• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Full Measure
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • "Slanted" Preorder here

Sharyl Attkisson

Untouchable Subjects. Fearless, Nonpartisan Reporting.

  • US
  • World
  • Business
  • Health
    • Vaccine, Medical links
  • Special Investigations
    • Attkisson v. DOJ
    • Benghazi
    • "Collusion v. Trump" TL
    • Fake News
    • Fast and Furious
    • Media Mistakes on Trump
    • Obama Surveillance TL
    • Obamacare

News

Exclusive: Puerto Rico's Federal Hurricane Aid by the Numbers. An original investigation

Puerto Rico hurricane victim Brenda Castro has received no assistance two years later

It wasn't easy getting the true numbers when it comes to how much U.S. aid has gone to Puerto Rico two years after their double hurricanes.

The results of my investigation are summarized in the table and chart below.

Also included in this post is the text of my Full Measure investigation from Puerto Rico and a link to the video.

Related: Puerto Rico Hurricane Aid and Fraud (Podcast)

Watch the video of the investigation by clicking the link below. Transcripts in both English and Spanish follow.

http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/hurricane-recovery

Puerto Rico Hurricane Aid Follow the Money...and Fraud

Please note: Spanish translation follows English below

Imagine having the task of distributing the most aid money ever for a natural disaster responsibly to a government mired in corruption and under FBI investigation. That’s what’s happening right now in the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico two years after two hurricanes, Maria and Irma. You have $91 billion reasons to care. That’s how much of your tax money is intended for recovery. Today, we go to Puerto Rico to follow the hurricane money and the fraud.

In the small Puerto Rican village of Corozal Brenda Rodriguez is still waiting for help. She recorded the frightening rise of the river outside her doorstep during Hurricane Maria.

Sharyl: What were you thinking when you saw the river coming up like that?

Brenda: That I was going to die and that the house would fall apart.

Two years later, Rodriguez still lives in the rotted-out home without a penny of the billions earmarked for hurricane recovery. She was surprised to learn she wasn’t eligible for assistance because she doesn’t own the house.

Brenda: A young man came around and gave me an application to fill and that’s it.

Sharyl: The mainland U.S.government gave a lot of money to the territory of Puerto Rico for hurricane recovery.

Rodriguez’s sister is on the phone helping translate.

Sharyl: Has she seen any of those funds they sent being used to help around your community?

Brenda: I haven’t seen any of that.

62,000 hurricane Puerto Rican victims, like Rodriguez, have been denied emergency help for technical reasons. That’s despite a record amount of U.S. tax money being devoted to recovery.

A Full Measure investigation crunched the numbers:

An estimated $48 billion dollars for Puerto Rico will come from emergency recovery funds.

$43 billion more has been appropriated by Congress so far.

In all, it’s estimated the recovery effort in Puerto Rico will amount to $91 billion U.S. tax dollars.

Of that amount, we found that the island has only received about $14 billion.

The biggest single chunk, $5 billion was spent fixing the electric system, which was already failing before the hurricane.

Nearly $20 billion has been earmarked for housing and shelter under “community planning and development” but two years after Maria, less than a million ($913,000) dollars has been paid out.

Omar Marrero is one of Puerto Rico’s top hurricane recovery officials.

Omar: When you talk about how much money has been allocated, earmarked for Puerto Rico, you're talking about billions. Then you're like, "Well, they're well off." No. That money, even though it has been obligated, there's not available still for the people.

Morrero told us not one damaged Puerto Rican school has seen permanent repairs in the past two years.

Omar:This is termites— I don't how to say in English.

Sharyl: Like their tunnel?

Omar: Yes.

Sharyl: Is this classroom being used?

Omar:Yes.

Sharyl: Well, and obviously it rains in here.

Omar: It rains .... exactly.

Omar: They’re painting over the mold, but the mold has not been remediated. The mold is from the hurricane.

