• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Full Measure
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • "Slanted" Preorder here

Sharyl Attkisson

Untouchable Subjects. Fearless, Nonpartisan Reporting.

  • US
  • World
  • Business
  • Health
    • Vaccine, Medical links
  • Special Investigations
    • Attkisson v. DOJ
    • Benghazi
    • "Collusion v. Trump" TL
    • Fake News
    • Fast and Furious
    • Media Mistakes on Trump
    • Obama Surveillance TL
    • Obamacare

Sharyl Attkisson

Why former FBI Acting Director McCabe wasn't charged for alleged leaks and perjury.

Andrew McCabe, Former FBI Acting Director

Employee was facing unprecedented challengers [sic] and pressures.

Justice Department Office of Professional Responsibility

In 2018, both the Department of Justice Inspector General and FBI Office of Professional Responsibility concluded that former FBI Acting Director Andrew McCabe had "made an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lacked candor − including under oath − on multiple occasions."

However, internal FBI documents indicate the Department of Justice, under Attorney General Jeff Sessions, decided to give McCabe the benefit of the doubt and credit for his years of devoted service in deciding not to charge him with a crime.

The documents, obtained by the watchdog Judicial Watch, appear to show that the case against McCabe was closed on March 20, 2018, about the time he was fired from the FBI. But the decision not to charge him was not announced publicly.

McCabe was a top FBI official during the agency's controversial efforts to wiretap Trump associates and use political opposition research collected by Democrats to attack Trump.

The treatment of McCabe is in stark contrast to that of other figures in the Trump-Russia probe. Not only were details of their cases leaked to the press, but they were not afforded similar benefit of the doubt or credit for their service.

Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn is among those who-- unlike McCabe-- were prosecuted for allegedly lying to the FBI.  On December 1, 2017, Flynn plead guilty to a felony count of "willfully and knowingly" making "false, fictitious and fraudulent statements" to the FBI.

Before briefly serving as advisor to President Trump, Flynn was Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Flynn had served multiple military tours and offices, including assignments in military intelligence and deployments in Afghanistan and the Iraq War.

Critics say that opponents of President Trump appear to be receiving more favorable treatment than Trump's allies.

Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI

Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his business partner Rick Gates were indicted on charges related to failing to register as foreign agents while lobbying for a pro-Russia group in Ukraine. However, their partner on the account, Tony Podesta, was not charged. Podesta is a Democrat lobbyist and brother of John Podesta who was President Clinton's chief of staff, an adviser to President Obama and Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman. A Podesta group spokesperson said at the time that all appropriate legal disclosures were made about the work for Ukraine.

There's also been no public action announced regarding the Senate's criminal referral to the Department of Justice more than year and a half ago of Christopher Steele for allegedly lying. "Steele compiled the 'Trump dossier' on behalf of Fusion GPS for the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee and also provided to the FBI," Republican Senators Charles Grassley and Lindsey Graham noted in their January 2018 referral to the Department of Justice.

Grassley and Graham are referring Steele for making potentially false statements about the distribution of claims from the dossier.

Referral by Senators Charles Grassley and Lindsey Graham, Jan. 5, 2018

Besides the documents regarding the decision not to prosecute McCabe, Judicial Watch also recently received records of 13 other referrals of FBI employees for leaking sensitive or classified information.

"Collectively, these documents show lenient treatment for evident criminal activity. Only four of the 14 employees found to have made an unauthorized disclosure were dismissed from the FBI,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

McCabe is now suing the Justice Department and FBI. He alleges his firing was politically motivated.

Read excerpts from the McCabe document below:

(Name redacted) (DOJ/O&R)  Closed: 3/20/2018  References: 2.5, 2.6, 4.10

SES [Senior Executive Service] employee released the FBI Sensitive information to a reporter and lacked candor not under oath and under oath when questioned about it, in violation of Offense Codes 4.10 (Unauthorized Disclosure – Sensitive Information); 2.5 (Lack of Candor- No Oath); and 2.6 (Lack of Candor – Under Oath).

The proposed decision in this matter was made by the AD, OPR.  The final decision was made by Attorney General Jeff Sessions. DOK retains final decision-making authority for certain high-ranking FBI officials.

MITIGATION: Employee as (redacted) years of FBI service and a remarkable performance record. Employee was facing unprecedented challengers and pressures.

AGGRAVATION: Employee held an extremely high position and was expected to comport himself with the utmost integrity. Lack of candor is incompatible with the FBI’s Core Values.

