• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Full Measure
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • "Slanted" Preorder here

Sharyl Attkisson

Untouchable Subjects. Fearless, Nonpartisan Reporting.

  • US
  • World
  • Business
  • Health
    • Vaccine, Medical links
  • Special Investigations
    • Attkisson v. DOJ
    • Benghazi
    • "Collusion v. Trump" TL
    • Fake News
    • Fast and Furious
    • Media Mistakes on Trump
    • Obama Surveillance TL
    • Obamacare

Sharyl Attkisson

Global border conflicts

It's not just the U.S. Southern border.

There's a mass exodus of migrants from Africa, the Mideast and Central America to the U.S. and Europe.

Sunday on Full Measure, Scott Thuman will take us to a hot spot in Northern Africa where a geographical quirk creates a land border between Africa and the Europe. It's a destination for illegal immigrants from Africa who want to reach Europe, including some with terrorist ties. A simple hop of the fence and they're in Europe, entitled to move freely within the nations of the European Union.

Also Sunday, I'll take you to Ireland as the establishment in Great Britain and Europe work to scuttle Brexit-- the British vote to exit the European Union. We'll explain why Ireland has a special dilemma in the whole mess.

Our trip to scenic Northern Ireland
With Full Measure cameraman Bryan (left) and investigative producer David (right) at Northern Ireland Parliament
We stopped by the Queen's residence in Northern Ireland while we were passing through. She wasn't home.

We'll have a fascinating interview with the co-founder of Wikipedia who left the online encyclopedia due to its bias, conflicts of interest, agenda editing and other problems. He'll tell us what we should all be looking for next in the online encyclopedia world, and he'll introduce us to "Everipedia."

Finally, we'll have an exclusive update on Fast and Furious, and an interesting note from the history files about the Titanic.

We promise we will never rehash news you've already heard all week.

Give us a try! Watch live on TV or anytime. Click the link below to find out how.

How to watch Full Measure

Fight government overreach and double-standard justice by supporting the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund for Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions. Click here.

Read: Ukraine documents about Biden, posted by John Solomon

At the link below, you can read the newly-posted documents about the Ukraine-Biden controversy.

(From statement by Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating a company connected to then-Vice President Joe Biden's son.)

Sept. 4, 2019 statement by former Ukraine prosecutor

Click the link below to read more documents:

https://www.scribd.com/user/259237201/JohnSolomon

Fight government overreach and double-standard justice by supporting the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund for Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions. Click here.

Read the "whistleblower" complaint against President Trump

Below is the link to the "whistleblower" complaint filed against President Trump.

Read the entire complaint by clicking the link below:

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

POLL RESULTS: Does "whistleblower" controversy hurt or help Trump?

Most people say the latest whistleblower story against President Trump will serve to ensure his re-election.

That's according to our latest poll at SharylAttkisson.com.

Only about four percent (4%) of those who responded say the story will take down or hurt Trump.

About eight percent (8%) said the whistleblower story would have no impact on Trump's fate in 2020.

Read the full results below. And leave your comments here.

Meantime, answer our latest poll on the home page of SharylAttkisson.com. Look for the black box in the right sidebar or scroll way down on the mobile site.

The latest whistleblower story vs. Trump will:

1% Take Trump down

2% Hurt Trump only a little

14% Help Trump a little

72% Ensure Trump's re-election

8% Have no impact

2% Not sure/Don't care

Support the fight against government overreach in Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions.
Thanks to the thousands who have already supported!

Fast and Furious: A shocking update (PODCAST)

The violent legacy of the government's Operation Fast and Furious continues nearly a decade after I began investigating it.

Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI

Foreign influence: the Ukrainian forest hidden by Russian trees

The following is an excerpt from a news analysis in The Hill.

As the media shows renewed interest in the involvement of both President Trump and former Vice President Biden — and Biden’s son — in the former Soviet republic of Ukraine, it’s worth asking: Was the U.S. 2016 election a surrogate battle between Russia and Ukraine?

The question isn’t new, just overlooked. Much emphasis has been given to Russia’s involvement — one cannot accurately say it has been underreported — but we have largely ignored the Ukrainian question. That’s despite hard facts linking Ukraine to multiple attempts to interfere in or to influence the campaign for the benefit of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

The suggestion was explicitly put into the public forum as early as January 2017 by David Merkel, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. Merkel told Politico that Russia and Ukraine, now mortal enemies, took opposite sides in the U.S. presidential race … each presumably banking on the idea that they would be better off with their chosen candidate, in terms of influence and U.S. aid.