To find out what’s wrong, we began with a helicopter tour of the 110-mile long island spotting dots of blue that mark homes that still have no roofs. Puerto Rico is extremely poor. At least 46% of its residents, 1.3 million people, were on welfare before the hurricanes.

Alberto Martinez, a history professor and Puerto Rico native, has been tracking the slow progress on the ground.

Alberto Martinez: Here we see one of the blue tarps distributed by FEMA to cover rooftops. These tarps were supposed to be usable only for 30 days, and yet it's two years after Hurricane Maria ... and yet still here it is.

Sharyl: Have the blue tarps kind of become a symbol of what's been left undone two years later?

Alberto Martinez: It's a symbol of the neglect. There's a bureaucracy in the way that prevents actual funds from being dispersed to individuals. Certainly contractors are making money, but individuals are not getting relief.

We took our questions to the top man in Puerto Rico from FEMA— the Federal Emergency Management Agency— Jonathan Hoyes.

Sharyl: Two years later, they're spending their own money, local money, to paint over mold because they don't have FEMA money or federal money to fix the roofs and to do anything else.

Jonathan Hoyes: We're not happy with the fact that people, as you say, if they are painting over mold are doing that.

But it turns out the biggest disaster relief effort in American history is also the most complicated.

Part of the explanation can be found in massive protests against Puerto Rico’s government while we were there in July.

Sharyl: Fueling discontent in Puerto Rico is news that the FBI is investigating a number of government officials and contractors are under fbi investigation over allegations of misuse of all the taxpayer money sent in after Hurricane Maria.

The FBI has arrested six top Puerto Rican government officials and consultants.

Also charged— FEMA official Ahsha Tribble - once an Obama homeland security adviser. Tribble took the lead on getting Puerto Rico’s electric grid fixed. Now she is accused of taking bribes to steer a $1.8 billion dollar contract to a company called Cobra. Cobra’s CEO at the time and a FEMA friend of Tribble's who went to work for COBRA were also arrested.

All have denied wrongdoing.

Sharyl: The FBI has arrested some top officials here and said that it's looking into Hurricane recovery fraud. How would it be possible to steal or commit corruption with this money that is being carefully tracked?

Omar: It could happen in the procurement process. Because, obviously, for any permanent work that was being initiated with disaster funding, you have to do procurement. So unfortunately, most of this recovery processes and as many other jurisdictions, we will not be exempt from wrongdoing.

What’s more, communities normally fund their own immediate repairs and then apply to get paid back by FEMA. But Puerto Rico was bankrupt and mired in a corruption scandal before the hurricanes. That means they didn’t have cash on hand.

Omar: FEMA it is totally agnostic to the fiscal economic situation in Puerto Rico. So as opposed to Texas, we don't have a rainy day fund.

Sharyl: Because you're already under financial management because of your, sort of like a bankruptcy.

Omar: Exactly, because when we came into public office, we were already dealing with two man-made hurricanes; fiscal and economic crisis.

Omar: Those challenges on the fiscal side exacerbates even more the recovery process of Puerto Rico.

Sharyl: The program may expect a community to lay out initial money and get paid back for it later?

Jonathan Hoyes: That's right.

But Puerto Rico really doesn't have that spare money.

Jonathan Hoyes: Some of the assumptions we have about what a community can do for itself and how quickly they can do it don't necessarily apply. And that's where we all have to be as flexible and as patient but as resourceful as we can be.

Both Puerto Rico and FEMA insist they’re doing what they can to get money to the needy while making sure it’s not lost to waste or fraud. Even without most of the recovery money actually in hand, Puerto Rico is slowly returning to normal.

Mego Garcia: We try to help each other recover but it was hard. It was really hard

For months, Mego Garcia says she cared for her mother and sister— both disabled— without power or running water.

Garcia: I don't work in seven or eight months.

Sharyl: You had to close down this business?

Mego Garcia: Yeah. I don't have money, no tourists.

