• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Full Measure
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • "Slanted" Preorder here

Sharyl Attkisson

Untouchable Subjects. Fearless, Nonpartisan Reporting.

  • US
  • World
  • Business
  • Health
    • Vaccine, Medical links
  • Special Investigations
    • Attkisson v. DOJ
    • Benghazi
    • "Collusion v. Trump" TL
    • Fake News
    • Fast and Furious
    • Media Mistakes on Trump
    • Obama Surveillance TL
    • Obamacare

Sharyl Attkisson

The Nuclear Option: It's complicated.

Nuclear power provides clean energy at a reasonable cost-- in theory. The problem seems to come in the construction of the plants. We recently set out to investigate the state of nuclear power in America. We were surprised to learn how many projects have been halted midstream, rife with mismanagement, cost overruns or waste: almost all of them. Watch our Full Measure video investigation at the link below. A transcript follows.

Watch the Full Measure investigation: The Nuclear Option

Today, a hard look at the double edged sword of the nuclear industry. Right now in the U.S. there are 60 commercially operating nuclear power plants in 30 states. But there’s a problem. This clean source of energy comes with a staggering price tag. One after another planned project has run behind schedule and wildly over budget. Today, there’s only one nuclear reactor project under construction in the US right now kept alive by *billions* in taxpayer dollars. Joce Sterman takes us there to investigate the Nuclear Option.

Every time Steve Prenovitz looks at his monthly power bill—he gets angry.

Steve Prenovitz: Pretty much everything has been passed on to the ratepayer.It's a high stakes game really is. And it's, you know, people getting screwed.

This is the source of his anger: The Vogtle Nuclear Plant in Waynesboro, Georgia - operated by Georgia Power. Crews nearby are working on Vogtle’s two new reactors that have become the face of the industry’s problems in this country. Reactors 3 and 4 are years behind schedule and more than a jaw dropping 10 billion dollars over budget so far. A seemingly bottomless pit supported by federal taxpayers and residents like Prenovitz.

Prenovitz: Right here, you've got the nuclear construction cost recovery.

His bill includes an extra monthly charge for nuclear construction. For an average family it adds up to 100 dollars each year.

Joce: What's the danger of passing on the responsibility and the cost to the rate payer?

Steve Prenovitz: Well the danger for who? For the company? No danger. You know, hey, the more they screw up, the more money they make.

The 14-billion dollar budget has swelled to more than 27 billion as problems have stacked up -- including inexperienced contractors, construction flaws and the bankruptcy of its original contractor: Westinghouse.

But the troubled Vogtle project has a key source of support.

Tim Echols: Why do I believe that this is the best way forward? Because Units 1 and Units 2 were built in 1987 and 1989 on that very same plant site, they went over budget as well, but now what is that? It is the cheapest energy in our state, and I believe Vogtle 3 and 4 will be that one day as well.

Tim Echols is Vice Chairman of the Georgia Public Service Commission, which regulates utilities. Even though its own analysts concluded the project was “no longer economic” and suggested it be shut down in 2017, the commission ultimately greenlighted customer fees to keep the project moving.

Tim Echols: It would be irresponsible for me to take all of the billions of dollars that have been spent and just, and just throw in the towel because we happen to be running late. No, we're going to push through.

Joce: Do you have to keep spending and just continue writing checks just to get this thing done and is that a wise way to go about it?

Tim Echols: No, i'll remind them that this elected public service commission will have the final say on what is prudent and it was not prudent. Plant Vogtle's very important because if we fail, if we throw in the towel on this, we essentially cede this technology authority to Russia, to China and to India, which is where the nuclear renaissance is happening right now in the world.

France derives 75% of its energy from nuclear making it a key component of their power grid. China has 13 new reactors in progress. Russia has more than 20.

Katie Tubb says the return on america’s nuclear investments will be worth it.

Katie Tubb: The case for nuclear energy is so compelling that I think at some point, we'll figure out how to do this right.

Tubb is a policy analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation. She blames over-regulation for the nuclear failures. One analysis says the average nuclear plant must pay nearly $9 million in regulatory costs and $22 million in fees to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Katie Tubb: I think we have essentially regulated ourselves out of the business of nuclear energy. We’ve made it very expensive and difficult to run power plants to innovate.