FINAL ACTION(S): OPR PROPOSED DECISION Proposed DISMISSAL

                              OPR FINAL DECISION:  DISMISSAL

McCabe was fired from the FBI on March 16, 2018, for leaking to the media and lacking “candor.” Then-U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions in a statement said:

After an extensive and fair investigation and according to Department of Justice procedure, the Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) provided its report on allegations of misconduct by Andrew McCabe to the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR).

The FBI’s OPR then reviewed the report and underlying documents and issued a disciplinary proposal recommending the dismissal of Mr. McCabe. Both the OIG and FBI OPR reports concluded that Mr. McCabe had made an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lacked candor − including under oath − on multiple occasions.

Pursuant to Department Order 1202, and based on the report of the Inspector General, the findings of the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility, and the recommendation of the Department’s senior career official, I have terminated the employment of Andrew McCabe effective immediately.”

Read more by clicking the link below:

Judicial Watch Obtains Records of 14 Referrals of FBI Employees for Leaking Sensitive or Classified Information

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

The Washington Post's "Monster Correction"

Photo from: Korshawilson.weebly.com, Celeste Noche Photography

The following is a news analysis.

The news isn’t what it used to be, folks.

(That's not a news flash to most people.)

This week, the Washington Post issued an embarrassingly extensive correction of a July 23 feature penned by freelance writer Korsha Wilson, whose credentials include bylines in the New York Times and publications such as Bon Appétit and Food & Wine.

The correction of Wilson's Washington Post article lasts 579 agonizing words, according to Washingtonian, which wrote its own article on the fiasco referring to the "Monster Correction."

The Washington Examiner referred to the original Wilson article as an "error-riddled disaster...a glorious train wreck [containing] 15 separate corrections. "

We are embarrassed by the widespread errors in this freelance article. We have published a detailed correction of each error and updated the story based on re-reporting by Post staff.

Martin Baron, Washington Post Executive Editor

“A previous version of this article contained many errors and omitted context and allegations important to understanding two families’ stories,” the correction in the Washington Post reads.

The list of corrected information from the original article is as follows:

The first name of Emanuel Freeman Sr. was misspelled.

Contrary to what was reported in the initial article, Freeman Sr.’s grandson, Johnny, did not refuse to move off a Halifax, Va., sidewalk for a white woman; he was talking to her, which drew the ire of some white locals, including the Ku Klux Klan. When a crowd gathered at the Freeman home where Johnny fled, gunfire was exchanged, and one family member’s home was set ablaze.

The 2017 U.S. Agricultural Census compared farmland owned and operated, not simply owned, by white and black farmers.

The number of children Freeman had with his second wife, Rebecca, was eight, not 10.

Ownership of Freeman’s property was not transferred to heirs when Rebecca died. In fact, he used a trust before he died to divide his property among his heirs.

The partition sale of the Freeman estate was in 2016, not 2018, and it included 360 acres of the original 1,000, not 30 acres of the original 99.

The story omitted key details that affect understanding of ownership of the land. Melinda J.G. Hyman says “Jr.” and “Sr.” were left off the names of father and son on documents, and the land was mistakenly combined under Rebecca’s name, meaning some descendants did not receive proper ownership. After requesting a summary of the property, Hyman says, she found her great-aunt, Pinkie Freeman Logan, was the rightful heir to hundreds of acres, but they were not properly transferred to her. In 2016, Hyman says, 360 acres of the original 1,000 were auctioned off after a lengthy court battle, a decision she says she and some other family members dispute.

The article omitted Hyman’s statement that actions by law firm Bagwell & Bagwell constitute apparent conflicts of interest and omitted firm owner George H. Bagwell’s response denying that allegation.

A description by agricultural lawyer Jillian Hishaw of laws governing who inherits property when a landowner dies was a reference to the laws in most states, not more than 20 states. She was also generally describing these laws, not referring to Virginia law.

A study the article said compared the prevalence of estate planning by older white and older black Americans was published in the Journal of Palliative Medicine, not the National Library of Medicine, and was about possession of advance health directives, not estate planning.

Tashi Terry said, “Welcome to Belle Terry Lane,” not “Welcome to Belle Terry Farm.” The property is named Terry Farm.

Aubrey Terry did not buy 170 acres with his siblings in 1963; his parents bought the 150-acre property in 1961.

The eldest Terry brother died in 2011, not 2015.

The article omitted Tashi Terry’s account of some incidents that led to a lawsuit seeking a partition sale of her family’s farm and her allegations against Bagwell & Bagwell, which the firm denies.