Now, she’s been able to reopen the roadside business she’s operated for the past 27 years. And hurricane recovery officials tell us victims like Brenda Rodriguez may yet qualify for some aid, such as cash for relocating to a more livable house. For now, there’s just no telling when that might be.

Puerto Rico’s governor resigned in late July and the territory’s Justice Secretary Wanda Vázquez Garced is the new governor. She announced plans to review Hurricane relief funds and all government contracts.

Spanish translation: 

En el pequeño pueblo Puertorriqueño de Corozal Brenda Rodriguez aún está esperando ayuda. Ella recordó el terrible alzamiento del río justo afuera de su puerta durante el Huracán María.

Sharyl: Qué estaba pensando cuando usted vio el río elevarse de esa manera?

Brenda: Que yo me iba a morir y que la casa se iba a despedazar.

Dos años luego, Rodriguez todavía vive en la casa deteriorada sin ni siquiera un centavo de los billones de dólares federales asignados para las reparaciones del huracán. A ella le sorprendió enterarse de que no era elegible para recibir fondos porque no es dueña de la casa.

Brenda: Un hombre joven vino por aquí y me entregó una solicitud para completar, y eso fue todo.

Sharyl: Estados Unidos envió mucho dinero a Puerto Rico para reconstrucción luego del huracán.

La hermana de Rodriguez está en el teléfono para ayudar a traducir.

Sharyl: Ha ella visto algo de los fondos enviados para ayudar en su comunidad?

Brenda: Yo no he visto nada de eso.

Como Rodriguez, hay 62,000 víctimas del huracán en Puerto Rico quienes han sido denegados asistencia de emergencia por razones técnicas. Eso a pesar de una cantidad record de dinero de impuestos Estadounidenses que han sido dirigidos a la recuperación.

Una investigación de Full Measure analizó los números:

Aproximadamente $48 billones de dólares para Puerto Rico vienen de fondos federales de emergencia.

También, $43 billones adicionales han sido asignados por el Congreso, hasta ahora.

En total, se estima que la inversión de reconstrucción en Puerto Rico será $91 billones de dólares de impuestos recaudados en Estados Unidos.

De ese dinero, hemos descubierto que la isla solamente ha recibido alrededor de $14 billones.

La porción más grande fue $5 billones invertidos para reparar el sistema eléctrico de la isla, el cual ya antes del huracán se encontraba en condición crítica de deterioro.

Aproximadamente $20 billones han sido separados para residencias y refugios bajo la categoría de “planificación y desarrollo de comunidades” pero dos años luego de María, menos de un millón ($913,000) dólares han sido pagados.

Omar Marrero es uno de los oficiales principales de Puerto Rico trabajando en la reconstrucción por el huracán.

Marrero: Cuando se habla de cuánto dinero ha sido asignado para Puerto Rico, se está hablando de billones de dólares. Entonces uno piensa, “Bueno, entonces ya están bien.” Pero no. Ese dinero, a pesar de que ha sido asignado, todavía no está disponible para la gente aquí.

Marrero nos informó que ni siquiera una sola escuela ha recibido reparaciones permanentes en los últimos dos años, desde el huracán.

Marrero: Aquí hay termitas — no sé como decirlo en inglés.

Sharyl: Como el túnel que hacen?

Marrero: Sí.

Sharyl: Y este salón está siendo usado para dar clases?

Marrero: Sí.

Sharyl: Y pues, aquí obviamente entra agua de la lluvia.

Marrero: Sí llueve . exactamente.

Marrero: Ahora han pintando por encima del hongo, pero el hongo no ha sido eliminado. El hongo surgió por el huracán.

Pare encontrar cuales son los problemas, tomamos un vuelo de helicóptero por las 110 millas de la isla viendo puntos azules que destacan las casas que aún no tienen techos. Puerto Rico es extremadamente pobre. Antes de los huracanes, al menos 46% de sus residentes, 1.3 millones de personas, recibían ayuda económica por la pobreza.