Meantime, the Vogtle project has now attracted support in the highest of places.

Rick Perry: We’re going to make nuclear cool again!

Federal Department of Energy Secretary Rick Perry recently offered $4 billion in new loan guarantees to see the Vogtle project through.

Rick Perry: The message that gets sent on this plant, America is back in the nuclear energy industry folks! We are back, We’re gonna be leading the world!

With all the enthusiasm, Greg Jackzo insists that continuing to fund the Vogtle Project is throwing good money after bad.

Gregory Jaczko: I was assured repeatedly that these plants would be built on time and on budget.

He once headed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission -- the powerful federal agency that oversees all nuclear activity in the US. He opposed construction of Vogtle 3 and four.

Gregory Jaczko: I mean, imagine giving somebody $15 billion what they could do with that. Tesla started a car company that is revolutionizing the transportation sector with less money than that. And so you, when you put it in that perspective, it really is a huge amount of money that's just really being wasted on, on these projects.

One notorious nuclear failure - is north of Waynesboro at the VC Summer Nuclear Plant in South Carolina, which also ran over budget and behind schedule. The plant, owned largely by a corporation called SCANA, was supposed to have 2 new reactors online by last year, also paid for by taxpayers and local electric cusomters.

Ad: Progress has been made on the VC Summer plant. Indeed, nuclear matters!

In 2017, after four years of work - the project was shut down -- after eating up $9 billion a quarter of that from electric customers. Customers sued, and late last year, SCANA agreed to pay them back $2 billion they had been forced to invest into the failed project. From 2007 to 2010, 30 nuclear projects were in design or construction. Every one of them was halted before completion- except Plant Vogtle reactors 3 and 4.

Jaczko - the former nuclear regulator - now says it’s time for America to face a harsh reality check.

Joce: Do you view nuclear power as essential to our power grid at this point given all the alternatives?

Gregory Jaczko: Not at all. I think we have many, many alternatives.

Joce: Should we pull the plug on it as a whole?

Gregory Jaczko: I think that's a very difficult question to answer. I think the answer is yes; I think the answer is we should have pulled the plug 5 years ago when it was clear this project wasn't going to succeed or 3 years ago when far less money was spent.

For now, the future of nuclear power in the us hangs on Waynesboro Georgia and the fees paid by people like Prenovitz keeping Vogtle’s new reactors on life support. They are now slated to go online in 2021 and 2022 4 years late.

Steve Prenovitz: You spent 10 years, which is true, it started in 2009 - we spent over 10 billion for the whole project- even more - 12 billion. I don’t know. How Much energy was produced? Not one kilowatt hour! As one cynic put it, they promised us power without cost. They gave us cost without power.

Georgia Power did not agree to an interview with us, but in an email, told us it's focused on completing the reactors - and once it's done, the Vogtle Plant will produce enough power for 1 million homes in Georgia. h

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

The Foreign Connection

Below is my investigation into foreign money influence into the U.S. political system as it aired on Full Measure on April 8, 2018.

Watch the video of the Full Measure investigation here.

Foreigners are barred from directly giving money to American politicians and political parties. But it turns out, there’s a legal way around that. It involves well-connected middlemen in the U.S., PR firms, and lobbyists, acting as foreign agents. They’re paid huge sums to get foreigners access to U.S. government officials that most Americans will never have. They may even help write our laws and direct your tax dollars to foreign interests. And when so many are talking about a foreign issue, for example, Russia, you can bet foreign agents are in the background pulling strings. For the past eight months, we’ve been examining The Foreign Connection to Russia and Ukraine.

The Foreign Agents Registration Act was passed in 1938 after an American got caught doing PR in the United States for the German Nazis.

Today, Americans who act as so-called “foreign agents” must file papers disclosing their work to the Justice Department. Lydia Dennett is an investigator with the watchdog Project on Government Oversight.

Sharyl Attkisson: So it's perfectly legal for foreign interests and foreign countries like Russia and Iran to pay some interest here in the United States to lobby for them?