A law proposed to protect heirs from losing land in partition sales is called the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act, not the Partition of Heirs Property Act. “Tenants in common” are not solely defined as those living on a property; they are all those who own a share in the property. The act would not require heirs living on a property to come to an agreement before it can be sold, but would instead provide several other protections.

Read more by clicking the link below:

The Washington Post Doesn’t Want to Talk About the Monster Correction It Published Today

Fight government overreach and double-standard justice by supporting the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund for Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions. Click here.

Poll: Does it matter if Intel community supports DNI nominee?

Most people (60%) say they are more likely to support the nominee for Director of National Intelligence if the Intel community opposes him or her.

That's the result of our latest unscientific poll at SharylAttkisson.com.

Thirty-seven percent (37%) of those who responded say Intel community opposition would have no impact on their feelings toward the nominee, or that are not sure.

The full poll results are below. Be sure and vote in our new poll on the home page. Look for the black box not the right sidebar or scroll down on the mobile site.

If Intel community opposes DNI [Director of National Intelligence] nominee, then I ________ the nominee.

3%: Oppose

60%: Support

20%: No impact

17%: Not sure

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Unscientific poll: should Trump be impeached?

The vast majority of you do not think President Trump should be impeached.

That’s according to the newest SharylAttkisson.com unscientific poll.

Ninety-seven (97%) percent of respondents say "no" to impeachment.

Only 2% of you think impeachment is appropriate, and another 1% are unsure of whether or not impeachment is necessary.

The full poll results are below. Meantime, vote now in our new poll on the home page at SharylAttkisson.com! Look for the black box on the right sidebar or scroll down on the mobile site.

Should Trump be impeached?

Yes (2%)

No (97%)

Not sure (1%)

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

53 injured or killed in Chicago mass shootings over the weekend

Amid the horror over mass shootings in Dayton, Ohio and El Paso, Texas over the weekend, violence in another American city largely went unnoticed in the national news media.

At least seven people were killed and 46 wounded in mass shootings across Chicago over the weekend, according to authorities.

There were two mass shootings in one night in Chicago's Lawndale neighborhood on the West Side. The casualties overran a local hospital to such a degree that it reportedly stopped accepting new patients for a time.

Rampant violence in Chicago routine and often escapes mention on the national news.

According to CBS 2 in Chicago, a partial list of victims includes:

A 21-year-old man shot in the groin;

A 25-year-old woman shot in the arm and leg;

A 20-year-old man shot in the right side;

A 19-year-old woman shot in the right leg;

A 22-year-old woman;

A 21-year-old man shot in the left leg;

A 23-year-old man shot in the chest and hand;

A 35-year-old man shot in the forehead;

A 28-year-old man shot in the hip;

A 27-year-old man shot in the foot;

A 28-year-old man shot in the leg;

A 14-year-old boy shot in the thigh;

A 21-year-old woman who suffered a graze wound to the thumb;

A 19-year-old woman shot in the head.

Police Supt. Johnson: Overnight West Side Gun Violence Was ‘Unacceptable And Disheartening’

Read more by CBS2 Chicago by clicking the link below:

7 Killed, 46 Wounded In Weekend Shootings; ‘It’s Destroying The Fiber Of Our Communities’

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Another epidemic: political blame for mass shootings

The following is an excerpt of a news analysis by Sharyl Attkisson in The Hill.

When it comes to addressing mass killings, what approach do you favor? It could be the tightening of gun laws, removing existing “loopholes,” examining mental health issues, investigating prescription of psychiatric medications, all of the above, or something else entirely.

Whatever your chosen approach, it seems to me that the least productive of the strategies, in terms of possible solutions, is categorizing the tragedies and the shooters in purely political terms.

It seems as if each time there is a new tragedy, some in the media, some political figures and some in the public wait just long enough to find out a detail that supports their political agenda. Then, they let loose with political blame.

Most recently, mass shooters killed nine in Dayton, Ohio, killed 20 people and injured two dozen in El Paso, Texas, and murdered three at a Garlic Festival in California.

Yes, there are political issues, policies and laws to discuss. But the over-the-top vitriol tends to drown out rational, productive conversation.

The rush by some to politicize every mass killing also leads to such nonsense such as some blaming President Trump after an anti-Trump mass shooter — a Democrat who supported Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) — targeted Republican members of Congress in 2017. 

Politicization also tends to incite more expressions of hate on all sides — the exact opposite of what most say they want. (Continued...)