“Now, it seems that a U.S. election may have been seen as a surrogate battle by those in Kiev [Ukraine] and Moscow [Russia],” Merkel said....

Politico’s investigation nearly three years ago found that: 

  • A Ukrainian-American operative consulting for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) met with top officials in Ukraine's U.S. embassy to publicize ties between Trump, his top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia. (It worked.)
  • Ukrainian officials tried to help Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. 
  • Ukrainian officials “disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election.”
  • Ukrainian officials helped Clinton allies dig up damaging information on Trump and his advisers.
  • “The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to … Russia.”

These findings would doubtlessly be considered alarming and scandalous if only the name “Trump” were substituted for “Clinton,” and “Ukraine” were substituted for “Russia.” Yet the information garnered little more than a ho-hum on the media landscape.

There’s more. (Continued...)

Read the entire article by clicking the link below:

https://thehill.com/opinion/international/462709-ukraine-scandal-shows-that-foreign-influence-is-a-bipartisan-affair?rnd=1569288425

Fight government overreach and double-standard justice by supporting the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund for Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions. Click here.

Exclusive: Another ATF "Fast and Furious" weapon recovered in Mexico a decade after U.S. government allowed gun sales to cartels

Seized weapons in Naco, Sonora related to Justice Department's Operation Fast and Furious

The violent legacy of a secret government operation lives on.

Another weapon from Operation Fast and Furious has been found in the hands of violent armed groups in Mexico. The newest recovery happened on June 20 in Chihuahua, Mexico. 

Mexican police and military arrested nine people and confiscated ten weapons after a gunfight between two groups. According to arrest documents, one of the weapons, a semi-automatic rifle, traces back to Fast and Furious.

The gun is listed as a “Romarm Cugir GP-WASR 10/63 rifle.” 

Excerpt from Mexican police report dated June 20, 2019

Authorities traced the serial number to a purchase in Prescott, Arizona by Fast and Furious suspect Sean Steward nearly a decade ago: December 9, 2009.

Steward eventually pled guilty to trafficking firearms while the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms was monitoring him under Operation Fast and Furious.

Sean Steward, photo from prison

Fast and Furious was one of numerous secret "gunwalking" operations launched by the federal government in the 2009-2011 time period that put thousands of assault rifles and other weapons into the hands of Mexican drug cartels.

Border patrol agent Brian Terry and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata were murdered by Mexican drug cartel thugs in separate incidents in 2010 and 2011 related to guns that were trafficked while under the watch of U.S. agents who neither intervened nor tracked the “walked” weapons.

U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry

Read: The Violent Legacy of Fast and Furious

Federal agent John Dodson of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms helped blow the whistle on the dangerous Fast and Furious operation in an interview with me for CBS News in 2011. At that time, and in interviews since, Dodson has warned that the violent legacy of the federal gunwalking programs would be felt for decades as many of the weapons remain in circulation.

ATF Special Agent John Dodson

In a 2017 interview for Full Measure, Dodson told me some of the important unanswered questions include "the amount of homicides or murders that have been caused by the firearms that we allowed to be trafficked, what the ultimate cost of this strategy was."

Unanswered questions include 'the amount of homicides or murders that have been caused by the firearms that we allowed to be trafficked, what the ultimate cost of this strategy was.'

John Dodson, Special Agent, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms

Watch the "Full Measure" interview with Dodson by clicking here: http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/fast-and-furious-08-24-2017

Since 2011, the Justice Department has refused repeated requests from Congress and the news media to fully disclose details of incidents involving guns that had been illegally trafficked to Mexican drug cartels under the watch of U.S. agents in Operation Fast and Furious.

Recovered guns traced back to Fast and Furious

Based on news reports and other sources, I’ve tracked the following known crimes linked to the “walked” weapons. 

Crimes linked to Fast and Furious and related operations

Deaths

At least 69, including 2 U.S. federal agents, 3 Mexican police, 1 terrorist torture/kidnaping/murder in Mexico.