Lydia Dennett: Yeah, absolutely perfectly legal for these foreign governments, individuals, political parties to hire often former members of Congress or former staff members to go and lobby on everything from arms deals to aid to trade and sort of everything in between.

And lobby they do. More than 15,000 foreign entities from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe have hired high-priced U.S. lobbyists and consultants.

The plain truth is foreign strife— like the conflict between Russia and Ukraine—provides business and fundraising opportunities in Washington D.C.

Sharyl Attkisson: It's illegal for foreign countries and interest to contribute directly to Congress. Are you suggesting it looks like they kind of funnel their money through a lobbyist and do the same thing?

Lydia Dennett: Yeah, absolutely. Sort of illuminated the fact that this looks like a quid pro quo relationship.

Sharyl Attkisson: US lobbyists use a wide variety of tactics to gain influence for their foreign clients

We analyzed Foreign Agents Registration Act records going back to 2012. Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, and energy mogul Oleg Deripaska, all hired the U.S. based Endeavour Law Firm for business and policy advice. Deripaska paid Endeavour $3.5 million dollars. He’d been banned from the U.S. for alleged criminal ties, which he denies.

This is an ad for Russia’s nationalist political party Rodina, which hired Global Strategic Communications Group, which boasts of arranging news stories and op-eds in national newspapers.

After Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, Russian banks sought to fend off US sanctions. One paid a total of $45,000 dollars a month, split between a U.S. lobbyist and a reputation management firm.

Another spent a total of more than $760,000 dollars between U.S. corporate law giant Sidley Austin, and Clinton-connected lobbyists Andy and Mike Manatos.

We asked Dennett what, exactly, do foreign interests get for their money?

Lydia Dennett: You will have the examples of foreign lobbyists writing legislation, writing statements, directly contacting members or their staff on issues. But you’ll also have large-scale public relations, placing of op-eds and sort of trying to very strategically influence U.S. public opinion on a particular issue or country.

Sharyl Attkisson:They arrange interviews with news reporters. They meet with news outlets?

Lydia Dennett: Yeah exactly. They'll meet with professors, think tanks.

In 2016, after a doping scandal, Russia was allowed to participate in the Rio de Janeiro Olympics anyway after the Russian group Top Sport shelled out $7, 000 dollars for positive PR from the U.S. firm Burson-Marsteller.

One of the biggest recipients of Russian cash is Ketchum Communications which got $17.2 million dollars over less than three years to arrange good press for Russian oil and gas company Gazprom. And $7.1 million dollars to publicize President Putin’s speeches, arrange helpful media interviews and operate social media accounts and the website ThinkRussia.com.

Ketchum even got the New York Times to publish an editorial signed by President Putin himself.

But as much as the Russians have spent pulling strings in the U.S., its adversary Ukraine has been equally if not more aggressive —especially after Russia’s invasion.

And who did we find from Ukraine hiring high-powered U.S. lobbyists and consultants? Ukraine’s national gas company, two investment firms and cryptocurrency firm Globee.

The government of Ukraine, its ministry of finance, a political leader and its National Reforms Council each paid up to $50-thousand dollars a month to U.S. PR firms and lobbyists.

Billionaire Volodymyr Lytvyn, then-Chairman of Ukraine’s parliament, paid an astounding $90-thousand dollars a month to arrange meetings with members of Congress and news reporters. And gas and steel mogul Victor Pinchuk, who, donated a fortune to the Clinton Foundation, has paid Democratic campaign consultant Doug Schoen $40-to-$64-thousand dollars a month to try to connect to the right people including Republican Senator John McCain, Obama and Trump officials and reporters at Fox, the New York Times, and the Washington Post.

While a lot of lobbyists are shy about discussing their foreign work, former Clinton counsel Lanny Davis did agree to talk about his client, another Ukrainian billionaire Dmitry Firtash.

Lanny Davis: I would never take on a government that was hurting my own country.

Davis told us he’s defending Firtash against prosecutorial abuse by the Justice Department, which indicted Firtash in 2014 for alleged bribery. Firtash has paid Davis $735,000 dollars over three years. Davis says he follows the Foreign Agents Registration Act to the letter.