Read the entire article in The Hill by clicking the link below:

https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/456146-political-blame-for-mass-shootings-is-not-a-solution

Fight government overreach and double-standard justice by supporting the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund for Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions. Click here.

The Pill Pitch

Prescription drugs help many people and even save lives. But use of prescription drugs as prescribed is also a leading cause of death in the U.S.

Are some pharmaceutical companies skirting TV ad rules so that they don't have to disclose side effects of some vaccines and other prescription medicine?

Some critics say "yes." And when I asked the FDA about the allegations, the agency told me it's planning a new study into the issue.

Below are excerpts from my Full Measure investigation with a link to the full story at the bottom.

Full Measure has learned the FDA is planning a new study on TV advertising of prescription drugs. It’s a multi-billion dollar industry benefiting both pharmaceutical companies and the television networks paid to run the ads. Supporters say patients benefit too. But almost nowhere in the world is it allowed except here. And with prescription drugs a leading cause of death and injury, we investigate the Pill Pitch.

Dr. Michael Carome leads the Health Research Group at the watchdog Public Citizen.

He’s against prescription drug advertising on TV. It was forbidden until a fierce lobbying campaign by the pharmaceutical industry in the 1990s.

Dr. Michael Carome: In 1997, the FDA opened the floodgates to broadcast media: television, and radio ads, for prescription drugs, and we now have companies spending billions of dollars every year on this advertising.

Dr. Michael Carome: The average person in the US sees 9 drug ads a day, or 30 hours of drug ads per year. It’s just an extraordinary amount of exposure to prescription drug advertising.

The average person in the U.S. sees 9 drugs ads a day or 30 hours of drug ads per year.

Dr. Michael Carome, Public Citizen health group

The ads upset the longstanding rule that doctors alone should decide the best pills for patients.

To get an idea of how much the ads boost profits, you need only look at how much is spent on them. In 2018, the pharmaceutical industry shelled out $6.4 billion on so-called “direct-to-consumer ads.” No-one from the drug industry would agree to an interview. Representatives have said in the past that advertising saves lives and improves public health.

  • In 2018, the pharmaceutical industry funded $6.4 billion on "direct-to-consumer ads."

Dr. Carome say there are serious downsides.

Dr. Michael Carome: they’re newest drugs, so we often know the least about their safety because they haven't been on the market for a while. And often there are older alternatives that may be equally effective, and safer, and because those drugs aren't advertised, because the generic drug industry doesn't do this type of advertising, it can worsen the public health overall.

Experts say taking prescription drugs as prescribed is a leading cause of death in the US – a factor in as many as 200,000 deaths a year.

Safety is a big reason why the FDA requires the ads to clearly disclose risks.

Dr. Michael Carome: they're going to make sure that the viewers leave the commercial with an understanding of the benefits of perhaps some miracle cure, and not hopefully remember too much about the potential harms and risks.

Read more and watch our investigative report by clicking the link below:

http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/the-pill-pitch

Support the fight against government overreach in Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions.
Thanks to the thousands who have already supported!

How do you view social media? Unscientific poll

(Updated: the original post left off the response: B and C)

The vast majority of you describe social media as something less than positive and genuine.

That's according to the newest SharylAttkisson.com unscientific poll.

Eighty-one percent (81%) describe social media as "divisive," "propaganda," or both.

Nobody (0%) who answered our survey said they view social media as "realistic."

The full poll results are below. Meantime, vote now in our new poll on the home page at SharylAttkisson.com! Look for the black box on the right sidebar or scroll down on the mobile site.

"I view social media as..."

0%: A. Realistic

11%: B. Divisive

13%: C. Propaganda

6%: A and C

4%: A and B

58%: B and C

8%: I don't know

Support the fight against government overreach in Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions.
Thanks to the thousands who have already supported!
« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Coming Soon

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

Follow Sharyl Attkisson

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent Comments

  • Mickey Pullen on Hydroxychloroquine: Politicizing Medicine (PODCAST)
  • Mike Marinak on Hydroxychloroquine: Politicizing Medicine (PODCAST)
  • Debunking “The Hotchkiss Republicans Report” - The Hotchkiss Record on "Collusion against Trump" timeline

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

Footer

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Support
  • Contact

2ndary Pages

  • Full Measure Stations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscribe to SharylAttkisson.com

SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

  • Attkisson v. DOJ/FBI
  • Benghazi
  • Fake News
  • Fast & Furious
  • Obamacare

Ad

Ad