Alberto Martínez es profesor de historia y nativo de Puerto Rico, y ha estado siguiendo el lento progreso de recuperación.

Martínez: Aquí vemos uno de los toldos azules que fueron distribuidos por FEMA para cubrir los techos. Estos toldos se supone que fueran usados solo por 30 días, y sin embargo ya han pasado dos años desde el Huracán María y sin embargo ahí está.

Sharyl: Los toldos azules se han convertido en símbolo de lo que no se ha hecho dos años luego?

Martínez: Es un símbolo de la negligencia. Hay de por medio una burocracia que impide que los fondos federales sean entregados a las personas. Y algunos contratistas están cobrando mucho dinero, pero los individuos no reciben ayuda.

Llevamos nuestras preguntas a Jonathan Hoyes, el encargado más importante de FEMA en Puerto Rico — la Agencia Federal de Manejar Emergencias.

Sharyl: Dos años luego, están gastando su propio dinero, dinero local, para pintar por encima del hongo porque no tienen fondos de FEMA ni fondos federales para reparar los techos ni para hacer nada más.

Hoyes: No nos agrada el hecho de que la gente, como usted dice, estén pintando por encima del hongo.

Pero resulta que nuestro proyecto de ayuda más grande en la historia Americana es también el más complicado. Parte de la explicación se puede ver en protestas masivas en contra del Gobierno e Puerto Rico que transcurrieron mientras estábamos allí en Julio.

Sharyl: Agitando la amargura en Puerto Rico están las noticias que el FBI está investigando a un número de oficiales del gobierno y contratistas que también están bajo investigación del FBI por alegada malversación de fondos federales enviados luego del Huracán María.

El FBI ha arrestado a seis oficiales de alto rango del gobierno de Puerto Rico y a consultores.

También ha sido acusado la oficial de FEMA Ahsha Tribble, anteriormente consejera den seguridad nacional (Homeland Security). Tribble fue líder en el proyecto de reparar la infraestructura eléctrica de Puerto Rico. Ahora está siendo acusada de aceptar sobornos para entregar un contrato de $1.8 billones a una compañía llamada Cobra. El CEO de Cobra en ese momento y un amigo de él de FEMA se fueron a trabajar entonces para Cobra y también fueron arrestados.

Todos han negado las acusaciones.

Sharyl: El FBI ha arrestado algunos oficiales de alto nivel y dice que está investigando fraude de la recuperación del huracán. Cómo sería posible cometer corrupción con este dinero que es supervisado con tanto cuidado.

Marrero: Puede pasar en el proceso de solicitud. Porque, obviamente, para cualquier trabajo permanente que fue iniciado con fondos de desastre, hay que hacer solicitud. Así que desafortunadamente, la mayor parte de este proceso de reconstrucción, y pregúntele a otras jurisdicciones, no vamos a ser exentos de malversación.

Además, las comunidades comúnmente invierten en sus propias reparaciones inmediatas y luego solicitan para ser reembolsados por FEMA. Pero Puerto Rico estaba en bancarrota y sumergido en un escándalo de corrupción antes de los huracanes. Por esto no tenían dinero a la mano.

Marrero: FEMA es totalmente indiferente sobre la situación fiscal económica en Puerto Rico. Por eso, a diferencia de Texas, no tenemos fondos de emergencia.

Sharyl: Porque ya están bajo supervisión fiscal (Marrero: Exactamente), es decir, debido a la bancarrota de Puerto Rico.

Marrero: Exacto, porque entramos a trabajar en el gobierno, y ya estábamos trabajando contra dos crisis hechas por los hombres: crisis fiscal y económica. Estos retos en el lado fiscal obstruyen aún más el proceso de recuperación de Puerto Rico.

Sharyl: El programe [de asistencia federal] puede requerir que una comunidad use su propio dinero inicialmente para luego ser reembolsada?

Hoyes: Es correcto.

Sharyl: Pero Puerto Rico en realidad no tiene el dinero disponible para usar.