Lanny Davis: I have to disclose when I call a reporter. When I send a press release out, I have to disclose that and file it with the Justice Department so when daylight is on, the American people have a chance to judge what the lobbyist, whether it's me or anyone else is doing and whether it's contrary to our national interest.

Numerous Ukrainian politicians have also hired American talent. Among them: Dmitry Shpenov, who paid Arnall Golden Gregory and the firm of ex-Congressman Billy Tauzin to lobby members of Congress and Obama officials.

Ukraine’s former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko sought U.S. help to get released from prison after her corruption conviction.

Sharyl Attkisson: Tymoshenko’s family paid nearly a million dollars to Democrat ex-Congressman Jim Slattery and his law firm who lobbied then-Secretary of State Clinton and President Obama, and got support from Senator McCain and Democrat Dick Durbin, who sponsored a Senate resolution pressing for Tymoshenko’s release.

But it’s lobbyists Paul Manafort and Rick Gates—former Trump campaign officials— who have grabbed the biggest headlines for alleged violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

The controversy dates back to 2012 and their clients: Ukraine’s pro-Russia President at the time, Viktor Yanukovich and his political group. Manafort connected them to lobbyists Tony Podesta, a Democrat heavy-hitter and Republican ex-member of Congress Vin Weber.

After special counsel Robert Mueller began investigating last year, the four lobbyists all denied wrongdoing but disclosed their work under the Foreign Agents Registration Act for the year’s old work.

Manafort reported collecting more than $17 million dollars in 2012 and 2013.

Lydia Dennett: The Department of Justice generally relies on voluntary compliance for these firms. And that when people do fail to register, fail to disclose as they should, they don't even really get a slap on the wrist. They're just sort of encouraged to retroactively follow the law.

Sharyl Attkisson: How many times has the Department of Justice, rather than the slap on the wrist or even less, how many times have they actually taken some serious action?

Lydia Dennett: They can file a civil injunction and they haven't used that since 1991. Or they can pursue criminal charges which they've only done eight times in the last 50 years, most recently with President Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort.

Manafort has pleaded not guilty to tax evasion and money laundering. Gates pleaded guilty to conspiracy and making false statements. Podesta hasn’t been charged but stepped down from his lobby firm.

In all, we found at least a half dozen interests from Russia and 19 from Ukraine turning to high-priced U.S. PR consultants and lobbyists.

Sharyl Attkisson: Why should it be legal for someone outside the U.S. system, who hasn't paid any taxes, to come in and influence how our tax money is spent and how our officials make decisions?

Lydia Dennett: We here at the Project on Government Oversight certainly think it’s fair and reasonable for foreign governments to want to put their issues before members of Congress as well as the American public. We just feel like that should be disclosed and the Department of Justice should be enforcing this law so that the American people and members of Congress know who is influencing them and where that money's going.

On Friday, President Trump sanctioned energy mogul Oleg Deripaska and top executives of both VTB Group and Gazprom, all mentioned in our piece, as part of the administration’s response to ongoing Russian actions in the West.

What your iPhone may be telling mysterious companies about you--without your permission

Photo of iPhone by Kelvinsong

Apple has used the phrase "what happens on your iPhone stays on your iPhone" many times before, but it turns out that may not be entirely true.

That's according to an article in the Washington Post. It says the problem isn't isolated to iPhones, either - Androids are just as bad at keeping your information limited to your device only.

The Post tracked how dozens of marketing companies may be using your personal information that it gets from apps to send out to other companies.

They can reportedly obtain your exact location, phone number, IP address, and more.

According to the Post, Yelp is a main player when it comes to sucking up data.

Here's an excerpt from a Washington Post article detailing the problem:

On a recent Monday night, a dozen marketing companies, research firms and other personal data guzzlers got reports from my iPhone. At 11:43 p.m., a company called Amplitude learned my phone number, email and exact location. At 3:58 a.m., another called Appboy got a digital fingerprint of my phone. At 6:25 a.m., a tracker called Demdex received a way to identify my phone and sent back a list of other trackers to pair up with. And all night long, there was some startling behavior by a household name: Yelp. It was receiving a message that included my IP address -— once every five minutes.

