro quo -- although one was not consummated in the Ukraine case -- are a common and necessary part of foreign aid.

So, under what authority did these diplomats, who are tasked with implementing the president's foreign policy, assume his motivations as nefarious (having never met or spoken with him) and resist his policy desires?

Much of what they criticized isn't controversial at all-- except to the extent it's President Trump who's making the decisions. And, at times, his decisions are contrary to the opinions of some long-established diplomats.

What follows below is a description of the U.S. president's authority when it comes to who he can appoint to conduct diplomacy.

It was written in 1960 by Henry Wriston, President Emeritus of Brown University; Chairman of the Secretary of State's Public Committee on Personnel, 1954-56; President of the American Assembly, Columbia University; author of "Strategy of Peace," "Diplomacy in a Democracy" and other works.

Wriston's description makes clear that President Trump's use of Giuliani, Volker, Sondland and anybody else he pleases is clearly within his authority-- not "irregular" or sinister "shadow diplomacy."

Quids pro quo and using personal representatives to conduct diplomacy are not controversial.

The practice of diplomats going rogue to pursue their own foreign policy contrary to the president's wishes is controversial.

Regarding the impeachment debate at hand, the main valid question, which has not been well-defined, is whether President Trump improperly attempted to direct foreign policy solely for his personal, political benefit and/or to the detriment of U.S. interests. He says no. His enemies say yes.

Foreign Policy 1960 article

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1960-01-01/special-envoy

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Seeking the wall

Part of the Arizona-Mexico border

Watch the Full Measure video investigation by clicking the link at the end of this story.

Building the wall was a top promise of the Trump campaign along with getting Mexico to pay for it. Well, Mexico hasn’t paid but some wall has been built with more progress made since summer after the Supreme Court ruled President Trump and use military funds. For a reality check on the wall we head to the Tucson Sector in Arizona, covering 262 border miles, and one of the busiest for illegal immigrants and drugs.

With dusk on the way, we’re far from civilization, in the northern part of Arizona’s Sonoran Desert.

Sharyl: Mexico is this way—Is that right?

Elledge: Yes, Mexico is approximately 34, 35 miles south of us here and we're just south by about six or seven miles of Three Points, Arizona.

Sharyl: Johnny Elledge is one of 250 agents assigned to the Border Patrol Search, Trauma, and Rescue Team, known as BORSTAR.

Sharyl: What's it like on a night like this?

Elledge: If you guys were here this morning, it was approximately 102 degrees. Now it's approximately 88 degrees. So the aliens and the smugglers are going to take advantage of this time that it's cooler to move.

Sharyl: if you find somebody, they've probably been walking for quite a while already?

Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI

Elledge: Yes. Most of the time if we're this far north of the border, the individuals have been walking for quite some time. And on BORSTAR, all of us are at a minimum of EMTs. And we also have paramedics.

Tena: This area, if you are lost or seeking aid, this is a very bad spot to be in.

Supervisory Border Patrol agent Richard Tena is trying out their newest technology.

Tena: This is a Polaris Ranger, that's been retrofitted with military specifications and it houses a scope package.

Sharyl: In this area where we are, have you run across much traffic?

Tena: Yes. This area, the Altar Valley, is historically very busy. For both illegal aliens and illegal narcotics trafficking. There’s never a dull moment, it's always busy.

Before long, they spot what they call a “quitter” an illegal immigrant who wants to be caught.

He’s Juan Manuel Juarez Melendez from Honduras.

Sharyl: How old are you? Cuantos anos?

Translator: 21

Sharyl: He tells me he came to the US for work it’s the second time he’s crossed illegally in two months.

Translator: because of the blisters I couldn’t continue walking. My last drink of water before this was around 6 or 7 in the morning.

Sharyl: Was there a fence that you crossed? How did you cross?

Translator: Up in the mountains

Sharyl: Where there was no fence?

(Continued below. Listen to the podcast on this topic at "Full Measure After Hours." Click the link below the photo.)

For more original, off-narrative reporting, subscribe to our PODCAST: "Full Measure After Hours" on iTunes or your favorite distributor. Or click here to listen now. Follow on Twitter! @FullMeasureAH

Translator: Just a barbwire fence.

Much of the border between the US and Mexico is just a barbed wire or other barriers easily crossed. This video shows 66 illegal immigrants on the Mexican side, on their way to a place where the fence ends and they walked into Arizona. Here, 38 illegal immigrants managed to cross from Mexico under old border wall. This photo shows how drug cartel vehicles use ramps to defeat vehicle barriers. And this group is walking into the U.S. between fencing and a short vehicle barrier. Before President Trump was elected, there were 654 miles of manmade barriers on the 1,933 mile long southern border. We wanted to find out how much new and improved wall has been built over the past three years. This is one spot along the Mexican border where there’s a big difference. The fence has been extended from 18 to 22 feet, it’s been reinforced, improved, and the razor wire added. We asked Ken Cuccinelli, head of US Citizenship and Immigration Services to quantify miles of new barrier.

Sharyl: Some people say there's almost nothing new as a result of President Trump. Some people argue there’s a lot of new wall or pieces of wall refurbishment. Is there a way to quantify what's been done?

Cuccinelli: Yeah. As we sit here, there's 75 miles of new wall. I think the debate arises because some of that new wall, which is this 18 foot steel girders with climb plates and that sort of thing, is replacing what looks like in some places dilapidated, the kind of things you see on tin shacks in third world countries, that people are walking through.