Hoyes: Algunas de las impresiones que tenemos sobre qué puede hacer una comunidad por si misma y cuán rápido puede hacerlo no necesariamente son válidas. Y ahí es donde todos tenemos que ser lo más flexible posible, y lo más paciente e ingenioso que se pueda.

Ambos el gobierno de Puerto Rico y FEMA insisten que están haciendo lo que se puede para llevarle dinero a los desamparados mientras tratan de asegurar que no sea desperdicio o fraude. Aún sin la mayor parte del dinero en mano Puerto Rico lentamente va regresando a la normalidad.

Mego García: Tratamos de ayudarnos los unos a los otros, pero era difícil era bien difícil

Por meses, Mego García dice que estuvo cuidando a su madre y hermana — ambas incapacitadas — sin electricidad ni servicio de agua.

García: Yo no he tenido empleo por siete u ocho meses.

Sharyl: Usted tuvo que cerrar su negocio?

García: Sí. Yo no tenía dinero, ni habían turistas

Ahora, ella ha logrado reabrir su negocio al lado de la carretera, el cual había operado por los últimos 27 años.

Y oficiales de la recuperación nos dicen que víctimas como Brenda Rodriguez quizás aún puedan cualificar para para alguna ayuda [federal] tal como dinero para mudarse a una casa más apropiada para vivir. Pero por ahora, no hay ningún indicio de cuándo podrá pasar eso.

Traducción por Alberto A. Martínez

Antifa protester who attacked pro-Trump activist pleads guilty

Above: article in New York Post

A pro-Trump activist is pledging to take new legal action against the left-wing Antifa follower who assaulted him.

The victim, Mike Cernovich, says his intention is to "find out who is funding" Antifa. Antifa activists have attacked police and Trump supporters during numerous, violent protests since 2016.

Most recently, 32 year old David Campbell plead guilty to felony assault in a 2018 outside a Manhattan nightclub where a conservative "Night for Freedom" party was being held. Campbell punched and kicked Cernovich. Campbell will receive prison time, according to an article in the New York Post.

When the Proud Boys [a far right fraternal organization] got into a street fight with Antifa members, it was a nationwide story. The Mayor and AG tweeted about the street fight. When Antifa attacked a 56-year-old man, silence from the press.

Mike Cernovich to the New York Post

Read more by clicking the link below.

https://nypost.com/2019/10/05/antifa-protester-who-attacked-trump-supporter-pleads-guilty-to-assault/

Support independent journalism. Donate to SharylAttkisson.com by clicking here.

Thank you to the thousands who are supporting the landmark case of Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions.

People say they trust President Trump most: Poll results

Our latest unscientific poll at SharylAttkisson.com asked people who they trust most among a group of national figures and groups. President Trump came out on top far and away.

Eighty-three percent (83%) of respondents say they trust Trump more than the media, polls, Democrats, Congress and the Intel community.

Second place is "None of the Above." The only other entity that registered statistically in the poll results was the Intel community, which received a little less than 1% of the vote.

Full results are below. Meantime, vote in our new poll right now on the home page at SharylAttkisson.com! Look for the black box on the sidebar or scroll way down on the mobile site.

If I have to pick one I trust the most it's:

<1% Media

<1% Polls

83% President Trump

<1% Democrats

<1% Congress

1% Intel community

15% None of the Above

Fight government overreach and double-standard justice by supporting the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund for Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the government computer intrusions. Click here.

Puerto Rico Hurricane Aid: We Follow the Money...and Fraud (PODCAST)

We dug deep to find the real numbers. How much U.S. tax money has Puerto Rico received two years after its double hurricanes? And why is the FBI arresting so many Puerto Rican officials, contractors and federal FEMA officials?

Click the arrow below to listen. Also subscribe to the "Full Measure After Hours" podcast and "The Sharyl Attkisson Podcast" on iTunes or your favorite distributor!