"It's the middle of the night. Do you know who your iPhone is talking to?" by Geoffrey A. Fowler for the Washington Post

Check out the rest of the story here: Invasion of privacy.

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Is self-censoring on mass shootings a slippery slope?

I read with interest a recent article by Poynter Institute, a nonprofit journalism organization, entitled, “Not naming mass shooters (much) is now the norm.” It was accompanied by the following tweet from Poynter’s account: “For an industry that is often criticized for being slow to change, this development is remarkable.”

“In a pivot from coverage of years past, the shooter’s name often isn’t mentioned at all,” notes Poynter’s Kelly McBride. “In the small number of stories where journalists deem the name relevant, it usually appears one-third of the way into the story. Suspect names rarely appear in headlines, teasers or tweets.”

The idea behind this is that the media should not give publicity to mass-killers because that is what the killers seek — attention, fame — and doing so can encourage others to copy them.

McBride is careful not to endorse some sort of wholesale media censorship of the names of shooters. But it seems to me we’re getting pretty close to that.

I worry about a bigger picture — that we may be cheering on censorship of public information under the guise of “the public good.”

Read the rest of the article in The Hill by clicking the link below:

Censoring Mass Shooters: A Slippery Slope?

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Wikipedia's Pharma Industry Agenda Editors--at it again.

Though it's a moving target that changes day-by-day, Wikpedia's vaccine industry agenda editors are at it again.

Besides the other longstanding false and defamatory information edited onto my Wikipedia bio page, new false information has appeared.

The good news is that for those who care, the source information is available for you to review so that you can make up your own mind.

Watch "The Dark Side of Wikipedia," a Full Measure investigation.

Among the new false information is a paragraph that follows (with the corrected information inserted):

False Wikipedia Claim: "In a January 2019 episode of her television show Full Measure, Attkisson mischaracterized statements made in 2007 by a medical expert, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, regarding a hypothetical relationship between vaccines and autism."

Correction: No statements were mischaracterized by Attkisson. The affidavit of Dr. Zimmerman, a pro-vaccine medical expert who served as a government expert witness, can be read in full here. 

False Wikipedia Claim: "Attkisson falsely said that the Omnibus Autism Proceeding (OAP), which refuted claims of a causal link between vaccines and autism, was based primarily on Dr. Zimmerman's testimony, and that Zimmerman's nuanced views on the subject were kept hidden from the public by the federal government until 2018 in what Attkisson called 'one of the most consequential frauds, arguably in human history'."

Correction: Attkisson did not call anything "one of the most consequential frauds arguably in human history." The quote that Wikipedia misattributed to Attkisson was actually uttered by Robert F. Kennedy, Junior, as can be clearly seen in the story. Attkisson took no position on the consequentiality of the alleged fraud.

False Wikipedia Claim: "In fact, the OAP's verdict that there is no causal link between vaccines and autism was based on testimony by nine expert witnesses, and the views that Attkisson said were kept secret had already been made public in 2006 and were noted in the OAP."

Correction: According to Dr. Zimmerman, it is false that his views had "already been made public." His affidavit can be read here so that people can make up their own mind. Additionally, at the government's request, the court sealed a landmark case where the government secretly agreed vaccines caused a child's autism.

Through my reporting, I've learned that my experience with Wikipedia is not uncommon. That's why I'm launching the Wikipedia Correction Project (WCP): to allow those slandered or censored by Wikipedia to submit information that will allow consumers of information to compare and make up their own mind.

Click here to find out how to take part in the Wikipedia Correction Project.

Who would be against efforts to allow the public to access to corrected information and different views so they can make up their own minds? Among others, perhaps those working on behalf of the Wikipedia agenda editors who have long-controlled topics and pages with impunity.

This "new blues" blog attempts to smear the Wikipedia Correction Project (WCP) using the typical tactics described in "The Smear," including invocation of the phrase "conspiracy theory." Judging by the response, the blog actually serves the opposite of its intended purpose and has sparked a great deal of positive interest.

Read the "news blues" blog that attempts to discourage corrections of Wikipedia's false and slanted information.

For the few who might be interested, here is an unbiased, factually correct Wikipedia-style biography page for me: Sharyl Attkisson.