Construction crews have been demolishing old barriers where border patrol said they most needed help. Most of the new construction is replacement, and there’s a handful of new barrier miles. Here’s a section of old wall on the left— made of what’s called “landing mat” material— next to the replacement. Border patrol says the new barrier makes a difference. This 2005 video shows illegal crossings in San Luis, Arizona despite 10 foot high landing mat wall. Here’s that spot today— a “triple layered enforcement zone” featuring an 18 foot high fence made of hollow steel beams filled with concrete and reinforced steel. This is a spot where the new 18-foot border wall meets the new 30-foot border wall east of the San Luis, AZ commercial port of entry.

Sharyl: President Trump has said since before he was elected that we do not need a wall along the entire border. But 75 miles is not a very big piece three years in.

Cuccinelli: The Department of Defense money was only freed up truly this summer. Literally, we're only weeks or a couple of months after that happened. And the other element of it is that like a lot of other construction, it takes more time to get ready to build than it does to build. We've pounded through a lot of the land acquisition, some of which has to be done by eminent domain, not our first choice.

Overall, since President Trump took office in early 2017, nearly ten billion dollars has been secured for 509 miles of "new border wall system.” Besides the 75 miles built 157 miles more are under construction. 276 miles are in the pre-construction phase. They expect to get to 450 miles by the end of President Trump’s first term.

There’s one more complication. On an air tour with border sheriff Mark Dannels, we saw something surprising on the Mexico side. Wall prototypes that look like ours.

Dannels: This is obviously built by the cartel, and this is a duplication of what the U.S. – Mexico barrier looks like. And they practice on that before they get to the real one.

No sooner do we design a better wall.. than the Mexican drug cartels find ways to defeat it. Before we leave Arizona, we go on a last call with Border Patrol surveillance cameras captured this image of a man getting over the new and improved wall into the U.S then disappearing in a nearby neighborhood.

Border patrol: Looks like a rock was kicked out of the way there.

Border patrol: He in there? Yeah he’s right around the corner.

Sharyl: Agents finally found him in a tree, his hands seriously cut.

Sharyl: How do you think he got across? One of the most fortified places?

Border Patrol: We have a cut in the concertina wire over here We've seen a major reduction in crossings in these particular areas. This used to be very well known for a drug smuggling route, now we'll see since this one individual maybe one or two on a random or rare occasion.

Since we spoke to Trump officials, six more miles of border wall has been finished for a total of 81 miles. Border Patrol says it costs an average of $6.5 million dollars per mile to build or replace fencing.

Watch the story by clicking the link below.

http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/seeking-the-wall

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Most say they won't closely watch impeachment proceedings: POLL

Eleven percent (11%) of those who answered the latest unscientific poll at SharylAttkisson.com say they "won't take their eyes off" the impeachment proceedings.

Forty-two percent (42%) say they are only interested in an overview.

Forty-seven percent (47%) indicated less interest, answering that the impeachment proceedings "do not exist to me."

Read the full results below. Meantime, be sure and vote in our latest poll at SharylAttkisson.com on the home page. Look for the black box in the right sidebar or scroll way down on the mobile site!

How closely will you watch impeachment proceedings?

11% Won't take my eyes off

42% Only interested in overview

47% They do not exist to me

Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI

Hospitals will have to now tell you their prices. This is "yuge."

The following is a news analysis.

On my Sunday TV program Full Measure, I've done quite a bit of reporting on the capricious cost of medical services at hospitals and how hard it is to get pricing upfront.

President Trump just instituted a new rule that will require hospitals to make that information available.

This could be a game changer.

As I reported, the prices hospitals charge vary widely and often do not seem to correlate to anything in particular. Insurance and private payers may be radically overcharged.

From my story comparing prices:

One hospital in the Los Angeles area charged $400 for the knee MRI. But a hospital in smaller Des Moines, Iowa quoted $3,500 ($3,536). That's eight and a half times as much for the exact same procedure.

Similar dramatic ranges are found within the same region. In Orlando, one hospital charged as little as $877 total. Another charged close to $2,000 ($1,980) and didn't even include the fee to read the MRI.

Hospitals in Los Angeles charged from $400 to $2,800 ($2,850).

Raleigh-Durham: about a $1,000 ($1,023) to $2,700 ($2,775).

Des Moines also from about $1,000 ($1,071) to $3,500 ($3,536).

Dallas and Fort Worth: $500 ($508) to $4,200 ($4,274).

And the biggest disparity was in the New York City area. The cheapest knee MRI was about $440. Another hospital in the area the most expensive in the survey charged $4,500!

Under President Trump's new rules, patients will be able to get this information upfront.

According to CNBC, "Hospitals will now be required to post their standard charges for services, which include gross charges, the negotiated rates with insurers and the discounted price a hospital is willing to accept from a patient."

Americans have a right to know the price of services before they go to the doctor. Today, President @realDonaldTrump finalized a rule requiring hospitals to make information about the cost of care available to patients up front. pic.twitter.com/aw4ixV6DEy

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) November 15, 2019

Read more about the Trump rule by clicking the link below: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/15/trump-releases-rule-requiring-hospitals-and-insurers-to-disclose-negotiated-rates.html

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Coming Soon

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

Follow Sharyl Attkisson

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent Comments

  • Mickey Pullen on Hydroxychloroquine: Politicizing Medicine (PODCAST)
  • Mike Marinak on Hydroxychloroquine: Politicizing Medicine (PODCAST)
  • Debunking “The Hotchkiss Republicans Report” - The Hotchkiss Record on "Collusion against Trump" timeline

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

Footer

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Support
  • Contact

2ndary Pages

  • Full Measure Stations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscribe to SharylAttkisson.com

SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

  • Attkisson v. DOJ/FBI
  • Benghazi
  • Fake News
  • Fast & Furious
  • Obamacare

Ad

Ad