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Puerto Rico: hurricane relief, fraud, and FBI arrests

Finding out how much U.S. tax money has actually been sent to the territory of Puerto Rico for hurricane recovery... and where it's gone... is no easy task. This week, Full Measure tackles that challenge with a trip to the island.

One of our scenic views on the beautiful island of Puerto Rico

How much aid has really gotten to the Puerto Ricans who need it? And why have so many Puerto Rican officials and contractors been arrested by the FBI?

We'll also tell you why the FBI has arrested some Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) officials. Watch our cover story investigation Sunday on Full Measure.

UT Professor Alberto Martinez helps Full Measure dissect the hurricane aid numbers in Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico resident Brenda Castro lives in a house that was mostly destroyed, but has received no federal assistance

Also this week, what happens to all of the people who cross into the U.S. illegally -- once they're released? They often have no money, no phone and can't speak English.

Some of them go to volunteer refugee centers for help. We take you inside one such center in Arizona where we speak to a woman who says she jumped the fence that very morning with her disabled son. 

Another story we will report pierces the veil of secrecy when it comes to who really writes the laws you have to follow in the state where you live. (It's not pretty.)

And from our trip to Northern Ireland, an interesting footnote about the Titanic! Learn how to find our program below!

We never waste your time rehashing news you've already seen all week. To learn how to watch Full Measure on TV, online or on demand, click: How to watch Full Measure

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Unscientific poll: Most say anti-Trump "whistleblower" has committed crime

More than three-quarters (78%) of those who responded to the latest unscientific poll at SharylAttkisson.com said they believe the anti-Trump "whistleblower" has committed a crime.

And about 2% of respondents said they believe the "whistleblower" has uncovered a crime.

A significant minority, about 19%, said they don't believe the person has committed or uncovered a crime-- or aren't sure about it.

Vote now in our new poll on the home page at SharylAttkisson.com. Look for the black box on the right sidebar or scroll way down on the mobile site.

Re: The anti-Trump "whistleblower"...

2% ...has uncovered a crime

78% ...has committed a crime

20% None of the above/Not sure

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

Talcum powder: A sprinkle of doubt

You may have heard about the lawsuits regarding the dangers allegedly associated with baby powder or other powder containing "talc." What's it all about? Read my Full Measure investigation below.

Deane Berg: I was about 16 years old. My mother had recommended it to me because of chafing problems in the heat in the summertime.

Deane Berg was among the millions of women who use talcum powder on their genital area for freshness.

Sharyl: Was it baby powder?

Berg: Sometimes it was baby powder. Other times it was the Shower to Shower, because that came out and it was specifically for women. "A sprinkle a day keeps the odor away."

TV Ad: A sprinkle a day keeps the odor away.

Berg: And so I just thought it was perfectly safe to use and they were marketing it quite a bit.

Sharyl: And how many years did this go on?

Berg: Until I got cancer, when I was 49.

Even though she’s a physician’s assistant, Berg knew nothing about the possible risks of that sprinkle a day.

TV Ad: Have you had your sprinkle today?

When she got cancer, she did her own research and was shocked to find longstanding studies suggesting a link between talc and ovarian cancer.

Sharyl: Why do you think it is that someone inside the medical industry wasn't even aware of this?

Berg: There really was nothing in the public at all about this, and even my gynecologist had never heard of that before.

Talc is the world’s softest mineral and a multi-billion-dollar a year industry. It’s used in plastics, antiperspirants, cosmetics, gum, medicine, soap, toothpaste and baby powder.

TV Ad: Johnsons Baby Powder, a feeling you never outgrow.

The debate over the safety of talc goes back decades. There’s already a warning that it could cause breathing problems if inhaled. Dr. Daniel Cramer says there may be other risks. A professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Harvard Medical School, he was first to find a statistical link between talc and ovarian cancer in a 1982 study.