Attempted murders or injuries

3: 1 in Mexico; 2 in U.S.

Kidnapings

4 (all in Mexico)

Assaults/Shootouts

6 incidents including, 2 in Mexico against military, 2 in U.S. against Phoenix law enforcement

In 2012, Attorney General Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress for withholding relevant documents. Subsequently, President Obama declared executive privilege to keep White House documents regarding Fast and Furious from being produced to the public or Congress.

Fast and Furious story links

70+ Examples of the Violent Legacy of Fast and Furious

Brexit: What's it all about... Alfie?

Our cover story this week on Full Measure looked at what's behind Brexit, what's taking so long, and what it all has to do with us. Here's the transcript of the report from London.

Today, we begin with disgust over establishment politicians and division among the parties. We're not talking about the U.S. but Europe which is suffering major political chaos as the British exit from the European Union or Brexit looms large. What's it all about? We explain the upheaval and the role the U.S. could play in the success of a newly independent Great Britain.

Anchor: The UK has voted to leave the European Union

Anchor: It is the biggest shock in the history of modern British politics

Nobody predicted the British would vote to exit the European Union.

Reporter: The word you hear over and over again, “stunning, shocking”

Well, almost nobody.

Halligan: I knew that outside of London media circles, an awful lot of people were going to vote for Brexit, and it would be a majority.

Liam Halligan is a columnist for the Telegraph newspaper and author of the book: Clean Brexit. I met him at a journalism conference shortly before the Brexit vote in 2016.

Sharyl: How did you know what almost nobody predicted?

Halligan: Well, I told you those years ago, Sharyl, that the UK would vote for Brexit, which at the time wasn’t obvious because I live outside the M25, the UK's version of the beltway, if you like. What’s amazed me and actually quite shocked me, is the extent to which the political and the media and the business establishment in this country has tried to thwart Brexit.

Millions of voters in the United Kingdom lashed out with a vote in support of Brexit, after Europe’s uncontrolled immigration surge a year before.

Halligan: And they got scared, not because they’re intolerant of immigration, because this is an extremely tolerant country when it comes to immigration. But because it was pressing down on their wages, we hadn’t made the right plans in terms of housing, the health service, schools So the UK wants immigration but it wants it to be planned and it wants a system of controlled immigration like you have in the states, Australia, New Zealand, Canada

Sharyl: If you can in a sentence, why do you think the vote for Brexit, what are people looking for?

Sharyl: But breaking up is hard to do. More than three years after the divorce, the exit is stalled amid efforts to unwind it.. by leaders who never supported it. And many Europeans want to hang on.

Bjoern Janetsky: This could really be a loss for, for Europe and for our common virtues and, or common goals.

The chaos has taken out two prime ministers and cleared the way for the Conservative Party’s Boris Johnson to become Britain’s new prime minister He campaigned on a promise to deliver Brexit.

Johnson: For the purpose in uniting and re-energizing our great United Kingdom, and making this country the greatest place on Earth.

Meantime, the turmoil has also shattered the country’s two major political parties, which are split within themselves over— ‘Should we stay or should we go?’

Cowling: We’ve had the most unprecedented revolt against the entire political class I think in our history.

Political analyst David Cowling is a scholar at Kings College, London University. He describes a dynamic that may sound familiar to Americans.

Cowling: In the immediate aftermath of our 2016 referendum, 17.4 million people voted to leave. And almost immediately people on the other side, people who'd never spoken to any of these people, didn't know their names, didn't know what they looked like, knew nothing about them, felt totally qualified to call them racists, homophobes, misogynists right wingers and the rest of it. And if you do that to people, what did you expect? When did you ever change your mind in favor of somebody who insulted you? It doesn't work in life, doesn't work in politics.

In the big picture, Cowling says voters left and right are disgusted with the establishment and fleeing the two main parties: Conservative and Labor.

Sharyl: As a person who's watched public opinion and politics, what is your overview opinion of what's happening now?

Cowling: Well, I've never seen anything like it. The politics of my lifetime has been dominated by two great monoliths: the Conservative Party and the Labor Party. They are currently desperately trying to get 50% of support in the country. And the opinion polls, it's a disintegration, a collapse, which I never expected to see in my lifetime.