Do your own research. Make up your own mind. Think for yourself.

Fight government overreach and double-standard justice by supporting the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund for Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions. Click here.

Cell phone tower shut down after complaints about cancer cluster in school children

Above: Cell phone tower petition at change.org

A controversial cell phone tower near a school in Ripon, California has been shut down amid reports of four students and three teachers children being diagnosed with cancer.

According to news reports, Sprint--which owns the tower--shut down the tower even though the company says radio frequencies emitted were 100 times below the federal limit.

The patients diagnosed with cancer have come down with different forms of the disease since 2016, including lymphoma, liver, brain, and kidney cancer.

Monica Ferrulli, the mother of a child diagnosed with brain cancer in 2016, has been among those fighting a legal battle for two years in an attempt to get the cell phone tower taken down.

We're not naive to the fact that there could be other components out there - other environmental influences… but the bottom line that we feel in regards to this tower is it doesn't belong there… if there's any indications that its unsafe.'

Parent Monica Ferrulli, to news reporters

A petition at change.org asking to remove cell phone towers from school property has received several hundred signatures.

Read more about the mysterious case here in Daily Mail.

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Organs from Chinese prisoners harvested: Insider account

A speaker protesting against the persecution of Falun Gong,
a Buddhist sect China has deemed harmful.

A horrifying practice is happening in China: dissidents in prison are being killed for their organs. That's according to Steven W. Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute, who writes about the practice in an article published the New York Post.

Mosher documents a graphic and terrifying account from Zheng Qiaozhi, once an intern at China’s Shenyang Army General Hospital. The former hospital worker is quoted as saying he saw the following as part of an organ-harvesting team:

The prisoner was brought in, tied hand and foot, but very much alive. The army doctor in charge sliced him open from chest to belly button and exposed his two kidneys. “Cut the veins and arteries,” he told his shocked intern. George did as he was told. Blood spurted everywhere. The kidneys were placed in an organ-transplant container. Then the doctor ordered George to remove the man’s eyeballs. Hearing that, the dying prisoner gave him a look of sheer terror, and George froze. “I can’t do it,” he told the doctor, who then quickly scooped out the man’s eyeballs himself.

"Chinese dissidents are being executed for their organs, former hospital worker says" by Stephen W. Mosher for The New York Post

According to Mosher, Zheng says he quit his job almost immediately, horrified by what was asked to do and what he saw. Zheng is also quoted as saying he fled China, fearful of the possibility that he could one day end up like the prisoners he'd seen.

Human rights observers say specific groups that go against China's policies are targeted, such as Falun Gong - a Buddhist sect that was deemed harmful by the Chinese government in 1999. Many members were arrested, imprisoned and never seen again.

Mosher says Muslim minorities could be next, with millions of Uighur and Kazakh men being sent to Chinese concentration camps.

Read more here: Disappearing dissidents harvested for organs.

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Fast Food Favorite: It's Still Burgers

The All American hamburger is apparently still king.

Just for fun, our latest unscientific poll at SharylAttkisson.com asked: What is your favorite fast food meal?

Burgers beat out the other food choices combined. Nearly 44% of respondents chose burgers over tacos, fish and chicken.

A significant number of you prefer something else or don't like fast food at all.

Here's how the results break down:

  • 44% Burgers
  • 13% Tacos
  • 24% Chicken
  • 17% None/Other

Vote in our our newest poll posted in the black box on the sidebar or scroll down on your mobile phone.

Fight government overreach and double-standard justice by supporting the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund for Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions. Click here.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Coming Soon

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

Follow Sharyl Attkisson

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent Comments

  • Mickey Pullen on Hydroxychloroquine: Politicizing Medicine (PODCAST)
  • Mike Marinak on Hydroxychloroquine: Politicizing Medicine (PODCAST)
  • Debunking “The Hotchkiss Republicans Report” - The Hotchkiss Record on "Collusion against Trump" timeline

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

Footer

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Support
  • Contact

2ndary Pages

  • Full Measure Stations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscribe to SharylAttkisson.com

SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

  • Attkisson v. DOJ/FBI
  • Benghazi
  • Fake News
  • Fast & Furious
  • Obamacare

Ad

Ad