Dr. Daniel Cramer: It has taken 25 years of additional literature I believe to make the case, but I believe we were on target in that study and that the subsequent studies have supported there is an elevated risk. We reported that the risk might be as high as a two-fold increase in risk if they had more than, say, 20 years of talc use.

Dr. Cramer testified as a paid expert in the trial of Deane Berg, who became the first ovarian cancer victim to sue America’s number one baby powder maker: Johnson and Johnson.

Talc can get into womens’ reproductive tract, testified Dr. Cramer, and trigger the cancer process, especially in long term users like Berg, who says she sprinkled on powder every day for more than 30 years.

Dr. Cramer: Talc is a potent inflammatory agent, and if it's able to reach the pelvic cavity, I think it is capable of inducing an inflammatory response.

Berg: They took my pathology report and my slides with my tissue and did further research on it, and it came back definitely showing talcum in my ovaries.

Berg: This was a shot that was taken on Mother's Day of 2007, when I had absolutely no hair.

Berg says Johnson and Johnson offered her a half million dollars to avoid trial.

Berg: I didn't like the attitude of the people that were there from Johnson & Johnson. It was almost like a brush-off. And the more I thought about it, I said, "Well, I didn't go into this just to make a million dollars." I said, "I wanna get the warning out there. Aren't you gonna do anything about that?” And so they went up to $1.3 million. And I finally said, "I'll see you in court in September," and walked out of the room.

Berg won her trial in 2013, but without explanation, the jury didn’t require Johnson and Johnson to pay her a penny.

Berg: They were proven guilty of negligence for failing to warn me about it, but there was no damages awarded to me, which was quite a shock in the sense of six months of no work, the pain of chemotherapy, hysterectomy, and permanent hearing loss, nerve damage.

Even without a cash award, Berg’s landmark victory set off panic in the talc industry and a torrent of new lawsuits.

TV Ad: Attention: Women who have used Talc based personal care products

TV Ad: Talcum powder has been linked to ovarian cancer and death...

In the past 13 months, ovarian cancer victims have won three major victories worth $197 million. Victims’ attorneys argued Johnson and Johnson knew about “30 years of studies showing an increased risk of ovarian cancer,” but failed to warn the public.

Johnson and Johnson wouldn’t agree to an interview, but says its products are safe and supported by decades of scientific evidence, that studies linking talc to cancer are flawed, and quote, “if there was the slightest risk to our consumers we would be the first to withdraw the product”.

The world’s leading talc producer, Imerys, wouldn’t agree to an interview, but referred us to American Tort Reform Association, a trade group supported in part by the talc industry. Darren McKinney is a spokesman.

Sharyl: What is your group or the talc industry's point of view in general in terms of the alleged association between talcum powder and ovarian cancer?

Darren McKinney: The American Tort Reform Association does not believe that credible medical and scientific authorities have, in fact they have not determined a causal link between the use, the cosmetic, external use of talcum powder with ovarian cancer.

Jurors may have been persuaded otherwise by company documents revealed as evidence in the lawsuits. In 1997, a Johnson and Johnson consultant wrote a scathing letter, telling the company that “9 studiesdid show a statistically significant association between hygenic talc use and ovarian cancer” and “anybody who denies this, risks that the talc industry will be perceivedlikethe cigarette industry: denying the obvious in the face of all evidence to the contrary.”

Another court exhibit was this 2004 letter from the biggest talc producer to the FDA. It proposed voluntarily phasing-out talc for genital use. It even suggested an FDA warning, saying there was a “possible association” with “ovarian cancer.”

McKinney points out the FDA never required a warning.

McKinney: The FDA as recently within the last couple of years has made it very clear that the science, as the FDA sees it, simply does not merit such a warning at this time.

Sharyl: The FDA also did say, though, the growing body of evidence to support a possible association between genital talc exposure and serous ovarian cancer is difficult to dismiss?