One party outside the “big two” is Britain’s Liberal party. Its spokesman on Brexit is Tom Brake.

Tom Brake: I've been a member of parliament for 22 years and this makes me incredibly angry.

Brake says his Liberal party has gained ground by taking a hard stand against Brexit— something the once-dominant Labor party did not do.

Sharyl: Would you say this is the single biggest issue since you've been involved in politics?

Tom Brake: This is without a doubt the single biggest, most divisive and most damaging issue that we have faced in the United Kingdom. What the governments are trying to do is to deliver something Brexit, which will leave the country poorer and less influential, will damage the opportunities of young people and will make the UK a more isolated place than before. So I'm doing everything I can to block it.

On the other side Mark Francois, a staunchly pro-Brexit parliament leader in the Conservative party.

Sharyl: If you could summarize why you and why those who voted to leave the European Union did so - what is the biggest single reason do you think?

Mark Francois: Basically the British people were fed up of being told how to run their country by somebody else.

Sharyl: There are divisions within the parties. There are exoduses to other choices now. would you say politics is in a major transition?

Mark Francois: There’s definitely a change that's going on because we've had three years since the referendum and we haven't yet left. The people voted to leave, the establishment have tried to stop them, and the people have become more and more angry and frustrated.

The biggest argument against the breakup is fear that Britain’s economy will crash when it’s no longer linked seamlessly to 27 other nations. That’s where the U.S. comes in and it turns out President Trump is on the Brexit train.

Trump: We’re working already on a trade agreement, and I think it will be a very substantial trade agreement you know we can do with the UK we can do 3 to 4 times, we were actually impeded by their relationship with the European Union.

Mark Francois: Well when he made his recent visit to the UK, which I think was, was a success, he basically offered in principle, an early comprehensive free trade deal with the UK. Now President Obama, when he tried to intervene in our referendum, said you know, “get in line.” Well, president Trump seems to think we should go to the front of the line. And that's all right by me.

But anti-Brexit Tom Brake says he’s worried Britain will get the short end of the stick in any trade deal with the U.S.

Brake: Three years ago, people said this was going to be simple. It is proving anything but simple

Some Europeans have other fears beyond Great Britain: that if an exit from the European Union appears beneficial for the breakaway country, it could prompt other nations to follow suit.

Sharyl: Do you think, maybe, if Brexit goes through other countries might follow and break away from Europe?

Christiana: Yes. If it goes through and if it's not too bad for the Britains then maybe.

Jacob: When you look at the election in France, the right, the nationalists were very strong and when they get stronger, they maybe that they would also exit from the Euro.

All of that might be putting the British trolley before the horse.

Sharyl: Up next is an October 31st deadline to make the split from Europe final— or cancel it.

Brake’s liberal party is pushing for a do over vote to stop Brexit.

Sharyl: What is an important, do you think, for an American audience to know about this whole mess?

Tom Brake: what's important for an American audience to know is that the UK is in a difficult position at the moment. And that when politicians make promises that are undeliverable, there are consequences of that so that the UK is now struggling to cope with.

Mark Francois: In the end, in a very British way, we will muddle through and we will drink lots of tea and we will leave the European Union on the 31st of October. We will take back control over our country. We will recover our sovereignty Whatever happens, we will remain the staunchest ally that America has around the globe.

One thing both sides of Brexit agree to.. the end deserves a party. But the pubs can't plan because the politicians can't deliver a date. 

Click the link below to watch the video: Not Yet, Brexit.

http://fullmeasure.news/news/politics/brexit-09-17-2019

Support the fight against government overreach in Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions.
Thanks to the thousands who have already supported!
« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Coming Soon

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

Follow Sharyl Attkisson

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent Comments

  • Mickey Pullen on Hydroxychloroquine: Politicizing Medicine (PODCAST)
  • Mike Marinak on Hydroxychloroquine: Politicizing Medicine (PODCAST)
  • Debunking “The Hotchkiss Republicans Report” - The Hotchkiss Record on "Collusion against Trump" timeline

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

Footer

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Support
  • Contact

2ndary Pages

  • Full Measure Stations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscribe to SharylAttkisson.com

SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

  • Attkisson v. DOJ/FBI
  • Benghazi
  • Fake News
  • Fast & Furious
  • Obamacare

Ad

Ad