The watchdog group Empower Oversight has released new documents related to the ongoing controversy over US taxpayer-funded research for ‘gain of function’ studies at the Wuhan, China lab that many…
From near misses to a mid-air door blowout, there have been notable troubles for air travel. This week, Congress revealed a new, proposed five-year plan of action for the FAA.…
Why will the USA not swallow their “False” Pride and go and learn from Israel, or better yet get the systems they need to defend their country, from Israel ???
You know this is an incredibly difficult task. It has never been successful. Israel’s Iron Dome has a much smaller requirement than the missile defense project you are discussing. Oh, and BTW, the Iron Dome is not dealing with nukes or the speeds that the missile defense system has to contend with. This money was spent over 2 decades. Boeing also had to build infrastructure as you indicate, This is not to say that there are not questionable politics involved in the relationship between defense contractors and the DOD. I am disappointed in this is a rather biased article. The language used was definitely editorial in nature, I expected better.
‘carbon fibre’ – do you mean graphene? it’s used to reinforce concrete, in car coating and in the surgical masks we’re required to wear. you can’t make this stuff up.
Guess when Killary lost the Gravy Train did too. What a waste and unacceptable, vulnerable state we are in.
Why will the USA not swallow their “False” Pride and go and learn from Israel, or better yet get the systems they need to defend their country, from Israel ???
Actually I think system used by israel is ours. Different vendor different objective
that’s what i’ve read somewhere too. however, compared to the US territory Isreal’s much smaller and therefore easier to defend, or….?
You know this is an incredibly difficult task. It has never been successful. Israel’s Iron Dome has a much smaller requirement than the missile defense project you are discussing. Oh, and BTW, the Iron Dome is not dealing with nukes or the speeds that the missile defense system has to contend with. This money was spent over 2 decades. Boeing also had to build infrastructure as you indicate, This is not to say that there are not questionable politics involved in the relationship between defense contractors and the DOD. I am disappointed in this is a rather biased article. The language used was definitely editorial in nature, I expected better.
When Boeing Gave the communists carbon fiber technology,so their tailfins could be made cheaper in China,I stopped caring what happened to them.
‘carbon fibre’ – do you mean graphene? it’s used to reinforce concrete, in car coating and in the surgical masks we’re required to wear. you can’t make this stuff up.
Boeing’s woes continue.