McKinney: God bless 'em. And I don't know anyone who is arguing that what we know today about talcum powder use or chocolate consumption or red wine consumption is what we will believe 30 years from now. But based on what we know today, certainly the FDA believes and many of the rest of us believe that there's no reason to hold the makers or the sellers of talcum powder liable to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, much of which the plaintiffs' bar is going to greedily call its own.

McKinney says money-grubbing plaintiffs’ lawyers are descending upon a sympathetic court in St. Louis, Missouri, where the talc industry lost those three big cases, and where more than one-thousand more lawsuits are pending.

McKinney: They chose a giant, deep-pocket defendant who they assume would cower because it's ovarian cancer and they presumed they could extort tens of millions of dollars’ worth of a universal settlement, and that hasn't worked out. But when science is on your side, as the talc defendants insists it is here, we would argue that you ought to stick to your guns and you ought to fight if you believe you're right, and that's what the talc defendants are doing.

There was victory for the talc industry last September, when a judge threw out two cases in New Jersey, saying there was inadequate scientific support.

But Berg says there’s one piece of evidence from her trial that she can’t shake. While there’s no cancer warning on baby powder, believe it or not there is one on industrial talc before it’s sold to consumers.

Added in 2006, it reads, “perineal [genital] use of talc-based body powder is possibly carcinogenic to humans.”

Sharyl: The workers who handle the talc are warned about the cancer risk?

Berg: Right.

Sharyl: But then the women who put it on their bodies are not.

Berg: Correct. Yes. That was rather shocking.

Today Berg is recovering from her surgeries, chemotherapy and nerve damage. As the first ovarian cancer victim to win a talc lawsuit, she wants other women to know what she didn’t.

Berg: If people wanna continue to use it, that's their right, but at least have a warning label stating to women, there is this risk. So it's up to you to make the final decision.

Watch the video investigation by clicking the link below:

http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/sprinkle-of-doubt

Another Trump court victory: his name will appear on California's 2020 ballot, after all

In a decision that President Trump complained was not widely reported, a federal judge has slapped down a California bill that attempted to keep Trump off the 2020 presidential ballot in the Golden State.

The bill in question was passed by California Democrats and signed by Governor Gavin Newsom. It required candidates to make public five years of tax returns to be able to appear on the 2020 primary ballot in California.

U.S. District Judge Morrison England, Jr. slammed the proposal in siding with Trump on Tuesday.

The dangerous precedent set by this act, allowing the controlling party in any state’s legislature to add substantive requirements as a precondition to qualifying for the state’s presidential primary ballot, should concern all candidates alike.

Morrison England, Jr., U.S. District Judge

England noted that the new law appears to have specifically targeted President Trump. England stated that the law violates the First Amendment rights of candidates.

I won the right to be a presidential candidate in California, in a major Court decision handed down yesterday. It was filed against me by the Radical Left Governor of that State to tremendous Media hoopla. The VICTORY, however, was barely covered by the Fake News. No surprise!

President Trump (tweet)

Read more about the story by clicking the link below:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/victory-trump-wins-2020-election-case-against-california-democrats-calls-out-media

Fight improper government surveillance. Support Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI over the government computer intrusions of Attkisson's work while she was a CBS News investigative correspondent. Visit the Attkisson Fourth Amendment Litigation Fund. Click here.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Coming Soon

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

Follow Sharyl Attkisson

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent Comments

  • Mickey Pullen on Hydroxychloroquine: Politicizing Medicine (PODCAST)
  • Mike Marinak on Hydroxychloroquine: Politicizing Medicine (PODCAST)
  • Debunking “The Hotchkiss Republicans Report” - The Hotchkiss Record on "Collusion against Trump" timeline

Subscribe

Get the Latest Stories Straight to Your Inbox

Footer

Pages

  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Support
  • Contact

2ndary Pages

  • Full Measure Stations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscribe to SharylAttkisson.com

SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

  • Attkisson v. DOJ/FBI
  • Benghazi
  • Fake News
  • Fast & Furious
  • Obamacare

Ad

Ad