(Language warning) The controversy over Wikipedia agenda editing and bias is longstanding, as I have reported for several years. Well-meaning Wikipedia editors are often outmatched and outgunned by more powerful editors who control pages and topics on behalf of vested […]
The egregious vandalism and misuse of my biography page by Wikipedia agenda editors continues. I understand that cases like this matter little except to those who are libeled. However, I would argue that they are important to the extent they
Though it’s a moving target that changes day-by-day, Wikpedia’s vaccine industry agenda editors are at it again. Besides the other longstanding false and defamatory information edited onto my Wikipedia bio page, new false information has appeared. The good news is
Wikipedia’s Pharma Industry Agenda Editors–at it again. Read More »
As an educated guess: lots of people are unhappy with what they view as inaccurate or slanted Wikipedia pages. The polling group Rasmussen Reports has taken a similar approach to one I took earlier this week. Frustrated by the inability
Rasmussen Reports: What Our Wikipedia Page Should Tell You Read More »
